Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005) 0.01
    0.012312385 = product of:
      0.043093346 = sum of:
        0.033838835 = weight(_text_:great in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033838835 = score(doc=2392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03863967 = queryNorm
            0.15552977 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
        0.0092545105 = product of:
          0.018509021 = sum of:
            0.018509021 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018509021 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03863967 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Classification
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    DDC
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    Footnote
    Part III, "Privacy and Information Control," has four articles and three discussion cases beginning with an 1890 article from the Harvard Law Review, "The Right to Privacy," written by Samuel A Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. Moore then includes an article debating whether people own their genes, an article on caller I.D., and an article on computer surveillance. While all four articles pose some very interesting questions, Margaret Everett's article "The Social Life of Genes: Privacy, Property, and the New Genetics" is incredible. She does a great job of demonstrating how advances in genetics have led to increased concerns over ownership and privacy of genetic codes. For instance, if someone's genetic code predisposes them to a deadly disease, should insurance companies have access to that information? Part IV, "Freedom of Speech and Information Control," has three articles and two discussion cases that examine speech and photography issues. Moore begins this section with Kent Greenawalt's "Rationales for Freedom of Speech," which looks at a number of arguments favoring free speech. Then the notion of free speech is carried over into the digital world in "Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society" by Jack M. Balkin. At 59 pages, this is the work's longest article and demonstrates how complex the digital environment has made freedom of speech issues. Finally, Part V, "Governmental and Societal Control of Information," contains three articles and three discussion cases which provide an excellent view into the conflict between security and privacy. For instance, the first article, "Carnivore, the FBI's E-mail Surveillance System: Devouring Criminals, Not Privacy" by Griffin S. Durham, examines the FBI's e-mail surveillance program called Carnivore. Durham does an excellent job of demonstrating that Carnivore is a necessary and legitimate system used in limited circumstances and with a court order. Librarians will find the final article in the book, National Security at What Price? A Look into Civil Liberty Concerns in the Information Age under the USA Patriot Act by Jacob R. Lilly, of particular interest. In this article, Lilly uses historical examples of events that sacrificed civil liberties for national security such as the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II and the McCarthyism of the Cold War era to examine the PATRIOT Act.
  2. Dane, F.C.: ¬The importance of the sources of professional obligations (2014) 0.01
    0.009668238 = product of:
      0.06767767 = sum of:
        0.06767767 = weight(_text_:great in 3367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06767767 = score(doc=3367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03863967 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 3367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3367)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The study of philosophy provides many general benefits to members of any field or discipline, the easiest of which to defend are an appreciation of, and experience with, critical thinking, including the ability to apply principles thoughtfully and logically in a variety of contexts; it is the discipline that, according to Plato, Socrates believed made life worth living. Today, however, most disciplines can lay claim to critical thinking - information science certainly involves a great deal of logical analysis - but only philosophy, in the Western world, can lay claim to having developed logic and critical thinking and thereby may have furthered the process more than any other discipline. Historically, philosophy is also the discipline in which one learns how to think about the most complex and important questions including questions about what is right and proper; that is, philosophy arguably lays claim to the development of ethics. Before going further, I should note that I am neither a philosopher nor an information scientist. I am a social psychologist and statistician whose interests have brought me into the realm of practical ethics primarily through ethical issues relevant to empirical research. I should also note that I am firmly in the camp of those who consider there to be an important distinction between morals and ethics; as do others, I argue that moral judgements essentially involve questions about whether or not rules, defined broadly, are followed, whereas ethical judgements essentially involve questions about whether or not a particular rule is worthwhile and, when there are incompatible rules, which rule should be granted higher priority.
  3. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.00
    0.0029915096 = product of:
      0.020940566 = sum of:
        0.020940566 = product of:
          0.041881133 = sum of:
            0.041881133 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041881133 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03863967 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
  4. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.00
    0.0029915096 = product of:
      0.020940566 = sum of:
        0.020940566 = product of:
          0.041881133 = sum of:
            0.041881133 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041881133 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03863967 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  5. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.00
    0.0029915096 = product of:
      0.020940566 = sum of:
        0.020940566 = product of:
          0.041881133 = sum of:
            0.041881133 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041881133 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03863967 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
  6. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.00
    0.0029915096 = product of:
      0.020940566 = sum of:
        0.020940566 = product of:
          0.041881133 = sum of:
            0.041881133 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041881133 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03863967 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
  7. Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019) 0.00
    0.0029915096 = product of:
      0.020940566 = sum of:
        0.020940566 = product of:
          0.041881133 = sum of:
            0.041881133 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041881133 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03863967 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    25.12.2019 14:19:22
  8. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.00
    0.0026175708 = product of:
      0.018322995 = sum of:
        0.018322995 = product of:
          0.03664599 = sum of:
            0.03664599 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03664599 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03863967 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  9. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.00
    0.0026175708 = product of:
      0.018322995 = sum of:
        0.018322995 = product of:
          0.03664599 = sum of:
            0.03664599 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03664599 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03863967 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
  10. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.00
    0.0018696935 = product of:
      0.013087854 = sum of:
        0.013087854 = product of:
          0.026175708 = sum of:
            0.026175708 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026175708 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03863967 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
  11. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.00
    0.0018696935 = product of:
      0.013087854 = sum of:
        0.013087854 = product of:
          0.026175708 = sum of:
            0.026175708 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026175708 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03863967 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  12. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.00
    0.0013087854 = product of:
      0.0091614975 = sum of:
        0.0091614975 = product of:
          0.018322995 = sum of:
            0.018322995 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018322995 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03863967 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
  13. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.00
    0.001121816 = product of:
      0.007852712 = sum of:
        0.007852712 = product of:
          0.015705423 = sum of:
            0.015705423 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015705423 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03863967 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.