Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Oppenheim, C."
  1. Oppenheim, C.: ¬An agenda for action to achieve the information society in the UK (1996) 0.06
    0.063361555 = product of:
      0.12672311 = sum of:
        0.12672311 = sum of:
          0.07026481 = weight(_text_:libraries in 7670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07026481 = score(doc=7670,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 7670, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7670)
          0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 7670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056458294 = score(doc=7670,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7670, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses ways in which government can play a important role in shaping national policies for a nation's information infrastructure. Considers such factors as the development of national policies for: supporting the development of electronic information services; privacy and data protection; copyright; and public libraries and national libraries
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.6, S.407-421
  2. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994) 0.05
    0.053071506 = product of:
      0.10614301 = sum of:
        0.10614301 = sum of:
          0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049684722 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
          0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056458294 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
  3. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.04
    0.03980363 = product of:
      0.07960726 = sum of:
        0.07960726 = sum of:
          0.037263542 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037263542 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
          0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042343717 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:22:45
  4. Oppenheim, C.; Stuart, D.: Is there a correlation between investment in an academic library and a higher education institution's ratings in the Research Assessment Exercise? (2004) 0.02
    0.016135586 = product of:
      0.032271173 = sum of:
        0.032271173 = product of:
          0.064542346 = sum of:
            0.064542346 = weight(_text_:libraries in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064542346 = score(doc=668,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.3771894 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates whether a correlation exists between a UK university's academic excellence, as judged by its Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) ratings, and the amount spent on its library. Considers both macro and micro levels, looking at institutions as a whole, and on a departmental level within the area of archaeology. As well as comparing all the higher education institutions, this group is broken down further, comparing the ratings and spending of the Russell and 94 Groups. There are correlations between the different groups of higher education institutions and RAE ratings. However, rather than high RAE ratings causing high library spending or high library spending causing high RAE ratings, it is likely that they are indirectly linked, good universities having both high RAE ratings and good libraries and poor universities having low RAE ratings and less money spent on libraries. Also describes how libraries in universities with archaeology departments allocate budgets.
  5. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The virtual library : some common sense please (1994) 0.01
    0.0124211805 = product of:
      0.024842361 = sum of:
        0.024842361 = product of:
          0.049684722 = sum of:
            0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 8289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049684722 = score(doc=8289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 8289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8289)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Queries the interpretations of the 'virtual library' made by authors and others. It is erroneous to relate the term to the possibilities of delivering the full text plus images of articles and books to the client's terminal, irrespective of where the client is located. Offers 3 definitions of 'vitual reality' taken from the literature. The concept is in its infacy. it will be many years before it becomes applied to libraries. The 'electronic library', 'the library without walls' and 'the networked library' are all acceptable terms
  6. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The legal problems associated with electronic copyright management systems (1996) 0.01
    0.0124211805 = product of:
      0.024842361 = sum of:
        0.024842361 = product of:
          0.049684722 = sum of:
            0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049684722 = score(doc=5056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines existing treaties and legislation relating to copyright such as the Berne Convention, the Unfair Contract Terms Act and the concept of fair dealing. Assesses the role of Electronic Copyright Management Systems (ECMS) in protecting holders of rights; their relationship to the law in the UK, USA, and Europe; and their value in providing an agreed framework between libraries, users and publishers, so that the concept of the 'electronic' library can become a reality
  7. Oppenheim, C.: Do citations count? : Citation indexing and the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) (1996) 0.01
    0.0124211805 = product of:
      0.024842361 = sum of:
        0.024842361 = product of:
          0.049684722 = sum of:
            0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049684722 = score(doc=6673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Citations are used to illustrate or elaborate on a point, or to criticize. Citation studies, based on ISI's citation indexes, can help evaluate scientific research, while impact factors aid libraries in deciding which journals to cancel or purchase. Suggests that citiation counts can replace the costly RAE in assessing the research output of university departments
  8. Oppenheim, C.: National information policies and the need for a coalition for public information (1996) 0.01
    0.0108685335 = product of:
      0.021737067 = sum of:
        0.021737067 = product of:
          0.043474134 = sum of:
            0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043474134 = score(doc=4859,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 4859, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4859)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Defines a national information policy, identifying 6 component areas. Describes some specific aspects of government action that can be used as a test of commitment to an national information policy. Suggests support for electronic information industries is one of the key methods by which a government can influence information policy, citing the case of the USA as an example. More specifically, considers freedom of information, and policy towards public and national libraries. Argues for the creation of a Coalition for Public Information in each major country, to provide a forum where members of the information community can participate in public policy discussions about technical, economic and social questions arising from the use of information derived from the new electronic communication and information delivery technologies
  9. Oppenheim, C.: Intellectual property : legal and other issues (1997) 0.01
    0.010585929 = product of:
      0.021171859 = sum of:
        0.021171859 = product of:
          0.042343717 = sum of:
            0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042343717 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information studies. 3(1997) no.1, S.5-22
  10. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.01
    0.0088216085 = product of:
      0.017643217 = sum of:
        0.017643217 = product of:
          0.035286434 = sum of:
            0.035286434 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035286434 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2011 19:22:13
  11. Zuccala, A.; Thelwall, M.; Oppenheim, C.; Dhiensa, R.: Web intelligence analyses of digital libraries : a case study of the National electronic Library for Health (NeLH) (2007) 0.01
    0.008783101 = product of:
      0.017566202 = sum of:
        0.017566202 = product of:
          0.035132404 = sum of:
            0.035132404 = weight(_text_:libraries in 838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035132404 = score(doc=838,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.2053159 = fieldWeight in 838, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the use of LexiURL as a Web intelligence tool for collecting and analysing links to digital libraries, focusing specifically on the National electronic Library for Health (NeLH). Design/methodology/approach - The Web intelligence techniques in this study are a combination of link analysis (web structure mining), web server log file analysis (web usage mining), and text analysis (web content mining), utilizing the power of commercial search engines and drawing upon the information science fields of bibliometrics and webometrics. LexiURL is a computer program designed to calculate summary statistics for lists of links or URLs. Its output is a series of standard reports, for example listing and counting all of the different domain names in the data. Findings - Link data, when analysed together with user transaction log files (i.e. Web referring domains) can provide insights into who is using a digital library and when, and who could be using the digital library if they are "surfing" a particular part of the Web; in this case any site that is linked to or colinked with the NeLH. This study found that the NeLH was embedded in a multifaceted Web context, including many governmental, educational, commercial and organisational sites, with the most interesting being sites from the.edu domain, representing American Universities. Not many links directed to the NeLH were followed on September 25, 2005 (the date of the log file analysis and link extraction analysis), which means that users who access the digital library have been arriving at the site via only a few select links, bookmarks and search engine searches, or non-electronic sources. Originality/value - A number of studies concerning digital library users have been carried out using log file analysis as a research tool. Log files focus on real-time user transactions; while LexiURL can be used to extract links and colinks associated with a digital library's growing Web network. This Web network is not recognized often enough, and can be a useful indication of where potential users are surfing, even if they have not yet specifically visited the NeLH site.