Search (45 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.03
    0.033169694 = product of:
      0.06633939 = sum of:
        0.06633939 = sum of:
          0.031052953 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031052953 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
          0.035286434 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035286434 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 36th Allerton Institute, 23-25 Oct 94, Allerton Park, Monticello, IL: "New Roles for Classification in Libraries and Information Networks: Presentation and Reports"
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
  2. Srivastava, A.P.: Theory of knowledge classification in libraries (1964) 0.03
    0.030740852 = product of:
      0.061481703 = sum of:
        0.061481703 = product of:
          0.122963406 = sum of:
            0.122963406 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.122963406 = score(doc=6250,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.71860564 = fieldWeight in 6250, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6250)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 27(1966) no.2, S.142 (D.J. Foskett)
  3. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.02
    0.021171859 = product of:
      0.042343717 = sum of:
        0.042343717 = product of:
          0.084687434 = sum of:
            0.084687434 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084687434 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  4. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.02
    0.021171859 = product of:
      0.042343717 = sum of:
        0.042343717 = product of:
          0.084687434 = sum of:
            0.084687434 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084687434 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  5. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.02
    0.021171859 = product of:
      0.042343717 = sum of:
        0.042343717 = product of:
          0.084687434 = sum of:
            0.084687434 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084687434 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  6. Bury, S.: Comparison of classification schedules for libraries (1980) 0.02
    0.017566202 = product of:
      0.035132404 = sum of:
        0.035132404 = product of:
          0.07026481 = sum of:
            0.07026481 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07026481 = score(doc=1603,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the basic criteria for comparison of classification for libraries. Identifies a set of intellectual criteria, derived from the general theory of library classification as expounded by Dewey, Bliss, and Ranganathan. Compares LC, DC, and BC in relation criteria namely - order, university, hospitality, adaptability, terminology, relationship, synthesis, notational features - simplicity, brevity, expressiveness, specifity, synonymity, flexibility, correlation, case of use, revision and practical use. Highlights the value of comparative studies among classification schemes
  7. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.014114574 = product of:
      0.028229147 = sum of:
        0.028229147 = product of:
          0.056458294 = sum of:
            0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056458294 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  8. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01
    0.014114574 = product of:
      0.028229147 = sum of:
        0.028229147 = product of:
          0.056458294 = sum of:
            0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056458294 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  9. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.014114574 = product of:
      0.028229147 = sum of:
        0.028229147 = product of:
          0.056458294 = sum of:
            0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056458294 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  10. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.01
    0.014114574 = product of:
      0.028229147 = sum of:
        0.028229147 = product of:
          0.056458294 = sum of:
            0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056458294 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
  11. Maple, A.: Faceted access : a review of the literature (1995) 0.01
    0.0124211805 = product of:
      0.024842361 = sum of:
        0.024842361 = product of:
          0.049684722 = sum of:
            0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049684722 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to define what is meant by facet analysis, and to review briefly the history of facet analysis within the context of other types of subject analysis in libraries and within the context of information retrieval research
  12. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.012350251 = product of:
      0.024700502 = sum of:
        0.024700502 = product of:
          0.049401004 = sum of:
            0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049401004 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  13. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01
    0.012350251 = product of:
      0.024700502 = sum of:
        0.024700502 = product of:
          0.049401004 = sum of:
            0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049401004 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01
    0.012350251 = product of:
      0.024700502 = sum of:
        0.024700502 = product of:
          0.049401004 = sum of:
            0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049401004 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
  15. Szostak, R.: ¬A grammatical approach to subject classification in museums (2017) 0.01
    0.0108685335 = product of:
      0.021737067 = sum of:
        0.021737067 = product of:
          0.043474134 = sum of:
            0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043474134 = score(doc=4136,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 4136, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4136)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Several desiderata of a system of subject classification for museums are identified. The limitations of existing approaches are reviewed. It is argued that an approach which synthesizes basic concepts within a grammatical structure can achieve the goals of subject classification in museums while addressing diverse challenges. The same approach can also be applied in galleries, archives, and libraries. The approach is described in some detail and examples are provided of its application. The article closes with brief discussions of thesauri and linked open data.
  16. Ullah, A.; Khusro, S.; Ullah, I.: Bibliographic classification in the digital age : current trends & future directions (2017) 0.01
    0.0108685335 = product of:
      0.021737067 = sum of:
        0.021737067 = product of:
          0.043474134 = sum of:
            0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043474134 = score(doc=5717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 5717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5717)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information Technology and Libraries. 36(2017) no.3, S.48-77
  17. Bliss, H.E.: ¬A bibliographic classification : principles and definitions (1985) 0.01
    0.010757058 = product of:
      0.021514116 = sum of:
        0.021514116 = product of:
          0.04302823 = sum of:
            0.04302823 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04302823 = score(doc=3621,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.2514596 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Henry Evelyn Bliss (1870-1955) devoted several decades of his life to the study of classification and the development of the Bibliographic Classification scheme while serving as a librarian in the College of the City of New York. In the course of the development of the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss developed a body of classification theory published in a number of articles and books, among which the best known are The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences (1929), Organization of Knowledge in Libraries and the Subject Approach to Books (1933; 2nd ed., 1939), and the lengthy preface to A Bibliographic Classification (Volumes 1-2, 1940; 2nd ed., 1952). In developing the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss carefully established its philosophical and theoretical basis, more so than was attempted by the makers of other classification schemes, with the possible exception of S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.) and his Colon Classification. The basic principles established by Bliss for the Bibliographic Classification are: consensus, collocation of related subjects, subordination of special to general and gradation in specialty, and the relativity of classes and of classification (hence alternative location and alternative treatment). In the preface to the schedules of A Bibliographic Classification, Bliss spells out the general principles of classification as weIl as principles specifically related to his scheme. The first volume of the schedules appeared in 1940. In 1952, he issued a second edition of the volume with a rewritten preface, from which the following excerpt is taken, and with the addition of a "Concise Synopsis," which is also included here to illustrate the principles of classificatory structure. In the excerpt reprinted below, Bliss discusses the correlation between classes, concepts, and terms, as weIl as the hierarchical structure basic to his classification scheme. In his discussion of cross-classification, Bliss recognizes the "polydimensional" nature of classification and the difficulties inherent in the two-dimensional approach which is characteristic of linear classification. This is one of the earliest works in which the multidimensional nature of classification is recognized. The Bibliographic Classification did not meet with great success in the United States because the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Library of Congress Classification were already weIl ensconced in American libraries by then. Nonetheless, it attracted considerable attention in the British Commonwealth and elsewhere in the world. A committee was formed in Britain which later became the Bliss Classification Association. A faceted edition of the scheme has been in preparation under the direction of J. Mills and V. Broughton. Several parts of this new edition, entitled Bliss Bibliographic Classification, have been published.
    Imprint
    Littleton, CO : Libraries Unlimited
  18. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.010585929 = product of:
      0.021171859 = sum of:
        0.021171859 = product of:
          0.042343717 = sum of:
            0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042343717 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  19. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01
    0.010585929 = product of:
      0.021171859 = sum of:
        0.021171859 = product of:
          0.042343717 = sum of:
            0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042343717 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  20. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.01
    0.010585929 = product of:
      0.021171859 = sum of:
        0.021171859 = product of:
          0.042343717 = sum of:
            0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042343717 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)

Years

Languages

  • e 40
  • f 3
  • chi 1
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 40
  • m 4
  • el 2
  • More… Less…