-
Radwanski, A.: Rozwoj formatu MARC (1996)
0.07
0.070243716 = product of:
0.105365574 = sum of:
0.0895263 = weight(_text_:development in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0895263 = score(doc=3052,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.55913603 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
0.01583927 = product of:
0.047517806 = sum of:
0.047517806 = weight(_text_:22 in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047517806 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the origins of the MARC format and its development connected with the proceedings of the Library of Congress and the British Library. Presents 2 standards: ISO 2709 and ISBD. Focuses on national and international formats elaborated in the 1970s and 1980s, including UNIMARC (1975) and CCF (1984). Outlines the prospects and directions of MARC format development, that is, integration of the format and implementing MARC in the network environment
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 20:34:37
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Development of the MARC format
-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.06
0.05929146 = product of:
0.088937186 = sum of:
0.073097914 = weight(_text_:development in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073097914 = score(doc=2834,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.45653263 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.01583927 = product of:
0.047517806 = sum of:
0.047517806 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047517806 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
-
Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997)
0.05
0.045018204 = product of:
0.0675273 = sum of:
0.05168803 = weight(_text_:development in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05168803 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.32281733 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.01583927 = product of:
0.047517806 = sum of:
0.047517806 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047517806 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Computers play an important role in the development of bibliographic databases. Exchange formats are needed for the generation and exchange of bibliographic data at different levels: international, national, regional and local. Discusses the formats available at national and international level such as the International Standard Exchange Format (ISO 2709); the various MARC formats and the Common Communication Format (CCF). Work on Indian standards involving the Bureau of Indian Standards, the National Information System for Science and Technology (NISSAT) and other institutions proceeds only slowly
- Source
- DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.05
0.045018204 = product of:
0.0675273 = sum of:
0.05168803 = weight(_text_:development in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05168803 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.32281733 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.01583927 = product of:
0.047517806 = sum of:
0.047517806 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047517806 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
-
McCallum, S.H.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1975-2007 (2009)
0.04
0.044468593 = product of:
0.06670289 = sum of:
0.054823436 = weight(_text_:development in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054823436 = score(doc=3841,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.34239948 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
0.011879452 = product of:
0.035638355 = sum of:
0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035638355 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This entry describes the development of the MARC Communications format. After a brief overview of the initial 10 years it describes the succeeding phases of development up to the present. This takes the reader through the expansion of the format for all types of bibliographic data and for a multiple character scripts. At the same time a large business community was developing that offered products based on the format to the library community. The introduction of the Internet in the 1990s and the Web technology brought new opportunities and challenges and the format was adapted to this new environment. There has been a great deal of international adoption of the format that has continued into the 2000s. More recently new syntaxes for MARC 21 and models are being explored.
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:38
-
Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995)
0.04
0.043218087 = product of:
0.06482713 = sum of:
0.04522703 = weight(_text_:development in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04522703 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.28246516 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.019600097 = product of:
0.058800288 = sum of:
0.058800288 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058800288 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Briefly summarizes the problems encountered when attempting to use the USMARC cataloguing format in US school libraries and describes the development of CEMARC format by the Northwest Ohio Educational Technology Foundation (NWOET), which addresses the main problems by: offering sata entry guidelines for a minimum USMARC standard in order to clarify inconsistencies in application; and by suggesting enhancements and new fields that go beyond the USMARC standard. Concludes with brief notes on early CEMARC implementation
- Date
- 11. 9.1996 19:22:20
- Source
- Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
-
Witt, M.: Evolution du format UNIMARC (1997)
0.04
0.039474797 = product of:
0.059212193 = sum of:
0.04522703 = weight(_text_:development in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04522703 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.28246516 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
0.013985164 = product of:
0.041955493 = sum of:
