Search (272 results, page 1 of 14)

0.044589937 = product of:
  0.13376981 = sum of:
    0.13376981 = sum of:
      0.0955034 = weight(_text_:history in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0955034 = score(doc=71,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.43612334 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
      0.038266413 = weight(_text_:22 in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038266413 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Cataloging rules for computer-based materials were first introduced in the 1970s, and since then have undergone almost continuous modification and revision. This article focuses on analysis and comparison of the various codes and guidelines for practice issued for what are now called electronic resources. Creation of new cataloging rules has been spurred by introduction of new physical carriers, the preeminence of materials accessed remotely versus those with physical carriers, the need for guidance in cataloging specific instances of computer-based materials, and the evolution of the theoretical concerns underlying the cataloging codes. Based on this history of constant change, it is easy to predict many more changes in the cataloging standards for computer-based materials in the future. However, continuous changes in the cataloging rules may have produced as much confusion as clarity for working catalogers. Caution should be exercised in the creation of new rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources, as it is possible that older rules and standards may, in fact, be readily adapted to new types of electronic resources.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.041143484 = product of:
  0.123430446 = sum of:
    0.123430446 = sum of:
      0.07878629 = weight(_text_:history in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07878629 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
      0.04464415 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04464415 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work

Footnote

Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24

0.041143484 = product of:
  0.123430446 = sum of:
    0.123430446 = sum of:
      0.07878629 = weight(_text_:history in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07878629 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
      0.04464415 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04464415 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication

Date

22. 2.1999 20:41:06

0.041143484 = product of:
  0.123430446 = sum of:
    0.123430446 = sum of:
      0.07878629 = weight(_text_:history in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07878629 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.04464415 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04464415 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Scholars have long noted the significance of Allegheny College's special collections to American cultural and educational history. Special collections have value to colleges and universities as publicity devices to draw scholars, students, and funding to the institution. Catalogers have an important role to play in marketing the library and the college through improved bibliographic access to these collections. Rare book and manuscript cataloging presents many challenges to catalogers, especially at smaller institutions. This report traces the evolution of Allegheny College's catalog, from book format in 1823, through card format, and finally to online. It also explores the bibliographic challenges created as the library moved from one format to another.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.041143484 = product of:
  0.123430446 = sum of:
    0.123430446 = sum of:
      0.07878629 = weight(_text_:history in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07878629 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.04464415 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04464415 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.03526584 = product of:
  0.10579752 = sum of:
    0.10579752 = sum of:
      0.06753111 = weight(_text_:history in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06753111 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
      0.038266413 = weight(_text_:22 in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038266413 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) presents a complex conceptual model. Because of this, it is not easy for everyone to understand. The purpose of this paper is to make some of the more difficult aspects of the FRBR model, in particular the Croup 1 entities work, expression, manifestation, and item, easier to understand by placing FRBR in the context of what it is: a conceptual entity-relationship model. To this end, a definition of the term "model" is presented, a variety of types and junctions of models are introduced, conceptual models are discussed in detail, modeling an abstraction is explained, and different ways of interpreting FRBR are suggested. Various models used in the history of cataloging are introduced to place FRBR in the context of the historical development of document models.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.03526584 = product of:
  0.10579752 = sum of:
    0.10579752 = sum of:
      0.06753111 = weight(_text_:history in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06753111 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
      0.038266413 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038266413 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.0293882 = product of:
  0.0881646 = sum of:
    0.0881646 = sum of:
      0.056275915 = weight(_text_:history in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056275915 = score(doc=2786,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
      0.03188868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03188868 = score(doc=2786,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This book looks at the ways that we define the things of the bibliographic world, and in particular how our bibliographic models reflect our technology and the assumed goals of libraries. There is, of course, a history behind this, as well as a present and a future. The first part of the book begins by looking at the concept of the 'work' in library cataloging theory, and how that concept has evolved since the mid-nineteenth century to date. Next it talks about models and technology, two areas that need to be understood before taking a long look at where we are today. It then examines the new bibliographic model called Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the technical and social goals that the FRBR Study Group was tasked to address. The FRBR entities are analyzed in some detail. Finally, FRBR as an entity-relation model is compared to a small set of Semantic Web vocabularies that can be seen as variants of the multi-entity bibliographic model that FRBR introduced.

Date

12. 2.2016 16:22:58

0.026262097 = product of:
  0.07878629 = sum of:
    0.07878629 = product of:
      0.15757258 = sum of:
        0.15757258 = weight(_text_:history in 5998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15757258 = score(doc=5998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.7195668 = fieldWeight in 5998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Journal of library history. 18(1983), S.163-177

0.026262097 = product of:
  0.07878629 = sum of:
    0.07878629 = product of:
      0.15757258 = sum of:
        0.15757258 = weight(_text_:history in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15757258 = score(doc=2996,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.7195668 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Cataloging oral histories presents many difficulties, especially for catalogers who have primarily worked with published materials and for institutions without funds or staff dedicated to managing oral history collections. Methods for cataloging oral histories can vary widely among institutions. In this paper I examine the issues and considerations involved in providing intellectual access to oral history interviews and offer a possible cataloging method to libraries holding unprocessed oral history materials. The cataloging procedures discussed here have worked well from a workflow standpoint as one of the initial steps to create access to oral histories at Columbus State University, a medium-sized academic library.

0.024051948 = product of:
  0.07215584 = sum of:
    0.07215584 = product of:
      0.14431168 = sum of:
        0.14431168 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14431168 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 1.2000 19:22:27

0.022743642 = product of:
  0.06823093 = sum of:
    0.06823093 = product of:
      0.13646185 = sum of:
        0.13646185 = weight(_text_:history in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13646185 = score(doc=120,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.62316316 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The bibliographic work has assumed a great deal of importance in modern cataloging. But the concept of the work has existed for over a century, and even some of the earliest catalog codes differentiate between the intellectual work and its instances. This article will delve into the history and theory of the work, providing a basic overview of the concept as well as a summary of the myriad uses of the work throughout the history of cataloging. In addition to monographs, this paper will look at the work as applied to music, moving images, serials, and aggregates.

0.021222979 = product of:
  0.06366894 = sum of:
    0.06366894 = product of:
      0.12733787 = sum of:
        0.12733787 = weight(_text_:history in 2542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12733787 = score(doc=2542,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.5814978 = fieldWeight in 2542, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2542)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

CONSER's comprehensive review in 1986 sets the stage for this organizational history. Significant events of the widely acclaimed cooperative serial cataloguing programme are traced through the last decade and focus on the CONSER plan, the programme's governance structure and changes in membership, the CONSER database, serials cataloguing issues, and programme documentation and publications. These developments are viewed as CONSER looks ahead to coordinate with the new programme for cooperative cataloguing, reexamine membership/governance issues, implement USMARC format integration, and address a variety of computer related issues

0.021222979 = product of:
  0.06366894 = sum of:
    0.06366894 = product of:
      0.12733787 = sum of:
        0.12733787 = weight(_text_:history in 5349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12733787 = score(doc=5349,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.5814978 = fieldWeight in 5349, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5349)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

With a long history, cataloging has developed gradually in China. Nowadays, both the content and method of cataloging have changed in many ways. As a type of organizing cataloging model, centralized cataloging came into being in 1936 in China. The history and the current status of centralized cataloging in China are described in the paper. The prospect for cataloging in the country is also discussed. In respect to resource building and sharing, cooperative cataloging is thought to be the best way to develop cataloging in the future.

0.021222979 = product of:
  0.06366894 = sum of:
    0.06366894 = product of:
      0.12733787 = sum of:
        0.12733787 = weight(_text_:history in 5407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12733787 = score(doc=5407,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.5814978 = fieldWeight in 5407, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Much of this history discusses the personal experience and recollections of the author, who since 1967 has been involved in the development of rules for nonbook cataloguing as an author of one of the works on which the AACR rules for nonbook materials are based, as a member of many cataloguing committees, and as chair of the Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR. Opposing points of view are described and reasons for actions taken are outlined.

0.021222979 = product of:
  0.06366894 = sum of:
    0.06366894 = product of:
      0.12733787 = sum of:
        0.12733787 = weight(_text_:history in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12733787 = score(doc=2161,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.5814978 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

LCSH

Descriptive cataloging / Great Britain / Rules / History

Subject

Descriptive cataloging / Great Britain / Rules / History

0.021222979 = product of:
  0.06366894 = sum of:
    0.06366894 = product of:
      0.12733787 = sum of:
        0.12733787 = weight(_text_:history in 2014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12733787 = score(doc=2014,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.5814978 = fieldWeight in 2014, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2014)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Cataloging practices for video games have been in flux since the late 1970s, often lagging behind technological developments. This article describes the history of descriptive cataloging practices and MARC coding for video games. Also discussed are the special problems presented by Library of Congress subject heading and uniform title practice, which were developed for book cataloging rather than for the cataloging of video games themselves.

0.020571742 = product of:
  0.061715223 = sum of:
    0.061715223 = sum of:
      0.039393146 = weight(_text_:history in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039393146 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.1798917 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
      0.022322075 = weight(_text_:22 in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.022322075 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Inhalt: 1. Library Catalogue : Its Nature, Factions, and Importance in a Library System 2. History of Modern Library Catalogues 3. Catalogue Codes: Origin, Growth and Development 4. Principles of Planning and Provision of the Library Catalogue 5.Catalogue Entries and their Functions in Achieving the Objectives of the Library Catalogue 6.Descriptive Cataloguing 7. Physical Forms of the Catalogue-I Manual Catalogues 8. Physical Forms of the Catalogues-II Computerised Cataloges 9. Varieties of Catalogues, their Scope and Functions 10. Subject Cataloguing 11. Cataloguing Department: Organization and Administration. 12. Cost Analysis of Cataloguing Procedures and Suggested Economies 13. Co-operation and Centralization in Cataloguing 14. Union Catalogues and Subject Specialisation 15. Cataloguing of Special Material 16. Arrangement, Filing, Guiding of catalogue and Instructions for its Use 17. Education and Training of Cataloguers 18.Documentation : An Extension of Cataloguing and Classification Applied to Isolates 19.Catalogue Cards, Their Style and Reproduction Methods 20. Work of Personal Authors 21. Choice and Entry of Personal Names 22. Works of Corporate Authors 23. Legal Publications 24. Choice of Headings for Corporate Bodies 25. Works of Unknown Authorship : Entry under Uniform Titles 26. Acces Points to Books and Meta- Books by A-ACR2 27. AACR2 1988 revision : Choice of Access Points to Name Headings and Uniform Titles 28. Added Entries Other Than Subject Entries 29. Subject Entries 30. Analytiacal Entries 31. Series Note and Series Entry 32. Contents, Notes and Annotation 33. References 34. Display of Entries Appendix-I Select Aids and Guides for the Cataloguer Appendix-II Definitions of Terms Commonly used in Cataloguing Appendix-III Cataloguing Examination: Select Questions Appendix-IV Implications of the adoption of A-ACR2

0.019494552 = product of:
  0.058483656 = sum of:
    0.058483656 = product of:
      0.11696731 = sum of:
        0.11696731 = weight(_text_:history in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11696731 = score(doc=4627,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.5341399 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Scholars working in the field of mediaeval history and cultural history have recognized that understanding the cataloguing and accessioning of books is central to understanding the transmission of ideas. Unfortunately, general histories of libraries and even the library literature seem content to sketch out a chronological development of cataloguing in line with the 19th and 20th century view of library development, from a simple list to complex intellectual systems. In truth, however, those individuals responsible for cataloguing books in mediaeval libraries faced many of the same challenges as cataloguers today: how to organize information; how to serve local needs; and how to provide access to individual works within larger bibliographic formats. Summarizes recent scholarship in the history of the book that relates to library cataloguing, as well as providing parallels to the cooperative library environment of today

0.01875864 = product of:
  0.056275915 = sum of:
    0.056275915 = product of:
      0.11255183 = sum of:
        0.11255183 = weight(_text_:history in 5985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11255183 = score(doc=5985,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.5139763 = fieldWeight in 5985, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5985)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Considers the relevance of AACR to online library catalogues. Surveys the history of cataloguing rules in relation to the code's relevance in the state of librarianship at the time. Stresses the need for a code taking account of the actual and potential benefit of computerized catalogues and discusses various relevant aspects