Search (48 results, page 1 of 3)

0.19437703 = product of:
  0.4535464 = sum of:
    0.06479234 = product of:
      0.19437702 = sum of:
        0.19437702 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19437702 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34585547 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.19437702 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19437702 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34585547 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.19437702 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19437702 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34585547 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)

Footnote

Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.

0.03631583 = product of:
  0.1271054 = sum of:
    0.069693595 = weight(_text_:case in 7165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069693595 = score(doc=7165,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 7165, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7165)
    0.05741181 = weight(_text_:studies in 7165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05741181 = score(doc=7165,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 7165, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7165)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Examines the reality of the archival management of electronic records and the digital world as a whole. Discusses issues surrounding the keeping of electronic records and examines the fundamental question of where records should be kept in the electronic age. Considers post custodial ideas and strategies by means of case studies and concludes with a discussion of whether, in a digital world, location really matters

0.03631583 = product of:
  0.1271054 = sum of:
    0.069693595 = weight(_text_:case in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069693595 = score(doc=2428,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
    0.05741181 = weight(_text_:studies in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05741181 = score(doc=2428,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Discusses the value of electronic document management (EDM), particularly in relation to avoiding misfiled (and thus lost) items. Outlines the major functions of WDM systems, and reports the findings of some surveys of their use. To aid explanation of how such systems work, present 4 case studies covering Railtrack (UK); Staffordshire County Council; the city of Vienna (Austria); and M J Gleeson, a large UK construction firm

0.0327864 = product of:
  0.1147524 = sum of:
    0.087116994 = weight(_text_:case in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087116994 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.48573974 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
    0.0276354 = product of:
      0.0552708 = sum of:
        0.0552708 = weight(_text_:22 in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0552708 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Discusses the costs and benefits of documents information systems (involving text and images) and some design methodological aspects that arise from the documentary nature of the data. Reports details of a case study involving a specific document information system introduced at Press Ltd, a company in the Netherlands

Source

Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.4, S.287-297

0.030202458 = product of:
  0.1057086 = sum of:
    0.043558497 = weight(_text_:case in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043558497 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
    0.062150106 = weight(_text_:studies in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062150106 = score(doc=2837,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.3818022 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a reconsideration of Michael Buckland's important question, "What is a document?", analysing the point and purpose of definitions of "document" and "documentation". Design/methodology/approach - Two philosophical notions of the point of definitions are contrasted: John Stuart Mill's concept of a "real" definition, purporting to specify the nature of the definiendum; and a concept of definition based upon a foundationalist philosophy of language. Both conceptions assume that a general, philosophical justification for using words as we do is always in order. This assumption is criticized by deploying Hilary Putnam's arguments against the orthodox Wittgensteinian interpretation of criteria governing the use of language. The example of the cabinets of curiosities of the sixteenth-century English and European virtuosi is developed to show how one might productively think about what documents might be, but without a definition of a document. Findings - Other than for specific, instrumentalist purposes (often appropriate for specific case studies), there is no general philosophical reason for asking, what is a document? There are good reasons for pursuing studies of documentation without the impediments of definitions of "document" or "documentation". Originality/value - The paper makes an original contribution to the new interest in documentation studies by providing conceptual resources for multiplying, rather than restricting, the areas of application of the concepts of documents and documentation.

0.02567917 = product of:
  0.08987709 = sum of:
    0.049280815 = weight(_text_:case in 4516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049280815 = score(doc=4516,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.2747759 = fieldWeight in 4516, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4516)
    0.040596277 = weight(_text_:studies in 4516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040596277 = score(doc=4516,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.24939215 = fieldWeight in 4516, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4516)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Discusses the skills and competencies required by contemporary records managers. The role of the records manager has recently gained a higher profile - due to increasing legislation (resulting from various corporate scandals worldwide) requiring organisations to focus an the integrity, currency and accessibility of their records. Case studies are included in the book to indicate the wide range of activities undertaken by records managers. The book addresses the skills and competencies required by records managers and considers how these are acquired and developed. Using guidance, actions plans can be developed by the reader. Using research undertaken by the author, a sample of roles currently undertaken is evaluated in detail to provide examples of the competencies and skills required for each role.

Content

Key Features - Fills the gap in the literature addressing competencies for records managers - Emerging legislation and regulatory frameworks and recent corporate scandals haue provided opportunities for records managers to increase their profile and involvement at the strategic level of their organisation. This book provides information an the required competencies to support and enable this higher profile - The author is a highly experienced practitioner, and also has a post-graduate qualification in the area - The use of case studies of practicing records managers provides real-life examples of the diversity of the contemporary records manager The Author Ceri Hughes is Associate Director of Global Knowledge Management at KPMG Financial Advisory Services. She is an active member of the Records Management Society of Great Britain, served four years an the Society's executive and is currently the Immediate Past Chair, having chaired the Society 2001-2003. Readership Records management and knowledge management practitioners. Data protection/Privacy/ Freedom of Information professionals. Information management sector training professionals. Records management students Contents Part 1: The role of the records manager - Records management in the modern environment: Records managers-'basement to boardroom': evaluating the range of roles: Records management in the knowledge economy Part 2: Skills and competencies - Core competencies: Core skills: Adding value Part 3: Records management and career progression - Continuing professional development: Higher education: Professional networks: Continuing career development Part 4: Conclusions - Conclusion: Useful directory

0.022376366 = product of:
  0.07831728 = sum of:
    0.058972497 = weight(_text_:libraries in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058972497 = score(doc=760,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.4400543 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.019344779 = product of:
      0.038689557 = sum of:
        0.038689557 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038689557 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

0.021705087 = product of:
  0.0759678 = sum of:
    0.062150106 = weight(_text_:studies in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062150106 = score(doc=1632,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.3818022 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
    0.0138177 = product of:
      0.0276354 = sum of:
        0.0276354 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0276354 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.011598936 = product of:
  0.08119255 = sum of:
    0.08119255 = weight(_text_:studies in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08119255 = score(doc=3064,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.4987843 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

traditionally, librarianship, archives management, and records management have functioned largely as autonomous disciplines. However, economic, technological and higher education trends conspire against continued, possibly self defeating, claims to uniqueness. Areas of convergence include the information life cycle concept, gatekeepers, information storage and retrieval, information representation, assistive and instructional roles, ethics, and custodial and preservation concerns. Suggests implications for education and research in an emerging field of 'information management' or information studies

0.010149069 = product of:
  0.071043484 = sum of:
    0.071043484 = weight(_text_:studies in 3430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071043484 = score(doc=3430,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.43643627 = fieldWeight in 3430, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3430)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

In this article a set of requirements for the design of a personal document management system is presented, based on the results of three research studies (Bondarenko, [2006]; Bondarenko & Janssen, [2005]; Bondarenko & Janssen, [2009]). We propose a framework, based on layers of task decomposition, that helps to understand the needs of information workers with regard to personal document and task management. Relevant user processes are described and requirements for a document-management system are derived for each layer. The derived requirements are compared to related studies, and implications for system design are discussed.

0.0087117 = product of:
  0.0609819 = sum of:
    0.0609819 = weight(_text_:case in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0609819 = score(doc=1499,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Information systems are essential support for knowledge management in all types of enterprises. This paper describes the evolution and development of a specialized hospital information system. The system is designed to integrate for access and retrieval from databases of patients' case records, and related images - CATSCAN, MRI, X-Ray - and to enable online access to full text of relevant papers on the Internet/WWW. The generation of information products and services from the system is briefly described.

0.008338233 = product of:
  0.058367632 = sum of:
    0.058367632 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058367632 = score(doc=5390,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 5390, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5390)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.007176476 = product of:
  0.05023533 = sum of:
    0.05023533 = weight(_text_:studies in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05023533 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

The Promenade image retrieval system us described in terms of its design, development and architecture. Design, development and implementation issues are discussed in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. A preliminary usability study is presented and the data resulting from the preliminary study are analysed and discussed. Efficiency in terms of response time due to network delays, database processing, application processing and image characteristcs and display is discussed. Response time results frome 40 queries made to the image database are presented and discussed. The results of theses studies demonstrate where improvements in the system need to be made in order ro improve usability and response time

0.0069485283 = product of:
  0.048639696 = sum of:
    0.048639696 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048639696 = score(doc=3337,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 3337, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3337)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Surveys document management systems is use in UK local government. covers: finance, revenues, benefits systems, palnning and other services including libraries, emergency planning, social services, electronic printing, purchasing, recruitment and contract services

0.0063166628 = product of:
  0.044216637 = sum of:
    0.044216637 = product of:
      0.08843327 = sum of:
        0.08843327 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08843327 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

22. 2.1997 19:46:30

0.0062226425 = product of:
  0.043558497 = sum of:
    0.043558497 = weight(_text_:case in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043558497 = score(doc=3942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Purpose - This work aims to draw attention to information retrieval philosophies and techniques allied to the records management profession, advocating a wider professional consideration of a functional approach to information management, in this instance in the development of information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws from a hypothesis originally presented by the author that advocated a viewpoint whereby the application of records management techniques, traditionally applied to develop business classification schemes, was offered as an additional solution to organising information resources and services (within a university intranet), where earlier approaches, notably subject- and administrative-based arrangements, were found to be lacking. The hypothesis was tested via work-based action learning and is presented here as an extended case study. The paper also draws on evidence submitted to the Joint Information Systems Committee in support of the University of Abertay Dundee's application for consideration for the JISC award for innovation in records and information management. Findings - The original hypothesis has been tested in the workplace. Information retrieval techniques, allied to records management (functional classification), were the main influence in the development of pre- and post-coordinate information retrieval systems to support a wider information architecture, where the subject approach was found to be lacking. Their use within the workplace has since been extended. Originality/value - The paper advocates that the development of information retrieval as a discipline should include a wider consideration of functional classification, as this alternative to the subject approach is largely ignored in mainstream IR works.

0.0062226425 = product of:
  0.043558497 = sum of:
    0.043558497 = weight(_text_:case in 4041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043558497 = score(doc=4041,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 4041, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4041)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

New technology implementations impact organizational behavior and outcomes, sometimes in unintended ways. A combination of design decisions, altered affordances, and political struggles within a state cloud computing implementation reduced levels of service among records management professionals, in spite of their strongly expressed desire to manage records with excellence. Struggles to maintain ownership and control over organizational processes and resources illustrate the power dynamics that are affected by the design of a new system implementation. By designing the system with a single goal in mind (centralization to reduce costs), strategic management failed to consider otherwise predictable outcomes of reducing the resources controlled by a group with lesser power and increasing the resources controlled by an already dominant power within the institution. These findings provide valuable insights into the considerations which cloud computing designs should take into account. They also offer an understanding of changing educational requirements for records management workers to engage more effectively across occupations in technologically changing environments and the potential risks that cloud computing provide to productivity. The research was comprised of an extensive literature review, a grounded theory methodological approach, and rigorous data collection and synthesis via an empirical case study.

0.006151265 = product of:
  0.043058854 = sum of:
    0.043058854 = weight(_text_:studies in 2431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043058854 = score(doc=2431,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 2431, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2431)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Reports and examines the results of a brief survey of records management training and education in some 26 countries and covering 79 institutions, conducted across the Internet in 1997 by researchers from the Archives and Records Management Programme at the University of Wales at Aberystwyth. Looks at the nees for records management training and education worldwide, and the emergence of the topic as a subset of information management, with an acknowledged impact on the systematic and efficient management of organizations. Suggests the focus of records management has shifted over the recent past from archival management of unwanted documents, to the management of electronic systems, giving records managers equal standing with other professionals in the information management field. Compares records management training in Malaysia and the UK, emphasizing that visiting consultants cannot be a substitute for courses based in universities. The survey revealed there is no standard approach to the training provided by these institutions: some are likely to reflect their archival origins, whilst others represent various streams of information studies

0.005896022 = product of:
  0.041272152 = sum of:
    0.041272152 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041272152 = score(doc=5593,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.30797386 = fieldWeight in 5593, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5593)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

The amount of digital content produced at academic research institutions is large, and libraries and archives at these institutions have a responsibility to bring this digital material under curatorial control in order to manage and preserve it over time. But this is a daunting task with few proven models, requiring new technology, policies, procedures, core staff competencies, and cost models. The MIT Libraries are working with the DSpace(TM) open-source digital repository platform to explore the problem of capturing research and teaching material in any digital format and preserving it over time. By collaborating on this problem with other research institutions using the DSpace platform in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, and other parts of the world, as well as with other important efforts in the digital preservation arena, we are beginning to see ways of managing arbitrary digital content that might make digital preservation an achievable goal.

0.005558823 = product of:
  0.038911756 = sum of:
    0.038911756 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038911756 = score(doc=3297,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04079441 = queryNorm
        0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

European research libraries cooperation. 5(1995) no.2, S.124-127