Search (925 results, page 1 of 47)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Mischo, W.H.; Lee, J.: End-user searching in bibliographic databases (1987) 0.07
    0.06896008 = product of:
      0.10344011 = sum of:
        0.014795236 = weight(_text_:in in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014795236 = score(doc=336,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
        0.08864488 = sum of:
          0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032032568 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052230705 = queryNorm
              0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
          0.056612313 = weight(_text_:22 in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056612313 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052230705 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The growing interest in end user or direct patron access to on-line bibliographic databases is reviewed with references to online catalogues, databases, and CD-ROMs. The literature of end user searching is surveyed with notes on: user training, software search aids, end user services in libraries: characterisation of end user searches; the role of librarians; and CD-ROMs as end user media
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.227-263
  2. Lee, Y.-R.: ¬A study on the conditions of using OPAC access points and subject searching by users (1997) 0.07
    0.06715009 = product of:
      0.10072514 = sum of:
        0.01208026 = weight(_text_:in in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01208026 = score(doc=933,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
        0.08864488 = sum of:
          0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032032568 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052230705 = queryNorm
              0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
          0.056612313 = weight(_text_:22 in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056612313 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052230705 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Uses the results of various user studies to offer some insight into user behaviour in connection with OPAC access points and to explore conditions for subject searching, the difficulties involved and the matching of queries to subject headings. Sums up suggestions for the improvement of subject access to OPACs
    Footnote
    In Chinesisch
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.22, S.39-55
  3. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.05
    0.054784253 = product of:
      0.08217638 = sum of:
        0.015692718 = weight(_text_:in in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015692718 = score(doc=1187,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
        0.06648366 = sum of:
          0.024024425 = weight(_text_:science in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024024425 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052230705 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
          0.042459235 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042459235 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052230705 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access to monographs through online public access catalogs (OPACs) has always been a major concern for large research and/or academic libraries. Academic library practice of providing subject access to monographs has proven inadequate, especially in the case of composite works. Many techniques have been proposed to enhance subject treatment of monographs in OPACs. This article briefly reviews these efforts in the past and presents the case of adding Tables of Contents as one of the Most useful and probably also one of the Most costeffective ways of improving subject access to Monographs in an academic environment.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler
  4. Alonso Lifante, M.P.; Molero Madrid, F.J.: Enhancing OPAC records : evaluating and fitting within cataloguing standards a new proposal of description parameters for historical astronomical resources (2015) 0.05
    0.053872727 = product of:
      0.08080909 = sum of:
        0.014325427 = weight(_text_:in in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014325427 = score(doc=2611,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
        0.06648366 = sum of:
          0.024024425 = weight(_text_:science in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024024425 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052230705 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
          0.042459235 = weight(_text_:22 in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042459235 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052230705 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Enhancing content description of specialized resources, particularly astronomical resources, is a matter that is still unresolved in library and information science. In this paper, the authors outline deficiencies in some fields and elements of cataloging standards for description of historical astronomical resources, mainly star atlases and catalogs. Furthermore, they review their recent proposal of astronomical parameters for a better description and propose an approach for accommodating these parameters in the current criteria of MARC 21, the International Standard Bibliographic Description, and Resource Description and Access. Fourteen new parameters are considered, and recommendations are provided to standards developers for the addition of elements to accommodate attributes of celestial cartographic resources. This would improve bibliographic records for such resources in astronomical libraries' OPACs, which will have a beneficial effect on information retrieval.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.4: Onderwerpsontsluiting en on-line catalogi (1990) 0.05
    0.047117487 = product of:
      0.07067623 = sum of:
        0.021140454 = weight(_text_:in in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021140454 = score(doc=211,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
        0.049535774 = product of:
          0.09907155 = sum of:
            0.09907155 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09907155 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Trends in subject indexing: subject indexing and online catalogues
    Source
    Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330
  6. Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation : Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane (2000) 0.04
    0.044846844 = product of:
      0.067270264 = sum of:
        0.014473881 = weight(_text_:in in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014473881 = score(doc=1429,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.20372246 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
        0.052796386 = sum of:
          0.028028497 = weight(_text_:science in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028028497 = score(doc=1429,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052230705 = queryNorm
              0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
          0.024767887 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024767887 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052230705 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Pauline Atherton Cochrane has been contributing to library and information science for fifty years. Think of it-from mid-century to the millennium, from ENIAC (practically) to Internet 11 (almost here). What a time to be in our field! Her work an indexing, subject access, and the user-oriented approach had immediate and sustained impact, and she continues to be one of our most heavily cited authors (see, JASIS, 49[4], 327-55) and most beloved personages. This introduction includes a few words about my own experiences with Pauline as well as a short summary of the contributions that make up this tribute. A review of the curriculum vita provided at the end of this publication Shows that Pauline Cochrane has been involved in a wide variety of work. As Marcia Bates points out in her note (See below), Pauline was (and is) a role model, but I will always think of her as simply the best teacher 1 ever had. In 1997, I entered the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science as a returning mid-life student; my previous doctorate had not led to a full-time job and I was re-tooling. I was not sure what 1 would find in library school, and the introductory course attended by more than 100 students from widely varied backgrounds had not yet convinced me I was in the right place. Then, one day, Pauline gave a guest lecture an the digital library in my introductory class. I still remember it. She put up some notes-a few words clustered an the blackboard with some circles and directional arrows-and then she gave a free, seemingly extemporaneous, but riveting narrative. She set out a vision for ideal information exchange in the digital environment but noted a host of practical concerns, issues, and potential problems that required (demanded!) continued human intervention. The lecture brought that class and the entire semester's work into focus; it created tremendous excitement for the future of librarianship. 1 saw that librarians and libraries would play an active role. I was in the right place.
