-
Klein, R.D.: ¬The problem of cataloguing world literature using the Nippon Decimal Classification (1994)
0.03
0.031604484 = product of:
0.047406726 = sum of:
0.019100567 = weight(_text_:in in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019100567 = score(doc=867,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
0.028306156 = product of:
0.056612313 = sum of:
0.056612313 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056612313 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem
-
Ueda, S.: Problems with title and author searching in WWW OPAC (1999)
0.03
0.02865137 = product of:
0.042977054 = sum of:
0.014948557 = weight(_text_:in in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014948557 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
0.028028497 = product of:
0.056056995 = sum of:
0.056056995 = weight(_text_:science in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056056995 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Library and information science. 1999, no.41, S.1-15
-
Taniguchi, S.: ¬An analysis of the oriented-ness in cataloguing rules (1997)
0.03
0.025676265 = product of:
0.038514398 = sum of:
0.018494045 = weight(_text_:in in 6343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018494045 = score(doc=6343,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.260307 = fieldWeight in 6343, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6343)
0.020020355 = product of:
0.04004071 = sum of:
0.04004071 = weight(_text_:science in 6343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04004071 = score(doc=6343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 6343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6343)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Proposes an approach to the analysis of cataloguing rules seen as bibliographic description in terms of 'oriented-ness'. Assesses the validity and usefulness of the proposed approach and considers its problems and issues
- Footnote
- [In Japanisch]
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.3, S.129-139
-
Oshiro, Z.; Kaji, K.: ¬A survey of Japanese Internet OPACs (1997)
0.02
0.020541014 = product of:
0.03081152 = sum of:
0.014795236 = weight(_text_:in in 1773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014795236 = score(doc=1773,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 1773, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1773)
0.016016284 = product of:
0.032032568 = sum of:
0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 1773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032032568 = score(doc=1773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports a survey conducted in April 1997 of 136 Japanese WWW and Telnet OPACs from the persepctive of their functions and user interfaces. These included: types of searchable files; access points; kinds of displays; login commands; search methods; Boolean operation; help functions; search history; and browsing of indexed terms. Results indicate a sharp rise in the number of WWW OPACs and problems with the provision of functions and user interfaces by Japanese WWW OPACs
- Footnote
- [In Japanisch]
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.3, S.103-116
-
Watanabe, T.: ¬A new tide in the user studies : focusing on C.C. Kuhlthau's cognitive user model (1997)
0.02
0.020484831 = product of:
0.030727245 = sum of:
0.016712997 = weight(_text_:in in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016712997 = score(doc=74,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
0.014014249 = product of:
0.028028497 = sum of:
0.028028497 = weight(_text_:science in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028028497 = score(doc=74,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reviews a series of studies conducted by C.C, Kuhlthau who investigated users' information seeking behaviour in libraries over a 10 year period. In her study she constructed and Information Search Process (ISP) Model which represents aspects of user activities as a whole including feelings, thoughts and actions or behaviour. Argues that, while the ISP model sheds new light on user studies, it has problems in the following areas: problem solving processes; the understanding of 'feelings'; and the method of investigating users' information seeking behaviour. Recommends that the ISP model be reconstructed from different perspectives and verified in areas other than libraries. This may lead to the development of a new model of information seeking
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.1, S.19-37
-
Taniguchi, S.: Reevaluation of the 3-layered model in descriptive cataloguing (1997)
0.02
0.020484831 = product of:
0.030727245 = sum of:
0.016712997 = weight(_text_:in in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016712997 = score(doc=91,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
0.014014249 = product of:
0.028028497 = sum of:
0.028028497 = weight(_text_:science in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028028497 = score(doc=91,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Several years ago a conceptual framework was proposed that was designed to capture a bibliographic item by means of a structured approach and to present it in a structured manner in a bibliographic record: the 3-layered approach. Recently IFLA published the report of a study entitled 'Functional requirements for bibliographic records: draft report for worldwide review' for the purpose of a thorough reexamination of the question based on an analysis of user needs. The IFLA report attempted to capture the bibliographic universe through E-R analysis and to define entities, attributes of entities and relationships between them, all of which constitute the bibliographic universe. Compares the 3-layered model and the IFLA model culminating in a reevaluation of the 3-layered model
- Footnote
- [In Japanisch]
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.1, S.1-18
-
Kim, S.Y.: Search strategy, search tactics, moves (1995)
0.02
0.020465266 = product of:
0.030697897 = sum of:
0.010677542 = weight(_text_:in in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010677542 = score(doc=622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
0.020020355 = product of:
0.04004071 = sum of:
0.04004071 = weight(_text_:science in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04004071 = score(doc=622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The terms search strategy, search tactics, and moves are used to refer to interaction between an information retrieval system and the user. Examines papers using search strategy, search tactics, moves and analyzes the meaning of these terms. Suggests the need to use strategy and moves in information seeking studies
- Source
- Library and information science. 1995, no.34, S.39-44
-
Midorikawa, N.: ¬A discussion of the concepts of facets from the viewpoint of the structures of classification systems (1997)
0.02
0.01930819 = product of:
0.028962284 = sum of:
0.016950073 = weight(_text_:in in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016950073 = score(doc=1806,freq=14.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
0.012012213 = product of:
0.024024425 = sum of:
0.024024425 = weight(_text_:science in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024024425 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- 2 concepts of facets have been used in studies of classification systems: one for systems which take hierarchical structure and the other for systems which take multidimensional structure. Both correspond to 'principles of division'. The concepts of facets in multidimensional structure systems is used for addressing a subject from many aspects so should equate to the broadest principle of division in order to grasp a multiplicity of aspects. The concept of facets used in hierarchical systems addresses only the significance of a coherent set of items. This concept is not distinguished from the principle of division and there is no purpose in introducing a concept of facets into hierarchical systems in addition to the principle of division
- Footnote
- [In Japanisch]
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.3, S.117-128
-
Fukuda, M.; Kageura, K.: Research into 'see also' references in the dictionary of terminology : using semantic relations between entries (1993)
0.02
0.01873103 = product of:
0.028096544 = sum of:
0.01208026 = weight(_text_:in in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01208026 = score(doc=1050,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
0.016016284 = product of:
0.032032568 = sum of:
0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032032568 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports a study to clarify the nature and functions of 'see also' references in the dictionaly of terminology by surveying 3 such dictionaries, using semantic relations between referring entries and referred entries as a key. The following points were clarified: major types of semantic relations between referring and referred entries and their quantitative tendencies; correlations between the general nature of dictionaries and overall tendencies of 'see also' references; some tendencies concerning the directions of references under some semantic relations; and correlations between the nature of dictionaries and the directions of 'see also' references
- Source
- Library and information science. 1993, no.31, S.1-23
-
Ueda, S.: Online public access catalogues (OPACs) of university libraries in Japan (1995)
0.02
0.01873103 = product of:
0.028096544 = sum of:
0.01208026 = weight(_text_:in in 3342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01208026 = score(doc=3342,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3342, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3342)
0.016016284 = product of:
0.032032568 = sum of:
0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 3342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032032568 = score(doc=3342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3342)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a postal survey of the use of OPACs in Japanese university libraries based upon an 84.9% return rate. These revealed that 60.4% of university libraries used OPACs, that most libraries were linked to the automated circulation system, but that only 6.5% had Internet connection
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 41(1995) no.2, S.81-88
-
Voshida, K.: ¬A study on improving subject access to the OPAC : a survey of catalogue use comparing an OPAC and a card catalogue in a private university library (1994)
0.02
0.017365353 = product of:
0.026048029 = sum of:
0.009060195 = weight(_text_:in in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009060195 = score(doc=753,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
0.016987834 = product of:
0.03397567 = sum of:
0.03397567 = weight(_text_:science in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03397567 = score(doc=753,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes a study conducted to compare the use of a new OPAC with that of the card catalogue looking primarily at the area of subject access. Library science students at a private university were asked to respond to questions concerning: the number of subject searches and searches for specific items that they carried out on the OPAC and on the card catalogue; the success rate of the catalogue searches; how the search was carried out (classification number or keywords); librarian assistance required; and knowledge of the Nippon Decimal Classification. Results revealed that while there was an increase in the number of users as a result of the introduction of OPAC facilities, there were certain aspects which required attention such as the area of subject searches
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 40(1994) no.2, S.71-82
-
Ito, J.: Bibliographic structure : a frame of reference for bibliographic relationships (1994)
0.02
0.016389651 = product of:
0.024584476 = sum of:
0.010570227 = weight(_text_:in in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010570227 = score(doc=3085,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
0.014014249 = product of:
0.028028497 = sum of:
0.028028497 = weight(_text_:science in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028028497 = score(doc=3085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Attempts to provide a theoretical rationale for the taxonomy of bibliographic relationships between a given work and its related bibliographic entities. Examines the bibliographic structure of the document carrying the messages in terms of their bibliographic functions of use and preservation, since the most common bibliographic relationships are normally revealed within the document itself. Defines the bibliographic characteristics of the document from the perspective of an analysis of the pattern of their structural elements. Presents 4 dimensions of the bibliographic structure as a frame of reference for the categorisation of bibliographic relationships, together with their subordinate types of equivalent relationships, focusing on common structural patterns revealed with in each entity itself
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 40(1994) no.4, S.160-172
-
Mirorikawa, N.: Structures of classification systems : hierarchical and multidimensional (1996)
0.02
0.016389651 = product of:
0.024584476 = sum of:
0.010570227 = weight(_text_:in in 6583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010570227 = score(doc=6583,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 6583, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6583)
0.014014249 = product of:
0.028028497 = sum of:
0.028028497 = weight(_text_:science in 6583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028028497 = score(doc=6583,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 6583, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6583)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Considers classification systems from a structural point of view. Distinguishes between 2 kinds of methods of categorization of classification systems: the first categorized by structure, either hierarchical or multidimensional; and the second by style of expression, either enumerative or sythetic. Identifies 4 leading classification systems according to their structures: DDC, LCC, UDC and Colon Classification. Focuses on DDC referring to 2 interpretatives of its structure, one of which is hierarchical and the other is partially multidimensional. Also relates this to the matter of interpretation of the notation '0', interpreted in one instance as 'generalities', and in another as 'coordination sign'
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 42(1996) no.2, S.99-110
-
Kim, P.K.: ¬An automatic indexing of compound words based on mutual information for Korean text retrieval (1995)
0.02
0.016372211 = product of:
0.024558317 = sum of:
0.008542033 = weight(_text_:in in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008542033 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
0.016016284 = product of:
0.032032568 = sum of:
0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032032568 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Presents an automatic indexing technique for compound words suitable for an agglutinative language, specifically Korean. Discusses some construction conditions for compound words and the rules for decomposing compound words to enhance the exhaustivity of indexing, demonstrating that this system, mutual information, enhances both the exhaustivity of indexing and the specifity of terms. Suggests that the construction conditions and rules for decomposition presented may be used in multilingual information retrieval systems to translate the indexing terms of the specific language into those of the language required
- Source
- Library and information science. 1995, no.34, S.29-38
-
Matsushita, A.: Science Citation Index on CD-ROM (1992)
0.02
0.015100298 = product of:
0.045300893 = sum of:
0.045300893 = product of:
0.09060179 = sum of:
0.09060179 = weight(_text_:science in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09060179 = score(doc=5723,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.6585298 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Object
- Science Citation Index
-
Anzai, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Ishizuka, H.: Experimental service of cataloguing database through WWW (1996)
0.01
0.014325685 = product of:
0.021488527 = sum of:
0.0074742786 = weight(_text_:in in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0074742786 = score(doc=509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
0.014014249 = product of:
0.028028497 = sum of:
0.028028497 = weight(_text_:science in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028028497 = score(doc=509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- An information retrieval system for a cataloguing database through the WWW is developed, and experimentally served to Japan MARC and ULIS (Univeristy of Library and Information Science) OPAC data. Since Japanese words are not separated by obvious delimiters, ensuring the same segmentation between the query and the database is a problem. The present system solves the problem by using the multiple hash screening technique for processing both book titles and query strings, based on the same dictionary and using similar algorithms. Database management is handled by ADABAS, reducing management chores and and response time. The effectiveness of the multiple hash screening technique for a Japanese text based information system is examined, and the limitation of the Web's hypertext environment for a bibliographic information retrieval service is discussed
- Footnote
- [In Japanisch]
-
Kobayashi, Y.: Area tables of Dewey 18 as compared with Nippon Decimal Classification (1976)
0.01
0.010677523 = product of:
0.032032568 = sum of:
0.032032568 = product of:
0.064065136 = sum of:
0.064065136 = weight(_text_:science in 6166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064065136 = score(doc=6166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 6166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6166)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library and information science. 1976, no.14, S.55-69
-
Agata, T.: ¬A measure for evaluating search engines on the World Wide Web : retrieval test with ESL (Expected Search Length) (1997)
0.01
0.008008142 = product of:
0.024024425 = sum of:
0.024024425 = product of:
0.04804885 = sum of:
0.04804885 = weight(_text_:science in 3892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04804885 = score(doc=3892,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 3892, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3892)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library and information science. 1997, no.37, S.1-11
-
Takano, M.: OPACs in university libraries (1994)
0.01
0.0079585705 = product of:
0.02387571 = sum of:
0.02387571 = weight(_text_:in in 871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02387571 = score(doc=871,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.3360549 = fieldWeight in 871, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=871)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In 1991 60,4% of Japanese university libraries had introduced computerized systems and 57,5% of these had computerized catalogues. In this context, discusses the following: subject searching in computerized catalogues; standardisation of OPACs, particularly as these are now available to a wide range of external users; and access to journal articles, especially in view of increasing journal purchase relative to books
-
Takeda, N.: Problems in hierarchical structures in thesauri : their influences on the results of information retrieval (1994)
0.01
0.0069745416 = product of:
0.020923624 = sum of:
0.020923624 = weight(_text_:in in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020923624 = score(doc=2642,freq=12.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.29450375 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In online retrieval search results do not always match the intent in spite of using correct keywords (descriptors). One of the causes of this problem is found in the hierarchical structures of the thesaurus, which often contains relations between broader and narrower concepts, the opposite of which is not necessarily true. Some examples are described from 2 thesauri, MeSH and JICST. In these cases searchers need to make an effort to increase precision
