-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.08
0.07960726 = product of:
0.15921453 = sum of:
0.15921453 = sum of:
0.074527085 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074527085 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.084687434 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084687434 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
- Imprint
- Englewood, CO : Libraries Unlimited
-
ChaPudhry, A.S.; Periasamy, M.: ¬A study of current practices of selected libraries in cataloguing electronic journals (2001)
0.08
0.077945225 = product of:
0.15589045 = sum of:
0.15589045 = sum of:
0.10648944 = weight(_text_:libraries in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10648944 = score(doc=746,freq=12.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.6223308 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049401004 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- MARC records and online policy documents of selected libraries were reviewed to study the approaches taken by libraries worldwide to catalogue electronic journals. In general, libraries catalogue those electronic journals that are subscribed by them on priority basis. Most of them annotate the e-journal to the print record, some prefer to catalogue them separately, while the majority of the libraries adopt both approaches. While most of the libraries studied prefer full record, cataloguing e-journals separately with a brief record (at least containing MARC fields 245, 500, and 856) that identifies and locates the resource seems to be the best practice.
- Date
- 22. 1.2007 20:46:57
-
Khurshid, Z.: ¬The impact of information technology an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers (2003)
0.07
0.07330606 = product of:
0.14661212 = sum of:
0.14661212 = sum of:
0.097211115 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097211115 = score(doc=2323,freq=10.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.56810766 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049401004 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Information technology (IT) encompassing an integrated library system, computer hardware and software, CDROM, Internet, and other domains, including MARC 21 formats, CORC, and metadata standards (Dublin Core, TEI, XML, RDF) has produced far-reaching changes in the job functions of catalogers. Libraries are now coming up with a new set of recruiting requirements for these positions. This paper aims to review job advertisements published in American Libraries (AL) and College and Research Libraries News (C&RL NEWS) to assess the impact of the use of IT in libraries an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers.
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 22(2003) no. March, S.18-21
-
Smith, P.: Book vendor-supplied cataloguing : impacts of technical services (1994)
0.07
0.07125738 = product of:
0.14251477 = sum of:
0.14251477 = sum of:
0.08605646 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08605646 = score(doc=2335,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.5029192 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056458294 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A survey in spring 94 indicates that most prominent book vendor provide: cataloguing records, authority control and shelf ready book. Considers the advantages and disadvantages of using book vendor cataloguing. Currently most libraries use book vendor supplied cataloguing to process approval books. Explains the process. Procedures worked out by the fast cataloguing project, PromptCat run by OCLC, Yankee Books and Michigan State Libraries may simplify work flow further
- Date
- 17.10.1995 18:22:54
- Source
- Colorado libraries. 20(1994) no.3, S.14-16
-
Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005)
0.07
0.07125738 = product of:
0.14251477 = sum of:
0.14251477 = sum of:
0.08605646 = weight(_text_:libraries in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08605646 = score(doc=43,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.5029192 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056458294 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.07
0.06817464 = product of:
0.13634928 = sum of:
0.13634928 = sum of:
0.08694827 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08694827 = score(doc=2600,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049401004 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Ho, J.: Cataloging practices and access methods for videos at arl and public libraries in the United States (2004)
0.07
0.06681019 = product of:
0.13362038 = sum of:
0.13362038 = sum of:
0.09127667 = weight(_text_:libraries in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09127667 = score(doc=134,freq=12.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.5334264 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042343717 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries may vary in the level and fullness of cataloging they give to video recordings and in the methods they use to provide access to them. This paper reports the results of a survey exploring the level of cataloging and access methods applied to videos, the degree to which catalogers view screen credits, and how often various credit information is included and used to create access points in catalog records in selected U. S. public and Association of Research Libraries member libraries. Resources for cataloging videos also were examined. Results showed that most libraries cataloged videos at the full level and provided access points to similar types of information in catalog records. Academic librarians reported viewing videos and providing access points to certain information to a greater extent than public librarians did. This study offers a general picture of the credit information libraries include or omit in video catalog records.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Caudle, D.M.: Cataloging videotapes (1995)
0.07
0.06633939 = product of:
0.13267878 = sum of:
0.13267878 = sum of:
0.062105905 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062105905 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
0.07057287 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07057287 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27.11.1995 17:07:22
- Source
- College and undergraduate libraries. 2(1995) no.1, S.33-38
-
Seymour, C.: Cataloging Internet resources (1996)
0.07
0.06633939 = product of:
0.13267878 = sum of:
0.13267878 = sum of:
0.062105905 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062105905 = score(doc=4679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
0.07057287 = weight(_text_:22 in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07057287 = score(doc=4679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the OCLC project for cataloguing Internet resources, a project aimed at developing rules for electronic material, and as a possible solution for the difficulty of locating materials on the Internet. No attempts is made to catalogue all the resources on the Internet and choice of materials is left to participating libraries
- Source
- Information and librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.33-35
-
Dunkle, C.B.: Outsourcing the catalog department : a mediation inspired by the business and library literature (1996)
0.07
0.06633939 = product of:
0.13267878 = sum of:
0.13267878 = sum of:
0.062105905 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062105905 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.07057287 = weight(_text_:22 in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07057287 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Draws on parallels between outsourcing in business and in libraries to examine the difficulties and implications of outsourcing the catalogue department. Examines why cataloguing, in particular, has received outsourcing attention. 2 major reasons emerge: cataloguing is a non core activity, and catalogue departments are troublesome
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.33-43
-
