Crowley, W.: Spanning the theory-practice divide in library and information science (2005)
0.00
0.0043058805 = product of:
0.017223522 = sum of:
0.017223522 = product of:
0.034447044 = sum of:
0.034447044 = weight(_text_:instruction in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034447044 = score(doc=439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.13114259 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- In the next four chapters, Crowley takes on the particulars involved in the divide by looking at library and information professionals engaged in and transitioning to various research and theory development roles. In "The Academic as Practitioner," he examines how the publishing world influences how academics communicate with practitioners and the difficulties in writing for practitioner-oriented publications. The history of religion in the development of higher education in general, and the research focus of doctoral-degree granting institutions, is offered to explain the dominance of the academic practitioner. The paradoxical edicts of the Ohio legislature, which sought to balance classroom time for professors by law, paint a vivid picture of the results-oriented public and the research-oriented academic institution. In "The Practitioner as Academic: Adjunct Faculty/Lecturers," the question of the perceived lack of "rigor" in practitioner-conducted research is illustrated and illuminated. While Crowley points out the value of "how we did it good" research, as providing material for qualitative analysis, I found myself desiring a bit more methodological instruction. Given where and when such articles are published, how such qualitative analysis could be conducted called the value of this research into question, given the prior treatise on conducting research in an academic environment. "Other Worlds of Practice: The Field Practitioner" and "Other Worlds of Practice: The Consultant" are extremely short expositions which, while addressing alternative professionals' roles, do not significantly further the premise of the work. Nonetheless, Crowley might have been considered remiss if he had excluded these professionals.
