Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Library science"
  1. Gartner, R.: Metadata : shaping knowledge from antiquity to the semantic web (2016) 0.01
    0.00937932 = product of:
      0.028137958 = sum of:
        0.028137958 = product of:
          0.056275915 = sum of:
            0.056275915 = weight(_text_:history in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056275915 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047072954 = queryNorm
                0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This book offers a comprehensive guide to the world of metadata, from its origins in the ancient cities of the Middle East, to the Semantic Web of today. The author takes us on a journey through the centuries-old history of metadata up to the modern world of crowdsourcing and Google, showing how metadata works and what it is made of. The author explores how it has been used ideologically and how it can never be objective. He argues how central it is to human cultures and the way they develop. Metadata: Shaping Knowledge from Antiquity to the Semantic Web is for all readers with an interest in how we humans organize our knowledge and why this is important. It is suitable for those new to the subject as well as those know its basics. It also makes an excellent introduction for students of information science and librarianship.
  2. Crowley, W.: Spanning the theory-practice divide in library and information science (2005) 0.00
    0.0037517282 = product of:
      0.011255184 = sum of:
        0.011255184 = product of:
          0.022510368 = sum of:
            0.022510368 = weight(_text_:history in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022510368 = score(doc=439,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047072954 = queryNorm
                0.10279526 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    In the next four chapters, Crowley takes on the particulars involved in the divide by looking at library and information professionals engaged in and transitioning to various research and theory development roles. In "The Academic as Practitioner," he examines how the publishing world influences how academics communicate with practitioners and the difficulties in writing for practitioner-oriented publications. The history of religion in the development of higher education in general, and the research focus of doctoral-degree granting institutions, is offered to explain the dominance of the academic practitioner. The paradoxical edicts of the Ohio legislature, which sought to balance classroom time for professors by law, paint a vivid picture of the results-oriented public and the research-oriented academic institution. In "The Practitioner as Academic: Adjunct Faculty/Lecturers," the question of the perceived lack of "rigor" in practitioner-conducted research is illustrated and illuminated. While Crowley points out the value of "how we did it good" research, as providing material for qualitative analysis, I found myself desiring a bit more methodological instruction. Given where and when such articles are published, how such qualitative analysis could be conducted called the value of this research into question, given the prior treatise on conducting research in an academic environment. "Other Worlds of Practice: The Field Practitioner" and "Other Worlds of Practice: The Consultant" are extremely short expositions which, while addressing alternative professionals' roles, do not significantly further the premise of the work. Nonetheless, Crowley might have been considered remiss if he had excluded these professionals.