    Content
    Enthält Beiträge von: FUGMANN, R.: Obstacles to progress in mechanized subject access and the necessity of a paradigm change; TELL, B.: On MARC and natural text searching: a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters; KING, D.W.: Blazing new trails: in celebration of an audacious career; FIDEL, R.: The user-centered approach; SMITH, L.: Subject access in interdisciplinary research; DRABENSTOTT, K.M.: Web search strategies; LAM, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs: table of contents added to bibliographic records; JOHNSON, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 28(2001) no.2, S.97-100 (S. Betrand-Gastaldy); Information processing and management 37(2001) no.5, S.766-767 (H. Borko); JASIST 23(2002) no.1, S.58-60 (A.T.D. Petrou); Library and information science research 23(2001) S.200-202 (D.J. Karpuk)
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
  7. Auer, G.: Online-Kataloge und Zeichensatz (1993) 0.04
    0.042989552 = product of:
      0.06448433 = sum of:
        0.014948557 = weight(_text_:in in 7584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014948557 = score(doc=7584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 7584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7584)
        0.049535774 = product of:
          0.09907155 = sum of:
            0.09907155 = weight(_text_:22 in 7584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09907155 = score(doc=7584,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7584, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. Replik in: Mitteilungen der VÖB 46(1993) H.3/4 S.69 (H. Wagner)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekare. 46(1993) H.2, S.21-22
  8. Wimmer, W.: Mit dem 'Surfbrett' in die Bibliothek : der World-Wide-Web Katalog der Bibliothek der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (1996) 0.04
    0.03684819 = product of:
      0.055272285 = sum of:
        0.012813049 = weight(_text_:in in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012813049 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
        0.042459235 = product of:
          0.08491847 = sum of:
            0.08491847 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08491847 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1996 20:07:57
  9. Hogan, S.A.: Educating users about catalogues and cataloguing : the impossible dream (1993) 0.04
    0.03591783 = product of:
      0.053876743 = sum of:
        0.018494045 = weight(_text_:in in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018494045 = score(doc=6437,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
        0.035382695 = product of:
          0.07076539 = sum of:
            0.07076539 = weight(_text_:22 in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07076539 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogue use studies in manual and online environments over the last 50 years have been succesful in identifying user behaviour and causes of user failure, but they have not led to substantial change in catalogue codes of practices. The online environment offers a myriad of new challenges
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.2, S.23-26
  10. Walker, S.: ¬The Okapi online catalogue research projects (1989) 0.03
    0.033655345 = product of:
      0.05048302 = sum of:
        0.015100324 = weight(_text_:in in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015100324 = score(doc=1942,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
        0.035382695 = product of:
          0.07076539 = sum of:
            0.07076539 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07076539 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    16. 8.1998 11:22:08
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.424-435.
