-
Boyack; K.W.; Börner, K.: Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research : visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers (2003)
0.05
0.047336154 = product of:
0.18934461 = sum of:
0.18934461 = weight(_text_:assisted in 1471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18934461 = score(doc=1471,freq=4.0), product of:
0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.6333042 = fieldWeight in 1471, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1471)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article reports research an analyzing and visualizing the impact of governmental funding an the amount and citation counts of research publications. For the first time, grant and publication data appear interlinked in one map. We start with an overview of related work and a discussion of available techniques. A concrete example- grant and publication data from Behavioral and Social Science Research, one of four extramural research programs at the National Institute an Aging (NIA)-is analyzed and visualized using the Vxlnsight® visualization tool. The analysis also illustrates current existing problems related to the quality and existence of data, data analysis, and processing. The article concludes with a list of recommendations an how to improve the quality of grant-publication maps and a discussion of research challenges for indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research.
-
Craven, T.C.: Determining authorship of Web pages (2006)
0.04
0.039050333 = product of:
0.15620133 = sum of:
0.15620133 = weight(_text_:assisted in 1498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15620133 = score(doc=1498,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.52244925 = fieldWeight in 1498, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1498)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Assignability of authors to Web pages using either normal browsing procedures or browsing assisted by simple automatic extraction was investigated. Candidate strings for 1000 pages were extracted automatically from title elements, meta-tags, and address-like and copyright-like passages; 539 of the pages produced at least one candidate: 310 candidates from titles, 66 from meta-tags, 91 from address-like passages, and 259 from copyright-like passages. An assistant attempted to identify personal authors for 943 pages by examining the pages themselves and related pages; this added 90 pages with authors to the pages from which no candidate strings were extracted. Specific problems are noted and some refinements to the extraction methods are suggested.
-
Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004)
0.03
0.034829967 = product of:
0.13931987 = sum of:
0.13931987 = sum of:
0.10334113 = weight(_text_:instruction in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10334113 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.39342776 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.035978727 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035978727 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The reference lists of forty-three education dissertations on curriculum and instruction completed at the University of Minnesota during the calendar years 2000-2002 were analyzed to inform collection development. As one measure of use of the academic library collection, the citation analysis yielded data to guide journal selection, retention, and cancellation decisions. The project aimed to ensure that the most frequently cited journals were retained on subscription. The serial monograph ratio for citation also was evaluated in comparison with other studies and explored in the context of funding ratios. Results of citation studies can provide a basis for liaison conversations with faculty in addition to guiding selection decisions. This research project can serve as a model for similar projects in other libraries that look at literature in education as well as other fields.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.01199291 = product of:
0.04797164 = sum of:
0.04797164 = product of:
0.09594328 = sum of:
0.09594328 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09594328 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Brown, C.: ¬The evolution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers (2001)
0.01
0.010764702 = product of:
0.04305881 = sum of:
0.04305881 = product of:
0.08611762 = sum of:
0.08611762 = weight(_text_:instruction in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08611762 = score(doc=5184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.32785648 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In one of two bibliometric papers in this issue Brown looks at formal publication and citation of Eprints as shown by the policies and practices of 37 top tier physics journals, and by citation trends in ISI's SciSearch database and Journal Citation Reports. Citation analysis was carried out if Eprint cites were indicated by editor response, instruction to authors sections, reports in the literature, or actual examination of citation lists. Total contribution to 12 archives and their citation counts in the journals were compiled. Of the 13 editors surveyed that responded, 8 published papers that had appeared in the archive. Two of these required removal from the archive at publication; two of the 13 did not publish papers that have appeared as Eprints. A review journal that solicits its contributions allowed citation of Eprints. Seven allowed citations to Eprints, but were less than enthusiastic.Nearly 36,000 citations were made to the 12 archives. Citations to the 37 journals and their impact factors remain constant over the period of 1991 to 1998. Eprint citations appear to peak about 3 years after appearance as do citations to published papers. Contribution to the archives, and their use as measured by citation, is clearly growing. Citation form and publishing policy varies from journal to journal.
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.010600335 = product of:
0.04240134 = sum of:
0.04240134 = product of:
0.08480268 = sum of:
0.08480268 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08480268 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.01
0.008994682 = product of:
0.035978727 = sum of:
0.035978727 = product of:
0.071957454 = sum of:
0.071957454 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071957454 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006)
0.01
0.006360201 = product of:
0.025440805 = sum of:
0.025440805 = product of:
0.05088161 = sum of:
0.05088161 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05088161 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:20:22
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.006360201 = product of:
0.025440805 = sum of:
0.025440805 = product of:
0.05088161 = sum of:
0.05088161 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05088161 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.01
0.005996455 = product of:
0.02398582 = sum of:
0.02398582 = product of:
0.04797164 = sum of:
0.04797164 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04797164 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.01
0.005996455 = product of:
0.02398582 = sum of:
0.02398582 = product of:
0.04797164 = sum of:
0.04797164 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04797164 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.01
0.0053001675 = product of:
0.02120067 = sum of:
0.02120067 = product of:
0.04240134 = sum of:
0.04240134 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04240134 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.01
0.005246898 = product of:
0.020987593 = sum of:
0.020987593 = product of:
0.041975185 = sum of:
0.041975185 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041975185 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003)
0.00
0.004497341 = product of:
0.017989364 = sum of:
0.017989364 = product of:
0.035978727 = sum of:
0.035978727 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035978727 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6.11.2005 19:02:22
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.00
0.004497341 = product of:
0.017989364 = sum of:
0.017989364 = product of:
0.035978727 = sum of:
0.035978727 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035978727 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.00
0.004497341 = product of:
0.017989364 = sum of:
0.017989364 = product of:
0.035978727 = sum of:
0.035978727 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035978727 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.00
0.004497341 = product of:
0.017989364 = sum of:
0.017989364 = product of:
0.035978727 = sum of:
0.035978727 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035978727 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.00
0.004497341 = product of:
0.017989364 = sum of:
0.017989364 = product of:
0.035978727 = sum of:
0.035978727 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035978727 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Althouse, B.M.; West, J.D.; Bergstrom, C.T.; Bergstrom, T.: Differences in impact factor across fields and over time (2009)
0.00
0.004497341 = product of:
0.017989364 = sum of:
0.017989364 = product of:
0.035978727 = sum of:
0.035978727 = weight(_text_:22 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035978727 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 23. 2.2009 18:22:28
-
Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009)
0.00
0.004497341 = product of:
0.017989364 = sum of:
0.017989364 = product of:
0.035978727 = sum of:
0.035978727 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035978727 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 17:49:11
