Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Busch, J.A.: Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation (1998) 0.04 
    0.041143484 = product of:
  0.123430446 = sum of:
    0.123430446 = sum of:
      0.07878629 = weight(_text_:history in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07878629 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.04464415 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04464415 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The Getty has a lenghty history in the research and development of thesauri and other structured vocabulary tools to make the use and exchange of electronic information easier
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  2. Bagheri, M.: Development of thesauri in Iran (2006) 0.04 
    0.03526584 = product of:
  0.10579752 = sum of:
    0.10579752 = sum of:
      0.06753111 = weight(_text_:history in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06753111 = score(doc=260,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
      0.038266413 = weight(_text_:22 in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038266413 = score(doc=260,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047072954 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The need for Persian thesauri became apparent during the late 1960s with the advent of documentation centres in Iran. The first Persian controlled vocabulary was published by IRANDOC in 1977. Other centres worked on translations of existing thesauri, but it was soon realised that these efforts did not meet the needs of the centres. After the Islamic revolution in 1979, the foundation of new centres intensified the need for Persian thesauri, especially in the fields of history and government documents. Also, during the Iran-Iraq war, Iranian research centres produced reports in scientific and technical fields, both to support military requirements and to meet society's needs. In order to provide a comprehensive thesaurus, the Council of Scientific Research of Iran approved a project for the compilation of such a work. Nowadays, 12 Persian thesauri are available and others are being prepared, based on the literary corpus and conformity with characteristics of Iranian culture.
    Source
    Indexer. 25(2006) no.1, S.19-22
  3. Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989) 0.01 
    0.014881384 = product of:
  0.04464415 = sum of:
    0.04464415 = product of:
      0.0892883 = sum of:
        0.0892883 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0892883 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
  4. Owens, L.A.; Cochrane, P.A.: Thesaurus evaluation (2004) 0.01 
    0.0131310485 = product of:
  0.039393146 = sum of:
    0.039393146 = product of:
      0.07878629 = sum of:
        0.07878629 = weight(_text_:history in 4856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07878629 = score(doc=4856,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 4856, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4856)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The process of thesaurus evaluation can enhance the value of a thesaurus in terms of usability, scope, precision and recall. Structural, formative, observational and comparative evaluation techniques are explained along with specific examples of their use. These methods of evaluation can be applied in the assessment of an existing thesaurus or the construction of a new thesaurus. The history of thesauri since 1960, the development of national and international standards, and sources of evaluative literature are also discussed.
  5. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.01 
    0.012755471 = product of:
  0.038266413 = sum of:
    0.038266413 = product of:
      0.076532826 = sum of:
        0.076532826 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076532826 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  6. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01 
    0.012755471 = product of:
  0.038266413 = sum of:
    0.038266413 = product of:
      0.076532826 = sum of:
        0.076532826 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076532826 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  7. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01 
    0.012755471 = product of:
  0.038266413 = sum of:
    0.038266413 = product of:
      0.076532826 = sum of:
        0.076532826 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076532826 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  8. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.01 
    0.012755471 = product of:
  0.038266413 = sum of:
    0.038266413 = product of:
      0.076532826 = sum of:
        0.076532826 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076532826 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  9. Will, L.: ¬The ISO 25964 data model for the structure of an information retrieval thesaurus (2012) 0.01 
    0.011255185 = product of:
  0.033765554 = sum of:
    0.033765554 = product of:
      0.06753111 = sum of:
        0.06753111 = weight(_text_:history in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06753111 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    International standard ISO 25964-1:2011 - Thesauri for information retrieval, includes a detailed data model for thesaurus structure. It is intended to provide a rigorous presentation of the elements and relationships which will not only clarify and standardise the varying and conflicting interpretations which exist but which can also be implemented consistently in automated systems. It makes a clear distinction between concepts and the terms which are used to label them, and includes other features that may be present in a thesaurus, such as compound equivalence, arrays and node labels, concept groups, notes and version history.
  10. Baca, M.; Gill, M.: Encoding multilingual knowledge systems in the digital age : the Getty vocabularies (2015) 0.01 
    0.011255185 = product of:
  0.033765554 = sum of:
    0.033765554 = product of:
      0.06753111 = sum of:
        0.06753111 = weight(_text_:history in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06753111 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper gives an overview of the history, development, and structure of the electronic thesauri produced and maintained by the Getty Research Institute (GRI). We describe the evolution of the Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT®), the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names (TGN®), and the Union List of Artist Names (ULAN®) as multilingual, cross-cultural knowledge organization systems (KOS); the factors that make them unique; and their potential, when expressed as Linked Open Data (LOD) to play a key role in the Semantic Web.
  11. Kempf, A.O.; Neubert, J.: ¬The role of thesauri in an Open Web : a case study of the STW Thesaurus for economics (2016) 0.01 
    0.011255185 = product of:
  0.033765554 = sum of:
    0.033765554 = product of:
      0.06753111 = sum of:
        0.06753111 = weight(_text_:history in 2912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06753111 = score(doc=2912,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 2912, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2912)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper illustrates the changing role of thesauri interlinked with overall changes of modern information infrastructure services, referring to "STW Thesaurus for Economics" as a case study. It starts with an overview of the history and development of the STW and describes the far-reaching changes brought about by its publication on the Web, with regard to subject indexing, retrieval and new uses for Linked Open Data. It argues that only the most recent technological developments help thesauri to exploit their full potential which is why they more than ever have a place in current information retrieval and infrastructure.
  12. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Information Retrieval Thesaurus (2019) 0.01 
    0.011255185 = product of:
  0.033765554 = sum of:
    0.033765554 = product of:
      0.06753111 = sum of:
        0.06753111 = weight(_text_:history in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06753111 = score(doc=5210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In the post-war period before computers were readily available, urgent demand for scientific and industrial develop-ment stimulated research and development (R&D) that led to the birth of the information retrieval thesaurus. This article traces the early history, speciation and progressive improvement of the thesaurus to reach the state now conveyed by guidelines in inter-national and national standards. Despite doubts about the effec-tiveness of the thesaurus throughout this period, and notwith-standing the dominance of Google and other search engines in the information retrieval (IR) scene today, the thesaurus still plays a complementary part in the organization of knowledge and in-formation resources. Success today depends on interoperability, and is opening up opportunities in linked data applications. At the same time, the IR demand from workers in the knowledge society drives interest in hybrid forms of knowledge organization system (KOS) that may pool the genes of thesauri with those of ontologies and classification schemes.
  13. Riege, U.: Thesaurus und Klassifikation Sozialwissenschaften : Entwicklung der elektronischen Versionen (1998) 0.01 
    0.01062956 = product of:
  0.03188868 = sum of:
    0.03188868 = product of:
      0.06377736 = sum of:
        0.06377736 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06377736 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  14. Alkämper, H.: ¬Die Neugestaltung des Parlamentsthesaurus PARTHES (1998) 0.01 
    0.01062956 = product of:
  0.03188868 = sum of:
    0.03188868 = product of:
      0.06377736 = sum of:
        0.06377736 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06377736 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  15. Schenkel, M.: Vom Leitkartenthesaurus zum Online-Bibliotheksthesaurus : Die Revision des Dokumentationssystems der Bibliothek des Deutschen Bundestages (1949-1998) (1998) 0.01 
    0.01062956 = product of:
  0.03188868 = sum of:
    0.03188868 = product of:
      0.06377736 = sum of:
        0.06377736 = weight(_text_:22 in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06377736 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  16. Velasco, M.: Algoritmo de filtrado multitermino para la obtencion de relaciones jerarquicas en la construction automatica de un tesauro de descriptores (1999) 0.01 
    0.01062956 = product of:
  0.03188868 = sum of:
    0.03188868 = product of:
      0.06377736 = sum of:
        0.06377736 = weight(_text_:22 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06377736 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.1, S.34-49
  17. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.01 
    0.01062956 = product of:
  0.03188868 = sum of:
    0.03188868 = product of:
      0.06377736 = sum of:
        0.06377736 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06377736 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  18. Chen, S.S.-J.: Methodological considerations for developing Art & Architecture Thesaurus in Chinese and its applications (2021) 0.01 
    0.00937932 = product of:
  0.028137958 = sum of:
    0.028137958 = product of:
      0.056275915 = sum of:
        0.056275915 = weight(_text_:history in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056275915 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    A multilingual thesaurus' development needs the appropriate methodological considerations not only for linguistics, but also cultural heterogeneity, as demonstrated in this report on the multilingual project of the Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) in the Chinese language, which has been a collaboration between the Academia Sinica Center for Digital Culture and the Getty Research Institute for more than a decade. After a brief overview of the project, the paper will introduce a holistic methodology for considering how to enable Western art to be accessible to Chinese users and Chinese art accessible to Western users. The conceptual and structural issues will be discussed, especially the challenges of developing terminology in two different cultures. For instance, some terms shared by Western and Chinese cultures could be understood differently in each culture, which raises questions regarding their locations within the hierarchical structure of the AAT. Finally, the report will provide cases to demonstrate how the Chinese-Language AAT language supports online exhibitions, digital humanities and linking of digital art history content to the web of data.
  19. Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997) 0.01 
    0.0085036475 = product of:
  0.025510943 = sum of:
    0.025510943 = product of:
      0.051021885 = sum of:
        0.051021885 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051021885 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
  20. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.01 
    0.0085036475 = product of:
  0.025510943 = sum of:
    0.025510943 = product of:
      0.051021885 = sum of:
        0.051021885 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051021885 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047072954 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 28
  • d 8
  • f 4
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 34
  • m 3
  • el 2
  • n 2
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications