-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.10
0.09968578 = product of:
0.29905733 = sum of:
0.29905733 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29905733 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39908504 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
-
Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995)
0.05
0.04702112 = product of:
0.14106336 = sum of:
0.14106336 = sum of:
0.09004147 = weight(_text_:history in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09004147 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.051021885 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051021885 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
-
Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011)
0.03
0.0293882 = product of:
0.0881646 = sum of:
0.0881646 = sum of:
0.056275915 = weight(_text_:history in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056275915 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.03188868 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03188868 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
-
Heruble, J.P.V.M.: Historical bibliometrics : its purpose and significance to the history of disciplines (1999)
0.03
0.026262097 = product of:
0.07878629 = sum of:
0.07878629 = product of:
0.15757258 = sum of:
0.15757258 = weight(_text_:history in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15757258 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.7195668 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Hauffe, H.: ¬The role of citation analysis in the history and evaluation of science : Bericht über einen Vortrag von Eugene Garfield (Wien, 26. Mai 2004) (2004)
0.02
0.01875864 = product of:
0.056275915 = sum of:
0.056275915 = product of:
0.11255183 = sum of:
0.11255183 = weight(_text_:history in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11255183 = score(doc=2492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.5139763 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Garfield, E.: From citation indexes to informetrics : is the tail now wagging the dog? (1998)
0.02
0.018570106 = product of:
0.05571032 = sum of:
0.05571032 = product of:
0.11142064 = sum of:
0.11142064 = weight(_text_:history in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11142064 = score(doc=2809,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.5088106 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Provides a synoptic review and history of citation indexes and their evolution into research evaluation tools including a discussion of the use of bibliometric data for evaluating US institutions (academic departments) by the National Research Council (NRC). Covers the origin and uses of periodical impact factors, validation studies of citation analysis, information retrieval and dissemination (current awareness), citation consciousness, historiography and science mapping, Citation Classics, and the history of contemporary science. Illustrates the retrieval of information by cited reference searching, especially as it applies to avoiding duplicated research. Discusses the 15 year cumulative impacts of periodicals and the percentage of uncitedness, the emergence of scientometrics, old boy networks, and citation frequency distributions. Concludes with observations about the future of citation indexing
-
Haustein, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication : Guest editorial (2015)
0.02
0.01763292 = product of:
0.05289876 = sum of:
0.05289876 = sum of:
0.033765554 = weight(_text_:history in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033765554 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.1541929 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.019133206 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019133206 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This year marks 350 years since the inaugural publications of both the Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions, first published in 1665 and considered the birth of the peer-reviewed journal article. This form of scholarly communication has not only remained the dominant model for disseminating new knowledge (particularly for science and medicine), but has also increased substantially in volume. Derek de Solla Price - the "father of scientometrics" (Merton and Garfield, 1986, p. vii) - was the first to document the exponential increase in scientific journals and showed that "scientists have always felt themselves to be awash in a sea of the scientific literature" (Price, 1963, p. 15), as, for example, expressed at the 1948 Royal Society's Scientific Information Conference: Not for the first time in history, but more acutely than ever before, there was a fear that scientists would be overwhelmed, that they would be no longer able to control the vast amounts of potentially relevant material that were pouring forth from the world's presses, that science itself was under threat (Bawden and Robinson, 2008, p. 183).
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.02
0.017007295 = product of:
0.051021885 = sum of:
0.051021885 = product of:
0.10204377 = sum of:
0.10204377 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10204377 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.017007295 = product of:
0.051021885 = sum of:
0.051021885 = product of:
0.10204377 = sum of:
0.10204377 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10204377 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.02
0.017007295 = product of:
0.051021885 = sum of:
0.051021885 = product of:
0.10204377 = sum of:
0.10204377 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10204377 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Zuccala, A.; Someren, M. van; Bellen, M. van: ¬A machine-learning approach to coding book reviews as quality indicators : toward a theory of megacitation (2014)
0.02
0.016245458 = product of:
0.048736375 = sum of:
0.048736375 = product of:
0.09747275 = sum of:
0.09747275 = weight(_text_:history in 1530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09747275 = score(doc=1530,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.44511652 = fieldWeight in 1530, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1530)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A theory of "megacitation" is introduced and used in an experiment to demonstrate how a qualitative scholarly book review can be converted into a weighted bibliometric indicator. We employ a manual human-coding approach to classify book reviews in the field of history based on reviewers' assessments of a book author's scholarly credibility (SC) and writing style (WS). In total, 100 book reviews were selected from the American Historical Review and coded for their positive/negative valence on these two dimensions. Most were coded as positive (68% for SC and 47% for WS), and there was also a small positive correlation between SC and WS (r = 0.2). We then constructed a classifier, combining both manual design and machine learning, to categorize sentiment-based sentences in history book reviews. The machine classifier produced a matched accuracy (matched to the human coding) of approximately 75% for SC and 64% for WS. WS was found to be more difficult to classify by machine than SC because of the reviewers' use of more subtle language. With further training data, a machine-learning approach could be useful for automatically classifying a large number of history book reviews at once. Weighted megacitations can be especially valuable if they are used in conjunction with regular book/journal citations, and "libcitations" (i.e., library holding counts) for a comprehensive assessment of a book/monograph's scholarly impact.
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.02
0.015032468 = product of:
0.045097403 = sum of:
0.045097403 = product of:
0.09019481 = sum of:
0.09019481 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09019481 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.015032468 = product of:
0.045097403 = sum of:
0.045097403 = product of:
0.09019481 = sum of:
0.09019481 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09019481 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Campanario, J.M.: Using 'Citation Classics' to study the incidence of serendipity in scientific discovery (1996)
0.02
0.015006913 = product of:
0.045020737 = sum of:
0.045020737 = product of:
0.09004147 = sum of:
0.09004147 = weight(_text_:history in 6693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09004147 = score(doc=6693,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 6693, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6693)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Suggests that the literature on the role of chance, error or accident in scientific progress tends to be anecdotal, hagiographic and rarely systematic. In contrast, presents a new approach to this topic, the study of serendipity in scietific discovery. Bases the approach on the study of highly cited papers obtained from the 'Citation Classics' feature of 'Current Contents'. Reports on the analysis of 205 'Citation Classics' commentaries from the 400 most cited papers in the recent history of science, and presents the results of the analysis
-
Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature I (1996)
0.02
0.015006913 = product of:
0.045020737 = sum of:
0.045020737 = product of:
0.09004147 = sum of:
0.09004147 = weight(_text_:history in 7170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09004147 = score(doc=7170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 7170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7170)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of a 2 part article reviewing the technique of bibliometrics and one of its most widely used methods, citation analysis. Traces the history and development of bibliometrics, including its definition, scope, role in scholarly communication and applications. Treats citation analysis similarly with particular reference to bibliographic coupling and cocitation coupling
-
Buchanan, A.L.; Herubel, J.-P.V.M.: Disciplinary culture, bibliometrics, and historical studies : preliminary observations (1997)
0.02
0.015006913 = product of:
0.045020737 = sum of:
0.045020737 = product of:
0.09004147 = sum of:
0.09004147 = weight(_text_:history in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09004147 = score(doc=407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses bibliometrics and its relationship to historical studies. Recommends that historical and qualitative bibliometrics are explored to examine community formation of scientific and scholarly communication through institutional affiliation. The study shows an institutional and geographical mapping of this school's contributors. Although a recent sample, bibliometrics can be utilized to explore journals from the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries for the history of disciplines, including library and information science
-
Szava-Kovats, E.: Non-indexed indirect-collective citedness (NIICC) (1998)
0.02
0.015006913 = product of:
0.045020737 = sum of:
0.045020737 = product of:
0.09004147 = sum of:
0.09004147 = weight(_text_:history in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09004147 = score(doc=175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Examines non-indexed indirect collective citedness (NIICC), through a study of 621 articles from 1969 volumes of 2 physics journals, in order to establish the frequency of the phenomenon in the research material. Findings refute the representativity ofd the citation indexes in the field of citedness in the scientific journal literature during the science history period of early Big Science as NIICC was found to be widespread
-
Kostoff, R.N.: ¬The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation (1998)
0.02
0.015006913 = product of:
0.045020737 = sum of:
0.045020737 = product of:
0.09004147 = sum of:
0.09004147 = weight(_text_:history in 4129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09004147 = score(doc=4129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 4129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Leydesdorff, in his 1998 paper 'Theories of citation?', addresses the history of citations and citation analysis, and the transformation of a reference mechanism into a purportedly quantitative measure of research impact/quality. Examines different facets of citations and citation analysis, and discusses the validity of citation analysis as a useful measure of research impact/quality
-
Hertzel, D.H.: Bibliometric research: history (2009)
0.02
0.015006913 = product of:
0.045020737 = sum of:
0.045020737 = product of:
0.09004147 = sum of:
0.09004147 = weight(_text_:history in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09004147 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.01
0.014881384 = product of:
0.04464415 = sum of:
0.04464415 = product of:
0.0892883 = sum of:
0.0892883 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0892883 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
