Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

0.016639076 = product of:
  0.11647353 = sum of:
    0.11647353 = weight(_text_:government in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11647353 = score(doc=3477,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23146805 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6930003 = idf(docFreq=404, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04065836 = queryNorm
        0.50319487 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6930003 = idf(docFreq=404, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Because of the individual character of museums the use of online catalogues to describe objects in the collections in the Netherlands has lagged behind that of libraries. In 1993 the MIRO (Museale Informatieverzorgingen Registratie Opleidingen) project was inaugurated to identify probllem areas and devise solutions. The project identified 4 areas for which training is required for museum staff: description of objects, compilation of indexes, automation in museums, and the use of multimedia systems. Following the project's report the Dutch government has dedicated extra funds for museum automation

0.01378879 = product of:
  0.09652153 = sum of:
    0.09652153 = weight(_text_:standards in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09652153 = score(doc=1464,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04065836 = queryNorm
        0.5326429 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

For the first time, under the leadership of the Visual Resources Association, a cross section of five visual and cultural heritage experts, along with scores of reviewers from varied institutions, have created a new data content standard focused on cultural materials. This cutting-edge reference offers practical resources for cataloging and flexibility to meet the needs of a wide range of institutions - from libraries to museums to archives to visual collections. Consistently following these guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate metadata elements in cultural materials' catalog records: promotes good descriptive cataloging and reduces redundancy; builds a foundation of shared documentation; creates data sharing opportunities; and, complements existing standards

Footnote

As the editors note in their introduction, "Standards that guide data structure, data values, and data content form the basis for a set of tools that can lead to good descriptive cataloging, consistent documentation, shared records, and increased end-user access" (p. xi). The VRA Core Categories, for example, represent a set of metadata elements expressed within an XML structure (data structure). Likewise, the Art Architecture Thesaurus contains sets of terms and relationships, or defined data values. While much effort has been expended on developing both data structures and values, the editors argue, the third leg of the stool, data content, has received less attention. Unlike the library community with its Anglo-American Cataloging Rules [sic though RDA is referenced in the Selected Bibliography], or its archival equivalent, Describing Archives: A Content Standard (DACS), those in the domain of cultural heritage responsible for describing and documenting works of art, architecture, cultural artifacts, and their respective images, have not had the benefit of such data content standards. CCO is intended to address (or redress) that gap, emphasizing the exercise of good judgment and cataloguer discretion over the application of "rigid rules" [p. xii], and building on existing standards. ... Overall, Cataloging Cultural Objects with its attending guidelines for descriptive metadata and authority control for "one-of-a-kind cultural objects" should merit a place among the "well-established" data content standards of the library and archival communities that CCO references with obvious regard."

LCSH

Cultural property / Documentation / Standards
Antiquities / Documentation / Standards
Architecture / Documentation / Standards
Art / Documentation / Standards

Subject

Cultural property / Documentation / Standards
Antiquities / Documentation / Standards
Architecture / Documentation / Standards
Art / Documentation / Standards

0.010816817 = product of:
  0.07571772 = sum of:
    0.07571772 = weight(_text_:standards in 3759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07571772 = score(doc=3759,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04065836 = queryNorm
        0.41783947 = fieldWeight in 3759, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3759)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

The entry provides an overview of the data content standard, Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO), developed by the Visual Resources Association (VRA), and published in 2006 by the American Library Association (ALA). CCO fills a gap in the array of descriptive standards by providing guidelines for visual resources curators, museum documentation specialists, archivists, librarians, or anyone engaged in the documentation of works of art and architecture, objects of material culture, and their images. The entry begins by placing CCO within the context of object and visual image cataloging and the broader framework of data content standards. Following the organization of the guide, which is divided into three parts, General Guidelines, Elements, and Authorities, it summarizes the main features of CCO. Finally, it evaluates CCO in terms of its suitability for use by the metadata communities that form its intended audience, and its sustainability.

0.010198194 = product of:
  0.07138735 = sum of:
    0.07138735 = weight(_text_:standards in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07138735 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04065836 = queryNorm
        0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Strategies for sharing, managing and accessing cultural heritage information centred around objects, images and related data are being tested currently through a variety of initiatives and resources. These fall into 3 categories: data sharing projects; image data banks; and rights management. Describes 2 data sharing projects, the Research Libraries Group' REACH and VISIION projects, focusing on core categories, standards and interoperability, metadata, and what might be accomplished through REACH and VISIION

0.0076486445 = product of:
  0.05354051 = sum of:
    0.05354051 = weight(_text_:standards in 2827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05354051 = score(doc=2827,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04065836 = queryNorm
        0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 2827, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2827)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Die wissenschaftliche Erschließung der Sammlungsbestände stellt neben dem Sammeln, Bewahren und Ausstellen eine Kernkompetenz musealer Arbeit dar und ist daher auch Teil der gemeinsam festgelegten Richtlinien des Internationalen Museumsverbandes "Standards für Museen". Seit einigen Jahren wird entsprechend auch in diesem Bereich eine Diskussion zu Fachterminologien geführt, weil die Inventare für eine schnellere Erschließung auch EDV-gestützt erfasst werden. Hierbei wird es als allgemein wünschenswert erachtet, sich auf einheitliche Thesauri im deutschsprachigen Raum, vor allem in den Bereichen Objektbezeichnung, Material und Technik zu verständigen. Erste Ansätze sind sowohl in der Fachgruppe Dokumentation des Deutschen Museumsbundes in Berlin als auch von den Arbeitsgruppen des MusIs-Projektes beim Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg (BSZ) in Konstanz gemacht worden. Basierend auf Erfahrungen bei der Konzeption und dem Aufbau von Thesauri in diesen Bereichen, die Eingang fanden in den Objektbezeichnungsthesaurus des BSZ sollen hier einige Aspekte und Überlegungen vorgestellt werden.

0.0062955962 = product of:
  0.04406917 = sum of:
    0.04406917 = product of:
      0.08813834 = sum of:
        0.08813834 = weight(_text_:22 in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08813834 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

5. 3.1999 17:40:22

0.005099097 = product of:
  0.035693675 = sum of:
    0.035693675 = weight(_text_:standards in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035693675 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04065836 = queryNorm
        0.19697142 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Purpose - This research project aims to provide a new visual representation of the Artefacts Canada digital collection, as well as a means for users to browse this content. Artefacts Canada Humanities is a database containing approximately 3.5 million records describing the different collections of Canadian museums. Design/methodology/approach - A four-step methodology was adopted for the development of the faceted taxonomy model. First, a best practice review consisting of an extensive analysis of existing terminology standards in museum communities and public web interfaces of large cultural organizations was performed. The second step of the methodology entailed a domain analysis; this involved extracting and comparing relevant concepts from terminological authoritative sources. The third step proceeded to term clustering and entity listing,which involved the breaking-up of the taxonomy domains into potential facets. An incremental user testing was also realized in order to validate and refine the taxonomy components (facets, values, and relationships). Findings - The project resulted in a bilingual and expandable vocabulary structure that will further be used to describe the Artefacts Canada database records. The new taxonomy simplifies the representation of complex content by grouping objects into similar facets to classify all records of the Artefacts Canada database. The user-friendly bilingual taxonomy provides worldwide visitors with the means to better access Canadian virtual museum collections. Originality/value - Few methodological tools are available for museums which wish to adopt a faceted approach in the development of their web sites. For practitioners, the methodology developed within this project is a direct contribution to support web site development of large cultural organizations.

0.004721697 = product of:
  0.03305188 = sum of:
    0.03305188 = product of:
      0.06610376 = sum of:
        0.06610376 = weight(_text_:22 in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06610376 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier

0.0039347475 = product of:
  0.027543232 = sum of:
    0.027543232 = product of:
      0.055086464 = sum of:
        0.055086464 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055086464 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill

0.0031477981 = product of:
  0.022034585 = sum of:
    0.022034585 = product of:
      0.04406917 = sum of:
        0.04406917 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04406917 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

1. 8.1996 22:01:00