-
Read, S.: ¬The new guide to working from home (1995)
0.14
0.1423423 = product of:
0.49819803 = sum of:
0.2652412 = weight(_text_:great in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2652412 = score(doc=780,freq=12.0), product of:
0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
1.2190994 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.23295681 = product of:
0.46591362 = sum of:
0.46591362 = weight(_text_:britain in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.46591362 = score(doc=780,freq=12.0), product of:
0.28835937 = queryWeight, product of:
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
1.6157395 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- LCSH
- Home / based businesses / Great Britain
Small business / Great Britain
New business enterprises / Great Britain
- Subject
- Home / based businesses / Great Britain
Small business / Great Britain
New business enterprises / Great Britain
-
Moys, E.M.: Computer-assisted indexing of looseleaf supplements (1995)
0.05
0.0472301 = product of:
0.33061066 = sum of:
0.33061066 = weight(_text_:assisted in 2966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.33061066 = score(doc=2966,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26102042 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
1.2666084 = fieldWeight in 2966, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2966)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Summarizes publishing practice and suggests a computer-assisted method of compiling supplementary indexes and dealing with with-drawels
-
Indexing: providing access to information : looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, Alexandria, VA, May 1993 (1993)
0.02
0.02410201 = product of:
0.16871406 = sum of:
0.16871406 = weight(_text_:assisted in 8077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16871406 = score(doc=8077,freq=6.0), product of:
0.26102042 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.64636344 = fieldWeight in 8077, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8077)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: ZAFRAN, E.L. u. C. MacKAY: Keeping up with the times (& the deadlines): indexing at BNA (Bureau of National Affairs); PRESCHEL, B.M.: Delivering database information to the user: technology, media, content; MULHOLLAND, S.: Indexing and the challenge of change at PsycINFO; LOCKE, C.: Weaving the social fabric; WEINBERG, B.H.: Computer-assisted database indexing; HODGE, G.M.: Computer-assisted database indexing: the state of the art; HUMPHREY, S.M.: The MedIndEx prototype for computer-assisted MEDLINE database indexing; KOLL, M.B.: Automatic relevance ranking: a searcher's complement to indexing; ANDERSON, J.D.: Indexing standards: are they possible? What good are they? Why bother?; SHUTER, J.: Standards for indexes: where do the come from and what use are they?; COUSINS, G.: Professional indexing in Australia: first steps towards accreditation; McFADDEN, T.G.: I wonder who's indexing the Internet now?; WALLIS, E.: Indexing training and accreditation in UK; BELL, H.K.: Vive la difference! The survival of the softest; LIDDY, E.D. u. C.L. JÖRGENSEN: Reality check: book index characteristics that ficilitate information sccess; KLEINBERG, I.: Making the case for professional indexers: where is the proof?
-
Hedden, H.: Creating an index for your Web site to make info easier to see (2006)
0.02
0.015469182 = product of:
0.10828427 = sum of:
0.10828427 = weight(_text_:great in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10828427 = score(doc=2189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.49769527 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Most libraries have long had their own Web sites. The longer a library has had a Web site the more likely it is that the number of pages, and the amount of information within those pages, has grown beyond what users can find simply with the navigation menu. Building a site index is a great way to help seekers find all those bits of data they might otherwise miss.
-
Manley, S.; Harwood, N.: Bringing it home : learning to index books by correspondence (1997)
0.02
0.015036816 = product of:
0.105257705 = sum of:
0.105257705 = weight(_text_:instruction in 3638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.105257705 = score(doc=3638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2293201 = queryWeight, product of:
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.45899904 = fieldWeight in 3638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3638)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Graduate School Correspondence Study Program offers 2 indexing courses: Basic indexing and Applied indexing. Basic indexing covers indexing techniques in the style used by the University of Chicago Press. The Applied indexing course is a short-form simulation of ehr experiences of a frelance indexer. Over 2.600 students have enrolled on these courses since their inception in the mid-1980s. Gives details of the contents of the courses, discusses the challenges for students and teachers and emphasizes the strength of individualized instruction provided by a correspondence course
-
Frame, A.: Indexers and publishers : their views on indexers and indexing (1996)
0.01
0.012888699 = product of:
0.09022089 = sum of:
0.09022089 = weight(_text_:instruction in 3737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09022089 = score(doc=3737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2293201 = queryWeight, product of:
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.39342776 = fieldWeight in 3737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3737)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Second of 2 articles reporting the results of a 1995 questionnaire survey of UK indexers and editors, focusing on work practices, relations between editors and indexers, editors' and editors' expectations, and the value placed on various characteristics of indexers and indexing. Data from 146 indexers and 123 editors was analysed on the following topics: complexity of the index and satisfaction with the index produced; instruction given to indexers; problems with the index; editors' judgement of the acceptability of the index; why the index was remembered; and whether editors would use the indexers again. While a high level of satisfaction with the indexes produced on the part of both editors and indexers was reported, results would seem to indicate that sending written instructions to indexers before the proofs are sent gives the lowest percentage of problems with the finished index. Suggests taht editors should consistently tell indexers of any problems to enable indexers to correct what goes wrong
-
Connolly, D.A.: ¬The many uses of Email discussion lists (2000)
0.01
0.011601887 = product of:
0.081213206 = sum of:
0.081213206 = weight(_text_:great in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081213206 = score(doc=216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- If you want to let other indexers know about a great new medical dictionary, discuss the pros and cons of using prepositions in subentries, find an indexer in Phoenix, or maybe share some marketing tips, then consider joining an email discussion list. Email discussion lists provide numerous tools and opportunities for indexers, especially for freelancers. Despite the rapid growth of Web- and graphical-based communication, email remains the linchpin of electronic communication. While the World Wide Web has become ubiquitous in our society, email remains the most reliable form of electronic communication. Email access is more prevalent than Web access, less cumbersome, and some would say, more egalitarian. Despite improvements over time, Web access is not available in equal quality or proportion to email access, especially in poorer or developing areas. Indeed, many users who have access to both restrict their use of the Web for important research efforts, and maintain nearconstant connection with their email servers for daily business
-
Software for Indexing (2003)
0.01
0.0068364777 = product of:
0.04785534 = sum of:
0.04785534 = weight(_text_:great in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04785534 = score(doc=2294,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.21995232 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.2, S.115-116 (C. Jacobs): "This collection of articles by indexing practitioners, software designers and vendors is divided into five sections: Dedicated Software, Embedded Software, Online and Web Indexing Software, Database and Image Software, and Voice-activated, Automatic, and Machine-aided Software. This diversity is its strength. Part 1 is introduced by two chapters an choosing dedicated software, highlighting the issues involved and providing tips an evaluating requirements. The second chapter includes a fourteen page chart that analyzes the attributes of Authex Plus, three versions of CINDEX 1.5, MACREX 7, two versions of SKY Index (5.1 and 6.0) and wINDEX. The lasting value in this chart is its utility in making the prospective user aware of the various attributes/capabilities that are possible and that should be considered. The following chapters consist of 16 testimonials for these software packages, completed by a final chapter an specialized/customized software. The point is made that if a particular software function could increase your efficiency, it can probably be created. The chapters in Part 2, Embedded Software, go into a great deal more detail about how the programs work, and are less reviews than illustrations of functionality. Perhaps this is because they are not really stand-alones, but are functions within, or add-ons used with larger word processing or publishing programs. The software considered are Microsoft Word, FrameMaker, PageMaker, IndexTension 3.1.5 that is used with QuarkXPress, and Index Tools Professional and IXgen that are used with FrameMaker. The advantages and disadvantages of embedded indexing are made very clear, but the actual illustrations are difficult to follow if one has not worked at all with embedded software. Nonetheless, the section is valuable as it highlights issues and provides pointers an solutions to embedded indexing problems.
