Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Austin, D.: Development of a new general classification : a progress report (1969) 0.03
    0.03445869 = product of:
      0.10337606 = sum of:
        0.10337606 = weight(_text_:development in 4972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10337606 = score(doc=4972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.64563465 = fieldWeight in 4972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4972)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  2. ¬The BSO manual : the development, rationale and use of the Broad System of Ordering (1979) 0.03
    0.030151352 = product of:
      0.09045406 = sum of:
        0.09045406 = weight(_text_:development in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09045406 = score(doc=1051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.5649303 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  3. Loehrlein, A.; Jacob, E.K.; Lee, S.; Yang, K.: Development of heuristics in a hybrid approach to faceted classification (2006) 0.02
    0.021320224 = product of:
      0.06396067 = sum of:
        0.06396067 = weight(_text_:development in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06396067 = score(doc=247,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.39946604 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes work in progress to identify automated methods to complement and streamline the intellectual process in the generation of faceted schemes. It reports on the development of the word pair heuristic, the suffix heuristic, and the WordNet heuristic, and how the three heuristics integrate to produce an initial organization of terms from which a classificationist can more efficiently construct a faceted vocabulary.
  4. Doria, O.D.: ¬The role of activities awareness in faceted classification development (2012) 0.02
    0.021320224 = product of:
      0.06396067 = sum of:
        0.06396067 = weight(_text_:development in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06396067 = score(doc=364,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.39946604 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we propose a part of the methodological work to accompanying the development of a new type of Knowledge Organization System (KOS) based on faceted classification. Our approach to faceted classification differs from its traditional use. We develop a theoretical typology of professional documents based on their uses. Then we correlate these types of documents to specific types of KOS according to their degree of structural constraint and activities they aim to serve.
  5. Rodriguez, R.D.: Kaiser's systematic indexing (1984) 0.02
    0.017229345 = product of:
      0.05168803 = sum of:
        0.05168803 = weight(_text_:development in 4521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05168803 = score(doc=4521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.32281733 = fieldWeight in 4521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4521)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    J. Kaiser (1868-1927) developed a system of subject indexing based on what he called "concretes" and "processes" to govern the form of subject headings and subdivisions. Although Kaiser applied his systematic indexing to specialized technical and business collections, his ideas are entirely applicable to all book collections and catalogs. Though largely ignored, Kaiser's system is of permanent interest in the study of the development of subject analysis
  6. Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification Second Edition (2009) 0.02
    0.017229345 = product of:
      0.05168803 = sum of:
        0.05168803 = weight(_text_:development in 3755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05168803 = score(doc=3755,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.32281733 = fieldWeight in 3755, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3755)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This entry looks at the origins of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition and the theory on which it is built. The reasons for the decision to revise the classification are examined, as are the influences on classification theory of the mid-twentieth century. The process of revision and construction of schedules using facet analysis is described. The use of BC2 is considered along with some recent development work on thesaural and digital formats.
  7. Sukhmaneva, E.G.: Modern development of faceted classification 0.02
    0.017229345 = product of:
      0.05168803 = sum of:
        0.05168803 = weight(_text_:development in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05168803 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.32281733 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  8. Faceted classification today : International UDC Seminar 2017, 14.-15. Spetember, London, UK. (2017) 0.02
    0.017229345 = product of:
      0.05168803 = sum of:
        0.05168803 = weight(_text_:development in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05168803 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.32281733 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted analytical theory is a widely accepted approach for constructing modern classification schemes and other controlled vocabularies. While the advantages of faceted approach are broadly accepted and understood the actual implementation is coupled with many challenges when it comes to data modelling, management and retrieval. UDC Seminar 2017 revisits faceted analytical theory as one of the most influential methodologies in the development of knowledge organization systems.
  9. Chatterjee, A.; Choudhury, G.G.: CC7: an evaluation of its development in three planes (1989) 0.02
    0.015075676 = product of:
      0.04522703 = sum of:
        0.04522703 = weight(_text_:development in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04522703 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.28246516 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Thomas, A.R.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd Edition : principles features and applications (1992) 0.02
    0.015075676 = product of:
      0.04522703 = sum of:
        0.04522703 = weight(_text_:development in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04522703 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.28246516 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Publication of the 2nd ed. of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification presents librarians with a fresh opportunity to reassess the nature and benefits of helpful order for their collections and records. Half the parts are now available, exhibiting major expansion, revision, and development of the scheme. The new edition is sponsored by the Bliss Classification Association which welcomes the views and inputs of American librarians. It has been applied to libraries and information centers and used in thesaurus construction. This edition provides intensive subject specifity through detailed term listings and full synthetic capability. The notation is designed to be as brief as possible for the detail attainable. The classification allows a large measure of flexibility in arrangement and syntax
  11. Broughton, V.: Facet analysis as a tool for modelling subject domains and terminologies (2011) 0.01
    0.010768341 = product of:
      0.03230502 = sum of:
        0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03230502 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Facet analysis is proposed as a general theory of knowledge organization, with an associated methodology that may be applied to the development of terminology tools in a variety of contexts and formats. Faceted classifications originated as a means of representing complexity in semantic content that facilitates logical organization and effective retrieval in a physical environment. This is achieved through meticulous analysis of concepts, their structural and functional status (based on fundamental categories), and their inter-relationships. These features provide an excellent basis for the general conceptual modelling of domains, and for the generation of KOS other than systematic classifications. This is demonstrated by the adoption of a faceted approach to many web search and visualization tools, and by the emergence of a facet based methodology for the construction of thesauri. Current work on the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (Second Edition) is investigating the ways in which the full complexity of faceted structures may be represented through encoded data, capable of generating intellectually and mechanically compatible forms of indexing tools from a single source. It is suggested that a number of research questions relating to the Semantic Web could be tackled through the medium of facet analysis.
  12. Giri, K.; Gokhale, P.: Developing a banking service ontology using Protégé, an open source software (2015) 0.01
    0.010768341 = product of:
      0.03230502 = sum of:
        0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 2793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03230502 = score(doc=2793,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 2793, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2793)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Computers have transformed from single isolated devices to entry points into a worldwide network of information exchange. Consequently, support in the exchange of data, information, and knowledge is becoming the key issue in computer technology today. The increasing volume of data available on the Web makes information retrieval a tedious and difficult task. Researchers are now exploring the possibility of creating a semantic web, in which meaning is made explicit, allowing machines to process and integrate web resources intelligently. The vision of the semantic web introduces the next generation of the Web by establishing a layer of machine-understandable data. The success of the semantic web depends on the easy creation, integration and use of semantic data, which will depend on web ontology. The faceted approach towards analyzing and representing knowledge given by S R Ranganathan would be useful in this regard. Ontology development in different fields is one such area where this approach given by Ranganathan could be applied. This paper presents a case of developing ontology for the field of banking.
  13. Broughton, V.: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (2006) 0.01
    0.010768341 = product of:
      0.03230502 = sum of:
        0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03230502 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of this article is to estimate the impact of faceted classification and the faceted analytical method on the development of various information retrieval tools over the latter part of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Design/methodology/approach - The article presents an examination of various subject access tools intended for retrieval of both print and digital materials to determine whether they exhibit features of faceted systems. Some attention is paid to use of the faceted approach as a means of structuring information on commercial web sites. The secondary and research literature is also surveyed for commentary on and evaluation of facet analysis as a basis for the building of vocabulary and conceptual tools. Findings - The study finds that faceted systems are now very common, with a major increase in their use over the last 15 years. Most LIS subject indexing tools (classifications, subject heading lists and thesauri) now demonstrate features of facet analysis to a greater or lesser degree. A faceted approach is frequently taken to the presentation of product information on commercial web sites, and there is an independent strand of theory and documentation related to this application. There is some significant research on semi-automatic indexing and retrieval (query expansion and query formulation) using facet analytical techniques. Originality/value - This article provides an overview of an important conceptual approach to information retrieval, and compares different understandings and applications of this methodology.
  14. Tomlinson, H.: Report on work for new general classification scheme (1969) 0.01
    0.007991524 = product of:
      0.023974571 = sum of:
        0.023974571 = product of:
          0.07192371 = sum of:
            0.07192371 = weight(_text_:29 in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07192371 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.29-41
  15. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.01
    0.006599696 = product of:
      0.019799087 = sum of:
        0.019799087 = product of:
          0.059397258 = sum of:
            0.059397258 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059397258 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  16. Dahlberg, I.: Towards a future for knowledge organization (2006) 0.01
    0.0053276825 = product of:
      0.015983047 = sum of:
        0.015983047 = product of:
          0.04794914 = sum of:
            0.04794914 = weight(_text_:29 in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04794914 = score(doc=1476,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 2.2008 13:41:01
  17. Dahlberg, I.: Information Coding Classification : Geschichtliches, Prinzipien, Inhaltliches (2010) 0.01
    0.0053276825 = product of:
      0.015983047 = sum of:
        0.015983047 = product of:
          0.04794914 = sum of:
            0.04794914 = weight(_text_:29 in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04794914 = score(doc=4057,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2011 18:29:20
  18. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.0052797566 = product of:
      0.01583927 = sum of:
        0.01583927 = product of:
          0.047517806 = sum of:
            0.047517806 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047517806 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  19. Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012) 0.01
    0.0052797566 = product of:
      0.01583927 = sum of:
        0.01583927 = product of:
          0.047517806 = sum of:
            0.047517806 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047517806 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:33:22
  20. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.00
    0.004619787 = product of:
      0.0138593605 = sum of:
        0.0138593605 = product of:
          0.04157808 = sum of:
            0.04157808 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04157808 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43