Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"06.35 Informationsmanagement"
  1. Borgman, C.L.: Big data, little data, no data : scholarship in the networked world (2015) 0.32
    0.31671897 = product of:
      0.44340652 = sum of:
        0.01235021 = weight(_text_:in in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01235021 = score(doc=2785,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.056979347 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04188874 = queryNorm
            0.2167489 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
        0.052191086 = weight(_text_:learning in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052191086 = score(doc=2785,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18702808 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04188874 = queryNorm
            0.27905482 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
        0.24444026 = weight(_text_:scholarship in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24444026 = score(doc=2785,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.27790213 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04188874 = queryNorm
            0.87959117 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
        0.07391272 = weight(_text_:technological in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07391272 = score(doc=2785,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22257082 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04188874 = queryNorm
            0.3320863 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
        0.060512275 = product of:
          0.12102455 = sum of:
            0.12102455 = weight(_text_:innovations in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12102455 = score(doc=2785,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28480354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04188874 = queryNorm
                0.42494047 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
    
    Abstract
    "Big Data" is on the covers of Science, Nature, the Economist, and Wired magazines, on the front pages of the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. But despite the media hyperbole, as Christine Borgman points out in this examination of data and scholarly research, having the right data is usually better than having more data; little data can be just as valuable as big data. In many cases, there are no data -- because relevant data don't exist, cannot be found, or are not available. Moreover, data sharing is difficult, incentives to do so are minimal, and data practices vary widely across disciplines. Borgman, an often-cited authority on scholarly communication, argues that data have no value or meaning in isolation; they exist within a knowledge infrastructure -- an ecology of people, practices, technologies, institutions, material objects, and relationships. After laying out the premises of her investigation -- six "provocations" meant to inspire discussion about the uses of data in scholarship -- Borgman offers case studies of data practices in the sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities, and then considers the implications of her findings for scholarly practice and research policy. To manage and exploit data over the long term, Borgman argues, requires massive investment in knowledge infrastructures; at stake is the future of scholarship.
    Content
    Provocations -- What are data? -- Data scholarship -- Data diversity -- Data scholarship in the sciences -- Data scholarship in the social sciences -- Data scholarship in the humanities -- Sharing, releasing, and reusing data -- Credit, attribution, and discovery of data -- What to keep and why to keep them.
    Footnote
    Weitere Rez. in: JASIST 67(2016) no.3, S.751-753 (C. Tenopir).
    LCSH
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Technological innovations
    Subject
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Technological innovations
  2. Beyond bibliometrics : harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly intent (2014) 0.24
    0.24057595 = product of:
      0.33680633 = sum of:
        0.009062577 = weight(_text_:in in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009062577 = score(doc=3026,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.056979347 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04188874 = queryNorm
            0.15905021 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
        0.052191086 = weight(_text_:learning in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052191086 = score(doc=3026,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18702808 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04188874 = queryNorm
            0.27905482 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
        0.14112766 = weight(_text_:scholarship in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14112766 = score(doc=3026,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.27790213 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04188874 = queryNorm
            0.5078322 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
        0.07391272 = weight(_text_:technological in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07391272 = score(doc=3026,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22257082 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04188874 = queryNorm
            0.3320863 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
        0.060512275 = product of:
          0.12102455 = sum of:
            0.12102455 = weight(_text_:innovations in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12102455 = score(doc=3026,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28480354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04188874 = queryNorm
                0.42494047 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliometrics has moved well beyond the mere tracking of bibliographic citations. The web enables new ways to measure scholarly productivity and impact, making available tools and data that can reveal patterns of intellectual activity and impact that were previously invisible: mentions, acknowledgments, endorsements, downloads, recommendations, blog posts, tweets. This book describes recent theoretical and practical advances in metrics-based research, examining a variety of alternative metrics -- or "altmetrics" -- while also considering the ethical and cultural consequences of relying on metrics to assess the quality of scholarship. Once the domain of information scientists and mathematicians, bibliometrics is now a fast-growing, multidisciplinary field that ranges from webometrics to scientometrics to influmetrics. The contributors to Beyond Bibliometrics discuss the changing environment of scholarly publishing, the effects of open access and Web 2.0 on genres of discourse, novel analytic methods, and the emergence of next-generation metrics in a performance-conscious age.
    Content
    Inhalt: Scholars and scripts, spoors and scores / Blaise CroninHistory and evolution of (biblio)metrics / Nicola De Bellis -- The citation : from culture to infrastructure / Paul Wouters -- The data it is me! / Ronald E. Day -- The ethics of evaluative bibliometrics / Jonathan Furner -- Criteria for evaluating indicators / Yves Gingras -- Obliteration by incorporation / Katherine W. McCain -- A network approach to scholarly evaluation / Jevin D. West and Daril A. Vilhena -- Science visualization and discursive knowledge / Loet Leydesdorff -- Measuring interdisciplinarity / Vincent Larivière and Yves Gingras -- Bibliometric standards for evaluating research institutes in the natural sciences / Lutz Bornmann, Benjamin E. Bowman, Jonathan Bauer, Werner Marx, Hermann Schier and Margit Palzenberger -- Identifying and quantifying research strengths using market segmentation / Kevin W. Boyack and Richard Klavans -- Finding and recommending scholarly articles / Michael J. Kurtz and Edwin A. Henneken -- Altmetrics / Jason Priem -- Web impact measures for research assessment / Kayvan Kousha and Mike Thelwall -- Bibliographic references in Web 2.0 / Judit Bar-Illan, Hadas Shema and Mike Thelwall -- Readership metrics / Stefanie Haustein -- Evaluating the work of judges / Peter Hook -- Academic genealogy / Cassidy R. Sugimoto -- A publishing perspective on bibliometrics / Judith Kamalski, Andrew Plume and Mayur Amin -- Science metrics and science policy / Julia Lane, Mark Largent and Rebecca Rosen.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 67(2016) no.7, S.1780-1783 (Daniel O'Connor).
    LCSH
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Technological innovations
    Subject
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Technological innovations
  3. Blair, A: Too much to know : managing scholarly information before the modern age (2011) 0.11
    0.10655794 = product of:
      0.2486352 = sum of:
        0.011865699 = weight(_text_:in in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011865699 = score(doc=4474,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.056979347 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04188874 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
        0.07380934 = weight(_text_:learning in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07380934 = score(doc=4474,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18702808 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04188874 = queryNorm
            0.3946431 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
        0.16296017 = weight(_text_:scholarship in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16296017 = score(doc=4474,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.27790213 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04188874 = queryNorm
            0.58639413 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The flood of information brought to us by advancing technology is often accompanied by a distressing sense of "information overload," yet this experience is not unique to modern times. In fact, says Ann M. Blair in this intriguing book, the invention of the printing press and the ensuing abundance of books provoked sixteenth- and seventeenth-century European scholars to register complaints very similar to our own. Blair examines methods of information management in ancient and medieval Europe as well as the Islamic world and China, then focuses particular attention on the organization, composition, and reception of Latin reference books in print in early modern Europe. She explores in detail the sophisticated and sometimes idiosyncratic techniques that scholars and readers developed in an era of new technology and exploding information.
    Content
    Information management in comparative perspective -- Note-taking as information management -- Reference genres and their finding devices -- Compilers, their motivations and methods -- The impact of early printed reference books.
    LCSH
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Europe / History / 17th century
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Europe / History / 16th century
    Subject
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Europe / History / 17th century
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Europe / History / 16th century

Authors

Types