Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Li, J."
  1. Zhao, S.X.; Zhang, P.L.; Li, J.; Tan, A.M.; Ye, F.Y.: Abstracting the core subnet of weighted networks based on link strengths (2014) 0.03
    0.027182227 = product of:
      0.10872891 = sum of:
        0.0910663 = weight(_text_:network in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0910663 = score(doc=1256,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17809492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.51133573 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
        0.017662605 = product of:
          0.03532521 = sum of:
            0.03532521 = weight(_text_:resources in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03532521 = score(doc=1256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Most measures of networks are based on the nodes, although links are also elementary units in networks and represent interesting social or physical connections. In this work we suggest an option for exploring networks, called the h-strength, with explicit focus on links and their strengths. The h-strength and its extensions can naturally simplify a complex network to a small and concise subnetwork (h-subnet) but retains the most important links with its core structure. Its applications in 2 typical information networks, the paper cocitation network of a topic (the h-index) and 5 scientific collaboration networks in the field of "water resources," suggest that h-strength and its extensions could be a useful choice for abstracting, simplifying, and visualizing a complex network. Moreover, we observe that the 2 informetric models, the Glänzel-Schubert model and the Hirsch model, roughly hold in the context of the h-strength for the collaboration networks.
  2. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.03
    0.025280248 = product of:
      0.10112099 = sum of:
        0.081964664 = weight(_text_:europe in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081964664 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24358861 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
        0.019156333 = product of:
          0.038312666 = sum of:
            0.038312666 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038312666 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  3. Lin, X.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.: Theme creation for digital collections (2008) 0.02
    0.0150676975 = product of:
      0.06027079 = sum of:
        0.041306987 = weight(_text_:computer in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041306987 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.28263903 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
        0.018963803 = product of:
          0.037927605 = sum of:
            0.037927605 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037927605 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an approach for integrating multiple sources of semantics for the creating metadata. A new framework is proposed to define topics and themes with both manually and automatically generated terms. The automatically generated terms include: terms from a semantic analysis of the collections and terms from previous user's queries. An interface is developed to facilitate the creation and use of such topics and themes for metadata creation. The framework and the interface promote human-computer collaboration in metadata creation. Several principles underlying such approach are also discussed.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  4. Xie, Z.; Ouyang, Z.; Li, J.; Dong, E.: Modelling transition phenomena of scientific coauthorship networks (2018) 0.01
    0.013301588 = product of:
      0.1064127 = sum of:
        0.1064127 = weight(_text_:property in 4043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1064127 = score(doc=4043,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25336683 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.335595 = idf(docFreq=212, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.4199946 = fieldWeight in 4043, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.335595 = idf(docFreq=212, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4043)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In a range of scientific coauthorship networks, transitions emerge in degree distribution, in the correlation between degree and local clustering coefficient, etc. The existence of those transitions could be regarded because of the diversity in collaboration behaviors of scientific fields. A growing geometric hypergraph built on a cluster of concentric circles is proposed to model two specific collaboration behaviors, namely the behaviors of research team leaders and those of the other team members. The model successfully predicts the transitions, as well as many common features of coauthorship networks. Particularly, it realizes a process of deriving the complex "scale-free" property from the simple "yes/no" decisions. Moreover, it provides a reasonable explanation for the emergence of transitions with the difference of collaboration behaviors between leaders and other members. The difference emerges in the evolution of research teams, which synthetically addresses several specific factors of generating collaborations, namely the communications between research teams, academic impacts and homophily of authors.
  5. Li, J.; Willett, P.: ArticleRank : a PageRank-based alternative to numbers of citations for analysing citation networks (2009) 0.01
    0.0077453456 = product of:
      0.061962765 = sum of:
        0.061962765 = weight(_text_:network in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061962765 = score(doc=751,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17809492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.34791988 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to suggest an alternative to the widely used Times Cited criterion for analysing citation networks. The approach involves taking account of the natures of the papers that cite a given paper, so as to differentiate between papers that attract the same number of citations. Design/methodology/approach - ArticleRank is an algorithm that has been derived from Google's PageRank algorithm to measure the influence of journal articles. ArticleRank is applied to two datasets - a citation network based on an early paper on webometrics, and a self-citation network based on the 19 most cited papers in the Journal of Documentation - using citation data taken from the Web of Knowledge database. Findings - ArticleRank values provide a different ranking of a set of papers from that provided by the corresponding Times Cited values, and overcomes the inability of the latter to differentiate between papers with the same numbers of citations. The difference in rankings between Times Cited and ArticleRank is greatest for the most heavily cited articles in a dataset. Originality/value - This is a novel application of the PageRank algorithm.
  6. Lin, N.; Li, D.; Ding, Y.; He, B.; Qin, Z.; Tang, J.; Li, J.; Dong, T.: ¬The dynamic features of Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube (2012) 0.00
    0.0031867218 = product of:
      0.025493775 = sum of:
        0.025493775 = product of:
          0.05098755 = sum of:
            0.05098755 = weight(_text_:resources in 4970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05098755 = score(doc=4970,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.349276 = fieldWeight in 4970, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This article investigates the dynamic features of social tagging vocabularies in Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube from 2003 to 2008. Three algorithms are designed to study the macro- and micro-tag growth as well as the dynamics of taggers' activities, respectively. Moreover, we propose a Tagger Tag Resource Latent Dirichlet Allocation (TTR-LDA) model to explore the evolution of topics emerging from those social vocabularies. Our results show that (a) at the macro level, tag growth in all the three tagging systems obeys power law distribution with exponents lower than 1; at the micro level, the tag growth of popular resources in all three tagging systems follows a similar power law distribution; (b) the exponents of tag growth vary in different evolving stages of resources; (c) the growth of number of taggers associated with different popular resources presents a feature of convergence over time; (d) the active level of taggers has a positive correlation with the macro-tag growth of different tagging systems; and (e) some topics evolve into several subtopics over time while others experience relatively stable stages in which their contents do not change much, and certain groups of taggers continue their interests in them.
  7. Li, J.; Shi, D.: Sleeping beauties in genius work : when were they awakened? (2016) 0.00
    0.002031836 = product of:
      0.016254688 = sum of:
        0.016254688 = product of:
          0.032509375 = sum of:
            0.032509375 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032509375 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:13:32
  8. Zheng, R.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Huang, Z.: ¬A framework for authorship identification of online messages : writing-style features and classification techniques (2006) 0.00
    0.0016931967 = product of:
      0.013545574 = sum of:
        0.013545574 = product of:
          0.027091147 = sum of:
            0.027091147 = weight(_text_:22 in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027091147 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:14:37