-
Williams, M.E.; Burgard, D.E.: New database products : social science, humanities, news and general (issue 11) (1998)
0.08
0.08098909 = product of:
0.12148364 = sum of:
0.010677542 = weight(_text_:in in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010677542 = score(doc=4290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
0.1108061 = sum of:
0.04004071 = weight(_text_:science in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04004071 = score(doc=4290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
0.07076539 = weight(_text_:22 in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07076539 = score(doc=4290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Part 11 of a continuing series devoted to new online and CD-ROM databases in the fields of social sciences, humanities, news and general coverage
- Source
- Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.3, S.169-190
-
Williams, M.E.; Novotny, E.: New database products : social science, humanities, news and general (issue 1) (1993)
0.08
0.08098909 = product of:
0.12148364 = sum of:
0.010677542 = weight(_text_:in in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010677542 = score(doc=2682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
0.1108061 = sum of:
0.04004071 = weight(_text_:science in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04004071 = score(doc=2682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
0.07076539 = weight(_text_:22 in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07076539 = score(doc=2682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of a continuing series devoted to new online and CD-ROM databases in the fields of social sciences, humanities, news and general coverage
- Date
- 17. 1.1999 10:44:22
-
Williams, M.E.; Burgard, D.E.: New database products : social science, humanities, news and general (issue 12) (1998)
0.08
0.08098909 = product of:
0.12148364 = sum of:
0.010677542 = weight(_text_:in in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010677542 = score(doc=3563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
0.1108061 = sum of:
0.04004071 = weight(_text_:science in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04004071 = score(doc=3563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
0.07076539 = weight(_text_:22 in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07076539 = score(doc=3563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Part 12 of a continuing series devoted to new online and CD-ROM databases in the fields of social sciences, humanities, news and general coverage. Information about the new databases were obtained from the Gale Directory of Databases
- Source
- Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.5, S.323-336
-
Williams, M.E.; Smith, L.C.: New database products : science, technology and medicine (issue 12) (1998)
0.08
0.07599565 = product of:
0.113993466 = sum of:
0.01208026 = weight(_text_:in in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01208026 = score(doc=3283,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.10191321 = sum of:
0.045300893 = weight(_text_:science in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045300893 = score(doc=3283,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.056612313 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056612313 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Part 12 of a continuing series of articles reporting new online, CD-ROM and other electronic databases in the fields of science, technology and medicine; summarizing and commenting on the new databases. The databases are taken from newly announced databases in the Gale Directory of Databases
- Source
- Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.4, S.263-274
-
Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)
0.07
0.07005739 = product of:
0.10508608 = sum of:
0.013077264 = weight(_text_:in in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013077264 = score(doc=2352,freq=12.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.092008814 = sum of:
0.056626115 = weight(_text_:science in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056626115 = score(doc=2352,freq=16.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.41158113 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.035382695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035382695 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
- Object
- Web of Science
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1711-1726
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Pinho, F.A.; Fox, M.J.: ¬The representation of ethics and knowledge organization in the WoS and LISTA databases (2015)
0.07
0.06734723 = product of:
0.101020835 = sum of:
0.016950073 = weight(_text_:in in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016950073 = score(doc=2358,freq=14.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.084070764 = sum of:
0.04161153 = weight(_text_:science in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04161153 = score(doc=2358,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.30244917 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.042459235 = weight(_text_:22 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042459235 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A naïve user seeking introductory information on a topic may perceive a domain as it is shown by the search results in a database; however, inconsistencies in indexing can misrepresent the full picture of the domain by including irrelevant documents or omitting relevant ones, sometimes inexplicably. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on the domain of ethics in knowledge organization in the World of Science (WoS) and Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA) databases to discern how it is being presented by search results in those databases and to attempt to determine why inconsistencies occurred.
- Content
- Beitrag anlässlich: Proceedings of the 3rd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Knowledge Organization, May 28-29, 2015, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_42_2015_5.
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 16:50:22
- Object
- World of Science
-
Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998)
0.07
0.06715009 = product of:
0.10072514 = sum of:
0.01208026 = weight(_text_:in in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01208026 = score(doc=3687,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
0.08864488 = sum of:
0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032032568 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
0.056612313 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056612313 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a questionnaire survey to assess the attitudes of scholarly users towards electronic journals and examines the current level of use of these publications by university academics in 2 departments in each of 5 faculties of a UK university
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:07:29
- Source
- Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.6, S.419-429
-
Nicholas, D.: LISA Plus on CD-ROM : version 4 (1997)
0.06
0.061537385 = product of:
0.09230608 = sum of:
0.016882677 = weight(_text_:in in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016882677 = score(doc=228,freq=20.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
0.075423405 = sum of:
0.04004071 = weight(_text_:science in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04004071 = score(doc=228,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
0.035382695 = weight(_text_:22 in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035382695 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Presents a brief, critical review of LISA PLaus: the CD-ROM database version of LISA and which includes the database of Current Research in Library and Information Science (CRLIS). The review covers the DOS version only, as it appeared in the Summer 1996 CD-ROM, noting that the Windows version was planned for the future. Points to the way LISA has found its mark, if not its fortune, in LISA Plus and notes its strengths, including: ideal suitability for current awareness in library and information science (LIS); massive and convenient consolidation of the published LIS literature; and massive increase in coverage from 7.900 abstracts in 1993 to over 12.000 currently. Criticizes certain features of LISA Plus, notably: the OPTI-Ware search interface; the combination of 2 databases (LISA and CRLIS) in a single, searchable database; and certain unexpected effects caused by the building of the Subject and Free Text indexes. Points particularly to great lack of consistency in the indexes and the indexing (faults that were fully rectified by a complete overhaul of the data in Summer 1996). Notes that LISA Plus is the first port of call for both information researchers and information science students. The Windows version of LISA Plus was launched in Spring 1997
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.3, A.161-162
-
Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014)
0.06
0.059498634 = product of:
0.08924795 = sum of:
0.012813049 = weight(_text_:in in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012813049 = score(doc=1540,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
0.0764349 = sum of:
0.03397567 = weight(_text_:science in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03397567 = score(doc=1540,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
0.042459235 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042459235 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Hundreds of scholarly studies have investigated various aspects of Wikipedia. Although a number of literature reviews have provided overviews of this vast body of research, none has specifically focused on the readers of Wikipedia and issues concerning its readership. In this systematic literature review, we review 99 studies to synthesize current knowledge regarding the readership of Wikipedia and provide an analysis of research methods employed. The scholarly research has found that Wikipedia is popular not only for lighter topics such as entertainment but also for more serious topics such as health and legal information. Scholars, librarians, and students are common users, and Wikipedia provides a unique opportunity for educating students in digital literacy. We conclude with a summary of key findings, implications for researchers, and implications for the Wikipedia community.
- Date
- 18.11.2014 13:22:03
- Series
- Advances in information science
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.12, S.2381-2403
-
Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020)
0.05
0.054045357 = product of:
0.08106803 = sum of:
0.069130175 = product of:
0.20739052 = sum of:
0.20739052 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20739052 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4428125 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.011937855 = weight(_text_:in in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011937855 = score(doc=5669,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
-
Gaus, W.: Information und Dokumentation in der Medizin (2004)
0.05
0.053141378 = product of:
0.07971206 = sum of:
0.016016312 = weight(_text_:in in 2952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016016312 = score(doc=2952,freq=18.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 2952, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2952)
0.06369575 = sum of:
0.028313057 = weight(_text_:science in 2952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028313057 = score(doc=2952,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2952, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2952)
0.035382695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035382695 = score(doc=2952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2952)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Literaturflut. Medizinische Forschung gibt es nicht nur in Forschungsinstituten mit vielerlei Spezialgebieten wie Vergiftungen, Krebsforschung, Zellbiologie usw., sondern auch in Universitätsklinika, Spezialkliniken und nicht zuletzt in der pharmazeutischen Industrie. Ärzte sind fleißige Schreiber, die auch über Kasuistiken, retrospektive Auswertungen der Krankenakten, prospektive Erhebungen, klinische Studien und natürlich auch über vielerlei Laborforschung, Versuche mit Zellkulturen und über Tierversuche berichten. Hinzu kommt Literatur von Institutionen und Firmen, die Medizingeräte (z.B. Beatmungsgeräte, Narkosegeräte, chirurgisches Instrumentarium, Röntgengeräte usw.) oder Medizinprodukte (z.B. Verbandsmaterial, Prothesen, Nahtmaterial, orthopädische Hilfen) herstellen. Vermutlich ist die Literaturflut in der Medizin größer als in jedem anderen Fachgebiet. Datenbasen und Datenbanken. Die derzeit wichtigsten Datenbasen für die medizinische Literaturdokumentation sind MEDLINE der US National Library of Medicine (siehe Glossar), BIOSIS, hergestellt von BIOSciences Information Service, EMBASE, hergestellt von Elsevier Science B.V. sowie eine ganze Reihe von Datenbasen mit Spezialgebieten wie z.B. TOXLINE. Der wichtigste Anbieter medizinischer Datenbanken in Deutschland ist das Deutsche Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information (DIMDI) in Köln, das 90 Datenbanken mit zusammen über 100 Millionen Dokumenten anbietet. Die Bedeutung der medizinischen Literatur zeigt sich auch am Science Citation Index (SCI). Im SCI sind 2345 medizinische Zeitschriften erfasst. Das sind 39% aller 6073 vom SCI erfassten naturwissenschaftlichen Zeitschriften. Nimmt man den Social-SCI mit 1798 Zeitschriften und den Art and Humanities-CI mit 1133 Zeitschriften noch hinzu, so haben die medizinischen Zeitschriften immer noch einen Anteil von 26%. Hinzu kommt, dass medizinische Zeitschriften meist mehr Hefte pro Jahr und dickere Hefte haben als die Zeitschriften anderer Fachgebiete.
- Date
- 5. 4.2013 10:22:15
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
-
Cho, H.; Chen, M.-H.; Chung, S.: Testing an integrative theoretical model of knowledge-sharing behavior in the context of Wikipedia (2010)
0.05
0.05172006 = product of:
0.07758009 = sum of:
0.011096427 = weight(_text_:in in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011096427 = score(doc=3460,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
0.06648366 = sum of:
0.024024425 = weight(_text_:science in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024024425 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
0.042459235 = weight(_text_:22 in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042459235 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This study explores how and why people participate in collaborative knowledge-building practices in the context of Wikipedia. Based on a survey of 223 Wikipedians, this study examines the relationship between motivations, internal cognitive beliefs, social-relational factors, and knowledge-sharing intentions. Results from structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis reveal that attitudes, knowledge self-efficacy, and a basic norm of generalized reciprocity have significant and direct relationships with knowledge-sharing intentions. Altruism (an intrinsic motivator) is positively related to attitudes toward knowledge sharing, whereas reputation (an extrinsic motivator) is not a significant predictor of attitude. The study also reveals that a social-relational factor, namely, a sense of belonging, is related to knowledge-sharing intentions indirectly through different motivational and social factors such as altruism, subjective norms, knowledge self-efficacy, and generalized reciprocity. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
- Date
- 1. 6.2010 10:13:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.6, S.1198-1212
-
Hill, L.L.; Zheng, Q.: Indirect geospatial referencing through place names in the digital library : Alexandra digital library experience with developing and implementing gazetteers (1999)
0.05
0.049582195 = product of:
0.07437329 = sum of:
0.010677542 = weight(_text_:in in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010677542 = score(doc=6543,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
0.06369575 = sum of:
0.028313057 = weight(_text_:science in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028313057 = score(doc=6543,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
0.035382695 = weight(_text_:22 in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035382695 = score(doc=6543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- All types of information can be referenced to a geographic place. Maps, aerial photographs, and remote sensing images are spatially georeferenced. Other forms of information such as books, articles, research papers, pieces of music, and art are often linked to a geographic location through place names (geographic names). A gazetteer (a dictionary of geographic names) that is spatially referenced itself provides the bridge between these two types of georeferencing. With a georeferenced gazetteer translation service, a user can start with a geographic name and find information that is described with either geographic names or with geospatial coordinates. Use of this powerful indirect geospatially referencing tool can be applied as a common approach to libraries, bibliographic files, data centers, web resources, and museum and specimen collections and can be particular useful across language barriers since latitude and longitude coordinates are universally understood. The Alexandria Digital Library has implemented a gazetteer component for its georeferenced digital library. This experience resulted in the creation of a Gazetteer Content Standard, a Feature Type Thesaurus, and an operational interactive gazetteer service. This paper describes the development of these components and illustrates the use of this tool in a georeferenced digital library. It also relates progress in working with Federal agencies and others toward developing shareable gazetteer data through Digital Gazetteer Information Exchange programs
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 20:22:45
- Series
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
- Source
- Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
-
Bargmann, M.; Katzmayr, M.; Putz, M.: E-LIS: Open-Access-Archiv für Literatur zum Informations- und Bibliothekswesen (2005)
0.04
0.04405373 = product of:
0.06608059 = sum of:
0.010677542 = weight(_text_:in in 3779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010677542 = score(doc=3779,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3779, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3779)
0.05540305 = sum of:
0.020020355 = weight(_text_:science in 3779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020020355 = score(doc=3779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3779)
0.035382695 = weight(_text_:22 in 3779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035382695 = score(doc=3779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3779)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Vorbemerkung: zur aktuellen Problematik im Zeitschriftenwesen Derzeit kann auf einschlägigen Fachveranstaltungen und Expertlnnentagungen oftmals (großteils berechtigte) Kritik am Verlags- und Zeitschriftenwesen vernommen werden. Mitunter werden regelrechte Zeitschriftenkrisen oder gar Informationskrisen ausgerufen, um im Anschluss daran auch gleich passende Auswege aufzuzeigen. Solche Geschütze werden hier nicht aufgefahren, doch soll mit Rückgriff auf Harnad u.a. (2004) kurz ein Schlaglicht auf die existierende Problematik im Zeitschriftenwesen geworfen werden. Einerseits leiden Bibliotheken unter dem so genannten Preisproblem (journal-affordability problem), womit gemeint ist, dass es aufgrund der Preisentwicklung wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriften für Bibliotheken zunehmend schwieriger wird, diese gedruckt oder elektronisch zu erwerben. Verbunden mit knapper werdenden Ressourcen sind hier Engpässe in der Informationsversorgung unvermeidlich. Daraus resultiert eine zweite Facette dieser Problemlage, nämlich dass - aus der Autorlnnensicht - viel an potentiellem Impact aufgrund der Nichtverfügbarkeit der Forschungsliteratur ungenutzt bleibt (article-access/impact problem). Als Impact wird dabei das Ausmaß der Rezeption der Forschungsergebnisse in der Scientific Community definiert. Viel spricht dafür, dass Open Access tatsächlich als möglicher Lösungsweg für diese beiden unterschiedlichen, aber zusammenhängenden Problemlagen gesehen werden kann. In diesem Artikel wird deshalb kurz aufgezeigt, was man unter Open Access versteht; anschließend wird das Volltextarchiv E-LIS: E-Prints in Library and Information Science etwas genauervorgestellt. Wir sind nämlich der Meinung, dass BibliothekarInnen und Informationsexpertinnen Open Access nicht nur bewerben und einfordern, sondern selbst mit gutem Beispiel vorangehen und deshalb möglichst alle ihre bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlichen Schriften entsprechend publizieren sollten.
- Date
- 6.11.2005 12:33:22
-
Schult, T.J.: World Book 1999 (1999)
0.04
0.042989552 = product of:
0.06448433 = sum of:
0.014948557 = weight(_text_:in in 2504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014948557 = score(doc=2504,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2504, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2504)
0.049535774 = product of:
0.09907155 = sum of:
0.09907155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09907155 = score(doc=2504,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2504, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2504)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Rezension der Enzyklopädie als Nachtrag zum Artikel in Heft 2'99
- Date
- 6. 3.1999 12:36:22
-
Oehlen, M.: Unser Wissen im Strudel der Zeit : 20. Auflage des 'Brockhaus' in neuer Rechtschreibung (1997)
0.04
0.042989552 = product of:
0.06448433 = sum of:
0.014948557 = weight(_text_:in in 6103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014948557 = score(doc=6103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 6103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6103)
0.049535774 = product of:
0.09907155 = sum of:
0.09907155 = weight(_text_:22 in 6103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09907155 = score(doc=6103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 18. 1.1997 12:15:22
-
Chi, Y.; He, D.; Jeng, W.: Laypeople's source selection in online health information-seeking process (2020)
0.04
0.040494546 = product of:
0.06074182 = sum of:
0.005338771 = weight(_text_:in in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005338771 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.07514416 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
0.05540305 = sum of:
0.020020355 = weight(_text_:science in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020020355 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
0.035382695 = weight(_text_:22 in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035382695 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 12.11.2020 13:22:09
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.12, S.1484-1499
-
Rowley, J.: Current awareness in an electronic age (1998)
0.04
0.04047749 = product of:
0.06071623 = sum of:
0.010677542 = weight(_text_:in in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010677542 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
0.050038688 = product of:
0.100077376 = sum of:
0.100077376 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.100077376 = score(doc=183,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 17:50:37
- Source
- Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.4, S.277-279
-
CD-ROMs in print (1995)
0.04
0.040386416 = product of:
0.060579624 = sum of:
0.01812039 = weight(_text_:in in 7589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01812039 = score(doc=7589,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 7589, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7589)
0.042459235 = product of:
0.08491847 = sum of:
0.08491847 = weight(_text_:22 in 7589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08491847 = score(doc=7589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Audiovisual librarian 22(1996) no.2, S.130-131 ( R. Williams)
-
Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000)
0.04
0.036935367 = product of:
0.1108061 = sum of:
0.1108061 = sum of:
0.04004071 = weight(_text_:science in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04004071 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
0.07076539 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07076539 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Subject gateways zu den Bereichen: Business economics - The virtual music library - clinical information - food science and food technology - energy technology
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:41:31
