Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Kataloge"
  1. Krajewski, M.: Paper machines : about cards & catalogs, 1548-1929 (2011) 0.02
    0.024170876 = product of:
      0.0966835 = sum of:
        0.081964664 = weight(_text_:europe in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081964664 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24358861 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
        0.014718837 = product of:
          0.029437674 = sum of:
            0.029437674 = weight(_text_:resources in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029437674 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    "Krajewski draws on recent German media theory and on a rich array of European and American sources in this thought-provoking account of the index card as a tool of information management. In investigating the road from the slips of paper of the 16th century to the data processing of the 20th, Krajewski highlights its twists and turns--failures and unintended consequences, reinventions, and surprising transfers."--Ann M. Blair, Henry Charles Lea Professor of History, Harvard University, and author of Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age -- Ann Blair "This is a fascinating, original, continuously surprising, and meticulously researched study of the long history of the emergence of card systems for organizing not only libraries but business activities in Europe and the United States. It is particularly important for English language readers due to its European perspective and the extraordinary range of German and other resources on which it draws." --W. Boyd Rayward, Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign -- W. Boyd Rayward "Markus Krajewski has done the history of cataloguing and the history of information management a considerable service: I recommend it highly." -- Professor Tom Wilson, Editor-in-Chief, Information Research
  2. Crestadoro, A.: ¬The art of making catalogues of libraries : or, a method to obtain in a short time a most perfect, complete, and satisfactory printed catalog of the British Museum Library / by a reader therein [i.e. A. Crestadoro] (1856) 0.02
    0.015518518 = product of:
      0.124148145 = sum of:
        0.124148145 = weight(_text_:property in 2159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.124148145 = score(doc=2159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25336683 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.335595 = idf(docFreq=212, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.4899937 = fieldWeight in 2159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.335595 = idf(docFreq=212, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2159)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Content
    Enthält als Definition für Katalog: "a list of goods; its direct object is to make an inventory of the property by recording a full and exact description of each and every article". Er führt weiter aus: There is no need to order this list "beyond the most common process of merely ticketing for future reference each article with a progressive number". Indexes on titles, authors and subject can refer to these running numbers.
  3. Gartner, R.: Metadata : shaping knowledge from antiquity to the semantic web (2016) 0.01
    0.009034022 = product of:
      0.072272174 = sum of:
        0.072272174 = weight(_text_:computer in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072272174 = score(doc=731,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.4945153 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    LCSH
    Computer science
    Computer applications in arts and humanities
    Popular computer science
    Subject
    Computer science
    Computer applications in arts and humanities
    Popular computer science
  4. Hauff, M.: Gimme back the card catalog (1996) 0.01
    0.008345272 = product of:
      0.06676218 = sum of:
        0.06676218 = weight(_text_:computer in 500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06676218 = score(doc=500,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.45681366 = fieldWeight in 500, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=500)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Computer catalogues are far less easy to use than card catalogues and that their increasing sophistication takes them further away from the casual user, making successful catalogue use and library research an elitist skill. Describes a number of ways in which computer catalogues can be frustrating to use, both physically and intellectually, and suggests that card catalogues be retained alongside the automated version
  5. Panizzi, A.K.C.B.: Passages in my official life (1871) 0.01
    0.006704717 = product of:
      0.053637736 = sum of:
        0.053637736 = product of:
          0.10727547 = sum of:
            0.10727547 = weight(_text_:22 in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10727547 = score(doc=935,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2007 12:05:26
    22. 7.2007 12:08:24
  6. Laaff, M.: Googles genialer Urahn (2011) 0.01
    0.005381321 = product of:
      0.021525284 = sum of:
