Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Smeaton, A.F."
  1. Smeaton, A.F.: Indexing, browsing, and searching of digital video (2003) 0.03
    0.028196286 = product of:
      0.042294428 = sum of:
        0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 4274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03230502 = score(doc=4274,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 4274, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4274)
        0.009989405 = product of:
          0.029968213 = sum of:
            0.029968213 = weight(_text_:29 in 4274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029968213 = score(doc=4274,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4274, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4274)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Video is a communications medium that normally brings together moving pictures with a synchronized audio track into a discrete piece or pieces of information. A "piece" of video is variously referred to as a frame, a shot, a scene, a Clip, a program, or an episode; these pieces are distinguished by their length and by their composition. We shall return to the definition of each of these in the section an automatically structuring and indexing digital video. In modern society, Video is commonplace and is usually equated with television, movies, or home Video produced by a Video camera or camcorder. We also accept Video recorded from closed circuit TVs for security and surveillance as part of our daily lives. In short, Video is ubiquitous. Digital Video is, as the name suggests, the creation or capture of Video information in digital format. Most Video produced today, commercial, surveillance, or domestic, is produced in digital form, although the medium of Video predates the development of digital computing by several decades. The essential nature of Video has not changed with the advent of digital computing. It is still moving pictures and synchronized audio. However, the production methods and the end product have gone through significant evolution, in the last decade especially.
    Date
    23.10.2005 18:29:40
  2. Smeaton, A.F.; Morrissey, P.J.: Experiments on the automatic construction of hypertext from texts (1995) 0.01
    0.012922008 = product of:
      0.038766023 = sum of:
        0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 7253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038766023 = score(doc=7253,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.242113 = fieldWeight in 7253, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7253)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to semi-automatically generate a hypertext from linear texts, based on initially creatign nodes and composite nodes composed of 'mini-hypertexts'. Node-node similarity values are computed using standard information retrieval techniques and these similarity measures are then used to selectively create node-node links based on the strength of similarity between them. The process is a novel one because the link creation process also uses values from a dynamically computed metric which measures the topological compactness of the overall hypertext being generated. Describes experiments on generating a hypertext from a collection of 846 software product descriptions comprising 8,5 MBytes of text which yield some guidelines on how the process should be automated. This text to hypertext conversion method is put into the context of an overall hypertext authoring tool currently under development
  3. Thornley, C.V.; Johnson, A.C.; Smeaton, A.F.; Lee, H.: ¬The scholarly impact of TRECVid (2003-2009) (2011) 0.01
    0.010768341 = product of:
      0.03230502 = sum of:
        0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 4363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03230502 = score(doc=4363,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 4363, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4363)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on an investigation into the scholarly impact of the TRECVid (Text Retrieval and Evaluation Conference, Video Retrieval Evaluation) benchmarking conferences between 2003 and 2009. The contribution of TRECVid to research in video retrieval is assessed by analyzing publication content to show the development of techniques and approaches over time and by analyzing publication impact through publication numbers and citation analysis. Popular conference and journal venues for TRECVid publications are identified in terms of number of citations received. For a selection of participants at different career stages, the relative importance of TRECVid publications in terms of citations vis à vis their other publications is investigated. TRECVid, as an evaluation conference, provides data on which research teams 'scored' highly against the evaluation criteria and the relationship between 'top scoring' teams at TRECVid and the 'top scoring' papers in terms of citations is analyzed. A strong relationship was found between 'success' at TRECVid and 'success' at citations both for high scoring and low scoring teams. The implications of the study in terms of the value of TRECVid as a research activity, and the value of bibliometric analysis as a research evaluation tool, are discussed.
  4. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.01
    0.009239574 = product of:
      0.027718721 = sum of:
        0.027718721 = product of:
          0.08315616 = sum of:
            0.08315616 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08315616 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  5. Richardson, R.; Smeaton, A.F.; Murphy, J.: Using WordNet for conceptual distance measurement (1996) 0.00
    0.004619787 = product of:
      0.0138593605 = sum of:
        0.0138593605 = product of:
          0.04157808 = sum of:
            0.04157808 = weight(_text_:22 in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04157808 = score(doc=6965,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  6. Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996) 0.00
    0.0039598173 = product of:
      0.011879452 = sum of:
        0.011879452 = product of:
          0.035638355 = sum of:
            0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035638355 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  7. O'Donnell, R.; Smeaton, A.F.: ¬A linguistic approach to information retrieval (1996) 0.00
    0.0039598173 = product of:
      0.011879452 = sum of:
        0.011879452 = product of:
          0.035638355 = sum of:
            0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 2575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035638355 = score(doc=2575,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2575, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2575)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  8. Keenan, S.; Smeaton, A.F.; Keogh, G.: ¬The effect of pool depth on system evaluation in TREC (2001) 0.00
    0.0033298018 = product of:
      0.009989405 = sum of:
        0.009989405 = product of:
          0.029968213 = sum of:
            0.029968213 = weight(_text_:29 in 5908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029968213 = score(doc=5908,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5908, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5908)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:01:50