-
Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005)
0.07
0.073870465 = product of:
0.14774093 = sum of:
0.14774093 = sum of:
0.10539721 = weight(_text_:libraries in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10539721 = score(doc=125,freq=16.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.6159477 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042343717 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005)
0.07
0.07125738 = product of:
0.14251477 = sum of:
0.14251477 = sum of:
0.08605646 = weight(_text_:libraries in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08605646 = score(doc=43,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.5029192 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056458294 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007)
0.06
0.06283376 = product of:
0.12566753 = sum of:
0.12566753 = sum of:
0.08332381 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08332381 = score(doc=2548,freq=10.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.4869494 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042343717 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005)
0.06
0.062350206 = product of:
0.12470041 = sum of:
0.12470041 = sum of:
0.075299405 = weight(_text_:libraries in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075299405 = score(doc=128,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.4400543 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049401004 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005)
0.05
0.053071506 = product of:
0.10614301 = sum of:
0.10614301 = sum of:
0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049684722 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056458294 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005)
0.05
0.04752116 = product of:
0.09504232 = sum of:
0.09504232 = sum of:
0.052698605 = weight(_text_:libraries in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052698605 = score(doc=121,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.30797386 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042343717 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper presents results from a fall 2003 survey of heads of cataloging at Association of Research Libraries United States academic libraries. The survey focused on the current number of professional catalogers and their responsibilities as well as future projections for demand for catalogers and thoughts about their roles. The study found that the numbers of professional catalogers are remaining constant or decreasing, and approximately one-third are projected to retire in the next decade. In addition, the role of the professional cataloger is perceived as continuing to evolve toward more cataloging-related activities and management and less direct cataloging. Most respondents predicted the professional cataloger has a role in the future and felt prepared for that future. Some respondents suggested that metadata cataloging would be a growing role in that future. This paper concludes with additional questions about the future of professional catalogers and cataloging.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Bowen, J.: FRBR : coming soon to your library? (2005)
0.05
0.04752116 = product of:
0.09504232 = sum of:
0.09504232 = sum of:
0.052698605 = weight(_text_:libraries in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052698605 = score(doc=122,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.30797386 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042343717 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) data model holds great potential for improving access to library resources, but may not affect all libraries in the same way. The Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules), assisted by the work of its Format Variation Working Group, is exploring ways to incorporate FRBR into the next edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules to facilitate collocation at the level of the FRBR entity expression. Several library system vendors are also adding FRBR-based functionality to their systems. A combination of these two approaches to FRBR can provide significant benefits to users. Most FRBR entities and attributes are already present in library catalog records, and the influence of FRBR can also be seen in existing library activities. FRBR is thus not something totally foreign, but a fresh, more rigorous way of thinking about what libraries already do that provides a basis for designing new ways to improve users' access to library resources.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006)
0.05
0.04643757 = product of:
0.09287514 = sum of:
0.09287514 = sum of:
0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043474134 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049401004 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hearn, S.: Comparing catalogs : currency and consistency of controlled headings (2009)
0.05
0.04643757 = product of:
0.09287514 = sum of:
0.09287514 = sum of:
0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043474134 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049401004 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Evaluative and comparative studies of catalog data have tended to focus on methods that are labor intensive, demand expertise, and can examine only a limited number of records. This study explores an alternative approach to gathering and analyzing catalog data, focusing on the currency and consistency of controlled headings. The resulting data provide insight into libraries' use of changed headings and their success in maintaining currency and consistency, and the systems needed to support the current pace of heading changes.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Lundy, M.W.: Evidence of application of the DCRB core standard in WorldCat and RLIN (2006)
0.04
0.03980363 = product of:
0.07960726 = sum of:
0.07960726 = sum of:
0.037263542 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037263542 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042343717 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Core Standard for Rare Books, known as the DCRB Core standard, was approved by the Program for Cooperative Cataloging for use beginning in January 1999. Comparable to the core standards for other types of materials, the DCRB Core standard provides requirements for an intermediate level of bibliographic description for the cataloging of rare books. While the Core Standard for Books seems to have found a place in general cataloging practice, the DCRB Core standard appears to have met with resistance among rare book cataloging practitioners. This study investigates the extent to which such resistance exists by examining all of the DCRB Core records in the OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) Online Union Catalog (WorldCat) and the Research Libraries Croup Union Catalog (RLIN) databases that were created during the standard's first five years. The study analyzes the content of the records for adherence to the standard and investigates the ways in which the flexibility of the standard and cataloger's judgment augmented many records with more than the mandatory elements of description and access.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009)
0.04
0.03980363 = product of:
0.07960726 = sum of:
0.07960726 = sum of:
0.037263542 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037263542 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042343717 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Some members of the library community, including the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, have suggested that libraries should open up their catalogs to allow users to add descriptive tags to the bibliographic data in catalog records. The web site LibraryThing currently permits its members to add such user tags to its records for books and therefore provides a useful resource to contrast with library bibliographic records. A comparison between the LibraryThing tags for a group of books and the library-supplied subject headings for the same books shows that users and catalogers approach these descriptors very differently. Because of these differences, user tags can enhance subject access to library materials, but they cannot entirely replace controlled vocabularies such as the Library of Congress subject headings.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014)
0.04
0.03980363 = product of:
0.07960726 = sum of:
0.07960726 = sum of:
0.037263542 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037263542 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042343717 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Filk, C.: Online, Internet und Digitalkultur : eine Bibliographie zur jüngsten Diskussion um die Informationsgesellschaft (1996)
0.03
0.034931786 = product of:
0.06986357 = sum of:
0.06986357 = product of:
0.13972715 = sum of:
0.13972715 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13972715 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 9.1997 19:22:27
- Source
- Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193
-
Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996)
0.03
0.028229147 = product of:
0.056458294 = sum of:
0.056458294 = product of:
0.11291659 = sum of:
0.11291659 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11291659 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.10.1996 14:22:33
-
Shieh, J.: Selective bibliography and network resources for the Institute on 'Networking in Law Libraries' (1994)
0.03
0.026892643 = product of:
0.053785287 = sum of:
0.053785287 = product of:
0.10757057 = sum of:
0.10757057 = weight(_text_:libraries in 8284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10757057 = score(doc=8284,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.628649 = fieldWeight in 8284, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8284)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A selective annotated bibliography on networking in law libraries. Comprises the following sections: bibliography; directories; net-finders and phone books; libraries' OPACs; electronic conferences (listservs); network resource services; and network services providers. Includes a useful glossary
-
Albers, C.: Zeitungen in Bibliotheken : Aufsätze, Monographien und Rezensionen aus den Jahren 2002-2003. Mit Nachträgen für die Jahre 1980-2001 (2004)
0.02
0.024951275 = product of:
0.04990255 = sum of:
0.04990255 = product of:
0.0998051 = sum of:
0.0998051 = weight(_text_:22 in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0998051 = score(doc=4,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 13:32:22
-
Murfin, M.E.; Wynar, L.R.: Reference service : an annotated bibliographic guide (1977)
0.02
0.024842361 = product of:
0.049684722 = sum of:
0.049684722 = product of:
0.099369444 = sum of:
0.099369444 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099369444 = score(doc=4617,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.5807211 = fieldWeight in 4617, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4617)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Imprint
- Littleton, CO : Libraries Unlimited
-
Denda, K.: Beyond subject headings : a structured information retrieval tool for interdisciplinary fields (2005)
0.02
0.024700502 = product of:
0.049401004 = sum of:
0.049401004 = product of:
0.09880201 = sum of:
0.09880201 = weight(_text_:22 in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09880201 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Jones, E.: ¬The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources (2005)
0.02
0.024700502 = product of:
0.049401004 = sum of:
0.049401004 = product of:
0.09880201 = sum of:
0.09880201 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09880201 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Dick, E.M.: Current information sources in mathematics : an annotated guide to books and periodicals, 1960-1972 (1973)
0.02
0.021737067 = product of:
0.043474134 = sum of:
0.043474134 = product of:
0.08694827 = sum of:
0.08694827 = weight(_text_:libraries in 8667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08694827 = score(doc=8667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 8667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8667)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Imprint
- Littleton, CO : Libraries Unlimited