  11. Trenner, L.: How to win friends and influence people : definitions of user-friendliness in interactive computer systems (1987) 0.03
    0.032744423 = product of:
      0.049116634 = sum of:
        0.017084066 = weight(_text_:in in 802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017084066 = score(doc=802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=802)
        0.032032568 = product of:
          0.064065136 = sum of:
            0.064065136 = weight(_text_:science in 802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064065136 = score(doc=802,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 802, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=802)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 13(1987), S.99-107
  12. Poo, D.C.C.; Khoo, C.: Subject searching in online catalog systems (1997) 0.03
    0.032744423 = product of:
      0.049116634 = sum of:
        0.017084066 = weight(_text_:in in 7760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017084066 = score(doc=7760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 7760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7760)
        0.032032568 = product of:
          0.064065136 = sum of:
            0.064065136 = weight(_text_:science in 7760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064065136 = score(doc=7760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 7760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.60, [=Suppl.23]
  13. Goldberg, T.; Neagle, E.: Serials information in the OPAC : a model for shared responsibility (1996) 0.03
    0.031604484 = product of:
      0.047406726 = sum of:
        0.019100567 = weight(_text_:in in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019100567 = score(doc=662,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
        0.028306156 = product of:
          0.056612313 = sum of:
            0.056612313 = weight(_text_:22 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056612313 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Two departments at Louisville University, Kentucky, one in public services and the other in technical services, share responsibility for creating and maintaing serials information in the NOTIS order/pay/receipt (OPR) record. Explains the various notes kept in OPR statements, as well as the benefits of this cooperative effort to usrs and staff
    Source
    Serials review. 22(1996) no.4, S.55-63
  14. Seruga, J.: Object-oriented modeling of a library information system (1997) 0.03
    0.03026015 = product of:
      0.045390222 = sum of:
        0.017084066 = weight(_text_:in in 8477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017084066 = score(doc=8477,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 8477, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8477)
        0.028306156 = product of:
          0.056612313 = sum of:
            0.056612313 = weight(_text_:22 in 8477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056612313 = score(doc=8477,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8477, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8477)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Analyses the OPAC at the Australian Catholic University in New South Wales, Castle Hill Campus using an object oriented model following Rumbaugh's methodology, as described in 'Object oriented modelling and design, 1991'. The process of analysis, although difficult, is one of the most effective ways of determining each function of a system of this kind. The methodology is especially useful as the data structure, behavioural and functional aspects of the system are displayed in separate diagrams. This is an advantage for those analysing systems, who can display many factors without confusing different aspects involved in the analysis process
    Source
    LASIE. 28(1997) no.4, S.22-34
  15. Cherry, J.M.; Clinton, M.: ¬An experimental investigation of two types of instruction for OPAC users (1991) 0.03
    0.029548293 = product of:
      0.08864488 = sum of:
        0.08864488 = sum of:
          0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032032568 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052230705 = queryNorm
              0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
          0.056612313 = weight(_text_:22 in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056612313 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052230705 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.4, S.2-22
  16. Slack, F.: Subject searching in OPACs : a general survey of facilities available on OPACs in academic libraries in the UK (1988) 0.03
    0.029264044 = product of:
      0.043896064 = sum of:
        0.02387571 = weight(_text_:in in 4241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02387571 = score(doc=4241,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.3360549 = fieldWeight in 4241, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4241)
        0.020020355 = product of:
          0.04004071 = sum of:
            0.04004071 = weight(_text_:science in 4241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04004071 = score(doc=4241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die neuere Studie: Crawford, J.C. et al.: A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain in: Journal of librarianship and information science 25(1993) no.2, S.85-93)
  17. Martin, G.: Main entry : the argument for a defence of main entry in the OPAC (1996) 0.03
    0.028734263 = product of:
      0.043101393 = sum of:
        0.014795236 = weight(_text_:in in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014795236 = score(doc=7234,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
        0.028306156 = product of:
          0.056612313 = sum of:
            0.056612313 = weight(_text_:22 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056612313 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that the current understanding of main entry is the chief access point for the work in a physical item being described by a bibliographic record. Explains the justification for main entries while drawing attention to the few related problems as they relate to OPACs
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the Australian Committee on Cataloguing (ACOC) seminar 'Rule revisions: who needs them' held prior to the National Cataloguing Conference in Oct. 95
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.21-25
  18. Ballard, T.; Grimaldi, A.: Improve OPAC searching by reducing tagging errors in MARC records (1997) 0.03
    0.028734263 = product of:
      0.043101393 = sum of:
        0.014795236 = weight(_text_:in in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014795236 = score(doc=695,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
        0.028306156 = product of:
          0.056612313 = sum of:
            0.056612313 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056612313 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    One of the most common errors in cataloguing library materials involves miscoding of the nonfiling indicator of title fields. Notes the extent of the problem and its negative effect on searching in the library's online catalogue and surveys how librarians have approached solutions to the problems. Describes how the major library automation system address this problem
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  19. Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002) 0.03
    0.028717373 = product of:
      0.043076057 = sum of:
        0.01830817 = weight(_text_:in in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01830817 = score(doc=156,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
        0.024767887 = product of:
          0.049535774 = sum of:
            0.049535774 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049535774 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access in the OPAC, as discussed in this article, is predicated on two different kinds of searching: subject (authority, alphabetic, or controlled vocabulary searching) or keyword (uncontrolled, free text, natural language vocabulary). The literature has focused on demonstrating that both approaches are needed, but very few authors address the need to integrate keyword into authority searching. The article discusses this difference and compares, with a query on the term garbage, search results in two online catalogs, one that performs keyword searches through the authority file and one where only bibliographic records are included in keyword searches.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986) 0.03
    0.02865137 = product of:
      0.042977054 = sum of:
        0.014948557 = weight(_text_:in in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014948557 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
        0.028028497 = product of:
          0.056056995 = sum of:
            0.056056995 = weight(_text_:science in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056056995 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986), S.357-367

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 820
  • m 34
  • el 25
  • x 22
  • s 21
  • r 17
  • b 4
  • i 3
  • d 2
  • p 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects