Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bawden, D."
  1. Bawden, D.: Information and digital literacies : a review of concepts (2001) 0.03
    0.029939227 = product of:
      0.11975691 = sum of:
        0.058416907 = weight(_text_:computer in 4479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058416907 = score(doc=4479,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.39971197 = fieldWeight in 4479, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4479)
        0.061340004 = weight(_text_:network in 4479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061340004 = score(doc=4479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17809492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.3444231 = fieldWeight in 4479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4479)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The concepts of 'information literacy' and 'digital literacy' are described, and reviewed, by way of a literature survey and analysis. Related concepts, including computer literacy, library literacy, network literacy, Internet literacy and hyper-literacy are also discussed, and their relationships elucidated. After a general introduction, the paper begins with the basic concept of 'literacy', which is then expanded to include newer forms of literacy, more suitable for complex information environments. Some of these, for example library, media and computer literacies, are based largely on specific skills, but have some extension beyond them. They lead togeneral concepts, such as information literacy and digital literacy which are based on knowledge, perceptions and attitudes, though reliant on the simpler skills-based literacies
  2. Rowlands, I.; Bawden, D.: Building the digital library on solid research foundations (1999) 0.02
    0.0150676975 = product of:
      0.06027079 = sum of:
        0.041306987 = weight(_text_:computer in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041306987 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.28263903 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
        0.018963803 = product of:
          0.037927605 = sum of:
            0.037927605 = weight(_text_:22 in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037927605 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The digital library is a socio-technical concept of great significance. It redefines the relationships between information providers and intermediaries and, potentially, transforms the way that services are delivered to users. This article, based on a British Library Research & Innovation Centre funded study, reviews current themes and directions in digital library research and scholarship. It locates the digital library in a simple work-oriented framework emphasising its social as well as its systems and informational dimensions. The article highlights differences in understanding of the digital library construct between the library and computer science communities and identifies some critical areas for further research.
    Date
    21. 1.2007 12:03:22
  3. Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Distance learning and LIS professional development (2002) 0.01
    0.0059009986 = product of:
      0.04720799 = sum of:
        0.04720799 = weight(_text_:computer in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04720799 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.32301605 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Theme
    Computer Based Training
  4. Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008) 0.00
    0.0047409507 = product of:
      0.037927605 = sum of:
        0.037927605 = product of:
          0.07585521 = sum of:
            0.07585521 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07585521 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:22:20
  5. Bawden, D.: Browsing : theory and practice (1993) 0.00
    0.004425749 = product of:
      0.035405993 = sum of:
        0.035405993 = weight(_text_:computer in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035405993 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a selective literature review covering the process of browsing as a means of searching for information. References are selected in order to illustrate the major themes and to bring out points which have not been emphasised before. The main points covered in the review include: consideration of browsing as an important, but under rated and little understood, form of information access; the ability in browsing to find analogies, connections, and new lines of thought; the potential of browsings as an ideal technique for accasional or non expert users; the ability to apply browsing to both paper based and computerized information retrieval; and the ability to search for information in a semi-random fashion leading to serendipitous linkage. Concludes that, despite the acknowledges importance of browsing, the increased effort being expended in making computerized systems browsable and the many references to the concept in the computer literature, there is still a lack of real understanding of the basic concepts of the process
  6. Brophy, J.; Bawden, D.: Is Google enough? : Comparison of an internet search engine with academic library resources (2005) 0.00
    0.0026019474 = product of:
      0.02081558 = sum of:
        0.02081558 = product of:
          0.04163116 = sum of:
            0.04163116 = weight(_text_:resources in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04163116 = score(doc=648,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.28518265 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of the study was to compare an internet search engine, Google, with appropriate library databases and systems, in order to assess the relative value, strengths and weaknesses of the two sorts of system. Design/methodology/approach - A case study approach was used, with detailed analysis and failure checking of results. The performance of the two systems was assessed in terms of coverage, unique records, precision, and quality and accessibility of results. A novel form of relevance assessment, based on the work of Saracevic and others was devised. Findings - Google is superior for coverage and accessibility. Library systems are superior for quality of results. Precision is similar for both systems. Good coverage requires use of both, as both have many unique items. Improving the skills of the searcher is likely to give better results from the library systems, but not from Google. Research limitations/implications - Only four case studies were included. These were limited to the kind of queries likely to be searched by university students. Library resources were limited to those in two UK academic libraries. Only the basic Google web search functionality was used, and only the top ten records examined. Practical implications - The results offer guidance for those providing support and training for use of these retrieval systems, and also provide evidence for debates on the "Google phenomenon". Originality/value - This is one of the few studies which provide evidence on the relative performance of internet search engines and library databases, and the only one to conduct such in-depth case studies. The method for the assessment of relevance is novel.
  7. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: ¬An introduction to information science (2012) 0.00
    0.0025757966 = product of:
      0.020606373 = sum of:
        0.020606373 = product of:
          0.041212745 = sum of:
            0.041212745 = weight(_text_:resources in 4966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041212745 = score(doc=4966,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 4966, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4966)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Landmark textbook taking a whole subject approach to information science as a discipline. The authors' expert narratives guides you through each of the essential components of information science, offering a concise introduction an expertly chosen readings and resources. This is the definitve science textbook for students of this subject, and of information and knowledge management, librarianship, archives and records management worldwide.
  8. Bawden, D.: Information policy or knowledge policy? (1997) 0.00
    0.0023704753 = product of:
      0.018963803 = sum of:
        0.018963803 = product of:
          0.037927605 = sum of:
            0.037927605 = weight(_text_:22 in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037927605 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Understanding information policy. Proceedings of a British Library funded Information Policy Unit Workshop, Cumberland Lodge, UK, 22-24 July 1996. Ed. by Ian Rowlands
  9. Bawden, D.: Encountering on the road to serendip? : Browsing in new information environments (2011) 0.00
    0.0023704753 = product of:
      0.018963803 = sum of:
        0.018963803 = product of:
          0.037927605 = sum of:
            0.037927605 = weight(_text_:22 in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037927605 = score(doc=3361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22