Search (160 results, page 1 of 8)

0.123823255 = product of:
  0.24764651 = sum of:
    0.12622975 = weight(_text_:assisted in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12622975 = score(doc=1782,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04425879 = queryNorm
        0.4222028 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
    0.12141677 = sum of:
      0.09743095 = weight(_text_:instruction in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09743095 = score(doc=1782,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04425879 = queryNorm
          0.37092724 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
      0.02398582 = weight(_text_:22 in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02398582 = score(doc=1782,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04425879 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

22. 3.2008 14:43:03

LCSH

Computer / assisted instruction / Great Britain

Subject

Computer / assisted instruction / Great Britain

0.10934076 = product of:
  0.21868151 = sum of:
    0.15778717 = weight(_text_:assisted in 4006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15778717 = score(doc=4006,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04425879 = queryNorm
        0.5277535 = fieldWeight in 4006, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4006)
    0.060894344 = product of:
      0.12178869 = sum of:
        0.12178869 = weight(_text_:instruction in 4006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12178869 = score(doc=4006,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.46365905 = fieldWeight in 4006, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4006)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

LCSH

Computer / assisted instruction

Subject

Computer / assisted instruction

0.0773156 = product of:
  0.1546312 = sum of:
    0.111572385 = weight(_text_:assisted in 46) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111572385 = score(doc=46,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04425879 = queryNorm
        0.37317806 = fieldWeight in 46, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=46)
    0.04305881 = product of:
      0.08611762 = sum of:
        0.08611762 = weight(_text_:instruction in 46) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08611762 = score(doc=46,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.32785648 = fieldWeight in 46, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=46)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This article seeks to address the following questions: Why do certain people, who are fully information literate with printed materials, become hesitant and even reluctant when it comes to finding something on the Internet? And why do we, information professionals, find it difficult to support them adequately? Mature users of digital information are often skeptical about the value of the Internet as a source for professional information. Over the years much has been achieved, but many prophecies of the experts on digitalization from the early hours still have not yet been fulfilled. Mature users do possess all skills needed to be digital-information literate, but they need to be assisted in specific areas where those skills are insufficient. They tend to blame themselves even if shortcomings in accessibility of digital sources and computer errors obstruct their search. Operating hardware requires a dexterity that can only be acquired by experience. Instruction should be hands-on; demonstration is far less effective. Special attention should be given to reading and interpreting navigation information on the screen and to the search strategies the Internet requires. Use of imagination and trial-and-error methods are to be recommended in this respect.

0.065604456 = product of:
  0.13120891 = sum of:
    0.09467231 = weight(_text_:assisted in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09467231 = score(doc=2391,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04425879 = queryNorm
        0.3166521 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
    0.036536608 = product of:
      0.073073216 = sum of:
        0.073073216 = weight(_text_:instruction in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073073216 = score(doc=2391,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.27819544 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

LCSH

Computer / assisted instruction

Subject

Computer / assisted instruction

0.030926237 = product of:
  0.061852474 = sum of:
    0.04462895 = weight(_text_:assisted in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04462895 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04425879 = queryNorm
        0.14927122 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
    0.017223522 = product of:
      0.034447044 = sum of:
        0.034447044 = weight(_text_:instruction in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034447044 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.13114259 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 55(2004) no.5, S.467-468 (W. Koehler): "Virtual Inequality is an important contribution to the digital divide debate. That debate takes two basic forms. One centers an the divide between the "information rich" developed countries and the "information poor" developing countries. The second is concerned with the rift between information "haves" and "have-nots" within countries. This book addresses the latter domain and is concerned with the digital divide in the United States. This book is the product of a cross-disciplinary collaboration. Mossberger and Tolbert are both members of the Kent State University political science department while Stansbury is an the Library and Information Science faculty. The book is extremely well documented. Perhaps the chapter an the democracy divide and e-government is the best done, reflecting the political science bent of two of the authors. E-government is very well covered. Unfortunately, e-commerce and e-education go virtually unmentioned. If e-government is important to defining the digital divide, then certainly e-commerce and e-education are as well. Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury argue that the digital divide should be described as four different divides: the access divide, the skills divide, the economic opportunity divide, and the democratic divide. Each of these divides is developed in its own chapter. Each chapter draws well an the existing literature. The book is valuable if for no other reason than that it provides an excellent critique of the current state of the understanding of the digital divide in the United States. It is particularly good in its contrast of the approaches taken by the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. Perhaps this is a function of the multidisciplinary strength of the book's authorship, for indeed it shows here. The access divide is defined along "connectivity" lines: who has access to digital technologies. The authors tonfirm the conventional wisdom that age and education are important predictors of in-home access, but they also argue that rate and ethnicity are also factors (pp. 32-33): Asian Americans have greatest access followed by whites, Latinos, and African Americans in that order. Most access the Internet from home or work, followed by friends' computers, libraries, and other access points. The skills divide is defined as technical competence and information literacy (p. 38). Variation was found along technical competence for age, education, affluence, rate, and ethnicity, but not gender (p. 47). The authors conclude that for the most part the skills divide mirrors the access divide (p. 55). While they found no gender difference, they did find a gender preference for skills acquisition: males prefer a more impersonal delivery ("online help and tutorials") while females prefer more personal instruction (p. 56).
The economic opportunity divide is predicated an the hypothesis that there has, indeed, been a major shift in opportunities driven by changes in the information environment. The authors document this paradigm shift well with arguments from the political and economic right and left. This chapter might be described as an "attitudinal" chapter. The authors are concerned here with the perceptions of their respondents of their information skills and skill levels with their economic outlook and opportunities. Technological skills and economic opportunities are correlated, one finds, in the minds of all across all ages, genders, races, ethnicities, and income levels. African Americans in particular are ". . attuned to the use of technology for economic opportunity" (p. 80). The fourth divide is the democratic divide. The Internet may increase political participation, the authors posit, but only among groups predisposed to participate and perhaps among those with the skills necessary to take advantage of the electronic environment (p. 86). Certainly the Web has played an important role in disseminating and distributing political messages and in some cases in political fund raising. But by the analysis here, we must conclude that the message does not reach everyone equally. Thus, the Internet may widen the political participation gap rather than narrow it. The book has one major, perhaps fatal, flaw: its methodology and statistical application. The book draws upon a survey performed for the authors in June and July 2001 by the Kent State University's Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) lab (pp. 7-9). CATI employed a survey protocol provided to the reader as Appendix 2. An examination of the questionnaire reveals that all questions yield either nominal or ordinal responses, including the income variable (pp. 9-10). Nevertheless, Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury performed a series of multiple regression analyses (reported in a series of tables in Appendix 1) utilizing these data. Regression analysis requires interval/ratio data in order to be valid although nominal and ordinal data can be incorporated by building dichotomous dummy variables. Perhaps Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury utilized dummy variables; but 1 do not find that discussed. Moreover, 1 would question a multiple regression made up completely of dichotomous dummy variables. I come away from Virtual Inequality with mixed feelings. It is useful to think of the digital divide as more than one phenomenon. The four divides that Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury offeraccess, skills, economic opportunity, and democratic-are useful as a point of departure and debate. No doubt, other divides will be identified and documented. This book will lead the way. Second, without question, Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury provide us with an extremely well-documented, -written, and -argued work. Third, the authors are to be commended for the multidisciplinarity of their work. Would that we could see more like it. My reservations about their methodological approach, however, hang over this review like a shroud."

0.030447172 = product of:
  0.12178869 = sum of:
    0.12178869 = product of:
      0.24357738 = sum of:
        0.24357738 = weight(_text_:instruction in 3462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24357738 = score(doc=3462,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.9273181 = fieldWeight in 3462, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In this new edition the author updates and expands an her reviews of the literature conceming learning styles, information skills, literacy skills, technological literacy, and bibliographic instruction.

0.02655461 = product of:
  0.05310922 = sum of:
    0.04462895 = weight(_text_:assisted in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04462895 = score(doc=91,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04425879 = queryNorm
        0.14927122 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.008480268 = product of:
      0.016960535 = sum of:
        0.016960535 = weight(_text_:22 in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016960535 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Classification

303.48/33 22 (LoC)

DDC

303.48/33 22 (LoC)

