Search (174 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.04 
    0.04136526 = product of:
  0.08273052 = sum of:
    0.08273052 = product of:
      0.24819154 = sum of:
        0.24819154 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24819154 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44160777 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Kuehn, E.F.: ¬The information ecosystem concept in information literacy : a theoretical approach and definition (2023) 0.04 
    0.03980363 = product of:
  0.07960726 = sum of:
    0.07960726 = sum of:
      0.037263542 = weight(_text_:libraries in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037263542 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052088603 = queryNorm
          0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
      0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042343717 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052088603 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Despite the prominence of the concept of the information ecosystem (hereafter IE) in information literacy documents and literature, it is under-theorized. This article proposes a general definition of IE for information literacy. After reviewing the current use of the IE concept in the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Framework for Information Literacy and other information literacy sources, existing definitions of IE and similar concepts (e.g., "evidence ecosystems") will be examined from other fields. These will form the basis of the definition of IE proposed in the article for the field of information literacy: "all structures, entities, and agents related to the flow of semantic information relevant to a research domain, as well as the information itself."
    Date
    22. 3.2023 11:52:50
  3. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.03 
    0.03447105 = product of:
  0.0689421 = sum of:
    0.0689421 = product of:
      0.20682628 = sum of:
        0.20682628 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20682628 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44160777 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  4. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.03 
    0.03447105 = product of:
  0.0689421 = sum of:
    0.0689421 = product of:
      0.20682628 = sum of:
        0.20682628 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20682628 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44160777 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  5. Preminger, M.; Rype, I.; Ådland, M.K.; Massey, D.; Tallerås, K.: ¬The public library metadata landscape : the case of Norway 2017-2018 (2020) 0.03 
    0.02662236 = product of:
  0.05324472 = sum of:
    0.05324472 = product of:
      0.10648944 = sum of:
        0.10648944 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10648944 = score(doc=5802,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.6223308 = fieldWeight in 5802, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5802)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to gauge the cataloging practices within the public library sector seen from the catalog with Norway as a case, based on a sample of records from public libraries and cataloging agencies. Findings suggest that libraries make few changes to records they import from central agencies, and that larger libraries make more changes than smaller libraries. Findings also suggest that libraries catalog and modify records with their patrons in mind, and though the extent is not large, cataloging proficiency is still required in the public library domain, at least in larger libraries, in order to ensure correct and consistent metadata.
  6. Palsdottir, A.: Data literacy and management of research data : a prerequisite for the sharing of research data (2021) 0.03 
    0.026535753 = product of:
  0.053071506 = sum of:
    0.053071506 = sum of:
      0.024842361 = weight(_text_:libraries in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024842361 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052088603 = queryNorm
          0.14518027 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
      0.028229147 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028229147 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052088603 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the knowledge and attitude about research data management, the use of data management methods and the perceived need for support, in relation to participants' field of research. Design/methodology/approach This is a quantitative study. Data were collected by an email survey and sent to 792 academic researchers and doctoral students. Total response rate was 18% (N = 139). The measurement instrument consisted of six sets of questions: about data management plans, the assignment of additional information to research data, about metadata, standard file naming systems, training at data management methods and the storing of research data. Findings The main finding is that knowledge about the procedures of data management is limited, and data management is not a normal practice in the researcher's work. They were, however, in general, of the opinion that the university should take the lead by recommending and offering access to the necessary tools of data management. Taken together, the results indicate that there is an urgent need to increase the researcher's understanding of the importance of data management that is based on professional knowledge and to provide them with resources and training that enables them to make effective and productive use of data management methods. Research limitations/implications The survey was sent to all members of the population but not a sample of it. Because of the response rate, the results cannot be generalized to all researchers at the university. Nevertheless, the findings may provide an important understanding about their research data procedures, in particular what characterizes their knowledge about data management and attitude towards it. Practical implications Awareness of these issues is essential for information specialists at academic libraries, together with other units within the universities, to be able to design infrastructures and develop services that suit the needs of the research community. The findings can be used, to develop data policies and services, based on professional knowledge of best practices and recognized standards that assist the research community at data management. Originality/value The study contributes to the existing literature about research data management by examining the results by participants' field of research. Recognition of the issues is critical in order for information specialists in collaboration with universities to design relevant infrastructures and services for academics and doctoral students that can promote their research data management.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.02 
    0.024700502 = product of:
  0.049401004 = sum of:
    0.049401004 = product of:
      0.09880201 = sum of:
        0.09880201 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09880201 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  8. Manzuch, Z.; Maceviciute, E.: Getting ready to reduce the digital divide : scenarios of Lithuanian public libraries (2020) 0.02 
    0.022819167 = product of:
  0.045638334 = sum of:
    0.045638334 = product of:
      0.09127667 = sum of:
        0.09127667 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09127667 = score(doc=5965,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.5334264 = fieldWeight in 5965, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5965)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Digital exclusion is high on the international agenda and covers a variety of inequalities in access to and use of digital technologies, and in the skills and motivation needed for their adoption. This research contributes to the discussion on solving digital exclusion issues by addressing the emergent roles and challenges of Lithuanian public libraries in reducing the digital divide. The article combines a multilevel model of the digital divide with the concept of business idea and analyzes the future scenarios of Lithuanian public libraries. The findings highlight the public libraries' importance in conducting training, consultancy, and experiential learning to stimulate digital inclusion. Potentially, libraries can motivate users to adopt digital technologies, but this role is still not sufficiently visible. The findings show that libraries face challenges of redefining their social value and obtaining the sustaining funds, skills, and infrastructure necessary for digital inclusion programs. However, they can use collaboration networks, effective cost management, and external expertise to overcome these obstacles.
  9. Boruah, B.B.; Ravikumar, S.; Gayang, F.L.: Consistency, extent, and validation of the utilization of the MARC 21 bibliographic standard in the college libraries of Assam in India (2023) 0.02 
    0.021737067 = product of:
  0.043474134 = sum of:
    0.043474134 = product of:
      0.08694827 = sum of:
        0.08694827 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08694827 = score(doc=1183,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper brings light to the existing practice of cataloging in the college libraries of Assam in terms of utilizing the MARC 21 standard and its structure, i.e., the tags, subfield codes, and indicators. Catalog records from six college libraries are collected and a survey is conducted to understand the local users' information requirements for the catalog. Places, where libraries have scope to improve and which divisions of tags could be more helpful for them in information retrieval, are identified and suggested. This study fulfilled the need for local-level assessment of the catalogs.
  10. Fortier, A.; Pretty, H.J.; Scott, D.B.: Assessing the readiness for and knowledge of BIBFRAME in Canadian libraries (2022) 0.02 
    0.021514116 = product of:
  0.04302823 = sum of:
    0.04302823 = product of:
      0.08605646 = sum of:
        0.08605646 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08605646 = score(doc=1147,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.5029192 = fieldWeight in 1147, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1147)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study assesses the Canadian library community's understanding of and readiness for the transition from the MARC format to the BIBFRAME model. Results indicate that knowledge of BIBFRAME is low among respondents and that most of the libraries surveyed do not know enough about BIBFRAME to consider planning a transition. The success of the transition will depend on the leadership of larger libraries as well as better training in formal programs and continuing education initiatives.
  11. Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020) 0.02 
    0.021171859 = product of:
  0.042343717 = sum of:
    0.042343717 = product of:
      0.084687434 = sum of:
        0.084687434 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084687434 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    2. 3.2020 14:08:22
  12. Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023) 0.02 
    0.021171859 = product of:
  0.042343717 = sum of:
    0.042343717 = product of:
      0.084687434 = sum of:
        0.084687434 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084687434 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
  13. Tharani, K.: Just KOS! : enriching digital collections with hypertexts to enhance accessibility of non-western knowledge materials in libraries (2020) 0.02 
    0.020830952 = product of:
  0.041661903 = sum of:
    0.041661903 = product of:
      0.08332381 = sum of:
        0.08332381 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08332381 = score(doc=5896,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.4869494 = fieldWeight in 5896, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5896)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The knowledge organization systems (KOS) in use at libraries are social constructs that were conceived in the Euro-American context to organize and retrieve Western knowledge materials. As social constructs of the West, the effectiveness of library KOSs is limited when it comes to organization and retrieval of non-Western knowledge materials. How can librarians respond if asked to make non-Western knowledge materials as accessible as Western materials in their libraries? The accessibility of Western and non-Western knowledge materials in libraries need not be an either-or proposition. By way of a case study, a practical way forward is presented by which librarians can use their professional agency and existing digital technologies to exercise social justice. More specifically I demonstrate the design and development of a specialized KOS that enriches digital collections with hypertext features to enhance the accessibility of non-Western knowledge materials in libraries.
  14. Darch, P.T.; Sands, A.E.; Borgman, C.L.; Golshan, M.S.: Library cultures of data curation : adventures in astronomy (2020) 0.02 
    0.020539597 = product of:
  0.041079193 = sum of:
    0.041079193 = product of:
      0.08215839 = sum of:
        0.08215839 = weight(_text_:libraries in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08215839 = score(doc=36,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.48013863 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    University libraries are partnering with disciplinary data producers to provide long-term digital curation of research data sets. Managing data set producer expectations and guiding future development of library services requires understanding the decisions libraries make about curatorial activities, why they make these decisions, and the effects on future data reuse. We present a study, comprising interviews (n = 43) and ethnographic observation, of two university libraries who partnered with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) collaboration to curate a significant astronomy data set. The two libraries made different choices of the materials to curate and associated services, which resulted in different reuse possibilities. Each of the libraries offered partial solutions to the SDSS leaders' objectives. The libraries' approaches to curation diverged due to contextual factors, notably the extant infrastructure at their disposal (including technical infrastructure, staff expertise, values and internal culture, and organizational structure). The Data Transfer Process case offers lessons in understanding how libraries choose curation paths and how these choices influence possibilities for data reuse. Outcomes may not match data producers' initial expectations but may create opportunities for reusing data in unexpected and beneficial ways.
  15. Buschman, J.: ¬The public sphere without democracy : some recent work in LIS (2020) 0.02 
    0.019015972 = product of:
  0.038031943 = sum of:
    0.038031943 = product of:
      0.07606389 = sum of:
        0.07606389 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07606389 = score(doc=5838,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.44452196 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze and re-direct recent schematic and empirical scholarship on Habermas' theory of the public sphere in library and information science (LIS). Design/methodology/approach This paper conducts a critical analysis of the relevant literature in light of Habermas' origination and use/purpose of the public sphere concept. Findings The authors examined here produced a schematic operationalization of the public sphere that thinned the concept, but in turn, that schematization has produced insight into the civil society functions and communications of libraries, both within and without. For this work to be meaningful, the considerations and contexts of democratic society must be reinserted. Research limitations/implications Further explorations of the relationship between the public sphere and civil society as they are manifested around and in libraries is called for. Additionally, Weigand's approach to producing data/evidence on the public sphere and libraries should be furthered. Practical implications Understanding the role and function of libraries in democratic societies is essential for libraries to play a productive democratic role in those societies and thus, in guiding them. Social implications This paper helps to situate the bewildering circumstances of libraries who face both popular support and broad political-social questioning of their role and place. Originality/value This paper arguably interjects a more sophisticated and nuanced theoretical picture of the public sphere than prior precis presented in the LIS literature have undertaken. It also engages a unique set of empirical-theoretical students from another perspective in order to deepen and shift that research discourse.
  16. Handis, M.W.: Greek subject and name authorities, and the Library of Congress (2020) 0.02 
    0.018824851 = product of:
  0.037649702 = sum of:
    0.037649702 = product of:
      0.075299405 = sum of:
        0.075299405 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075299405 = score(doc=5801,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.4400543 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Some international libraries are still using the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, 2nd edition revised, for cataloging even though the Library of Congress and other large libraries have retired it in favor of Resource Description and Access. One of these libraries is the National Library of Greece, which consults the Library of Congress database before establishing authorities. There are cultural differences in names and subjects between the Library of Congress and the National Library, but some National Library terms may be more appropriate for users than the Library of Congress-established forms.
  17. Schreur, P.E.: ¬The use of Linked Data and artificial intelligence as key elements in the transformation of technical services (2020) 0.02 
    0.018824851 = product of:
  0.037649702 = sum of:
    0.037649702 = product of:
      0.075299405 = sum of:
        0.075299405 = weight(_text_:libraries in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075299405 = score(doc=125,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.4400543 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Library Technical Services have benefited from numerous stimuli. Although initially looked at with suspicion, transitions such as the move from catalog cards to the MARC formats have proven enormously helpful to libraries and their patrons. Linked data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold the same promise. Through the conversion of metadata surrogates (cataloging) to linked open data, libraries can represent their resources on the Semantic Web. But in order to provide some form of controlled access to unstructured data, libraries must reach beyond traditional cataloging to new tools such as AI to provide consistent access to a growing world of full-text resources.
  18. McElfresh, L.K.: Creator name standardization using faceted vocabularies in the BTAA geoportal : Michigan State University libraries digital repository case study (2023) 0.02 
    0.018824851 = product of:
  0.037649702 = sum of:
    0.037649702 = product of:
      0.075299405 = sum of:
        0.075299405 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075299405 = score(doc=1178,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.4400543 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Digital libraries incorporate metadata from varied sources, ranging from traditional catalog data to author-supplied descriptions. The Big Ten Academic Alliance (BTAA) Geoportal unites geospatial resources from the libraries of the BTAA, compounding the variability of metadata. The BTAA Geospatial Information Network's (BTAA GIN) Metadata Committee works to ensure completeness and consistency of metadata in the Geoportal, including a project to standardize the contents of the Creator field. The project comprises an OpenRefine data cleaning phase; evaluation of controlled vocabularies for semiautomated matching via OpenRefine reconciliation; and development and testing of a best practices guide for application of a controlled vocabulary.
  19. Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020) 0.02 
    0.017643217 = product of:
  0.035286434 = sum of:
    0.035286434 = product of:
      0.07057287 = sum of:
        0.07057287 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07057287 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 1.2020 22:15:11
  20. Wagner, E.: Über Impfstoffe zur digitalen Identität? (2020) 0.02 
    0.017643217 = product of:
  0.035286434 = sum of:
    0.035286434 = product of:
      0.07057287 = sum of:
        0.07057287 = weight(_text_:22 in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07057287 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 5.2020 17:22:40

Authors

Languages

  • e 141
  • d 33

Types

  • a 163
  • el 30
  • m 5
  • p 4
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications