Search (3808 results, page 1 of 191)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Armour, J.; Cisler, S.: Community networks on the Internet (1994) 0.13
    0.12921673 = product of:
      0.25843346 = sum of:
        0.25843346 = sum of:
          0.20284177 = weight(_text_:networks in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20284177 = score(doc=678,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.8361396 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
          0.055591684 = weight(_text_:22 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055591684 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Community networks have existed since the 1970s when Community Memory in Berkeley, Californis, installed terminals in public places for people to read and post material of all sorts on a centralised time sharing system. Community Memory was the first known community access network. Several foundations and government agencies have funded community networks, known as freenets. Discusses the freenet movement; library involvement; the Apple Library of Tomorrow and the Morino Foundation conference on community networks and how to keep in touch with community network developments
    Source
    Library journal. 119(1994) no.11, S.22-24
  2. Chakrabati, S.; Van den Berg, M.; Dom, B.: Focused crawling : a new approach in topic-specific Web resource discovery (1999) 0.12
    0.11775942 = product of:
      0.23551884 = sum of:
        0.23551884 = sum of:
          0.15213132 = weight(_text_:networks in 6285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15213132 = score(doc=6285,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.6271047 = fieldWeight in 6285, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6285)
          0.083387524 = weight(_text_:22 in 6285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.083387524 = score(doc=6285,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6285, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6285)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2001 13:04:22
    Source
    Computer networks. 31(1999) no.11-16, S.1623-1640
  3. Mason, J.: Communities, networks, and education (1998) 0.12
    0.11562891 = product of:
      0.23125783 = sum of:
        0.23125783 = sum of:
          0.17566614 = weight(_text_:networks in 3523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17566614 = score(doc=3523,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.7241182 = fieldWeight in 3523, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3523)
          0.055591684 = weight(_text_:22 in 3523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055591684 = score(doc=3523,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3523, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates evolving notions and expressions of community and networks, in the context of educational culture which is engaged in the process of discovering the opportunities and challenges presented by communications and information technologies. Parallel to this is the task of identifying key elements or threads that might be common to a wide diversity of educational electronic communities
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Source
    Computer networks and ISDN systems. 30(1998) nos.1/7, S.583-586
  4. Kumar, S.: Co-authorship networks : a review of the literature (2015) 0.11
    0.114007905 = product of:
      0.22801581 = sum of:
        0.22801581 = sum of:
          0.18632205 = weight(_text_:networks in 2586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18632205 = score(doc=2586,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.7680432 = fieldWeight in 2586, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2586)
          0.041693762 = weight(_text_:22 in 2586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041693762 = score(doc=2586,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2586, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2586)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to attempt to provide a review of the growing literature on co-authorship networks and the research gaps that may be investigated for future studies in this field. Design/methodology/approach - The existing literature on co-authorship networks was identified, evaluated and interpreted. Narrative review style was followed. Findings - Co-authorship, a proxy of research collaboration, is a key mechanism that links different sets of talent to produce a research output. Co-authorship could also be seen from the perspective of social networks. An in-depth analysis of such knowledge networks provides an opportunity to investigate its structure. Patterns of these relationships could reveal, for example, the mechanism that shapes our scientific community. The study provides a review of the expanding literature on co-authorship networks. Originality/value - This is one of the first comprehensive reviews of network-based studies on co-authorship. The field is fast evolving, opening new gaps for potential research. The study identifies some of these gaps.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  5. Bertot, J.C.; McClure, C.R.: Developing assessment techniques for statewide electronic networks (1996) 0.11
    0.11306464 = product of:
      0.22612928 = sum of:
        0.22612928 = sum of:
          0.17748655 = weight(_text_:networks in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17748655 = score(doc=2173,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.73162216 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
          0.048642725 = weight(_text_:22 in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048642725 = score(doc=2173,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a study assessing statewide electronic network initiatives using the Maryland Sailor network as a case study. Aims to develop assessment techniques and indicators for the evaluation of statewide electronic networks. Defines key components of the statewide networked environment. Develops and operationalizes performance measures for networked information technologies and services provided through statewide networks. Explores several methods of evaluating statewide electronic networks. Identifies and discusses key issues and preliminary findings that affect the successful evaluation of statewide networked services
    Date
    7.11.1998 20:27:22
  6. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10
    0.10230751 = sum of:
      0.08146063 = product of:
        0.24438189 = sum of:
          0.24438189 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24438189 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43482926 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.020846881 = product of:
        0.041693762 = sum of:
          0.041693762 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041693762 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  7. Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011) 0.10
    0.10117529 = product of:
      0.20235059 = sum of:
        0.20235059 = sum of:
          0.15370786 = weight(_text_:networks in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15370786 = score(doc=4188,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.6336034 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
          0.048642725 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048642725 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article aims to identify whether different weighted PageRank algorithms can be applied to author citation networks to measure the popularity and prestige of a scholar from a citation perspective. Information retrieval (IR) was selected as a test field and data from 1956-2008 were collected from Web of Science. Weighted PageRank with citation and publication as weighted vectors were calculated on author citation networks. The results indicate that both popularity rank and prestige rank were highly correlated with the weighted PageRank. Principal component analysis was conducted to detect relationships among these different measures. For capturing prize winners within the IR field, prestige rank outperformed all the other measures
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:02:21
  8. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.10
    0.09957789 = sum of:
      0.067883864 = product of:
        0.20365158 = sum of:
          0.20365158 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20365158 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43482926 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.031694025 = product of:
        0.06338805 = sum of:
          0.06338805 = weight(_text_:networks in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06338805 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  9. Law, D.: Electronic information : access, control and availability (1993) 0.10
    0.09813285 = product of:
      0.1962657 = sum of:
        0.1962657 = sum of:
          0.1267761 = weight(_text_:networks in 6498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1267761 = score(doc=6498,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.52258724 = fieldWeight in 6498, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6498)
          0.069489606 = weight(_text_:22 in 6498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.069489606 = score(doc=6498,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6498, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6498)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at the UK Serials Group 16th Annual Conference, Southampton, 22-25 Mar 93: electronic information: access, control and availability. Discusses nationally and internationally networked electronic information covering access control and availability. Describes JANET and navigation around networks
  10. Borgne, L.I.: INTERNET: vers la bibliothèque virtuel? (1993) 0.10
    0.09813285 = product of:
      0.1962657 = sum of:
        0.1962657 = sum of:
          0.1267761 = weight(_text_:networks in 7333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1267761 = score(doc=7333,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.52258724 = fieldWeight in 7333, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7333)
          0.069489606 = weight(_text_:22 in 7333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.069489606 = score(doc=7333,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7333, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7333)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Defines a virtual library as an environment where information on paper is transferred to magnetic or optical media accessible direct by means of terminals and distributed via networks. Describes such a telecommunication system, the Internet, its capabilities, services offered and principle problems. provides examples of the different INTERNET applications
    Source
    Argus. 22(1993) no.2, S.21-29
  11. MacDonald, A.H.: ¬The survival of libraries in the electronic age (1994) 0.10
    0.09813285 = product of:
      0.1962657 = sum of:
        0.1962657 = sum of:
          0.1267761 = weight(_text_:networks in 8645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1267761 = score(doc=8645,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.52258724 = fieldWeight in 8645, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8645)
          0.069489606 = weight(_text_:22 in 8645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.069489606 = score(doc=8645,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 8645, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8645)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the likely future for libraries in an environment of increasing availability of information in electronic form via networks, particularly the Internet. The concept of the library will survive and thrive, but that the library as a place is an endangered species, and that librarians are facing the greatest challenge in a century
    Source
    Feliciter. 40(1994) no.1, S.18-22
  12. Arms, C.R.: ¬A new information infrastructure (1990) 0.10
    0.09813285 = product of:
      0.1962657 = sum of:
        0.1962657 = sum of:
          0.1267761 = weight(_text_:networks in 3604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1267761 = score(doc=3604,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.52258724 = fieldWeight in 3604, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3604)
          0.069489606 = weight(_text_:22 in 3604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.069489606 = score(doc=3604,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3604, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Recommends that librarians apply their expertise to the changing world of information communication and adopt their services to the increasing exploration of cooperation and networking of computerised information services. Traces the development of Internet, BITNET and similar networks and outlines the proposal structure of a future Digital Library System.
    Source
    Online. 14(1990) no.5, S.15-22
  13. Bonhomme, S.; Roisin, C.: Interactively restructuring HTML documents (1996) 0.10
    0.09813285 = product of:
      0.1962657 = sum of:
        0.1962657 = sum of:
          0.1267761 = weight(_text_:networks in 5862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1267761 = score(doc=5862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.52258724 = fieldWeight in 5862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5862)
          0.069489606 = weight(_text_:22 in 5862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.069489606 = score(doc=5862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5862)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Source
    Computer networks and ISDN systems. 28(1996) nos.7/11, S.1075-1084
  14. Seidler, W.; Oberhauser, O.: Managing a large academic CD-ROM network (1996) 0.10
    0.09813285 = product of:
      0.1962657 = sum of:
        0.1962657 = sum of:
          0.1267761 = weight(_text_:networks in 6195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1267761 = score(doc=6195,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.52258724 = fieldWeight in 6195, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6195)
          0.069489606 = weight(_text_:22 in 6195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.069489606 = score(doc=6195,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6195, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6195)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes one of the largest CD-ROM networks in Europe, managed by the University of Vienna Library over the past 3 years. Discusses background, history of the project, the current technical status, use of the system, some economic aspects, and current issues and problems
    Source
    Audiovisual librarian. 22(1996) no.3, S.190-193
  15. Marx, E. et al.: Exploring term networks for semantic search over RDF knowledge graphs (2016) 0.10
    0.09813285 = product of:
      0.1962657 = sum of:
        0.1962657 = sum of:
          0.1267761 = weight(_text_:networks in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1267761 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.52258724 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
          0.069489606 = weight(_text_:22 in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.069489606 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  16. Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023) 0.10
    0.09691254 = product of:
      0.19382508 = sum of:
        0.19382508 = sum of:
          0.15213132 = weight(_text_:networks in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15213132 = score(doc=918,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.6271047 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
          0.041693762 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041693762 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To what extent is the destiny of a scientific paper shaped by the cocitation network in which it is involved? What are the social contexts that can explain these structuring? Using bibliometric data, interviews with researchers, and social network analysis, this article proposes a typology based on egocentric cocitation networks that displays a quadruple structuring (before and after publication): polarization, clusterization, atomization, and attrition. It shows that the academic capital of the authors and the intellectual resources of their research are key factors of these destinies, as are the social relations between the authors concerned. The circumstances of the publishing are also correlated with the structuring of the egocentric cocitation networks, showing how socially embedded they are. Finally, the article discusses the contribution of these original networks to the analyze of scientific production and its dynamics.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:14
  17. Fóris, A.: Network theory and terminology (2013) 0.10
    0.095006585 = product of:
      0.19001317 = sum of:
        0.19001317 = sum of:
          0.15526837 = weight(_text_:networks in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15526837 = score(doc=1365,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.640036 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
          0.034744803 = weight(_text_:22 in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034744803 = score(doc=1365,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper aims to present the relations of network theory and terminology. The model of scale-free networks, which has been recently developed and widely applied since, can be effectively used in terminology research as well. Operation based on the principle of networks is a universal characteristic of complex systems. Networks are governed by general laws. The model of scale-free networks can be viewed as a statistical-probability model, and it can be described with mathematical tools. Its main feature is that "everything is connected to everything else," that is, every node is reachable (in a few steps) starting from any other node; this phenomena is called "the small world phenomenon." The existence of a linguistic network and the general laws of the operation of networks enable us to place issues of language use in the complex system of relations that reveal the deeper connection s between phenomena with the help of networks embedded in each other. The realization of the metaphor that language also has a network structure is the basis of the classification methods of the terminological system, and likewise of the ways of creating terminology databases, which serve the purpose of providing easy and versatile accessibility to specialised knowledge.
    Date
    2. 9.2014 21:22:48
  18. Ding, Y.; Yan, E.: Scholarly network similarities : how bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other (2012) 0.09
    0.093161024 = product of:
      0.18632205 = sum of:
        0.18632205 = product of:
          0.3726441 = sum of:
            0.3726441 = weight(_text_:networks in 274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3726441 = score(doc=274,freq=48.0), product of:
                0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051289067 = queryNorm
                1.5360864 = fieldWeight in 274, product of:
                  6.928203 = tf(freq=48.0), with freq of:
                    48.0 = termFreq=48.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=274)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study explores the similarity among six types of scholarly networks aggregated at the institution level, including bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks. Cosine distance is chosen to measure the similarities among the six networks. The authors found that topical networks and coauthorship networks have the lowest similarity; cocitation networks and citation networks have high similarity; bibliographic coupling networks and cocitation networks have high similarity; and coword networks and topical networks have high similarity. In addition, through multidimensional scaling, two dimensions can be identified among the six networks: Dimension 1 can be interpreted as citation-based versus noncitation-based, and Dimension 2 can be interpreted as social versus cognitive. The authors recommend the use of hybrid or heterogeneous networks to study research interaction and scholarly communications.
  19. Hu, D.; Kaza, S.; Chen, H.: Identifying significant facilitators of dark network evolution (2009) 0.09
    0.0882424 = product of:
      0.1764848 = sum of:
        0.1764848 = sum of:
          0.14174 = weight(_text_:networks in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14174 = score(doc=2753,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.5842703 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
          0.034744803 = weight(_text_:22 in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034744803 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Social networks evolve over time with the addition and removal of nodes and links to survive and thrive in their environments. Previous studies have shown that the link-formation process in such networks is influenced by a set of facilitators. However, there have been few empirical evaluations to determine the important facilitators. In a research partnership with law enforcement agencies, we used dynamic social-network analysis methods to examine several plausible facilitators of co-offending relationships in a large-scale narcotics network consisting of individuals and vehicles. Multivariate Cox regression and a two-proportion z-test on cyclic and focal closures of the network showed that mutual acquaintance and vehicle affiliations were significant facilitators for the network under study. We also found that homophily with respect to age, race, and gender were not good predictors of future link formation in these networks. Moreover, we examined the social causes and policy implications for the significance and insignificance of various facilitators including common jails on future co-offending. These findings provide important insights into the link-formation processes and the resilience of social networks. In addition, they can be used to aid in the prediction of future links. The methods described can also help in understanding the driving forces behind the formation and evolution of social networks facilitated by mobile and Web technologies.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:50:30
  20. Rees, J.: Information access versus document supply : the international visual arts information network project (1994) 0.09
    0.087072335 = product of:
      0.17414467 = sum of:
        0.17414467 = sum of:
          0.12550195 = weight(_text_:networks in 583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12550195 = score(doc=583,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.517335 = fieldWeight in 583, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=583)
          0.048642725 = weight(_text_:22 in 583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048642725 = score(doc=583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051289067 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=583)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Image content opens up exciting possibilities for stand-alone media, distributed networks, online networks, and on-site publishing from information systems for use by the general public, for research, collection management, education and distance learning. These developments coincide and overlap with widespread new questioning and thinking as to the role of museums in relation to their diverse publics and also may have many parallels in the library world. They raise difficult questions about intellectual propriety rights - copyright protection, fair renumeration and complex questions concerning moral rights. Clearly international cooperation, working partnerships and consortia are going to gain further importance and significance
    Source
    Interlending and document supply. 22(1994) no.1, S.20-24

Languages

Types

  • el 90
  • b 35
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes