-
Greenberg, J.: Automatic query expansion via lexical-semantic relationships (2001)
0.01
0.0054767863 = product of:
0.04381429 = sum of:
0.04381429 = weight(_text_:network in 5703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04381429 = score(doc=5703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17809492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.039991006 = queryNorm
0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 5703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5703)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Structured thesauri encode equivalent, hierarchical, and associative relationships and have been developed as indexing/retrieval tools. Despite the fact that these tools provide a rich semantic network of vocabulary terms, they are seldom employed for automatic query expansion (QE) activities. This article reports on an experiment that examined whether thesaurus terms, related to query in a specified semantic way (as synonyms and partial-synonyms (SYNs), narrower terms (NTs), related terms (RTs), and broader terms (BTs)), could be identified as having a more positive impact on retrieval effectiveness when added to a query through automatic QE. The research found that automatic QE via SYNs and NTs increased relative recall with a decline in precision that was not statistically significant, and that automatic QE via RTs and BTs increased relative recall with a decline in precision that was statistically significant. Recallbased and a precision-based ranking orders for automatic QE via semantically encoded thesauri terminology were identified. Mapping results found between enduser query terms and the ProQuest Controlled Vocabulary (1997) (the thesaurus used in this study) are reported, and future research foci related to the investigation are discussed
-
Greenberg, J.; Pattuelli, M.; Parsia, B.; Robertson, W.: Author-generated Dublin Core Metadata for Web Resources : A Baseline Study in an Organization (2002)
0.00
0.0036797093 = product of:
0.029437674 = sum of:
0.029437674 = product of:
0.05887535 = sum of:
0.05887535 = weight(_text_:resources in 1281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05887535 = score(doc=1281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.039991006 = queryNorm
0.40330917 = fieldWeight in 1281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Greenberg, J.: Metadata generation : processes, people and tools (2003)
0.00
0.0029437675 = product of:
0.02355014 = sum of:
0.02355014 = product of:
0.04710028 = sum of:
0.04710028 = weight(_text_:resources in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04710028 = score(doc=1251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.039991006 = queryNorm
0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Metadata generation is the act of creating or producing metadata. Generating good quality metadata in an efficient manner is essential for organizing and making accessible the growing number of rich resources available an the Web. The success of digital libraries, the sustenance of interoperability - as promoted by the Open Archives Initiative - and the evolution of Semantic Web all rely an efficient metadata generation. This article sketches a metadata generation framework that involves processes, people and tools. It also presents selected research initiatives and highlights the goals of the Metadata Generation Research Project.
-
White, H.C.; Carrier, S.; Thompson, A.; Greenberg, J.; Scherle, R.: ¬The Dryad Data Repository : a Singapore framework metadata architecture in a DSpace environment (2008)
0.00
0.0023704753 = product of:
0.018963803 = sum of:
0.018963803 = product of:
0.037927605 = sum of:
0.037927605 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037927605 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039991006 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Greenberg, J.: Understanding metadata and metadata scheme (2005)
0.00
0.0022078257 = product of:
0.017662605 = sum of:
0.017662605 = product of:
0.03532521 = sum of:
0.03532521 = weight(_text_:resources in 5725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03532521 = score(doc=5725,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.039991006 = queryNorm
0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 5725, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5725)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Although the development and implementation of metadata schemes over the last decade has been extensive, research examining the sum of these activities is limited. This limitation is likely due to the massive scope of the topic. A framework is needed to study the full extent of, and functionalities supported by, metadata schemes. Metadata schemes developed for information resources are analyzed. To begin, I present a review of the definition of metadata, metadata functions, and several metadata typologies. Next, a conceptualization for metadata schemes is presented. The emphasis is on semantic container-like metadata schemes (data structures). The last part of this paper introduces the MODAL (Metadata Objectives and principles, Domains, and Architectural Layout) framework as an approach for studying metadata schemes. The paper concludes with a brief discussion on value of frameworks for examining metadata schemes, including different types of metadata schemes.
-
Shoffner, M.; Greenberg, J.; Kramer-Duffield, J.; Woodbury, D.: Web 2.0 semantic systems : collaborative learning in science (2008)
0.00
0.0013545573 = product of:
0.010836459 = sum of:
0.010836459 = product of:
0.021672918 = sum of:
0.021672918 = weight(_text_:22 in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021672918 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039991006 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
