Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Beghtol, C."
  1. Beghtol, C.: Professional values and ethics in knowledge organization and cataloguing : observations on standards and implementation (1998) 0.02
    0.015297289 = product of:
      0.10708102 = sum of:
        0.10708102 = weight(_text_:standards in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10708102 = score(doc=3026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.59091425 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  2. Beghtol, C.: ¬The Iter Bibliography : International standard subject access to medieval and renaissance materials (400-1700) (2003) 0.01
    0.0057428097 = product of:
      0.040199667 = sum of:
        0.040199667 = weight(_text_:networks in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040199667 = score(doc=3965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19231078 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.2090349 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Content
    "1. Iter: Gateway to the Middle Ages and Renaissance Iter is a non-profit research project dedicated to providing electronic access to all kinds and formats of materials pertaining to the Middle Ages and Renaissance (400-1700). Iter began in 1995 as a joint initiative of the Renaissance Society of America (RSA) in New York City and the Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies (CRRS), Univ. of Toronto. By 1997, three more partners had joined: Faculty of Information Studies (FIS), Univ. of Toronto; Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies (ACMRS), Arizona State Univ. at Tempe; and John P. Robarts Library, Univ. of Toronto. Iter was funded initially by the five partners and major foundations and, since 1998, has offered low-cost subscriptions to institutions and individuals. When Iter becomes financially self-sufficient, any profits will be used to enhance and expand the project. Iter databases are housed and maintained at the John P. Robarts Library. The interface is a customized version of DRA WebZ. A new interface using DRA Web can be searched now and will replace the DRA WebZ interface shortly. Iter was originally conceived as a comprehensive bibliography of secondary materials that would be an alternative to the existing commercial research tools for its period. These were expensive, generally appeared several years late, had limited subject indexing, were inconsistent in coverage, of uneven quality, and often depended an fragile networks of volunteers for identification of materials. The production of a reasonably priced, web-based, timely research tool was Iter's first priority. In addition, the partners wanted to involve graduate students in the project in order to contribute to the scholarly training and financial support of future scholars of the Middle Ages and Renaissance and to utilize as much automation as possible."
  3. Beghtol, C.: Response to Hjoerland and Nicolaisen (2004) 0.00
    0.0044617094 = product of:
      0.031231964 = sum of:
        0.031231964 = weight(_text_:standards in 3536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031231964 = score(doc=3536,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.17234999 = fieldWeight in 3536, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3536)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Second, the paper posits that these different reasons for creating classification systems strongly influence the content and extent of the two kinds of classifications, but not necessarily their structures. By definition, naïve classifications for new knowledge have been developed for discrete areas of disciplinary inquiry in new areas of knowledge. These classifications do not attempt to classify the whole of that disciplinary area. That is, naïve classifications have a explicit purpose that is significantly different from the purpose of the major disciplinary classifications Hjoer-land and Nicolaisen provide as examples of classifications they think I discuss under the rubric of "naïve classifications" (e.g., classifications for the entire field of archaeology, biology, linguistics, music, psychology, etc.). My paper is not concerned with these important classifications for major disciplinary areas. Instead, it is concerned solely and specifically with scholarly classifications for small areas of new knowledge within these major disciplines (e.g., cloth of aresta, double harpsichords, child-rearing practices, anomalous phenomena, etc.). Thus, I have nowhere suggested or implied that the broad disciplinary classifications mentioned by Hjoerland and Nicolaisen are appropriately categorized as "naïve classifications." For example, I have not associated the Periodic System of the Elements with naïve classifications, as Hjoerland and Nicolaisen state that I have done. Indeed, broad classifications of this type fall well outside the definition of naïve classifications set out in my paper. In this case, too, 1 believe that Hjorland and Nicolaisen have misunderstood an important point in my paper. I agree with a number of points made in Hjorland and Nicolaisen's paper. In particular, I agree that researchers in the knowledge organization field should adhere to the highest standards of scholarly and scientific precision. For that reason, I am glad to have had the opportunity to respond to their paper.
  4. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.00
    0.0031477981 = product of:
      0.022034585 = sum of:
        0.022034585 = product of:
          0.04406917 = sum of:
            0.04406917 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04406917 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04065836 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  5. Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.00
    0.0019673738 = product of:
      0.013771616 = sum of:
        0.013771616 = product of:
          0.027543232 = sum of:
            0.027543232 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027543232 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04065836 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Pages
    S.19-22