Search (88 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Levergood, B.; Farrenkopf, S.; Frasnelli, E.: ¬The specification of the language of the field and interoperability : cross-language access to catalogues and online libraries (CACAO) (2008) 0.05
    0.05344303 = product of:
      0.10688606 = sum of:
        0.10688606 = sum of:
          0.064542346 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.064542346 = score(doc=2646,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.3771894 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042343717 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The CACAO Project (Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries) has been designed to implement natural language processing and cross-language information retrieval techniques to provide cross-language access to information in libraries, a critical issue in the linguistically diverse European Union. This project report addresses two metadata-related challenges for the library community in this context: "false friends" (identical words having different meanings in different languages) and term ambiguity. The possible solutions involve enriching the metadata with attributes specifying language or the source authority file, or associating potential search terms to classes in a classification system. The European Library will evaluate an early implementation of this work in late 2008.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007) 0.05
    0.053071506 = product of:
      0.10614301 = sum of:
        0.10614301 = sum of:
          0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049684722 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
          0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056458294 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this presentation, we therefore focus on a solution for providing uniform access to Digital Libraries and other online services. In order to enable uniform query access to heterogeneous sources, we must provide metadata interoperability in a way that a query language - in this case SPARQL - can cope with the incompatibility of the metadata in various sources without changing their already existing information models.
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:46
  3. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.05
    0.048573304 = product of:
      0.09714661 = sum of:
        0.09714661 = sum of:
          0.037263542 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037263542 = score(doc=1967,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.059883066 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059883066 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Source
    Beyond libraries - subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn
  4. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.05
    0.048259467 = product of:
      0.096518934 = sum of:
        0.096518934 = product of:
          0.2895568 = sum of:
            0.2895568 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2895568 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.44160777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  5. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.05
    0.04643757 = product of:
      0.09287514 = sum of:
        0.09287514 = sum of:
          0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043474134 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
          0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049401004 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 10th Metadata and Semantics Research Conference, MTSR 2016, held in Göttingen, Germany, in November 2016. The 26 full papers and 6 short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 67 submissions. The papers are organized in several sessions and tracks: Digital Libraries, Information Retrieval, Linked and Social Data, Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures, Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment, Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications, European and National Projects.
  6. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.04
    0.040477753 = product of:
      0.080955505 = sum of:
        0.080955505 = sum of:
          0.031052953 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031052953 = score(doc=1962,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
          0.04990255 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04990255 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Footnote
    Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
  7. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.04
    0.03980363 = product of:
      0.07960726 = sum of:
        0.07960726 = sum of:
          0.037263542 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037263542 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
          0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042343717 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Terminology registries (TRs) are a crucial element of the infrastructure required for resource discovery services, digital libraries, Linked Data, and semantic interoperability generally. They can make the content of knowledge organization systems (KOS) available both for human and machine access. The paper describes the attributes and functionality for a TR, based on a review of published literature, existing TRs, and a survey of experts. A domain model based on user tasks is constructed and a set of core metadata elements for use in TRs is proposed. Ideally, the TR should allow searching as well as browsing for a KOS, matching a user's search while also providing information about existing terminology services, accessible to both humans and machines. The issues surrounding metadata for KOS are also discussed, together with the rationale for different aspects and the importance of a core set of KOS metadata for future machine-based access; a possible core set of metadata elements is proposed. This is dealt with in terms of practical experience and in relation to the Dublin Core Application Profile.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
  8. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.03
    0.03447105 = product of:
      0.0689421 = sum of:
        0.0689421 = product of:
          0.20682628 = sum of:
            0.20682628 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20682628 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.44160777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  9. Gracy, K.F.; Zeng, M.L.; Skirvin, L.: Exploring methods to improve access to Music resources by aligning library Data with Linked Data : a report of methodologies and preliminary findings (2013) 0.03
    0.026535753 = product of:
      0.053071506 = sum of:
        0.053071506 = sum of:
          0.024842361 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024842361 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.14518027 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
          0.028229147 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028229147 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As a part of a research project aiming to connect library data to the unfamiliar data sets available in the Linked Data (LD) community's CKAN Data Hub (thedatahub.org), this project collected, analyzed, and mapped properties used in describing and accessing music recordings, scores, and music-related information used by selected music LD data sets, library catalogs, and various digital collections created by libraries and other cultural institutions. This article reviews current efforts to connect music data through the Semantic Web, with an emphasis on the Music Ontology (MO) and ontology alignment approaches; it also presents a framework for understanding the life cycle of a musical work, focusing on the central activities of composition, performance, and use. The project studied metadata structures and properties of 11 music-related LD data sets and mapped them to the descriptions commonly used in the library cataloging records for sound recordings and musical scores (including MARC records and their extended schema.org markup), and records from 20 collections of digitized music recordings and scores (featuring a variety of metadata structures). The analysis resulted in a set of crosswalks and a unified crosswalk that aligns these properties. The paper reports on detailed methodologies used and discusses research findings and issues. Topics of particular concern include (a) the challenges of mapping between the overgeneralized descriptions found in library data and the specialized, music-oriented properties present in the LD data sets; (b) the hidden information and access points in library data; and (c) the potential benefits of enriching library data through the mapping of properties found in library catalogs to similar properties used by LD data sets.
    Date
    28.10.2013 17:22:17
  10. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.02
    0.024700502 = product of:
      0.049401004 = sum of:
        0.049401004 = product of:
          0.09880201 = sum of:
            0.09880201 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09880201 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  11. Piscitelli, F.A.: Library linked data models : library data in the Semantic Web (2019) 0.02
    0.021957751 = product of:
      0.043915503 = sum of:
        0.043915503 = product of:
          0.087831005 = sum of:
            0.087831005 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087831005 = score(doc=5478,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.51328975 = fieldWeight in 5478, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5478)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This exploratory study examined Linked Data (LD) schemas/ontologies and data models proposed or in use by libraries around the world using MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) as a basis for comparison of the scope and extensibility of these potential new standards. The researchers selected 14 libraries from national libraries, academic libraries, government libraries, public libraries, multi-national libraries, and cultural heritage centers currently developing Library Linked Data (LLD) schemas. The choices of models, schemas, and elements used in each library's LD can create interoperability issues for LD services because of substantial differences between schemas and data models evolving via local decisions. The researchers observed that a wide variety of vocabularies and ontologies were used for LLD including common web schemas such as Dublin Core (DC)/DCTerms, Schema.org and Resource Description Framework (RDF), as well as deprecated schemas such as MarcOnt and rdagroup1elements. A sharp divide existed as well between LLD schemas using variations of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) data model and those with different data models or even with no listed data model. Libraries worldwide are not using the same elements or even the same ontologies, schemas and data models to describe the same materials using the same general concepts.
  12. Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007) 0.02
    0.021171859 = product of:
      0.042343717 = sum of:
        0.042343717 = product of:
          0.084687434 = sum of:
            0.084687434 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084687434 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  13. Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008) 0.02
    0.021171859 = product of:
      0.042343717 = sum of:
        0.042343717 = product of:
          0.084687434 = sum of:
            0.084687434 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084687434 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2008 19:30:41
  14. Schreur, P.E.: ¬The use of Linked Data and artificial intelligence as key elements in the transformation of technical services (2020) 0.02
    0.018824851 = product of:
      0.037649702 = sum of:
        0.037649702 = product of:
          0.075299405 = sum of:
            0.075299405 = weight(_text_:libraries in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075299405 = score(doc=125,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4400543 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Library Technical Services have benefited from numerous stimuli. Although initially looked at with suspicion, transitions such as the move from catalog cards to the MARC formats have proven enormously helpful to libraries and their patrons. Linked data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold the same promise. Through the conversion of metadata surrogates (cataloging) to linked open data, libraries can represent their resources on the Semantic Web. But in order to provide some form of controlled access to unstructured data, libraries must reach beyond traditional cataloging to new tools such as AI to provide consistent access to a growing world of full-text resources.
  15. Stempfhuber, M.; Zapilko, B.: Modelling text-fact-integration in digital libraries (2009) 0.02
    0.018631771 = product of:
      0.037263542 = sum of:
        0.037263542 = product of:
          0.074527085 = sum of:
            0.074527085 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074527085 = score(doc=3393,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 3393, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3393)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Digital Libraries currently face the challenge of integrating many different types of research information (e.g. publications, primary data, expert's profiles, institutional profiles, project information etc.) according to their scientific users' needs. To date no general, integrated model for knowledge organization and retrieval in Digital Libraries exists. This causes the problem of structural and semantic heterogeneity due to the wide range of metadata standards, indexing vocabularies and indexing approaches used for different types of information. The research presented in this paper focuses on areas in which activities are being undertaken in the field of Digital Libraries in order to treat semantic interoperability problems. We present a model for the integrated retrieval of factual and textual data which combines multiple approaches to semantic interoperability und sets them into context. Embedded in the research cycle, traditional content indexing methods for publications meet the newer, but rarely used ontology-based approaches which seem to be better suited for representing complex information like the one contained in survey data. The benefits of our model are (1) easy re-use of available knowledge organisation systems and (2) reduced efforts for domain modelling with ontologies.
  16. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.02
    0.017643217 = product of:
      0.035286434 = sum of:
        0.035286434 = product of:
          0.07057287 = sum of:
            0.07057287 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07057287 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  17. Celli, F. et al.: Enabling multilingual search through controlled vocabularies : the AGRIS approach (2016) 0.02
    0.017643217 = product of:
      0.035286434 = sum of:
        0.035286434 = product of:
          0.07057287 = sum of:
            0.07057287 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07057287 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  18. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.01
    0.014970766 = product of:
      0.029941533 = sum of:
        0.029941533 = product of:
          0.059883066 = sum of:
            0.059883066 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059883066 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  19. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Marinai, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Report on execution and results of the interoperability tests (2008) 0.01
    0.014114574 = product of:
      0.028229147 = sum of:
        0.028229147 = product of:
          0.056458294 = sum of:
            0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 7411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056458294 = score(doc=7411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  20. Hubrich, J.: CrissCross: SWD-DDC-Mapping (2008) 0.01
    0.014114574 = product of:
      0.028229147 = sum of:
        0.028229147 = product of:
          0.056458294 = sum of:
            0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 2175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056458294 = score(doc=2175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 10:35:21

Years

Languages

  • e 75
  • d 13

Types

  • a 56
  • el 31
  • m 9
  • s 6
  • x 3
  • p 2
  • r 2
  • More… Less…