Search (80 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Bestandsaufstellung"
  1. Boll, J.J.: Shelf browsing, open access and storage capacity in research libraries (1985) 0.03 
    0.032744423 = product of:
  0.049116634 = sum of:
    0.017084066 = weight(_text_:in in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017084066 = score(doc=3326,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
    0.032032568 = product of:
      0.064065136 = sum of:
        0.064065136 = weight(_text_:science in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064065136 = score(doc=3326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Imprint
    Champaign, Ill. : Univ. of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
  2. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.03 
    0.026477631 = product of:
  0.039716445 = sum of:
    0.014948557 = weight(_text_:in in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014948557 = score(doc=883,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.024767887 = product of:
      0.049535774 = sum of:
        0.049535774 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049535774 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    As part of her doctoral dissertation at Brabant Catholic University in the Netherlands A. Oomens recently held a survey to determine the relative merits of author and subject arrangements for non fiction collections. Although users browsing through the collections were more likely to find material of interest via a subject arrangement, those looking for a particular title were best served by an author arrangement. All users interviewed preferred the arrangement with which they were familiar
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Subject arrangement assists browsing?: subject versus alphabetical arrangement: a study in differences in user behavious
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
  3. Rotten, C. v.d.: oderzoek naar alternatieve plaatsing : Bijna net zoveel systemen als bibliotheken (1995) 0.03 
    0.02514248 = product of:
  0.037713718 = sum of:
    0.012945832 = weight(_text_:in in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012945832 = score(doc=4660,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
    0.024767887 = product of:
      0.049535774 = sum of:
        0.049535774 = weight(_text_:22 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049535774 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    In the last 10 years a number of libraries in the Netherlands have developed akternative shelf arrangements to the standard SISO system. A survey undertaken at Felde children's library following the implementation of an alternative arrangement showed that children had been unaware of the change. In 1989 the Nederlands Bibliothekk en Lektuur Centrum (Dutch Centre for Libraries and Reading) began developing a system based on trials at 15 libraries. Further implementations of the system should take account of developments with automated catalogues
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.11, S.20-22
  4. Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992) 0.03 
    0.02514248 = product of:
  0.037713718 = sum of:
    0.012945832 = weight(_text_:in in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012945832 = score(doc=913,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
    0.024767887 = product of:
      0.049535774 = sum of:
        0.049535774 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049535774 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Describes a project designed to integrate art into the children's library at Espergaerde in Denmark. Explains the aims of the project, principally to make the use of the library an artistic experience, and the 3 tasks the project was to fulfil: the redesign of the interior using artwork by local artists; a change from the traditional arrangement of fiction; and provision of workshop facilities for children to exercise their artistic inclinations. Details how these tasks were accopmplished and discusses the results of the project, stressing the renewed appreciation of art and the importance of passing that on to children
    Footnote
    Contribution to an issue devoted to children's libraries in SCandinavia
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
  5. Minter, C.: Systematic or mechanical arrangement? : Revisiting a debate in German library science, 1790-1914 (2017) 0.02 
    0.024602022 = product of:
  0.03690303 = sum of:
    0.016882677 = weight(_text_:in in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016882677 = score(doc=5066,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
    0.020020355 = product of:
      0.04004071 = sum of:
        0.04004071 = weight(_text_:science in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04004071 = score(doc=5066,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article examines changing views on "systematic" or classified shelf-arrangement in German library science from Kayser's 1790 work Ueber die Manipulation bey der Einrichtung einer Bibliothek to the 1914 Versammlung deutscher Bibliothekare in Leipzig, at which Georg Leyh delivered the seminal paper, "Systematische oder mechanische Aufstellung?" Systematic arrangement was, with few exceptions, held up as an ideal throughout the nineteenth century; but by 1914 it could be agreed to belong to a past era in which, in the words of Leyh, libraries ran as a "Kleinbetrieb" [small business] (Leyh 1913, 100, "Das Dogma von der systematischen Aufstellung II-IV." Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 30:97-135). In particular, this article seeks to explore how changing views on the ideal of systematic shelf-arrangement in German library science during this period reflected evolving conceptions of librarianship. For nineteenth-century writers such as Ebert, Molbech, and Petzholdt, systematic classification and arrangement had meaning against the backdrop of an encyclopedic tradition within which libraries and librarians played an important role in organizing and presenting a rational overview of the universe of knowledge - an overview that was to be both physical and intellectual. The waning of the ideal of systematic arrangement at the turn of the twentieth century was associated with a sense of loss, as an intellectual or "scholarly" tradition of librarianship was seen to give way to more utilitarian and "bureaucratic" expectations. The changing fortunes of the ideal of systematic arrangement in German library science between 1790 and 1914 may be seen to illustrate how progress and loss are often inextricably linked in the history of libraries and librarianship
  6. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.02 
    0.024565458 = product of:
  0.036848187 = sum of:
    0.008542033 = weight(_text_:in in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008542033 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
    0.028306156 = product of:
      0.056612313 = sum of:
        0.056612313 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056612313 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
  7. Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996) 0.02 
    0.024565458 = product of:
  0.036848187 = sum of:
    0.008542033 = weight(_text_:in in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008542033 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
    0.028306156 = product of:
      0.056612313 = sum of:
        0.056612313 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056612313 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
  8. Lazinger, S.S.: LC Classification of a library and information science library for maximum shelf retrieval (1984) 0.02 
    0.021843314 = product of:
  0.03276497 = sum of:
    0.012945832 = weight(_text_:in in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012945832 = score(doc=339,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
    0.01981914 = product of:
      0.03963828 = sum of:
        0.03963828 = weight(_text_:science in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03963828 = score(doc=339,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    In reclassifying a Library and Information Science library from DDC to LC, an attempt was made to concentrate books with related subject headings on the shelf for maximum shelf retrieval even in cases where the Subject Authorities or C.I.P. assign them varying numbers. Most of the shelf concentration was achieved either by selecting a single number for a given heading and then classifying all books with the heading in that number or by replacing the standard LC number for a heading with one which placed it together with related books on the shelf.
  9. Lowisch, M.: Gesamthochschulbibliotheken und Klassifikationsentwicklung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kooperation und lokalen Bedürfnissen (2017) 0.02 
    0.021494776 = product of:
  0.032242164 = sum of:
    0.0074742786 = weight(_text_:in in 5116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0074742786 = score(doc=5116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 5116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5116)
    0.024767887 = product of:
      0.049535774 = sum of:
        0.049535774 = weight(_text_:22 in 5116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049535774 = score(doc=5116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5116)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag beschreibt die Entwicklung der Gesamthochschulbibliothekssystematik (GHBS) als Aufstellungssystematik der Gesamthochschulbibliotheken (GHBs) in Nordrhein-Westfalen (NRW) seit den 1970er Jahren bis heute. Dabei werden zunächst mittels Literaturauswertung und Archivmaterial entscheidende Entwicklungspunkte kursorisch bis zum Ende der gemeinsamen Pflege der Systematik im Jahre 2004 dargestellt. Die Einflüsse lokaler Interessengruppen sowie technischer Veränderungen auf die kooperative Klassifikationsentwicklung werden betrachtet. Die Untersuchung wird durch Experteninterviews erweitert. Konzeption und Auswertung der Interviews bedienen sich der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse nach Gläser und Laudel und des Ressourcenabhängigkeitsansatzes (RDT). Aus Experteninterviews und Literaturauswertung wird sich eine heute nur noch nachrangige Bedeutung der Klassifikationsentwicklung sowie ein Mangel an Aufsichts- und Sanktionierungsmaßnahmen gegenüber den GHBs ergeben
    Date
    17. 3.2019 16:22:59
  10. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.02 
    0.020193208 = product of:
  0.030289812 = sum of:
    0.009060195 = weight(_text_:in in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009060195 = score(doc=125,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
    0.021229617 = product of:
      0.042459235 = sum of:
        0.042459235 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042459235 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009) 0.02 
    0.020193208 = product of:
  0.030289812 = sum of:
    0.009060195 = weight(_text_:in in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009060195 = score(doc=1858,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
    0.021229617 = product of:
      0.042459235 = sum of:
        0.042459235 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042459235 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The verification of the functionality of the Philosophy classification schema adopted at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore needs to take into account the context: the Library is both a special and a multidisciplinary library; its collections reflect the history of the SNS. The philosophy collection has a specialized and selective nature, as do others within the same Library; the Library is open shelves, and classification is used as a shelving and location device. Bearing in mind the above conditions, the second part of this paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of the schema in order to highlight its suitability to match a coherent classification of documents with the effective fruition by the users.
    Date
    9. 1.2010 14:22:20
  12. Müller-Dreier, A.: Einheitsklassifikation : die Geschichte einer fortwirkenden Idee (1994) 0.02 
    0.019752802 = product of:
  0.029629203 = sum of:
    0.011937855 = weight(_text_:in in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011937855 = score(doc=2052,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
    0.017691348 = product of:
      0.035382695 = sum of:
        0.035382695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035382695 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Im Mittelpunkt dieser Arbeit steht das Projekt Einheitsklassifikation der Arbeitsstelle für das Bibliothekswesen (AfB), das die bibliothekarische Öffentlichkeit während der Zeit von 1969 bis 1977 intensiv beschäftigte. Dieser erfolglos beendete Versuch zur Durchsetzung einer einhetlichen klassifikatorischen Sacherschließung für die Bibliotheken in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland steht in der Tradition früher schon gescheiterter Unternehmungen mit ähnlicher Zielsetzung. In anderer Hinsicht wurde mit ihm auch neues, bisher nicht erreichtes Terrain betreten.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungsblatt VdB NW N.F. 45(1995) H.3, S.332-333 (H. Lohse) [Auch wenn H. Lohse meint, das Buch bzw. die zugrundeliegende Assessorarbeit hätte nicht geschrieben werden müssen, so liefert doch gerade seine Rezension den Beweis, wie notwendig diese Arbeit war]; BuB 47(1995) H.10, S.955-959 (I. Nöther) ["Diese von einem Berufsanfänger vorgelegte Arbeit ist eine Spitzenleistung, ein Meisterwerk, auf das der Autor, seine Ausbildungsstätte sowie der Verlag und der Herausgeber der Reihe sotz sein können. Für jeden, der sich heute und in Zukunft mit Fragen der Klassifikation befaßt, ist die Lektüre dieses Buches Pflicht"]; Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 20(1996) H.1, S.134-135 (W. Gödert); Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.178 (B. Lorenz); Journal of documentation 51(1995) no.4, S.434-437 (J.S. Andrews)
  13. Lin, W.; Yueh, H.-P.; Wu, H.-Y.; Fu, L.-C.: Developing a service robot for a children's library : a design-based research approach (2014) 0.02 
    0.018469956 = product of:
  0.027704932 = sum of:
    0.015692718 = weight(_text_:in in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015692718 = score(doc=1198,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
    0.012012213 = product of:
      0.024024425 = sum of:
        0.024024425 = weight(_text_:science in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024024425 = score(doc=1198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Understanding book-locating behavior in libraries is important and leads to more effective services that support patrons throughout the book-locating process. This study adopted a design-based approach to incorporate robotic assistance in investigating the book-locating behaviors of child patrons, and developed a service robot for child patrons in library settings. We describe the iterative cycles and process to develop a robot to assist with locating resources in libraries. Stakeholders, including child patrons and librarians, were consulted about their needs, preferences, and performance in locating library resources with robotic assistance. Their needs were analyzed and incorporated into the design of the library robot to provide comprehensive support. The results of the study suggest that the library robot was effective as a mobile and humanoid service agent for providing motivation and knowledgeable guidance to help child patrons in the initially complicated sequence of locating resources.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.290-301
  14. Bonse, C.; Fischer, N.: So wird die Sucheffizienz gesteigert : Stadtbibliothek Siegburg stellt nach Kundenbefragung den Bestand fast komplett um (2008) 0.02 
    0.016134545 = product of:
  0.024201818 = sum of:
    0.011817873 = weight(_text_:in in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011817873 = score(doc=1827,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.16633868 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
    0.012383943 = product of:
      0.024767887 = sum of:
        0.024767887 = weight(_text_:22 in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024767887 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Die Kunden in Bibliotheken versuchen mehrheitlich, die gewünschten Medien selbstständig zu finden. Ihr Anspruch dabei ist die Sucheffizienz, weshalb gute Orientierungsmöglichkeiten gegeben sein müssen. Doch im Vordergrund des Interesses der Bibliotheken steht meist die Stimulation des Kunden. Er soll auf interessante Medien aufmerksam gemacht werden. Deshalb bieten Bibliotheken als Elemente der Präsentation attraktive Bestandsträger und Dekorationen dar und realisieren als Element der Platzierung die Aufstellung nach Interessengebieten. Eine kundenfreundliche Bestandsplatzierung, die das Kriterium der Sucheffizienz erfüllt, wurde bisher vernachlässigt.