0.041955493 = weight(_text_:29 in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041955493 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Since publication in 1977 of the first version of UNIMARC, conceived as an international exchange format for countries using different forms of MARC, it has been widely adopted as a national format. In France the National Library (BNF) uses UNIMARC for its bibliographic records, though with some differences from the official IFLA version. This. together with promotion by central government, has led to adoption of UNIMARC by most libraries. A permanent committee manages the development of UNIMARC, introducing regular changes, updates and guidelines. The BNF, however, has recently introduced further modifications and is working on a UNIMARC version of the INTERMARC authority list, without consulting French libraries. The French Librarians Association is accordingsly promoting BNF collaboration with UNIMARC users on future developments
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 16:50:24
-
Hsueh, L.-k.: ¬The development and implementation of the MARC AMC : an overview (1997)
0.03
0.03445869 = product of:
0.10337606 = sum of:
0.10337606 = weight(_text_:development in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10337606 = score(doc=2284,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.64563465 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reviews the development of the MARC AMC (MAchine-Readable Cataloging for Archives and Manuscript Control) Format, including the development background, the archival and manuscripts features, the development and the implementation of USMARC AMC in the USA
-
Zapounidou, S.; Sfakakis, M.; Papatheodorou, C.: Library data integration : towards BIBFRAME mapping to EDM (2014)
0.03
0.03383554 = product of:
0.05075331 = sum of:
0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038766023 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.242113 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.011987286 = product of:
0.035961855 = sum of:
0.035961855 = weight(_text_:29 in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035961855 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Integration of library data into the Linked Data environment is a key issue in libraries and is approached on the basis of interoperability between library data conceptual models. Achieving interoperability for different representations of the same or related entities between the library and cultural heritage domains shall enhance rich bibliographic data reusability and support the development of new data-driven information services. This paper aims to contribute to the desired interoperability by attempting to map core semantic paths between the BIBFRAME and EDM conceptual models. BIBFRAME is developed by the Library of Congress to support transformation of legacy library data in MARC format into linked data. EDM is the model developed for and used in the Europeana Cultural Heritage aggregation portal.
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
-
Andresen, L.: After MARC - what then? (2004)
0.03
0.03376365 = product of:
0.050645474 = sum of:
0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 4751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038766023 = score(doc=4751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.242113 = fieldWeight in 4751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4751)
0.011879452 = product of:
0.035638355 = sum of:
0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 4751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035638355 = score(doc=4751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4751)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The article discusses the future of the MARC formats and outlines how future cataloguing practice and bibliographic records might look. Background and basic functionality of the MARC formats are outlined, and it is pointed out that MARC is manifest in several different formats. This is illustrated through a comparison between the MARC21 format and the Danish MARC format "danMARC2". It is argued that present cataloguing codes and MARC formats are based primarily on the Paris principles and that "functional requirements for bibliographic records" (FRBR) would serve as a more solid and user-oriented platform for future development of cataloguing codes and formats. Furthermore, it is argued that MARC is a library-specific format, which results in neither exchange with library external sectors nor inclusion of other texts being facilitated. XML could serve as the technical platform for a model for future registrations, consisting of some core data and different supplements of data necessary for different sectors and purposes.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.40-51
-
Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004)
0.03
0.03376365 = product of:
0.050645474 = sum of:
0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038766023 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.242113 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.011879452 = product of:
0.035638355 = sum of:
0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035638355 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic relationships have taken on even greater importance in the context of ongoing efforts to integrate concepts from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) into cataloging codes and database structures. In MARC 21, the linking entry fields are a major mechanism for expressing relationships between bibliographic records. Taxonomies of bibliographic relationships have been proposed by Tillett, with an extension by Smiraglia, and in FRBR itself. The present exercise is to provide a detailed bidirectional mapping of the MARC 21 linking fields to these two schemes. The correspondence of the Tillett taxonomic divisions to the MARC categorization of the linking fields as chronological, horizontal, or vertical is examined as well. Application of the findings to MARC format development and system functionality is discussed.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.3: some MARC formats based on UKMARC (1995)
0.03
0.030457465 = product of:
0.09137239 = sum of:
0.09137239 = weight(_text_:development in 6945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09137239 = score(doc=6945,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.5706658 = fieldWeight in 6945, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6945)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Surveys the development of various MARC formats out of UKMARC. Considers the formats for Australia, Thailand, Italy and Singapore. Indicates the main points of difference between them and the influence of local requirements on their development
-
Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.2: some MARC formats based on USMARC (1995)
0.03
0.030457465 = product of:
0.09137239 = sum of:
0.09137239 = weight(_text_:development in 3812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09137239 = score(doc=3812,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.5706658 = fieldWeight in 3812, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3812)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Surveys the development of various MARC formats out of USMARC. Considers the formats for Canada, France, Spain and Indonesia. Indicates the main points of difference between them and the influence of local requirements on their development
-
Will, L.D.: UML model : as given in British Standard Draft for Development DD8723-5:2008 (2008)
0.03
0.030151352 = product of:
0.09045406 = sum of:
0.09045406 = weight(_text_:development in 7636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09045406 = score(doc=7636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.5649303 = fieldWeight in 7636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7636)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.1: the emergence and divergence of MARC (1995)
0.03
0.029842101 = product of:
0.0895263 = sum of:
0.0895263 = weight(_text_:development in 3813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0895263 = score(doc=3813,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.55913603 = fieldWeight in 3813, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3813)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Surveys the evolution and development of MARC formats for the digital encoding of bibliographic data from their beginnings in 1968 at the Library of Congress to the present time, with particular emphasis on the development of 17 national formats. Examines the reasons for the divergence of MARC formats from each other as well as the early and recent trends in the development of national MARC formats
-
Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.1: the emergence and divergence of MARC (1996)
0.03
0.029842101 = product of:
0.0895263 = sum of:
0.0895263 = weight(_text_:development in 6726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0895263 = score(doc=6726,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.55913603 = fieldWeight in 6726, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6726)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Surveys the evolution and development of MARC formats for the digital encoding of bibliographic data from their beginnings in 1968 at the Library of Congress to the present time, with particular emphasis on the development of 17 national formats. Examines the reasons for the divergence of MARC formats from each other as well as the early and recent trends in the development of national MARC formats
-
Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996)
0.03
0.026518598 = product of:
0.079555795 = sum of:
0.079555795 = product of:
0.119333684 = sum of:
0.059936427 = weight(_text_:29 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059936427 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
0.059397258 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059397258 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 9.1996 18:58:22
-
Lauro, A. Di: IDIN manual for the creation and management of a bibliographic database using Micro-ISIS (1988)
0.03
0.02611184 = product of:
0.078335516 = sum of:
0.078335516 = weight(_text_:development in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078335516 = score(doc=4292,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.48924404 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Die UNESCO vertreibt kostenfrei die Software Micro-ISIS für PCs. Zur Anwendung in kleinen Dokumentationseinrichtungen unter dem Dach des International Development Information Network (IDIN) wurde ein eigenes IDIN-Format geschaffen, das unter dieser Software eingesetzt werden kann. Besonders berücksichtigt sind dabei unselbständige Werke und die Sacherschließung mit Hilfe des 'OECD Macrothesaurus for Information Processing in the Field of Economic and Social Development'. Das Format ist abgeleitet vom 'Common Communication Format (CCF)', das ebenfalls im Auftrag der Unesco entwickelt wurde. IDIN ist eine vereinfachte Version und hat eine andere Behandlung mehrteiliger Werke
- Imprint
- Paris : OECD Development Centre
-
Guenther, R.S.: ¬The USMARC Format for Classification Data : development and implementation (1992)
0.02
0.024365973 = product of:
0.073097914 = sum of:
0.073097914 = weight(_text_:development in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073097914 = score(doc=2996,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.45653263 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards for representing bibliographic and related information in machine-readable form. It provides a summary of the fields in the format, and considers the prospects for its implementation.
-
Guenther, R.S.: ¬The development and implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1992)
0.02
0.024365973 = product of:
0.073097914 = sum of:
0.073097914 = weight(_text_:development in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073097914 = score(doc=8865,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.45653263 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards. It provides a summary of the fields in the format and considers the prospects for its implementation. The papaer describes an experiment currently being conducted at the Library of Congress to create USMARC classification records and use a classification database in classifying materials in the social sciences