Weitz, J.: Cataloger's judgment : music cataloging questions and answers from the music OCLC users group newsletter (2003)
0.07
0.06633939 = product of:
0.13267878 = sum of:
0.13267878 = sum of:
0.062105905 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062105905 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
0.07057287 = weight(_text_:22 in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07057287 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25.11.2005 18:22:29
- Imprint
- Littleton, CO : Libraries Unlimited
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.06
0.0647644 = product of:
0.1295288 = sum of:
0.1295288 = sum of:
0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049684722 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.07984409 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07984409 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994)
0.06
0.063361555 = product of:
0.12672311 = sum of:
0.12672311 = sum of:
0.07026481 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07026481 = score(doc=2170,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056458294 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
- Date
- 17.10.1995 18:22:54
- Source
- Colorado libraries. 20(1994) no.3, S.20-23
-
Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007)
0.06
0.06283376 = product of:
0.12566753 = sum of:
0.12566753 = sum of:
0.08332381 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08332381 = score(doc=2548,freq=10.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.4869494 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042343717 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005)
0.06
0.062350206 = product of:
0.12470041 = sum of:
0.12470041 = sum of:
0.075299405 = weight(_text_:libraries in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075299405 = score(doc=128,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.4400543 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049401004 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Long, C.E.: ¬The Internet's value to catalogers : results of a survey (1997)
0.06
0.058435403 = product of:
0.116870806 = sum of:
0.116870806 = sum of:
0.074527085 = weight(_text_:libraries in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074527085 = score(doc=494,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042343717 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a questionnaire survey of cataloguers, conducted over the AUTOCAT Internet discussion group, to determine those areas of cataloguing for which the Internet is a valuable tool and those areas for which it is not as useful. Respondents indicated 4 areas in which cataloguers use the Internet: searching the OPACs of other libraries, communicating with colleagues, accessing online cataloguing documentation and publications, and authority work. Cataloguers who found access to other libraries' OPACs did so for the following reasons: assigning call numbers and subject headings; finding full cataloguing copy from other libraries; enriching their local catalogue with notes present in records in other libraries; finding copy for foreign language items that cannot be read by library staff; and resolving difficult problems when important parts of the item are missing ar are in disarray. Some cataloguers also related processes for which they have found the Internet to not be efficient
- Date
- 29. 8.1997 19:46:22
-
Khurshid, Z.: Cooperative cataloging : prospects and problems for libraries in Saudi Arabia (1997)
0.06
0.058435403 = product of:
0.116870806 = sum of:
0.116870806 = sum of:
0.074527085 = weight(_text_:libraries in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074527085 = score(doc=541,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042343717 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Despite witnessing the enormous success of cooperative cataloguing programmes in Europe and North America, libraries in Saudi Arabia and other Arabian Gulf states have made no concerted afforts in initiating similar programmes. Emphasizes the need for cooperation in cataloguing, especially of local materials. Due to unavailability of cataloguing copy from the Library of Congress and other sources for a high percentage of imprints from Arab countries and in the absence of bibliographic cooperation, libraries are doing redundant cataloguing and thus wasting both time and money. Reviews the current state of bibliographic cooperation, discusses prospects for further cooperation, and highlights difficulties in cooperation. Concludes with recommendations that the King Fahd National Library develop a national cooperative cataloguing programme with specific goals, set guidelines and prepare rules and procedures for participating libraries to contribute in various cooperative cataloguing programmes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 13:11:38
-
Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H. (Janet): Cataloging in three academic libraries: operations, trends, and perspectives (2000)
0.06
0.058435403 = product of:
0.116870806 = sum of:
0.116870806 = sum of:
0.074527085 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074527085 = score(doc=5386,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042343717 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article describes the cataloging operations and management in three medium-sized academic libraries - Oregon State University, University of Houston, and Colorado State University. It provides an overview of the staffing and organizational structure of the cataloging department in each library. Faced with similar challenges from constantly changing environments brought about by technology and institutional pressure to achieve more with less, library technical services in these three libraries, cataloging in particular, are developing some common strategies for coping. These trends include: (1) changing the roles and responsibilities of both professional and support staff (2) designing workflow around library systems and limited personnel resources, (3) mainstreaming government documents cataloging and processing into technical services, (4) using technology to increase cataloging efficiency, and (5) dealing with bibliographic control of current electronic resources and moving into digitization and metadata arenas.
- Date
- 27. 7.2006 18:22:11
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Managing cataloging and the organization of information: philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century. Part II: Specialized and academic libraries in the United States"
-
Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996)
0.06
0.055441353 = product of:
0.11088271 = sum of:
0.11088271 = sum of:
0.061481703 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061481703 = score(doc=6737,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 6737, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6737)
0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 6737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049401004 = score(doc=6737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6737)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reviews issues related to the cataloguing of Internet resources and considers short term and long term directions for cataloguing and the gereal provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. Discusses the strengths and weaknesses of using a library catalogue model to improve access to Internet resources. Based on experience gained through 2 OCLC Internet cataloguing projects, recommends continued application of library cataloguing standard and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogues, cataloguing and libraries in general will continue to evolve. Points to problems inherent in the MARC field 856
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004)
0.06
0.055441353 = product of:
0.11088271 = sum of:
0.11088271 = sum of:
0.061481703 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061481703 = score(doc=4849,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049401004 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