    Content
    "Auch in der Stadtbibliothek Siegburg war man bisher der Meinung, die Kunden wären zufrieden, da sich die Medien durchschnittlich sieben oder acht Mal jährlich umsetzten. Daraus schloss man, dass die Kunden fanden, was sie suchten. Zwei empirische Erhebungen zeigten anderes. Um einen Eindruck über das Platzierungswissen in der Bibliothek zu erhalten, wurden in einer ersten empirischen Analyse von den Kunden die kognitiven Lagepläne der Bibliothek erhoben. Die Probanden bekamen die Lagepläne der Bibliothek vorgelegt, in die die platzierten Bereiche eingetragen werden sollten, sowie einen Fragebogen. Die Bereitschaft der Kunden zur Teilnahme war überragend, die Kunden nahmen sich viel Zeit und nutzten auch die freien Antwortmöglichkeiten. Die Analyse zeigte das überwiegend schlechte Platzierungswissen in der Bibliothek. Selbst Kunden, die bestimmte Bereiche regelmäßig besuchten, mussten sich zum Teil jedes Mal wieder neu orientieren. Als Schwachstellen einschließlich der von den Kunden genannten Kritikpunkte stellten sich der fehlende thematische Zusammenhang in der Platzierung, die Regalanordnung, die ungenügende Beschilderung sowie die Aufstellung der Belletristik in die verschiedenen Interessenkreise heraus. Dass die Platzierung in Teilen nicht den kognitiven Kategorien der Kunden entsprach, zeigte sich zum Beispiel darin, dass die Bereiche Heimatkunde und Geschichte oder Heimatkunde und Geografie von den Kunden auf dem Lageplan im Erdgeschoss zusammen platziert wurden, obwohl der Bereich Heimatkunde zum Zeitpunkt der Untersuchung im Obergeschoss stand.
    . . . Die neue Konzeption, die viele positive räumliche Veränderungen mit sich brachte, ergab sehr schöne Nebeneffekte. Durch den Einsatz zahlreicher Wandregale konnte viel Platz gewonnen werden, sodass auch Kinderwagen bequem durch die Regalreihen zu schieben sind. Die Verlagerung der ausleihbaren Zeitschriften vom Eingangsbereich auf die Empore im Sachbuchbereich ermöglicht der Bibliothek jetzt, diese Empore aufgrund der neuen Platzverhältnisse auch als Bühne für Lesungen und Kabarett zu nutzen. Davor ergab sich ein großer freier Raum, der mit zwei Couchen und Beistelltischen zu einer Art »Wohnzimmer« avanciert ist. Seit der Neuplatzierung gibt es an den Informations- und Ausleihtheken kaum noch Orientierungsfragen. Die klare, übersichtliche und inhaltlich strukturierte Anordnung mit einem Hauptgang, der die Bibliothek erschließt, ermöglicht den Kunden eine eigenständige, gute Orientierung. Die am Hauptgang gelegenen Lagepläne unterstützen diese bei Bedarf. Bei der Aufstellung der Belletristik haben sich inzwischen auch die Anhänger der vielen Interessenkreise umgewöhnt und bevorzugen das eindeutige Ordnungskriterium Alphabet, zumal der Interessenkreis nach wie vor auf den Büchern steht. Viele geben an, neue Autoren und Interessen entdeckt zu haben, was schon im ersten Halbjahr nach der Umstellung zu einer Ausleihsteigerung von 2400 Entleihungen führte. Bei fast allen Bestandsgruppen sind Ausleihsteigerungen zu verzeichnen. Die Übersichtlichkeit hat die Wahrnehmung der Bereiche verbessert, und indem die Kunden die Bibliothek durch den Hauptgang erschließen, besteht ein Mitnahme-Effekt »im Vorbeigehen« bei fast allen Bereichen. Die Neuplatzierung bot Nährboden für viele neue Ideen im Kollegenbereich und Eigeninitiative zu eigenen Umstellungen. So wurden beispielsweise die AV-Medien aus den Sachbuchbereichen ausgegliedert und in einem eigenen AV-Bereich zusammengefasst. Die kundenorientierte Platzierung hat der Bibliothek viel Lob von den Benutzern eingebracht und wurde mit großer Resonanz im Rahmen einer Pressekonferenz Anfang 2007 durch den Bürgermeister der Öffentlichkeit vorgestellt."