A chapter an image indexing starts with a useful discussion of the elements of bibliographic description needed for visual materials and of the variations in the functioning and naming of functions in different software packaltes. Sample features are discussed in light of four different software systems: MAVIS, Convera Screening Room, CONTENTdm, and Virage speech and pattern recognition programs. The chapter concludes with an overview of what one has to consider when choosing a system. The last chapter in this section is an oddball one an creating a back-ofthe-book index using Microsoft Excel. The author warns: "It is not pretty, and it is not recommended" (p.209). A curiosity, but it should have been included as a counterpoint in the first part, not as part of the database indexing section. The final section begins with an excellent article an voice recognition software (Dragon Naturally Speaking Preferred), followed by a look at "automatic indexing" through a critique of Sonar Bookends Automatic Indexing Generator. The final two chapters deal with Data Harmony's Machine Aided Indexer; one of them refers specifically to a news content indexing system. In terms of scope, this reviewer would have liked to see thesaurus management software included since thesaurus management and the integration of thesauri with database indexing software are common and time-consuming concerns. There are also a few editorial glitches, such as the placement of the oddball article and inconsistent uses of fonts and caps (eg: VIRAGE and Virage), but achieving consistency with this many authors is, indeed, a difficult task. More serious is the fact that the index is inconsistent. It reads as if authors submitted their own keywords which were then harmonized, so that the level of indexing varies by chapter. For example, there is an entry for "controlled vocabulary" (p.265) (singular) with one locator, no cross-references. There is an entry for "thesaurus software" (p.274) with two locators, plus a separate one for "Thesaurus Master" (p.274) with three locators. There are also references to thesauri/ controlled vocabularies/taxonomies that are not mentioned in the index (e.g., the section Thesaurus management an p.204). This is sad. All too often indexing texts have poor indexes, I suppose because we are as prone to having to work under time pressures as the rest of the authors and editors in the world. But a good index that meets basic criteria should be a highlight in any book related to indexing. Overall this is a useful, if uneven, collection of articles written over the past few years. Because of the great variation between articles both in subject and in approach, there is something for everyone. The collection will be interesting to anyone who wants to be aware of how indexing software works and what it can do. I also definitely recommend it for information science teaching collections since the explanations of the software carry implicit in them descriptions of how the indexing process itself is approached. However, the book's utility as a guide to purchasing choices is limited because of the unevenness; the vendor-written articles and testimonials are interesting and can certainly be helpful, but there are not nearly enough objective reviews. This is not a straight listing and comparison of software packaltes, but it deserves wide circulation since it presents an overall picture of the state of indexing software used by freelancers."
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.01
0.0059830192 = product of:
0.041881133 = sum of:
0.041881133 = product of:
0.083762266 = sum of:
0.083762266 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083762266 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.01
0.0059830192 = product of:
0.041881133 = sum of:
0.041881133 = product of:
0.083762266 = sum of:
0.083762266 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083762266 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.01
0.0059830192 = product of:
0.041881133 = sum of:
0.041881133 = product of:
0.083762266 = sum of:
0.083762266 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083762266 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.01
0.0059830192 = product of:
0.041881133 = sum of:
0.041881133 = product of:
0.083762266 = sum of:
0.083762266 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083762266 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.01
0.0052351416 = product of:
0.03664599 = sum of:
0.03664599 = product of:
0.07329198 = sum of:
0.07329198 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07329198 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.01
0.0052351416 = product of:
0.03664599 = sum of:
0.03664599 = product of:
0.07329198 = sum of:
0.07329198 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07329198 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.01
0.0052351416 = product of:
0.03664599 = sum of:
0.03664599 = product of:
0.07329198 = sum of:
0.07329198 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07329198 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.01
0.0052351416 = product of:
0.03664599 = sum of:
0.03664599 = product of:
0.07329198 = sum of:
0.07329198 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07329198 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.01
0.0052351416 = product of:
0.03664599 = sum of:
0.03664599 = product of:
0.07329198 = sum of:
0.07329198 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07329198 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.01
0.0052351416 = product of:
0.03664599 = sum of:
0.03664599 = product of:
0.07329198 = sum of:
0.07329198 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07329198 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.01
0.0052351416 = product of:
0.03664599 = sum of:
0.03664599 = product of:
0.07329198 = sum of:
0.07329198 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07329198 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.01
0.0052351416 = product of:
0.03664599 = sum of:
0.03664599 = product of:
0.07329198 = sum of:
0.07329198 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07329198 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03863967 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
