-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.23
0.23431563 = product of:
0.46863127 = sum of:
0.11715782 = product of:
0.35147345 = sum of:
0.35147345 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.35147345 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3752265 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.35147345 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.35147345 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3752265 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.19
0.1874525 = product of:
0.374905 = sum of:
0.09372625 = product of:
0.28117874 = sum of:
0.28117874 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28117874 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3752265 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.28117874 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28117874 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3752265 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Kempf, A.O.; Ritze, D.; Eckert, K.; Zapilko, B.: New ways of mapping knowledge organization systems : using a semiautomatic matchingprocedure for building up vocabulary crosswalks (2013)
0.03
0.033471715 = product of:
0.13388686 = sum of:
0.13388686 = weight(_text_:assisted in 989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13388686 = score(doc=989,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.44781366 = fieldWeight in 989, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=989)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Crosswalks between different vocabularies are an indispensable prerequisite for integrated and high quality search scenarios in distributed data environments. Offered through the web and linked with each other they act as a central link so that users can move back and forth between different data sources available online. In the past, crosswalks between different thesauri have primarily been developed manually. In the long run the intellectual updating of such crosswalks requires huge personnel expenses. Therefore, an integration of automatic matching procedures, as for example Ontology Matching Tools, seems an obvious need. On the basis of computer generated correspondences between the Thesaurus for Economics (STW) and the Thesaurus for the Social Sciences (TheSoz) our contribution will explore cross-border approaches between IT-assisted tools and procedures on the one hand and external quality measurements via domain experts on the other hand. The techniques that emerge enable semi-automatically performed vocabulary crosswalks.
-
Combs, A.; Krippner, S.: Collective consciousness and the social brain (2008)
0.03
0.033471715 = product of:
0.13388686 = sum of:
0.13388686 = weight(_text_:assisted in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13388686 = score(doc=5622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.44781366 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses supportive neurological and social evidence for 'collective consciousness', here understood as a shared sense of being together with others in a single or unified experience. Mirror neurons in the premotor and posterior parietal cortices respond to the intentions as well as the actions of other individuals. There are also mirror neurons in the anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortices which have been implicated in empathy. Many authors have considered the likely role of such mirror systems in the development of uniquely human aspects of sociality including language. Though not without criticism, Menant has made the case that mirror-neuron assisted exchanges aided the original advent of self-consciousness and intersubjectivity. Combining these ideas with social mirror theory it is not difficult to imagine the creation of similar dynamical patterns in the emotional and even cognitive neuronal activity of individuals in human groups, creating a feeling in which the participating members experience a unified sense of consciousness. Such instances pose a kind of 'binding problem' in which participating individuals exhibit a degree of 'entanglement'.
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Panzer, M.: Dewey linked data : Making connections with old friends and new acquaintances (2012)
0.03
0.027893096 = product of:
0.111572385 = sum of:
0.111572385 = weight(_text_:assisted in 305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111572385 = score(doc=305,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.37317806 = fieldWeight in 305, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=305)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the history, uses cases, and future plans associated with availability of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system as linked data. Parts of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system have been available as linked data since 2009. Initial efforts included the DDC Summaries (the top three levels of the DDC) in eleven languages exposed as linked data in dewey.info. In 2010, the content of dewey.info was further extended by the addition of assignable numbers and captions from the Abridged Edition 14 data files in English, Italian, and Vietnamese. During 2012, we will add assignable numbers and captions from the latest full edition database, DDC 23. In addition to the "old friends" of different Dewey language versions, institutions such as the British Library and Deutsche Nationalbibliothek have made use of Dewey linked data in bibliographic records and authority files, and AGROVOC has linked to our data at a general level. We expect to extend our linked data network shortly to "new acquaintances" such as GeoNames, ISO 639-3 language codes, and Mathematics Subject Classification. In particular, we will examine the linking process to GeoNames as an example of cross-domain vocabulary alignment. In addition to linking plans, we report on use cases that facilitate machine-assisted categorization and support discovery in the Semantic Web environment.
-
¬The Computer Science Ontology (CSO) (2018)
0.03
0.027893096 = product of:
0.111572385 = sum of:
0.111572385 = weight(_text_:assisted in 4429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111572385 = score(doc=4429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.37317806 = fieldWeight in 4429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4429)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The Computer Science Ontology (CSO) is a large-scale ontology of research areas that was automatically generated using the Klink-2 algorithm on the Rexplore dataset, which consists of about 16 million publications, mainly in the field of Computer Science. The Klink-2 algorithm combines semantic technologies, machine learning, and knowledge from external sources to automatically generate a fully populated ontology of research areas. Some relationships were also revised manually by experts during the preparation of two ontology-assisted surveys in the field of Semantic Web and Software Architecture. The main root of CSO is Computer Science, however, the ontology includes also a few secondary roots, such as Linguistics, Geometry, Semantics, and so on. CSO presents two main advantages over manually crafted categorisations used in Computer Science (e.g., 2012 ACM Classification, Microsoft Academic Search Classification). First, it can characterise higher-level research areas by means of hundreds of sub-topics and related terms, which enables to map very specific terms to higher-level research areas. Secondly, it can be easily updated by running Klink-2 on a set of new publications. A more comprehensive discussion of the advantages of adopting an automatically generated ontology in the scholarly domain can be found in.
-
McIlwaine, J.: Bibliographical control : self-instruction from individualised investigations (2000)
0.03
0.025835283 = product of:
0.10334113 = sum of:
0.10334113 = product of:
0.20668226 = sum of:
0.20668226 = weight(_text_:instruction in 5410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20668226 = score(doc=5410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.7868555 = fieldWeight in 5410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5410)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
ChatGPT : Optimizing language models for dalogue (2022)
0.02
0.017223522 = product of:
0.06889409 = sum of:
0.06889409 = product of:
0.13778818 = sum of:
0.13778818 = weight(_text_:instruction in 836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13778818 = score(doc=836,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.52457035 = fieldWeight in 836, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=836)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- We've trained a model called ChatGPT which interacts in a conversational way. The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer followup questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests. ChatGPT is a sibling model to InstructGPT, which is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response.
-
Heery, R.; Carpenter, L.; Day, M.: Renardus project developments and the wider digital library context (2001)
0.01
0.013946548 = product of:
0.055786192 = sum of:
0.055786192 = weight(_text_:assisted in 1219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055786192 = score(doc=1219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.18658903 = fieldWeight in 1219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1219)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Funding from the UK Electronic Libraries (eLib) programme and the European Community's Fourth Framework programme assisted the initial emergence of information gateways (e.g., SOSIG, EEVL, OMNI in the UK, and EELS in Sweden). Other gateways have been developed by initiatives co-ordinated by national libraries (such as DutchESS in the Netherlands, and AVEL and EdNA in Australia) and by universities and research funding bodies (e.g., GEM in the US, the Finnish Virtual Library, and the German SSG-FI services). An account of the emergence of subject gateways since the mid-1990s by Dempsey gives an historical perspective -- informed by UK experience in particular -- and also considers the future development of subject gateways in relation to other services. When considering the development and future of gateways, it would be helpful to have a clear definition of the service offered by a so-called 'subject gateway'. Precise definitions of 'information gateways', 'subject gateways' and 'quality controlled subject gateways' have been debated elsewhere. Koch has reviewed definitions and suggested typologies that are useful, not least in showing the differences that exist between broadly similar services. Working definitions that we will use in this article are that a subject gateway provides a search service to high quality Web resources selected from a particular subject area, whereas information gateways have a wider criteria for selection of resources, e.g., a national approach. Inevitably in a rapidly changing international environment different people perceive different emphases in attempts to label services, the significant issue is that users, developers and designers can recognise and benefit from commonalties in approach.