Footnote

The volume is organized into 13 sections, each of which contains between two and eight conference papers. As with most conferences, the papers do not cover the issues in each section with equal weight or depth but the editors have grouped papers into reasonable patterns. Section 1 covers "understanding online behavior" with eight papers on problems such as e-learning attitudes, the neuropsychology of HCI, Japanese blogger motivation, and the dividing line between computer addiction and high engagement. Sections 2 (personality and computer attitudes), 3 (cyber interactions), and 4 (new interaction methods) each contain only two papers on topics such as helmet-mounted displays, online energy audits, and the use of ICT in family life. Sections 6, 7, and 8 focus on gender issues with papers on career development, the computer literacy of Malaysian women, mentoring, gaming, and faculty job satisfaction. Sections 9 and 10 move to a broader examination of cyber society and its diversity concerns with papers on cultural identity, virtual architecture, economic growth's impact on culture, and Iranian development impediments. Section 11's two articles on advertising might well have been merged with those of section 13's ebusiness. Section 12 addressed education with papers on topics such as computer-assisted homework, assessment, and Web-based learning. It would have been useful to introduce each section with a brief definition of the theme, summaries of the major contributions of the authors, and analyses of the gaps that might be addressed in future conferences. Despite the aforementioned concerns, this volume does provide a uniquely rich array of technological analyses embedded in social context. An examination of recent works in related areas finds nothing that is this complex culturally or that has such diversity of disciplines. Cultural Production in a Digital Age (Klinenberg, 2005), Perspectives and Policies on ICT in Society (Berleur & Avgerou, 2005), and Social, Ethical, and Policy Implications of Information Technology (Brennan & Johnson, 2004) address various aspects of the society/Internet intersection but this volume is unique in its coverage of psychology, gender, and culture issues in cyberspace. The lip service often given to global concerns and the value of interdisciplinary analysis of intransigent social problems seldom develop into a genuine willingness to listen to unfamiliar research paradigms. Academic silos and cultural islands need conferences like this one-willing to take on the risk of examining the large questions in an intellectually open space. Editorial and methodological concerns notwithstanding, this volume merits review and, where appropriate, careful consideration across disciplines."

0.025835283 = product of:
  0.10334113 = sum of:
    0.10334113 = product of:
      0.20668226 = sum of:
        0.20668226 = weight(_text_:instruction in 4602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20668226 = score(doc=4602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.7868555 = fieldWeight in 4602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Designed for simple instruction and practice, this workbook helps present and reinforce basic rules for cataloguing in an online environment.

0.024070604 = product of:
  0.096282415 = sum of:
    0.096282415 = product of:
      0.19256483 = sum of:
        0.19256483 = weight(_text_:instruction in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19256483 = score(doc=43,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.73310935 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

More than 5000 publications related to library user instruction and information literacy have been published and reviewed in the past thirty years. New developments in education and technology during the last two decades have affected user instruction and have led to the emergence of information literacy. Based on needs related to the rapid development of information technology and the evolving information society, librarians have begun teaching information skills to all types of users to ensure that they gain information fluency so they can become productive and effective information users both in the education environment and in the work environment. The number of publications related to user instruction and information literacy, like the field itself, show phenomenal growth during the past three decades as demonstrated by the fact that in 1973 twenty-eight publications were reviewed, and in 2002 more than 300 publications dealing with the topic of information literacy will be issued. It is noteworthy that in the last decade there has been a tremendous growth in publications related to information literacy globally. During the 1970s, publications indicate that user instruction activities were of concern primarily to librarians in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. At the present time, publications indicate a major concern with information literacy not only in the countries mentioned above but also in China, Germany, Mexico, Scandinavia, Singapore, South Africa, South America, Spain, and others. On an annual hasis, the majority of the publications have addressed information literacy in academic libraries (60 percent) followed by publications related to information literacy instruction in school media centers (20 percent).

0.022314476 = product of:
  0.0892579 = sum of:
    0.0892579 = weight(_text_:assisted in 1224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0892579 = score(doc=1224,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04425879 = queryNorm
        0.29854244 = fieldWeight in 1224, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1224)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: BACKGROUND: Alva T STONE: The LCSH Century: A Brief History of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and Introduction to the Centennial Essays - THEORY AND PRINCIPLES: Elaine SVENONIUS: LCSH: Semantics, Syntax and Specificity; Heidi Lee HOERMAN u. Kevin A. FURNISS: Turning Practice into Principles: A Comparison of the IFLA: Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) and the Principles Underlying the Library of Congress Subject Headings System; Hope A. OLSON: Difference, Culture and Change:The Untapped Potential of LCSH - ONLINE ENVIRONMENT: Pauline Atherton COCHRANE: Improving LCSH for Use in Online Catalogs Revisited-What Progress Has Been Made? What Issues Still Remain?; Gregory WOOL: Filing and Precoordination: How Subject Headings Are Displayed in Online Catalogs and Why It Matters; Stephen HEARN: Machine-Assisted Validation of LC Subject Headings: Implications for Authority File Structure - SPECIFIC PERSPECTIVES: Thomas MANN: Teaching Library of Congress Subject Headings; Louisa J. KREIDER: LCSH Works! Subject Searching Effectiveness at the Cleveland Public Library and the Growth of Library of Congress Subject Headings Through Cooperation; Harriette HEMMASI u J. Bradford YOUNG: LCSH for Music: Historical and Empirical Perspectives; Joseph MILLER u. Patricia KUHR: LCSH and Periodical Indexing: Adoption vs. Adaptation; David P MILLER: Out from Under: Form/Genre Access in LCSH - WORLD VIEW: Magda HEINER-FREILING: Survey on Subject Heading Languages Used in National Libraries and Bibliographies; Andrew MacEWAN: Crossing Language Barriers in Europe: Linking LCSH to Other Subject Heading Languages; Alvaro QUIJANO-SOLIS u.a.: Automated Authority Files of Spanish-Language Subject Headings - FUTURE PROSPECTS: Lois Mai CHAN u. Theodora HODGES: Entering the Millennium: a new century for LCSH

0.01606487 = product of:
  0.06425948 = sum of:
    0.06425948 = sum of:
      0.04305881 = weight(_text_:instruction in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04305881 = score(doc=207,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04425879 = queryNorm
          0.16392824 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
      0.02120067 = weight(_text_:22 in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02120067 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04425879 = queryNorm
          0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Classification

025.3/071 22

Content

Inhalt: Education and training for cataloguing at the University of Botswana Library : an overview / Rose Tiny Kgosiemang -- The relevance of cataloguing in library science curriculum in Cross River State of Nigeria in this technological age / J.I. Iwe -- The education and training of cataloguing students in South Africa through distance education / Linda M. Cloete -- Education of cataloging and classification in China / Zhanghua Ma -- The status quo and future development of cataloging and classification education in China / Li Si -- Education for knowledge organization : the Indian scene / K.S. Raghavan -- Current status of cataloging and classification education in Japan / Shoichi Taniguchi -- A study on the job training and self-training of the cataloging and classification librarians working in South Korean academic libraries / Chul-Wan Kwak -- Beyond our expectations : a review of an independent learning module in descriptive cataloguing at the Queensland University of for cataloguing and classification in Australia / Ross Harvey, Susan Reynolds -- Education for cataloging and classification in Austria and Germany / Monika Münnich, Heidi Zotter-Straka, Petra Hauke -- Education and training on studies and professional librarianship schools / Anna Sitarska -- Cataloging education on the sunny side of the Alps / Jerry D. Saye, Alenka ^Sauperl -- Education for cataloging in Spanish universities : a descriptive and López-Cózar -- Education and training for cataloguing and classification in the British Isles / J.H. Bowman -- The teaching of information processing in the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina / Elsa E. Barber, Silvia L. Pisano -- Education for cataloging and classification in Mexico / Filiberto Felipe Martínez Arellano -- Education for cataloging and related areas in Peru / Ana María Talavera Ibarra -- Cataloging and classification education in Egypt : stressing the fundamentals while moving toward automated applications / Mohammed Fat'hy Abdel Hady, Ali Kamal Shaker -- An account of cataloging and classification education in Iranian universities / Mortaza Kokabi -- Cataloging instruction in Israel / Snunith Shoham -- Continuing education for catalogers in Saudi Arabia / Zahiruddin Khurshid.

DDC

025.3/071 22

0.014608216 = product of:
  0.058432862 = sum of:
    0.058432862 = sum of:
      0.034447044 = weight(_text_:instruction in 359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034447044 = score(doc=359,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04425879 = queryNorm
          0.13114259 = fieldWeight in 359, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=359)
      0.02398582 = weight(_text_:22 in 359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02398582 = score(doc=359,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04425879 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 359, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=359)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

"The contents of the book cover: This book is intended as an introduction to the Dewey Decimal Classification, edition 22. It is not a substitute for it, and I assume that you have it, all four volumes of it, by you while reading the book. I have deliberately included only a short section an WebDewey. This is partly because WebDewey is likely to change more frequently than the printed version, but also because this book is intended to help you use the scheme regardless of the manifestation in which it appears. If you have a subscription to WebDewey and not the printed volumes you may be able to manage with that, but you may then find my references to volumes and page numbers baffling. All the examples and exercises are real; what is not real is the idea that you can classify something without seeing more than the title. However, there is nothing that I can do about this, and I have therefore tried to choose examples whose titles adequately express their subject-matter. Sometimes when you look at the 'answers' you may feel that you have been cheated, but I hope that this will be seldom. Two people deserve special thanks. My colleague Vanda Broughton has read drafts of the book and made many suggestions. Ross Trotter, chair of the CILIP Dewey Decimal Classification Committee, who knows more about Dewey than anyone in Britain today, has commented extensively an it and as far as possible has saved me from error, as well as suggesting many improvements. What errors remain are due to me alone. Thanks are also owed to OCLC Online Computer Library Center, for permission to reproduce some specimen pages of DDC 22. Excerpts from the Dewey Decimal Classification are taken from the Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 which is Copyright 2003 OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. DDC, Dewey, Dewey Decimal Classification and WebDewey are registered trademarks of OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc."

Footnote

Dewey requires that you classify bilingual dictionaries that go only one way with the language in which the entries are written, which means that an English-French dictionary has to go with English, not French. This is very unhelpful and probably not widely observed in English-speaking libraries ... one may wonder (the Norman conquest not withstanding) why Bowman feels that it is more useful to class the book in the language of the definition rather than that of the entry words - Dewey's requirement to class a dictionary of French words with English definitions with French language dictionaries seems quite reasonable. In the example of Anglo-French relations before the second World War (p. 42) the principle of adding two notations from Table 2 is succinctly illustrated but there is no discussion of why the notation is -41044 rather than -44041. Is it because the title is 'Anglo'-'French', or because -41 precedes -44, or because it is assumed that the book is being catalogued for an English library that wished to keep all Anglo relations together? The bibliography lists five classic works and the School Library Association (UK) website. The index provides additional assistance in locating topics; however it is not clear whether it is intended to be a relative index with terms in direct order or nouns with subdivisions. There are a few Cross-references and some double posting. The instruction ") ( means 'compared with"' (p. 147) seems particularly twee since the three occasions in the index could easily have included the text "compared with;" the saving of space is not worth the potential confusion. There is no entry for "displaced standard subdivisions" one must look under "standard subdivisions" with the subdivision "displaced." There is no entry for "approximating the whole," although "standing room," "class here notes" and "including notes" are listed. Both "rule of zero" and "zero" with the subdivision "rule of" are included. The "rule of zero" is really all you need to know about Dewey (p. 122): Something which can be useful if you are really stuck is to consider the possibilities one digit at a time, and never put 0 if you can put something more specific. Be as specific as possible, but if you can't say something good, say nothing. This slim volume clearly follows this advice."

Object

DDC-22

0.012917642 = product of:
  0.051670566 = sum of:
    0.051670566 = product of:
      0.10334113 = sum of:
        0.10334113 = weight(_text_:instruction in 41) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10334113 = score(doc=41,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.39342776 = fieldWeight in 41, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=41)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Regional accreditation agencies have established mandates for higher education institutions to implement information literacy programs and to assess the resultant learning outcomes. This mandate calls for a shift in the established library instruction paradigm at many institutions. Responsibility shifts from librarians teaching students how to locate materials for particular assignments, to faculty and librarians working together to embed the teaching and learning of information literacy skills systematically into syllabi and curricula. The new paradigm requires librarians and faculty to adapt a broader sense of the role of information literacy skills in higher education and in the preparation for the professional workforce. It also demands the learning of new methods and concepts by both teaching faculty and librarians, as they develop a collaborative approach to the integration of information literacy into general education and disciplinary education.

0.012917642 = product of:
  0.051670566 = sum of:
    0.051670566 = product of:
      0.10334113 = sum of:
        0.10334113 = weight(_text_:instruction in 45) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10334113 = score(doc=45,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.39342776 = fieldWeight in 45, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=45)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Academic librarians have a long and rich tradition of collaborating with discipline-based faculty members to advance the mission and goals of the library. Included in this tradition is the area of information literacy, a foundation skill for academic success and a key component of independent, lifelong learning. With the rise of the general education reform movement on many campuses resurfacing in the last decade, libraries have been able to move beyond course-integrated library instruction into a formal planning role for general education programmatic offerings. This article shows the value of 1. strategic alliances, developed over time, to establish information literacy as a foundation for student learning; 2. strong partnerships within a multicampus higher education system to promote and advance information literacy efforts; and 3. assessment as a key component of outcomes-based information literacy activities.

0.012917642 = product of:
  0.051670566 = sum of:
    0.051670566 = product of:
      0.10334113 = sum of:
        0.10334113 = weight(_text_:instruction in 47) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10334113 = score(doc=47,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.39342776 = fieldWeight in 47, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=47)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

With the development of the information society, education is facing great challenges and opportunities. Information literacy is recognized as a basic competency of individuals that ought to be incorporated into the educational mission. In order to enhance information education, Chinese educators and librarians have been reviewing traditional information instruction, and they are preparing to establish their exclusive information education role in this new century. This paper deals with the new informational and educational environment in China and discusses the increasing needs for information and knowledge in Chinese higher education. Some modes and measurements are proposed to promote information literacy and some experiences and experiments are described. Librarians in China have already done much work related to information literacy, as they prepare to become part of modern education.

0.01199291 = product of:
  0.04797164 = sum of:
    0.04797164 = product of:
      0.09594328 = sum of:
        0.09594328 = weight(_text_:22 in 5848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09594328 = score(doc=5848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

25. 3.2003 15:35:22

0.01199291 = product of:
  0.04797164 = sum of:
    0.04797164 = product of:
      0.09594328 = sum of:
        0.09594328 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09594328 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

27.11.2005 18:04:22

0.011157238 = product of:
  0.04462895 = sum of:
    0.04462895 = weight(_text_:assisted in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04462895 = score(doc=2312,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04425879 = queryNorm
        0.14927122 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

The section of background papers starts most appropriately by reprinting the Statement of Principles from the 1961 Paris Conference and continues with another twelve papers of varying lengths, most written specifically for the IME ICC. For the published report the papers have been organized to follow the order of topics assigned to the Tive working groups: Working Group 1 Personal names; WG2 Corporate bodies; WG3 Seriality; WG4 Multivolume/multipart structures; and WG5 Uniform titles, GMDs. Pino Buizza and Mauro Guerrini co-author a substantial paper "Author and title access point control: On the way national bibliographic agencies face the issue forty years after the Paris Principles," which was first presented in Italian at the November 2002 workshop an Cataloguing and Authority Control in Rome. Issues that remain unresolved are which name or title to adopt, which form of the name or title, and which entry word to select, while choice of headings has become more uniform. The impact of catalogue language (meaning both the language of the cataloguing agency and of the majority of users of the catalogue) an these choices is explored by examining the headings used in ten national authority files for a full range of names, personal and corporate. The reflections presented are both practical and grounded in theory. Mauro Guerrini, assisted by Pino Buizza and Lucia Sardo, contributes a further new paper "Corporate bodies from ICCP up to 2003," which is an excellent survey of the surprisingly controversial issue of corporate bodies as authors, starting with Panizzi, Jewett, Cutter, Dziatzko, Fumagalli, and Lubetzky, through the debate at the Paris Conference, to the views of Verona, Domanovszky and Carpenter, and work under the auspices of IFLA an the Form and structure of corporate headings (FSCH) project and its Rvew, as well as a look at the archival standard ISAAR(CPF). This paper is the only one to have a comprehensive bibliography.

0.010493796 = product of:
  0.041975185 = sum of:
    0.041975185 = product of:
      0.08395037 = sum of:
        0.08395037 = weight(_text_:22 in 644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08395037 = score(doc=644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

19. 7.2002 22:05:14

0.010493796 = product of:
  0.041975185 = sum of:
    0.041975185 = product of:
      0.08395037 = sum of:
        0.08395037 = weight(_text_:22 in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08395037 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

25. 3.2003 13:22:23