Gartner, R.: Metadata in the digital library : building an integrated strategy with XML (2021)
0.02
0.015509414 = product of:
0.062037654 = sum of:
0.05320635 = weight(_text_:property in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05320635 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25336683 = queryWeight, product of:
6.335595 = idf(docFreq=212, maxDocs=44218)
0.039991006 = queryNorm
0.2099973 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.335595 = idf(docFreq=212, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
0.008831303 = product of:
0.017662605 = sum of:
0.017662605 = weight(_text_:resources in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017662605 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.039991006 = queryNorm
0.12099275 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The range of metadata needed to run a digital library and preserve its collections in the long term is much more extensive and complicated than anything in its traditional counterpart. It includes the same 'descriptive' information which guides users to the resources they require but must supplement this with comprehensive 'administrative' metadata: this encompasses technical details of the files that make up its collections, the documentation of complex intellectual property rights and the extensive set needed to support its preservation in the long-term. To accommodate all of this requires the use of multiple metadata standards, all of which have to be brought together into a single integrated whole.
