Search (120 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information : papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College London, 3-18 August 1990 (1991) 0.03
    0.02762478 = product of:
      0.09668673 = sum of:
        0.028705904 = weight(_text_:studies in 7884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028705904 = score(doc=7884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.17634688 = fieldWeight in 7884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7884)
        0.067980826 = product of:
          0.13596165 = sum of:
            0.13596165 = weight(_text_:asia in 7884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13596165 = score(doc=7884,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.29789865 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.3024383 = idf(docFreq=80, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.4564024 = fieldWeight in 7884, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.3024383 = idf(docFreq=80, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: TEMPLETON, R.: The Library Association's role in developing standards; HARRISON, H.P.: Special materials and problems: standards for audiovisual materials; ANDERSON, D.: Selections of bibliographic standards and the processes of standardization; GILCHRIST, A.: The standards jungle; BOURNE, R.: The IFLA UBCIM programme: standards in the changing world; ROBERTS, W.: The role of IFLA in framing and promoting bibliographic standards; HILL, M.W.: Standards for information handling: needs and dilemmas; JUSU-SHERIFF, G.: Standardization: an African viewpoint; BISWAS, S.C.: Standardization of bibliographic control in South Asia; CROUCHER, M.: The British National Bibliography: an historical perspective; BUCKLEY, B.J.: CD-ROM at the British Library; HOPKINSON, A.: Information transfer and exchange formats; HESELTINE, R.G.: Library automation in the 1990s: the open systems future; GRAVES, S.E.: Problems of serials control; ODDY, P.: Authority control in the local, national and international environment; MITCHELL, J.: Library co-operatives: bibliographic databases; BROWN, S.: Angl-American cataloguing rules; MORELELI-CACOURIS, M. u. M. SKEPASTIANU: Cataloguing practices in Greece; MUN, K.S.: Bibliographic description and information exchange in Southeast Asia: a survey; CURWEN, A.G.: International standard bibliographic description; HANCOCK-BEAULIEU, M.: Bibliographic standards and the online catalogue user; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Subject cataloguing and LCSH; AITCHISON, J.: Subject control: thesaurus construction standards; SWEENEY, R.: Dewey Decimal Classification: an international standard; McILWAINE, I.C.: Present role and future policy for UDC as a standard for subject control; BUXTON, A.B.: UDC in online systems; BUXTON, A.B.: International gateways; BUXTON, A.B.: Common command languages
  2. Kokabi, M.: ¬The Iranian adaptation of UNIMARC (1997) 0.03
    0.02752102 = product of:
      0.096323565 = sum of:
        0.038911756 = weight(_text_:libraries in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038911756 = score(doc=537,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
        0.05741181 = weight(_text_:studies in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05741181 = score(doc=537,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Outline of a thesis produced at the University of New South Wales School of Information, Library and Archive Studies, the first serious study of MARC for Iran despite 12 years of the presence of computers in Iranian libraries. Considers the various MARC formats, reasons for choosing UNIMARC, and the use of the Farsi language in machines. Lists the modifications required to UNIMARC for use in the Iranian National Bibliography
  3. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.03
    0.026229119 = product of:
      0.09180191 = sum of:
        0.069693595 = weight(_text_:case in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069693595 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
        0.022108318 = product of:
          0.044216637 = sum of:
            0.044216637 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044216637 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This case study details the evolution of descriptive practices and standards used in the Mount Holyoke College Archives and the Five College Finding Aids Access Project, discusses the relationship of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and the MARC standard in reference to archival description, and addresses the challenges and opportunities of transferring data from one metadata standard to another. The study demonstrates that greater standardization in archival description allows archivists to respond more effectively to technological change.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  4. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.03
    0.02615146 = product of:
      0.09153011 = sum of:
        0.058367632 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058367632 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
        0.033162475 = product of:
          0.06632495 = sum of:
            0.06632495 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06632495 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
    Imprint
    Englewood, CO : Libraries Unlimited
  5. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.02
    0.022720037 = product of:
      0.07952013 = sum of:
        0.05741181 = weight(_text_:studies in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05741181 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
        0.022108318 = product of:
          0.044216637 = sum of:
            0.044216637 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044216637 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 32(1995) no.3, S.i-iv
  6. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.020050757 = product of:
      0.070177644 = sum of:
        0.038911756 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038911756 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
        0.031265885 = product of:
          0.06253177 = sum of:
            0.06253177 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06253177 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  7. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.02
    0.01917974 = product of:
      0.06712909 = sum of:
        0.050547853 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050547853 = score(doc=4748,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.3771894 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
        0.016581237 = product of:
          0.033162475 = sum of:
            0.033162475 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033162475 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  8. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.02
    0.017544411 = product of:
      0.06140544 = sum of:
        0.03404779 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03404779 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
        0.027357649 = product of:
          0.054715298 = sum of:
            0.054715298 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054715298 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly summarizes the problems encountered when attempting to use the USMARC cataloguing format in US school libraries and describes the development of CEMARC format by the Northwest Ohio Educational Technology Foundation (NWOET), which addresses the main problems by: offering sata entry guidelines for a minimum USMARC standard in order to clarify inconsistencies in application; and by suggesting enhancements and new fields that go beyond the USMARC standard. Concludes with brief notes on early CEMARC implementation
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  9. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.02
    0.017434308 = product of:
      0.061020076 = sum of:
        0.038911756 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038911756 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
        0.022108318 = product of:
          0.044216637 = sum of:
            0.044216637 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044216637 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. Describes how changes are effected in MARC and the role of the various groups in the library community that are involved in the implementing these changes. Discusses the expansion of the formats to accomodate cataloguing and retrieval for visual materials. Expanded capabilities for coding visual materials offer greater opportunity for user access.
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20
  10. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.02
    0.017434308 = product of:
      0.061020076 = sum of:
        0.038911756 = weight(_text_:libraries in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038911756 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.022108318 = product of:
          0.044216637 = sum of:
            0.044216637 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044216637 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  11. Matoria, R.K.; Upadhyay, P.K.: Migration of data from one library management system to another : a case study in India (2004) 0.02
    0.0174234 = product of:
      0.1219638 = sum of:
        0.1219638 = weight(_text_:case in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1219638 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.68003565 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  12. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.02
    0.016529541 = product of:
      0.05785339 = sum of:
        0.041272152 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041272152 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.30797386 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
        0.016581237 = product of:
          0.033162475 = sum of:
            0.033162475 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033162475 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  13. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.02
    0.01525502 = product of:
      0.053392567 = sum of:
        0.03404779 = weight(_text_:libraries in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03404779 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
        0.019344779 = product of:
          0.038689557 = sum of:
            0.038689557 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038689557 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
  14. Snow, M.: Visual depictions and the use of MARC : a view from the trenches of slide librarianship (1989) 0.02
    0.01525502 = product of:
      0.053392567 = sum of:
        0.03404779 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03404779 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
        0.019344779 = product of:
          0.038689557 = sum of:
            0.038689557 = weight(_text_:22 in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038689557 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. The only way to get bibliographic records on to campus on-line library catalogues, and slide records on the national bibliographic utilities, is through the use of MARC. Discusses the importance of having individual slide and photograph records on the national bibliographic utilities, and considers the obstacles which currently make this difficult. Discusses mapping to MARC from data base management systems.
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:51:36
  15. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.02
    0.01525502 = product of:
      0.053392567 = sum of:
        0.03404779 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03404779 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
        0.019344779 = product of:
          0.038689557 = sum of:
            0.038689557 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038689557 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  16. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.02
    0.01525502 = product of:
      0.053392567 = sum of:
        0.03404779 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03404779 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
        0.019344779 = product of:
          0.038689557 = sum of:
            0.038689557 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038689557 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  17. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.01
    0.013774617 = product of:
      0.048211157 = sum of:
        0.03439346 = weight(_text_:libraries in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03439346 = score(doc=154,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.25664487 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
        0.0138177 = product of:
          0.0276354 = sum of:
            0.0276354 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0276354 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Encoded Archival Description (EAD) has provided a new way to approach manuscript and archival collection representation. A review of previous representational practices and problems highlights the benefits of using EAD. This new approach should be considered a partner rather than an adversary in the access providing process. Technological capabilities now allow for multiple metadata schemas to be employed in the creation of the finding aid. Crosswalks allow for MARC records to be generated from the detailed encoding of an EAD finding aid. In the process of creating these crosswalks and detailed encoding, EAD has generated more changes in traditional processes and procedures than originally imagined. The North Carolina State University (NCSU) Libraries sought to test the process of crosswalking EAD to MARC, investigating how this process used technology as well as changed physical procedures. By creating a complex and indepth EAD template for finding aids, with accompanying related encoding analogs embedded within the element structure, MARC records were generated that required minor editing and revision for inclusion in the NCSU Libraries OPAC. The creation of this bridge between EAD and MARC has stimulated theoretical discussions about the role of collaboration, technology, and expertise in the ongoing struggle to maximize access to our collections. While this study is a only a first attempt at harnessing this potential, a presentation of the tensions, struggles, and successes provides illumination to some of the larger issues facing special collections today.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003) 0.01
    0.010896442 = product of:
      0.038137548 = sum of:
        0.024319848 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024319848 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
        0.0138177 = product of:
          0.0276354 = sum of:
            0.0276354 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0276354 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  19. Kushwoh, S.S.; Gautam, J.N.; Singh, R.: Migration from CDS / ISIS to KOHA : a case study of data conversion from CCF to MARC 21 (2009) 0.01
    0.010560175 = product of:
      0.073921226 = sum of:
        0.073921226 = weight(_text_:case in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073921226 = score(doc=2279,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.41216385 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Standards are important for quality and interoperability in any system. Bibliographic record creation standards such as MARC 21 (Machine Readable Catalogue), CCF (Common Communication Format), UNIMARC (Universal MARC) and their local variations, are in practice all across the library community. ILMS (Integrated Library Management Systems) are using these standards for the design of databases and the creation of bibliographic records. Their use is important for uniformity of the system and bibliographic data, but there are problems when a library wants to switch over from one system to another using different standards. This paper discusses migration from one record standard to another, mapping of data and related issues. Data exported from CDS/ISIS CCF based records to KOHA MARC 21 based records are discussed as a case study. This methodology, with few modifications, can be applied for migration of data in other bibliographicformats too. Freeware tools can be utilized for migration.
  20. Chandrakar, R.: Mapping CCF to MARC21 : an experimental approach (2001) 0.01
    0.010300651 = product of:
      0.07210456 = sum of:
        0.07210456 = product of:
          0.14420912 = sum of:
            0.14420912 = weight(_text_:asia in 5437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14420912 = score(doc=5437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29789865 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.3024383 = idf(docFreq=80, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.48408782 = fieldWeight in 5437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.3024383 = idf(docFreq=80, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this article is to raise and address a number of issues pertaining to the conversion of Common Communication Format (CCF) into MARC21. In this era of global resource sharing, exchange of bibliographic records from one system to another is imperative in today's library communities. Instead of using a single standard to create machine-readable catalogue records, more than 20 standards have emerged and are being used by different institutions. Because of these variations in standards, sharing of resources and transfer of data from one system to another among the institutions locally and globally has become a significant problem. Addressing this problem requires keeping in mind that countries such as India and others in southeast Asia are using the CCF as a standard for creating bibliographic cataloguing records. This paper describes a way to map the bibliographic catalogue records from CCF to MARC21, although 100% mapping is not possible. In addition, the paper describes an experimental approach that enumerates problems that may occur during the mapping of records/exchanging of records and how these problems can be overcome.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 103
  • m 10
  • s 8
  • el 3
  • b 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…