Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dextre Clarke, S.G."
  1. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007) 0.02
    0.024700502 = product of:
      0.049401004 = sum of:
        0.049401004 = product of:
          0.09880201 = sum of:
            0.09880201 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09880201 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  2. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.01
    0.012350251 = product of:
      0.024700502 = sum of:
        0.024700502 = product of:
          0.049401004 = sum of:
            0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049401004 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  3. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01
    0.012350251 = product of:
      0.024700502 = sum of:
        0.024700502 = product of:
          0.049401004 = sum of:
            0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049401004 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  4. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesauri, topics and other structures in knowledge management software (2000) 0.01
    0.010585929 = product of:
      0.021171859 = sum of:
        0.021171859 = product of:
          0.042343717 = sum of:
            0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042343717 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:45
  5. Aitchison, J.; Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Thesaurus : a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future (2004) 0.01
    0.010585929 = product of:
      0.021171859 = sum of:
        0.021171859 = product of:
          0.042343717 = sum of:
            0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042343717 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:46:13
  6. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Origins and trajectory of the long thesaurus debate (2016) 0.01
    0.007763238 = product of:
      0.015526476 = sum of:
        0.015526476 = product of:
          0.031052953 = sum of:
            0.031052953 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031052953 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The information retrieval thesaurus emerged in the 1950s, settled down to a more-or-less standard format in the 1970s and has continued to evolve marginally since then. Throughout its whole lifetime, doubts have been expressed about its efficacy with emphasis latterly on cost-effectiveness. Prolonged testing of different styles of index language in the 1970s failed to settle the doubts. The arena occupied by the debate has moved from small isolated databases in the post-war era to diverse situations nowadays with the whole Internet at one extreme and small in-house collections at the other. Sophisticated statistical techniques now dominate the retrieval landscape on the Internet but leave opportunities for the thesaurus and other knowledge organization techniques in niches such as image libraries and corporate intranets. The promise of an ontology-driven semantic web with linked data resources opens another opportunity. Thus much scope remains for research to establish the usefulness of the thesaurus in these places and to inspire its continuing evolution.