        0.014752497 = weight(_text_:computer in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014752497 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.100942515 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
        0.006772787 = product of:
          0.013545574 = sum of:
            0.013545574 = weight(_text_:22 in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013545574 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Content
    "Die erste Suchmaschine der Welt ist aus Holz und Papier gebaut. Mannshohe, dunkelbraune Schränke reihen sich aneinander, darin Zettelkästen mit Karteikarten. "Sechzehn Millionen Karteikarten", sagt Jaques Gillen und legt die Hand auf den Griff eines Schrankes. Gillen ist Archivar im Mundaneum - der Institution, die diesen gigantischen Katalog in den zwanziger Jahren des vergangenen Jahrhunderts betrieb. Anfragen gingen per Brief oder Telegramm in Brüssel ein, bis zu 1500 im Jahr. Antworten wurden per Hand herausgesucht, das konnte Wochen dauern. Ein Papier-Google, entwickelt Jahrzehnte vor dem Internet, ohne Computer. Erfinder des Mundaneums war der belgische Bibliothekar Paul Otlet. Der gelernte Jurist aus bürgerlichem Hause wollte das Wissen der Welt kartografieren und in Holzschränken aufbewahren. Seine Vision: Das Mundaneum sollte alle Bücher erfassen, die jemals erschienen sind - und sie über ein eigens entwickeltes Archivsystem miteinander verbinden. Archivar Gillen fischt eine Karteikarte aus einem Kasten. Aus dem Zahlenwirrwarr darauf kann er dutzende Informationen über das Buch, auf das verwiesen wird, ablesen. Mit seinem Archivsystem, darin sind sich viele Forscher heute einig, hat Otlet praktisch schon um die Jahrhundertwende den Hypertext erfunden - das Netz von Verknüpfungen, die uns heute durch das Internet navigieren. "Man könnte Otlet als einen Vordenker des Internets bezeichnen", sagt Gillen und steckt die Karteikarte zurück.
    Date
    24.10.2008 14:19:22
  7. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.01
    0.0052930266 = product of:
      0.042344213 = sum of:
        0.042344213 = product of:
          0.12703264 = sum of:
            0.12703264 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12703264 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33904418 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
  8. Liu, S.; Shen, Z.: ¬The development of cataloging in China (2002) 0.00
    0.004425749 = product of:
      0.035405993 = sum of:
        0.035405993 = weight(_text_:computer in 5486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035405993 = score(doc=5486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 5486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5486)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    With a long history, cataloging has evolved with changes in society, economy, and technology in China. This paper presents Chinese cataloging history in four parts, with emphasis on the last two parts: the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949 and the development of cataloging after 1979 when China opened its doors to the world. Particularly important has been the rapid growth of online cataloging in recent years. The China Academic Library and Information System (CALIS), as a successful online cataloging model, is emphasized. Through investigation of the entire history of Chinese cataloging, three distinct features can be stated: (1) Standardization- switching from the Chinese traditional way to aligning with international standards, (2) Cooperation-from decentralized and self-supporting systems to sharing systems, (3) Computerization and networking-from manual operation to computer-based online operation. At the end of this paper, a set of means by which to enhance online cataloging and resource sharing is suggested.
  9. Takawashi, T.: Cataloging in Japan : relationship between Japanese and Western cataloging rules (2002) 0.00
    0.004425749 = product of:
      0.035405993 = sum of:
        0.035405993 = weight(_text_:computer in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035405993 = score(doc=5490,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In 1943 the Japanese League of Young Librarians published Nippon Catalog Rules (NCR1942) based on ALA 1908, and adopted the author main-entry system for Japanese and Western materials. After World War II, the Japan Library Association (JLA) compiled and published NCR1952, based on ALA 1949 and LC 1949 but maintained the author main-entry system. The main-entry system was then replaced by an alternative heading method, which came to be known as the Description-Independent-System (DIS). NCR1965 adopted the main entry principle, which was based on the Paris Principles of 1961. NCR1977 was compiled and published by the JLA Cataloging Committee and based upon a "no-main-entry principle." Then in 1987, the Committee published the standard edition of the rules, which was completely compatible with the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD). NCR1987R was published in 1994 and NCR1987R01 in 2001, which included revised "Chapter 9: Computer Files," devised according to ISBD(ER).
  10. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003) 0.00
    0.0033863934 = product of:
      0.027091147 = sum of:
        0.027091147 = product of:
          0.054182295 = sum of:
            0.054182295 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054182295 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Pages
    S.3-22
  11. Steinhagen, E.N.: Historical perspective of a union catalog in Chile : authorities and periodicals (2003) 0.00
    0.0033863934 = product of:
      0.027091147 = sum of:
        0.027091147 = product of:
          0.054182295 = sum of:
            0.054182295 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054182295 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2006 20:06:22
  12. Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : On an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017) 0.00
    0.0029504993 = product of:
      0.023603994 = sum of:
        0.023603994 = weight(_text_:computer in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023603994 = score(doc=3859,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.16150802 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographical Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data - modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid - 1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early 20th - century British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911 - 1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can conceivably be classified. These he first divided into accidental and inseparable attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition - level and copy - level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into physical and non - physical attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstraction hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity - the book - , whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
  13. Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : on an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017) 0.00
    0.0029504993 = product of:
      0.023603994 = sum of:
        0.023603994 = weight(_text_:computer in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023603994 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.16150802 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data-modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid-1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early twentiethcentury British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911-1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can be classified. These he first divided into "accidental" and "inseparable" attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition-level and copy-level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into "physical" and "non-physical" attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstract hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity-the book-whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
  14. Glasby, D.: Historical background and review of serials cataloging rules (1990) 0.00
    0.0029437675 = product of:
      0.02355014 = sum of:
        0.02355014 = product of:
          0.04710028 = sum of:
            0.04710028 = weight(_text_:resources in 7164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04710028 = score(doc=7164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 7164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 34(1990) no.1, S.80-87
  15. Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975) 0.00
    0.0027091147 = product of:
      0.021672918 = sum of:
        0.021672918 = product of:
          0.043345835 = sum of:
            0.043345835 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043345835 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
  16. Tillett, B.B.: Catalog it once for all : a history of cooperative cataloging in the United States prior to 1967 (before MARC) (1993) 0.00
    0.0025757966 = product of:
      0.020606373 = sum of:
        0.020606373 = product of:
          0.041212745 = sum of:
            0.041212745 = weight(_text_:resources in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041212745 = score(doc=575,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Librarians in the United States always seem to be trying to reduce their costs and share resources through various centralized or cooperative endeavors. Early cooperative cataloging efforts, prior to 1967 when the MARC format made its appearance and automation took off, clearly recognized the need to create a shared national resource of bibliographic records. Yet, the dreams of cataloging it once for all turned into nightmares over and over as many schemes were tried and failed. However, some schemes succeeded and millions of items were cataloged through these early efforts. The promise of our preliminary steps in cooperative cataloging during the pre-automation era sparked our imaginations and raised our hopes for the future.
  17. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002) 0.00
    0.0023704753 = product of:
      0.018963803 = sum of:
        0.018963803 = product of:
          0.037927605 = sum of:
            0.037927605 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037927605 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
  18. Krajewski, M.: Zettelwirtschaft : Die Geburt der Kartei aus dem Geiste der Bibliothek (2002) 0.00
    0.0022358063 = product of:
      0.01788645 = sum of:
        0.01788645 = weight(_text_:computer in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01788645 = score(doc=621,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.12238629 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.013671875 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Auf nahezu jedem Schreibtisch steht heute ein zumeist grauer Kasten, aus dem viele Kabel kommen. Vor 70 Jahren war dieser datenverarbeitende Kasten noch unscheinbarer, unelektronisch und aus Holz, buchstäblich eine Papiermaschine. Die ZettelWirtschaft widmet sich der Frage, wie diese >Maschine< namens Kartei ihren Siegeszug als ebenso universelles wie zentrales Werkzeug zur Datenverarbeitung in die Büros und Schreibstuben um 1930, bis zum Vorabend der >Universalen Diskreten Maschine< namens Computer, antreten konnte. Dabei wird die Entwicklung der Kartei anhand ihrer historischen Brüche verfolgt: angefangen bei den ersten explizit beschriebenen Verzettelungen des Wissens in der Frühen Neuzeit, über die beinahe zufällige Einführung und allmähliche Durchsetzung von Zettel-Katalogen in den Bibliotheken um 1800 steuert die Studie - nach einem Seitenblick auf die Produktionsbedingungen von Literatur mit Hilfe der Zettelkästen- hin zur zentralen These, der diskursiven Übertragung zwischen den Institutionen des Schreibens, zwischen Bibliothek und Büro. Versehen mit zahlreichen Abbildungen und zum Teil auf bislang unveröffentlichtem Archivmaterial basierend, wird hier die Historie der Zettelkästen und Karteisysteme als eine notwendige Vorgeschichte des Computers beschrieben, nicht ohne diesen Prozeß als eine abwechslungsreiche, bisweilen überraschende Geschichte des Scheiterns zu bilanzieren.
    RSWK
    Computer / Bibliothekskatalog / Geschichte (BVB)
    Subject
    Computer / Bibliothekskatalog / Geschichte (BVB)
  19. Jeng, L.H.: From cataloging to organization of information : a paradigm for the core curriculum (1993) 0.00
    0.0022078257 = product of:
      0.017662605 = sum of:
        0.017662605 = product of:
          0.03532521 = sum of:
            0.03532521 = weight(_text_:resources in 7379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03532521 = score(doc=7379,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 7379, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The traditional library and information science (LIS) curriculum for organization of information assumes a cataloging paradigm that is built on the concepts and theories developed throughout the history of library cataloging as well as practical knowledge and skills of applying current standards and systems developed specifically for practice in cataloging. Advocates for LIS curriculum reform point out, however, that this cataloging paradigm must be replaced by knowledge of resources and systems management in order to equip LIS graduates with the knowledge and skills needed for an information society. By comparing the traditional and nontraditional curricula in the area of organization of information, this paper proposes a paradigm for organization of information in which information is defined in the context of five attributes and cataloging is perceived as a mode of organizational behavior. Some implications of this paradigm on the core curriculum for organization of information are suggested
  20. Understanding FRBR : what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools (2007) 0.00
    0.0015611685 = product of:
      0.012489348 = sum of:
        0.012489348 = product of:
          0.024978695 = sum of:
            0.024978695 = weight(_text_:resources in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024978695 = score(doc=1675,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.17110959 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    An overview of the FRBR model, and how it can improve access to information through the helpful organization of metadata records. What is FRBR, and why is everyone talking about it? Is it really going to revolutionize cataloguing? And if so, what form will it take? This book is written for librarians, bibliographic systems designers, library and information science faculty and students, and anyone else who is interested in learning about the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and how following the FRBR model can improve access to information through helpful organization of the metadata records that are surrogates for information resources. Serials, art, music, moving images, maps, and archival materials are just a few of the formats covered. Not for catalogers only!
    Footnote
    Resonanz: "Arlene Taylor and her compadres don't even try to teach you how to construct a hierarchical record. Instead, they direct their efforts toward showcasing what's possible when digital technology and traditional cataloging practice meet. This is the future of cataloging." - Library Media Connection "The emergence of this textbook is testimony to the breadth and depth of work done to date. It documents much of that work, and provides a good basic introduction to FRBR that is broadly understandable... The relational concepts within FRBR are complicated and can be challenging. This book does a good job of illuminating them in a straightforward manner. It also describes how the application of the FRBR concepts could improve our systems of bibliographic access in very specific ways... For those of us that really want or need to be able to predict the impact that FRBR will have on our work, this is an accessible explanation of the current state of the art. As such it is a real contribution to our understanding." - TechKNOW "Understanding FRBR... features chapters contributed by leading authorities in the cataloging field... It offers a basic introduction to FRBR, discussions about FRBR, FRAD (functional requirements for authority data), and RDA (resource description and access), and the issues involved in using FRBR in nontraditional library settings such as with cartographic materials and music. Both books are well illustrated and include numerous bibliographical resources.' [Reviewed in conjuntion with FRBR: A Guide for the Perplexed]." - Library Journal "Taylor and her contributors cover FRBR and introduce the reader to FRAD as well... All chapters conclude with current and useful references to further reading and more information." - Booklist "Understanding FRBR is clearly written, well illustrated (many of the concepts are clarified by very helpful diagrams), and well indexed; additionally, chapters feature extensive bibliographies, many of which provide URLs to the IFLA groups' documents. While it may seem that this book is of interest only to catalogers, the application of FRBR will change the structure of catalog and the systems used to store and display it; therefore, it is an important text for systems librarians, reference librarians, and anybody else interested in the future of the organization and display of bibliographic information." - College & Research Libraries "Understanding FRBR is a useful and timely book that brings together recent developments in FRBR and offers several assessments of it." - Technicalities "No cataloguer, bibliographic systems designer or library and information science lecturers and students should be without this book. It is a useful resource in acquiring an understanding of what FRBR is about and how it will change the way in which cataloguers will think about cataloguing in future." - The Electronic Library

Languages

  • e 16
  • d 5

Types