-
Shechtman, N.; Chung, M.; Roschelle, J.: Supporting member collaboration in the Math Tools digital library : a formative user study (2004)
0.01
0.012917642 = product of:
0.051670566 = sum of:
0.051670566 = product of:
0.10334113 = sum of:
0.10334113 = weight(_text_:instruction in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10334113 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.39342776 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In this paper, we discuss a user study done at the formative stage of development of a Math Tools developers' community. The Math Tools digital library, which aims to collect software tools to support K-12 and university mathematics instruction, has two synergistic purposes. One is to support federated search and the other is to create a community of practice in which developers and users can work together. While much research has explored the technical problem of federated search, there has been little investigation into how to grow a creative, working community around a digital library. To this end, we surveyed and interviewed members of the Math Tools community in order to elicit concerns and priorities. These data led to rich descriptions of the teachers, developers, and researchers who comprise this community. Insights from these descriptions were then used to inform the creation of a set of metaphors and design principles that the Math Tools team could use in their continuing design work.
-
Danskin, A.: Linked and open data : RDA and bibliographic control (2012)
0.01
0.012917642 = product of:
0.051670566 = sum of:
0.051670566 = product of:
0.10334113 = sum of:
0.10334113 = weight(_text_:instruction in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10334113 = score(doc=304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.39342776 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- RDA: Resource Description and Access is a new cataloguing standard which will replace the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, which has been widely used in libraries since 1981. RDA, like AACR2, is a content standard providing guidance and instruction on how to identify and record attributes or properties of resources which are significant for discovery. However, RDA is also an implementation of the FRBR and FRAD models. The RDA element set and vocabularies are being published on the Open Metadata Registry as linked open data. RDA provides a rich vocabulary for the description of resources and for expressing relationships between them. This paper describes what RDA offers and considers the challenges and potential of linked open data in the broader framework of bibliographic control.
-
Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22 : an introduction (2003)
0.01
0.011732421 = product of:
0.046929684 = sum of:
0.046929684 = product of:
0.09385937 = sum of:
0.09385937 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09385937 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.
- Object
- DDC-22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.010600335 = product of:
0.04240134 = sum of:
0.04240134 = product of:
0.08480268 = sum of:
0.08480268 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08480268 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999)
0.01
0.010493796 = product of:
0.041975185 = sum of:
0.041975185 = product of:
0.08395037 = sum of:
0.08395037 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08395037 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Ariadne. 1999, no.22
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007)
0.01
0.010493796 = product of:
0.041975185 = sum of:
0.041975185 = product of:
0.08395037 = sum of:
0.08395037 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08395037 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Strobel, S.: ¬The complete Linux kit : fully configured LINUX system kernel (1997)
0.01
0.008994682 = product of:
0.035978727 = sum of:
0.035978727 = product of:
0.071957454 = sum of:
0.071957454 = weight(_text_:22 in 8959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071957454 = score(doc=8959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8959)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 16. 7.2002 20:22:55
-
Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996)
0.01
0.008994682 = product of:
0.035978727 = sum of:
0.035978727 = product of:
0.071957454 = sum of:
0.071957454 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071957454 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10.11.1996 16:36:22
-
Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: EDLproject : one more step towards the European digtial library (2007)
0.01
0.008994682 = product of:
0.035978727 = sum of:
0.035978727 = product of:
0.071957454 = sum of:
0.071957454 = weight(_text_:22 in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071957454 = score(doc=3184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Boleda, G.; Evert, S.: Multiword expressions : a pain in the neck of lexical semantics (2009)
0.01
0.008994682 = product of:
0.035978727 = sum of:
0.035978727 = product of:
0.071957454 = sum of:
0.071957454 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071957454 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 3.2013 14:56:22
-
Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001)
0.01
0.008994682 = product of:
0.035978727 = sum of:
0.035978727 = product of:
0.071957454 = sum of:
0.071957454 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071957454 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 24. 8.2005 19:20:22
