Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tudhope, D."
  1. Tudhope, D.; Blocks, D.; Cunliffe, D.; Binding, C.: Query expansion via conceptual distance in thesaurus indexed collections (2006) 0.03
    0.027893096 = product of:
      0.111572385 = sum of:
        0.111572385 = weight(_text_:assisted in 2215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.111572385 = score(doc=2215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.37317806 = fieldWeight in 2215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2215)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore query expansion via conceptual distance in thesaurus indexed collections Design/methodology/approach - An extract of the National Museum of Science and Industry's collections database, indexed with the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT), was the dataset for the research. The system architecture and algorithms for semantic closeness and the matching function are outlined. Standalone and web interfaces are described and formative qualitative user studies are discussed. One user session is discussed in detail, together with a scenario based on a related public inquiry. Findings are set in context of the literature on thesaurus-based query expansion. This paper discusses the potential of query expansion techniques using the semantic relationships in a faceted thesaurus. Findings - Thesaurus-assisted retrieval systems have potential for multi-concept descriptors, permitting very precise queries and indexing. However, indexer and searcher may differ in terminology judgments and there may not be any exactly matching results. The integration of semantic closeness in the matching function permits ranked results for multi-concept queries in thesaurus-indexed applications. An in-memory representation of the thesaurus semantic network allows a combination of automatic and interactive control of expansion and control of expansion on individual query terms. Originality/value - The application of semantic expansion to browsing may be useful in interface options where thesaurus structure is hidden.
  2. Golub, K.; Soergel, D.; Buchanan, G.; Tudhope, D.; Lykke, M.; Hiom, D.: ¬A framework for evaluating automatic indexing or classification in the context of retrieval (2016) 0.03
    0.027893096 = product of:
      0.111572385 = sum of:
        0.111572385 = weight(_text_:assisted in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.111572385 = score(doc=3311,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.37317806 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Tools for automatic subject assignment help deal with scale and sustainability in creating and enriching metadata, establishing more connections across and between resources and enhancing consistency. Although some software vendors and experimental researchers claim the tools can replace manual subject indexing, hard scientific evidence of their performance in operating information environments is scarce. A major reason for this is that research is usually conducted in laboratory conditions, excluding the complexities of real-life systems and situations. The article reviews and discusses issues with existing evaluation approaches such as problems of aboutness and relevance assessments, implying the need to use more than a single "gold standard" method when evaluating indexing and retrieval, and proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework. The framework is informed by a systematic review of the literature on evaluation approaches: evaluating indexing quality directly through assessment by an evaluator or through comparison with a gold standard, evaluating the quality of computer-assisted indexing directly in the context of an indexing workflow, and evaluating indexing quality indirectly through analyzing retrieval performance.
  3. Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007) 0.01
    0.008994682 = product of:
      0.035978727 = sum of:
        0.035978727 = product of:
          0.071957454 = sum of:
            0.071957454 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071957454 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04425879 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  4. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.01
    0.007495569 = product of:
      0.029982276 = sum of:
        0.029982276 = product of:
          0.059964553 = sum of:
            0.059964553 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059964553 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04425879 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  5. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.00
    0.004497341 = product of:
      0.017989364 = sum of:
        0.017989364 = product of:
          0.035978727 = sum of:
            0.035978727 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035978727 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04425879 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54