Search (55 results, page 1 of 3)

0.045018204 = product of:
  0.0675273 = sum of:
    0.05168803 = weight(_text_:development in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05168803 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.32281733 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
    0.01583927 = product of:
      0.047517806 = sum of:
        0.047517806 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047517806 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

State of the art review of the historical development of information science as deemed to be covered by the particular interests of memebers of the American Society for Information Science, as defined as the representation, storage, transmission, selection, retrieval, filtering, and use of documents and messages. Arranges the references cited roughly according to the classification scheme used by Information Science Abstracts, and so uses the headings: background; information science; techniques and technology; information related behaviour; application areas; social aspects; education for information science; institutions; individuals; geographical areas; and conclusions

Date

13. 6.1996 19:22:20

0.030457465 = product of:
  0.09137239 = sum of:
    0.09137239 = weight(_text_:development in 1571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09137239 = score(doc=1571,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.5706658 = fieldWeight in 1571, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1571)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Introduces some of the literature on object-orientated analysis and design, concentrating on the study of object oriented development methods. Outlines both regular and irregular sources of material on object oriented development methods and it lists over 240 references of which approximately 60 are annotated

0.030151352 = product of:
  0.09045406 = sum of:
    0.09045406 = weight(_text_:development in 2626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09045406 = score(doc=2626,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.5649303 = fieldWeight in 2626, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2626)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Series

Information sources for research and development

0.028136378 = product of:
  0.042204566 = sum of:
    0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03230502 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
    0.009899544 = product of:
      0.029698629 = sum of:
        0.029698629 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029698629 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The topic of electronic journals (e-journals) dominated the serials literature from 2000 to 2003. This review is limited to the events and issues within the broad topics of cost, management, and archiving. Coverage of cost includes such initiatives as PEAK, JACC, BioMed Central, SPARC, open access, the "Big Deal," and "going e-only." Librarians combated the continued price increase trend for journals, fueled in part by publisher mergers, with the economies found with bundled packages and consortial subscriptions. Serials management topics include usage statistics; core title lists; staffing needs; the "A-Z list" and other services from such companies as Serials Solutions; "deep linking"; link resolvers such as SFX; development of standards or guidelines, such as COUNTER and ERMI; tracking of license terms; vendor mergers; and the demise of integrated library systems and a subscription agent's bankruptcy. Librarians archived print volumes in storage facilities due to space shortages. Librarians and publishers struggled with electronic archiving concepts, discussing questions of who, where, and how. Projects such as LOCKSS tested potential solutions, but missing online content due to the Tasini court case and retractions posed more archiving difficulties. The serials literature captured much of the upheaval resulting from the rapid pace of changes, many linked to the advent of e-journals.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.018274479 = product of:
  0.054823436 = sum of:
    0.054823436 = weight(_text_:development in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054823436 = score(doc=4760,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.34239948 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Videogames are important cultural and economic artifacts. They also present challenges that anticipate the problems inherent in any complex digital interactive system. Not only are they digital and hence very difficult to preserve but they also are software systems that have significant hardware, peripheral, and network dependencies, which are difficult to collect and formally represent. This article reviews the literature related to videogame preservation. In addition to covering the traditional technology-related issues inherent in all digital preservation endeavors, this review also attempts to describe the complexities and relationships between the traditional acts of technology preservation, representation, and collection development. Future work should include the identification of important user groups, an examination of games' context of use, and the development of representational models to describe interaction of players with the game and the interactions between players playing the game.

0.01591116 = product of:
  0.04773348 = sum of:
    0.04773348 = product of:
      0.07160021 = sum of:
        0.035961855 = weight(_text_:29 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035961855 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
        0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035638355 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22
17.12.2006 13:29:07

0.015075676 = product of:
  0.04522703 = sum of:
    0.04522703 = weight(_text_:development in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04522703 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.28246516 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the development of current practice in information literacy education in tertiary institutions in South Africa. The policy framework affecting information literacy is examined from multiple perspectives. An examination of the literature identifies key concerns that are used in the compilation of a small survey instrument to establish current practice. The impact of institutional policies, finding educational strategies that meet the identified objectives of information literacy, diversity in students' backgrounds and abilities, and ultimately the assessment of performance all emerged as significant. The concept of multiliteracies is suggested as a useful approach to conceptualizing information literacy as central to student learning. Future directions are suggested.

0.013185343 = product of:
  0.039556026 = sum of:
    0.039556026 = product of:
      0.11866807 = sum of:
        0.11866807 = weight(_text_:29 in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11866807 = score(doc=1733,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.7694941 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

9. 1.1999 18:29:29

0.013066731 = product of:
  0.039200194 = sum of:
    0.039200194 = product of:
      0.117600575 = sum of:
        0.117600575 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.117600575 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

5. 9.1997 19:22:27

Source

Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193

0.012922008 = product of:
  0.038766023 = sum of:
    0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 47) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038766023 = score(doc=47,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.242113 = fieldWeight in 47, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=47)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

With the development of the information society, education is facing great challenges and opportunities. Information literacy is recognized as a basic competency of individuals that ought to be incorporated into the educational mission. In order to enhance information education, Chinese educators and librarians have been reviewing traditional information instruction, and they are preparing to establish their exclusive information education role in this new century. This paper deals with the new informational and educational environment in China and discusses the increasing needs for information and knowledge in Chinese higher education. Some modes and measurements are proposed to promote information literacy and some experiences and experiments are described. Librarians in China have already done much work related to information literacy, as they prepare to become part of modern education.

0.012922008 = product of:
  0.038766023 = sum of:
    0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 1718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038766023 = score(doc=1718,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.242113 = fieldWeight in 1718, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1718)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This review describes experimental designs (users, search tasks, measures, etc.) used by 31 controlled user studies of information visualization (IV) tools for textual information retrieval (IR) and a meta-analysis of the reported statistical effects. Comparable experimental designs allow research designers to compare their results with other reports, and support the development of experimentally verified design guidelines concerning which IV techniques are better suited to which types of IR tasks. The studies generally use a within-subject design with 15 or more undergraduate students performing browsing to known-item tasks on sets of at least 1,000 full-text articles or Web pages on topics of general interest/news. Results of the meta-analysis (N = 8) showed no significant effects of the IV tool as compared with a text-only equivalent, but the set shows great variability suggesting an inadequate basis of comparison. Experimental design recommendations are provided which would support comparison of existing IV tools for IR usability testing.

0.010768341 = product of:
  0.03230502 = sum of:
    0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03230502 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

More than 5000 publications related to library user instruction and information literacy have been published and reviewed in the past thirty years. New developments in education and technology during the last two decades have affected user instruction and have led to the emergence of information literacy. Based on needs related to the rapid development of information technology and the evolving information society, librarians have begun teaching information skills to all types of users to ensure that they gain information fluency so they can become productive and effective information users both in the education environment and in the work environment. The number of publications related to user instruction and information literacy, like the field itself, show phenomenal growth during the past three decades as demonstrated by the fact that in 1973 twenty-eight publications were reviewed, and in 2002 more than 300 publications dealing with the topic of information literacy will be issued. It is noteworthy that in the last decade there has been a tremendous growth in publications related to information literacy globally. During the 1970s, publications indicate that user instruction activities were of concern primarily to librarians in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. At the present time, publications indicate a major concern with information literacy not only in the countries mentioned above but also in China, Germany, Mexico, Scandinavia, Singapore, South Africa, South America, Spain, and others. On an annual hasis, the majority of the publications have addressed information literacy in academic libraries (60 percent) followed by publications related to information literacy instruction in school media centers (20 percent).

0.010559513 = product of:
  0.03167854 = sum of:
    0.03167854 = product of:
      0.09503561 = sum of:
        0.09503561 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09503561 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

17.10.1996 14:22:33

0.00933338 = product of:
  0.028000137 = sum of:
    0.028000137 = product of:
      0.08400041 = sum of:
        0.08400041 = weight(_text_:22 in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08400041 = score(doc=4,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 3.2008 13:32:22

0.009239574 = product of:
  0.027718721 = sum of:
    0.027718721 = product of:
      0.08315616 = sum of:
        0.08315616 = weight(_text_:22 in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08315616 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.009239574 = product of:
  0.027718721 = sum of:
    0.027718721 = product of:
      0.08315616 = sum of:
        0.08315616 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08315616 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.007991524 = product of:
  0.023974571 = sum of:
    0.023974571 = product of:
      0.07192371 = sum of:
        0.07192371 = weight(_text_:29 in 1089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07192371 = score(doc=1089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1089)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

9.11.2002 17:29:36

0.007919635 = product of:
  0.023758903 = sum of:
    0.023758903 = product of:
      0.07127671 = sum of:
        0.07127671 = weight(_text_:22 in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07127671 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

19. 3.1998 11:23:22

0.0066596037 = product of:
  0.01997881 = sum of:
    0.01997881 = product of:
      0.059936427 = sum of:
        0.059936427 = weight(_text_:29 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059936427 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Isbn

81-85880-29-8

0.0066596037 = product of:
  0.01997881 = sum of:
    0.01997881 = product of:
      0.059936427 = sum of:
        0.059936427 = weight(_text_:29 in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059936427 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Rez. zu Band 1 in: IfB. 5(1997) H.1/2, S.5-9 (K. Schreiber); Refer. 13(1997) no.1, S.13-14 (C.A. Toase); Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.2, S.107-108 (A. Smith)