    Date
    11. 5.2008 15:11:22
  15. Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998) 0.01 
    0.009435385 = product of:
  0.028306156 = sum of:
    0.028306156 = product of:
      0.056612313 = sum of:
        0.056612313 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056612313 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24
  16. Hyman, R.J.: Shelf classification research : past, present, future? (1980) 0.01 
    0.0093428325 = product of:
  0.028028497 = sum of:
    0.028028497 = product of:
      0.056056995 = sum of:
        0.056056995 = weight(_text_:science in 3498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056056995 = score(doc=3498,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 3498, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3498)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Series
    University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library Science: occasional papers; no.146
  17. Hyman, R.J.: Shelf access in libraries (1982) 0.01 
    0.008542033 = product of:
  0.025626099 = sum of:
    0.025626099 = weight(_text_:in in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025626099 = score(doc=3391,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.36069193 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Schmidt, S.: Anmerkungen ... in Mitteilungsblatt: Verband der Bibliotheken des Landes NW N.F. 37(1987) S.24-35.
    Series
    ALA studies in librarianship; no.9
  18. Dean, B.C.: Reclassification in an automated environment (1984) 0.01 
    0.006406525 = product of:
  0.019219575 = sum of:
    0.019219575 = weight(_text_:in in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019219575 = score(doc=340,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.27051896 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    For a variety of reasons, reclassification was a popular project in libraries in the 1960s. Although such projects have faded from the limelight, some of the reasons for doing them remain valid today, i.e., a need to cut processing costs, participation in cooperative ventures, the inconvenience caused by working with a collection split between two classification systems, and continuing changes in the Dewey schedules. This article compares the steps needed for reclassifying in a manual environment with those required when the library has an in-house computer system. The comparison shows how using the latter makes a reclassification project more feasible than it would be in a totally manual library. The article also discusses various issues associated with reclassification in an automated environment such as the problem posed by a frozen public catalog and the combining of reclassification and conversion projects.
  19. Eaton, G.: Lost in the library : are spatial skills important in shelf searches? (1991) 0.01 
    0.006366856 = product of:
  0.019100567 = sum of:
    0.019100567 = weight(_text_:in in 4863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019100567 = score(doc=4863,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 4863, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4863)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The failure of children (or adults) to find items on the shelf, after locating the item in the catalogue, may be due to spatial confusion. Describes a field study designed to test the possibility that spatial skills are related to subjects' speed and directness in retrieving books from the stacks of an unfamiliar library
    Source
    Journal of youth services in libraries. 5(1991) no.1, S.77-86
  20. Alternative arrangement : new approaches to public library stock (1982) 0.01 
    0.006366856 = product of:
  0.019100567 = sum of:
    0.019100567 = weight(_text_:in in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019100567 = score(doc=1774,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052230705 = queryNorm
        0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ASTIN, J.: Cheshire: Alternative arrangement and beyond; READER, D.: User orientation in a Hertfordshire branch; CHANDLER, D.: Self-service-libraries: providing for the smaller community in Cambridgeshire; BETTS, D.: Reader interest categories in Surrey; DONBROSKI, L.: Categorisation at East Sussex County Library; McCARTHY, A.: Burning issues: stock appeal in Sunderland; MORSON, I. u. M. PERRY: Two-tier and total: stock arrangement in Brent

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 38
  • d 37
  • nl 4
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 66
  • m 9
  • x 4
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications