Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zhang, L."
  1. Lai, M.-S.; Fan, Z.; Zhang, L.: ¬The development, current state, and effects of community informatization in mainland China : dreaming scientific order at the fin de siècle (2013) 0.01
    0.014343816 = product of:
      0.11475053 = sum of:
        0.11475053 = weight(_text_:europe in 5554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11475053 = score(doc=5554,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24358861 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.4710833 = fieldWeight in 5554, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5554)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, community informatization initiatives have developed throughout mainland China. The meaning of "community informatization" in China is similar to "community informatics" in the U.S. This paper aims to investigate the current state of community informatization in mainland China-with a focus on best practices, major challenges, patterns of development, developing trends, and effects. Comparing the theory and practice of China's community informatization to community informatics in other countries, especially in the U.S. and Europe, this paper asks: can government-sponsored or independent informatization efforts bridge the digital divide and help China realize digital-or information-equity?
  2. Kulczycki, E.; Huang, Y.; Zuccala, A.A.; Engels, T.C.E.; Ferrara, A.; Guns, R.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.; Taskin, Z.; Zhang, L.: Uses of the Journal Impact Factor in national journal rankings in China and Europe (2022) 0.01
    0.010245583 = product of:
      0.081964664 = sum of:
        0.081964664 = weight(_text_:europe in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081964664 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24358861 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  3. Zhang, L.; Thijs, B.; Glänzel, W.: What does scientometrics share with other "metrics" sciences? (2013) 0.01
    0.008762858 = product of:
      0.07010286 = sum of:
        0.07010286 = weight(_text_:network in 960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07010286 = score(doc=960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17809492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.3936264 = fieldWeight in 960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=960)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the authors answer the question of whether the field of scientometrics/bibliometrics shares essential characteristics of "metrics" sciences. To achieve this objective, the citation network of seven selected metrics and their information environment is analyzed.
  4. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.01
    0.0070661027 = product of:
      0.05652882 = sum of:
        0.05652882 = sum of:
          0.029437674 = weight(_text_:resources in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029437674 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039991006 = queryNorm
              0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.027091147 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027091147 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039991006 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
  5. Zhang, L.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, T.: Focused named entity recognition using machine learning (2004) 0.00
    0.004063672 = product of:
      0.032509375 = sum of:
        0.032509375 = product of:
          0.06501875 = sum of:
            0.06501875 = weight(_text_:22 in 4086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06501875 = score(doc=4086,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4086, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4086)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    15.10.2005 19:57:22
  6. Zhang, L.; Liu, Q.L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.F.; Pan, Y.; Yu, Y.: Semplore: an IR approach to scalable hybrid query of Semantic Web data (2007) 0.00
    0.0036881242 = product of:
      0.029504994 = sum of:
        0.029504994 = weight(_text_:computer in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029504994 = score(doc=231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.20188503 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; 4825
  7. Zhang, L.: Linking information through function (2014) 0.00
    0.0022078257 = product of:
      0.017662605 = sum of:
        0.017662605 = product of:
          0.03532521 = sum of:
            0.03532521 = weight(_text_:resources in 1526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03532521 = score(doc=1526,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 1526, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1526)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    How information resources can be meaningfully related has been addressed in contexts from bibliographic entries to hyperlinks and, more recently, linked data. The genre structure and relationships among genre structure constituents shed new light on organizing information by purpose or function. This study examines the relationships among a set of functional units previously constructed in a taxonomy, each of which is a chunk of information embedded in a document and is distinct in terms of its communicative function. Through a card-sort study, relationships among functional units were identified with regard to their occurrence and function. The findings suggest that a group of functional units can be identified, collocated, and navigated by particular relationships. Understanding how functional units are related to each other is significant in linking information pieces in documents to support finding, aggregating, and navigating information in a distributed information environment.
  8. Zhang, L.: Grasping the structure of journal articles : utilizing the functions of information units (2012) 0.00
    0.002031836 = product of:
      0.016254688 = sum of:
        0.016254688 = product of:
          0.032509375 = sum of:
            0.032509375 = weight(_text_:22 in 65) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032509375 = score(doc=65,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 65, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=65)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2012 18:43:22