-
Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008)
0.02
0.022509102 = product of:
0.03376365 = sum of:
0.025844015 = weight(_text_:development in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025844015 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.16140866 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.007919635 = product of:
0.023758903 = sum of:
0.023758903 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023758903 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Social tagging empowers users to categorize content in a personally meaningful way while harnessing their potential to contribute to a collaborative construction of knowledge (Vander Wal, 2007). In addition, social tagging systems offer innovative filtering mechanisms that facilitate resource discovery and browsing (Mathes, 2004). As a result, social tags may support online communication, informal or intended learning as well as the development of online communities. The purpose of this mixed methods study is to examine how undergraduate students participate in social tagging activities in order to learn about their motivations, behaviours and practices. A better understanding of their knowledge, habits and interactions with such systems will help practitioners and developers identify important factors when designing enhancements. In the first phase of the study, students enrolled at a Canadian university completed 103 questionnaires. Quantitative results focusing on general familiarity with social tagging, frequently used Web 2.0 sites, and the purpose for engaging in social tagging activities were compiled. Eight questionnaire respondents participated in follow-up semi-structured interviews that further explored tagging practices by situating questionnaire responses within concrete experiences using popular websites such as YouTube, Facebook, Del.icio.us, and Flickr. Preliminary results of this study echo findings found in the growing literature concerning social tagging from the fields of computer science (Sen et al., 2006) and information science (Golder & Huberman, 2006; Macgregor & McCulloch, 2006). Generally, two classes of social taggers emerge: those who focus on tagging for individual purposes, and those who view tagging as a way to share or communicate meaning to others. Heavy del.icio.us users, for example, were often focused on simply organizing their own content, and seemed to be conscientiously maintaining their own personally relevant categorizations while, in many cases, placing little importance on the tags of others. Conversely, users tagging items primarily to share content preferred to use specific terms to optimize retrieval and discovery by others. Our findings should inform practitioners of how interaction design can be tailored for different tagging systems applications, and how these findings are positioned within the current debate surrounding social tagging among the resource discovery community. We also hope to direct future research in the field to place a greater importance on exploring the benefits of tagging as a socially-driven endeavour rather than uniquely as a means of managing information.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Vander Wal, T.: Welcome to the Matrix! (2008)
0.02
0.022509102 = product of:
0.03376365 = sum of:
0.025844015 = weight(_text_:development in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025844015 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.16140866 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.007919635 = product of:
0.023758903 = sum of:
0.023758903 = weight(_text_:22 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023758903 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- My keynote at the workshop "Social Tagging in Knowledge Organization" was a great opportunity to make and share new experiences. For the first time ever, I sat in my office at home and gave a live web video presentation to a conference audience elsewhere on the globe. At the same time, it was also an opportunity to premier my conceptual model "Matrix of Perception" to an interdisciplinary audience of researchers and practitioners with a variety of backgrounds - reaching from philosophy, psychology, pedagogy and computation to library science and economics. The interdisciplinary approach of the conference is also mirrored in the structure of this volume, with articles on the theoretical background, the empirical analysis and the potential applications of tagging, for instance in university libraries, e-learning, or e-commerce. As an introduction to the topic of "social tagging" I would like to draw your attention to some foundation concepts of the phenomenon I have racked my brain with for the last few month. One thing I have seen missing in recent research and system development is a focus on the variety of user perspectives in social tagging. Different people perceive tagging in complex variegated ways and use this form of knowledge organization for a variety of purposes. My analytical interest lies in understanding the personas and patterns in tagging systems and in being able to label their different perceptions. To come up with a concise picture of user expectations, needs and activities, I have broken down the perspectives on tagging into two different categories, namely "faces" and "depth". When put together, they form the "Matrix of Perception" - a nuanced view of stakeholders and their respective levels of participation.
- Date
- 22. 6.2009 9:15:45
-
Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008)
0.02
0.021214878 = product of:
0.06364463 = sum of:
0.06364463 = product of:
0.09546694 = sum of:
0.04794914 = weight(_text_:29 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04794914 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
0.047517806 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047517806 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 21. 6.2009 9:55:29
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011)
0.02
0.019221356 = product of:
0.057664067 = sum of:
0.057664067 = product of:
0.0864961 = sum of:
0.050857745 = weight(_text_:29 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050857745 = score(doc=164,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035638355 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 5.2012 13:58:08
29. 5.2012 14:15:36
- Source
- ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
-
Abbas, J.: In the margins : reflections on scribbles (2007)
0.02
0.015075676 = product of:
0.04522703 = sum of:
0.04522703 = weight(_text_:development in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04522703 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.28246516 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Marginalia or 'scribbling in the margins' is a means for readers to add a more in-depth level of granularity and subject representation to digital documents such as those present in social sharing environments like Flickr and del.icio.us. Social classification and social sharing sites development of user-defined descriptors or tags is discussed in the context of knowledge organization. With this position paper I present a rationale for the use of the resulting folksonomies and tag clouds being developed in these social sharing communities as a rich source of information about our users and their natural organization processes. The knowledge organization community needs to critically examine our understandings of these emerging classificatory schema and determine how best to adapt, augment, revitalize existing knowledge organization structures.
-
Tennis, J.T.; Jacob, E.K.: Toward a theory of structure in information organization frameworks (2008)
0.02
0.015075676 = product of:
0.04522703 = sum of:
0.04522703 = weight(_text_:development in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04522703 = score(doc=2251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.28246516 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- This paper outlines a formal and systematic approach to explication of the role of structure in information organization. It presents a preliminary set of constructs that are useful for understanding the similarities and differences that obtain across information organization systems. This work seeks to provide necessary groundwork for development of a theory of structure that can serve as a lens through which to observe patterns across systems of information organization.
-
Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008)
0.01
0.013259299 = product of:
0.039777897 = sum of:
0.039777897 = product of:
0.059666842 = sum of:
0.029968213 = weight(_text_:29 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029968213 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
0.029698629 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029698629 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 2.2009 10:29:07
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Fried, M.; Toma, I.; Yan, E.; Foo, S.; Milojevicacute, S.: Upper tag ontology for integrating social tagging data (2010)
0.01
0.012922008 = product of:
0.038766023 = sum of:
0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038766023 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.242113 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Data integration and mediation have become central concerns of information technology over the past few decades. With the advent of the Web and the rapid increases in the amount of data and the number of Web documents and users, researchers have focused on enhancing the interoperability of data through the development of metadata schemes. Other researchers have looked to the wealth of metadata generated by bookmarking sites on the Social Web. While several existing ontologies have capitalized on the semantics of metadata created by tagging activities, the Upper Tag Ontology (UTO) emphasizes the structure of tagging activities to facilitate modeling of tagging data and the integration of data from different bookmarking sites as well as the alignment of tagging ontologies. UTO is described and its utility in modeling, harvesting, integrating, searching, and analyzing data is demonstrated with metadata harvested from three major social tagging systems (Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube).
-
Aparecida Moura, M.; Assis, J.: Social networks, indexing languages and organization of knowledge : a semiotic approach
0.01
0.012922008 = product of:
0.038766023 = sum of:
0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 3544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038766023 = score(doc=3544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.242113 = fieldWeight in 3544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3544)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This study will present a theoretical discussion about the semiotics categories and its application in the information organization. An experiment about the performance of the Gemet and Eurovoc thesauri with the subject "sustainable development" comparing with the folksonomies and distributed classification systems available on the online repositories of individual or collective information is presented. The new configuration of warrant (literary, structural and of usage) in the process of constructing indexing languages in digital environments will also be discussed. It suggested in the methodological terms that the new theoretical and informational mediations have to be incorporated in the construction process of indexing languages.
-
Huang, S.-L.; Lin, S.-C.; Chan, Y.-C.: Investigating effectiveness and user acceptance of semantic social tagging for knowledge sharing (2012)
0.01
0.012922008 = product of:
0.038766023 = sum of:
0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 2732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038766023 = score(doc=2732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.242113 = fieldWeight in 2732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2732)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Social tagging systems enable users to assign arbitrary tags to various digital resources. However, they face vague-meaning problems when users retrieve or present resources with the keyword-based tags. In order to solve these problems, this study takes advantage of Semantic Web technology and the topological characteristics of knowledge maps to develop a system that comprises a semantic tagging mechanism and triple-pattern and visual searching mechanisms. A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and user acceptance of these mechanisms in a knowledge sharing context. The results show that the semantic social tagging system is more effective than a keyword-based system. The visualized knowledge map helps users capture an overview of the knowledge domain, reduce cognitive effort for the search, and obtain more enjoyment. Traditional keyword tagging with a keyword search still has the advantage of ease of use and the users had higher intention to use it. This study also proposes directions for future development of semantic social tagging systems.
-
Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Flack, M.: Social bookmarking tools (II) : a case study - Connotea (2005)
0.01
0.010768341 = product of:
0.03230502 = sum of:
0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03230502 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Connotea is a free online reference management and social bookmarking service for scientists created by Nature Publishing Group. While somewhat experimental in nature, Connotea already has a large and growing number of users, and is a real, fully functioning service. The label 'experimental' is not meant to imply that the service is any way ephemeral or esoteric, rather that the concept of social bookmarking itself and the application of that concept to reference management are both recent developments. Connotea is under active development, and we are still in the process of discovering how people will use it. In addition to Connotea being a free and public service, the core code is freely available under an open source license. Connotea was conceived from the outset as an online, social tool. Seeing the possibilities that del.icio.us was opening up for its users in the area of general web linking, we realised that scholarly reference management was a similar problem space. Connotea was designed and developed late in 2004, and soft-launched at the end of December 2004. Usage has grown over the past several months, to the point where there is now enough data in the system for interesting second-order effects to emerge. This paper will start by giving an overview of Connotea, and will outline the key concepts and describe its main features. We will then take the reader on a brief guided tour, show some of the aforementioned second-order effects, and end with a discussion of Connotea's likely future direction.
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011)
0.01
0.0053276825 = product of:
0.015983047 = sum of:
0.015983047 = product of:
0.04794914 = sum of:
0.04794914 = weight(_text_:29 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04794914 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.29-53
-
Evedove Tartarotti, R. Dal'; Lopes Fujita, M.: ¬The perspective of social indexing in online bibliographic catalogs : between the individual and the collaborative (2016)
0.01
0.0053276825 = product of:
0.015983047 = sum of:
0.015983047 = product of:
0.04794914 = sum of:
0.04794914 = weight(_text_:29 in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04794914 = score(doc=4917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.00
0.00466669 = product of:
0.014000068 = sum of:
0.014000068 = product of:
0.042000204 = sum of:
0.042000204 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042000204 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Marchitelli, A.; Piazzini, T.: OPAC, SOPAC e social networking : cataloghi di biblioteca 2.0? (2008)
0.00
0.0046617216 = product of:
0.013985164 = sum of:
0.013985164 = product of:
0.041955493 = sum of:
0.041955493 = weight(_text_:29 in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041955493 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 17:18:10
-
Oudenaar, H.; Bullard, J.: NOT A BOOK : goodreads and the risks of social cataloging with insufficient direction (2024)
0.00
0.0046617216 = product of:
0.013985164 = sum of:
0.013985164 = product of:
0.041955493 = sum of:
0.041955493 = weight(_text_:29 in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041955493 = score(doc=1156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22.11.2023 18:29:56
-
Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008)
0.00
0.004619787 = product of:
0.0138593605 = sum of:
0.0138593605 = product of:
0.04157808 = sum of:
0.04157808 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04157808 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 21. 6.2009 12:22:44
-
Furner, J.: User tagging of library resources : toward a framework for system evaluation (2007)
0.00
0.003995762 = product of:
0.011987286 = sum of:
0.011987286 = product of:
0.035961855 = sum of:
0.035961855 = weight(_text_:29 in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035961855 = score(doc=703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:29:31
-
Corrado, E.; Moulaison, H.L.: Social tagging and communities of practice : two case studies (2008)
0.00
0.003995762 = product of:
0.011987286 = sum of:
0.011987286 = product of:
0.035961855 = sum of:
0.035961855 = weight(_text_:29 in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035961855 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27.12.2008 11:20:29
-
Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009)
0.00
0.0039598173 = product of:
0.011879452 = sum of:
0.011879452 = product of:
0.035638355 = sum of:
0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035638355 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.2010 12:35:22
