Search (435 results, page 1 of 22)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.05
    0.05129412 = product of:
      0.119686276 = sum of:
        0.029183816 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029183816 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
        0.073921226 = weight(_text_:case in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073921226 = score(doc=1187,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.41216385 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
        0.016581237 = product of:
          0.033162475 = sum of:
            0.033162475 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033162475 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access to monographs through online public access catalogs (OPACs) has always been a major concern for large research and/or academic libraries. Academic library practice of providing subject access to monographs has proven inadequate, especially in the case of composite works. Many techniques have been proposed to enhance subject treatment of monographs in OPACs. This article briefly reviews these efforts in the past and presents the case of adding Tables of Contents as one of the Most useful and probably also one of the Most costeffective ways of improving subject access to Monographs in an academic environment.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  2. Buckland, M.K.: OASIS: a front-end for prototyping catalog enhancements (1992) 0.05
    0.04901763 = product of:
      0.114374466 = sum of:
        0.03404779 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03404779 = score(doc=4546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
        0.0609819 = weight(_text_:case in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0609819 = score(doc=4546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
        0.019344779 = product of:
          0.038689557 = sum of:
            0.038689557 = weight(_text_:22 in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038689557 = score(doc=4546,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    By the mid 1980s online bibliographic systems retrieved excessively large sets. Conversely, with standard Boolean systems, searches retrieved commonly nothing or too few records. In Nov. 92, 32% of searches yielded nothing from a retrieval set averaging 98. Offers solutions to these problems using MELVYL as a case study. Examines how non topical data such as date, language and location of document can improve topical searches. Explains OASIS and front end phototyping. Discusses adaptive retrieval, strategic commands, expanded retrieval and developments of OASIS. Covers aggregation of filtered sets, related terms, automatic progressive truncation, the SUMMARIZE LIBRARIES command, filing and filtering and collection analysis
    Source
    Library hi tech. 10(1992) no.4, S.7-22
  3. Wilson, V.: Catalog users "in the wild" : the potential of an ethnographic approach to studies of library catalogs and their users (2015) 0.05
    0.046129305 = product of:
      0.16145256 = sum of:
        0.0609819 = weight(_text_:case in 2016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0609819 = score(doc=2016,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 2016, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2016)
        0.10047066 = weight(_text_:studies in 2016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10047066 = score(doc=2016,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.6172141 = fieldWeight in 2016, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2016)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    An increasing number of library user studies are employing ethnographic techniques as an alternative to more traditional qualitative methods such as surveys. Such techniques, however, are only beginning to see significant application to catalog user studies. Beginning with a discussion of the applied ethnographic method and its current usage within the field of Library and Information Science research, this article will assess methods that have traditionally been applied to studies of catalog users and present the case for the potential of an ethnographic approach for future catalog evaluation and design.
  4. Lazinger, S.S.; Peritz, B.C.: Reader use of a nationwide research library network : local OPAC vs. remote files (1991) 0.04
    0.043248106 = product of:
      0.10091224 = sum of:
        0.041272152 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041272152 = score(doc=3013,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.30797386 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
        0.043058854 = weight(_text_:studies in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043058854 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
        0.016581237 = product of:
          0.033162475 = sum of:
            0.033162475 = weight(_text_:22 in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033162475 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The primary objective of the present study was to exmine whether readers conducting bibliographic searches in ALEPH - Israel's research library network - tend to search only within the OPAC of the library within which they are working or whether they access the remote OPACs of other libraries. The ALEPH network has a dezentralized database. Therefore, it was possible to examine this question because each library has its own access code and each database can be searched separately. The data were collected by means of a one-page questionnaire lefr beside each terminal in the library of the Graduate School of Library and Archive Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem during an entire academic years. results of analysis of the data collected in this survey are presented in 6 tables
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:06:18
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 10(1991), S.192-200
  5. Matthews, J.R.; Lawrence, G.S.; Ferguson, D.K.: Using online catalogs : a nationwide survey, a report of a study sponsored by the Council on Library Resources (1983) 0.04
    0.042463288 = product of:
      0.1486215 = sum of:
        0.04815084 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04815084 = score(doc=4168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
        0.10047066 = weight(_text_:studies in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10047066 = score(doc=4168,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.6172141 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    LCSH
    Online library catalogs / Use studies
    Library catalogs / Use studies
    Libraries / United States / Automation
    Subject
    Online library catalogs / Use studies
    Library catalogs / Use studies
    Libraries / United States / Automation
  6. Intelligent interfaces : theory, research and design (1992) 0.04
    0.03631583 = product of:
      0.1271054 = sum of:
        0.069693595 = weight(_text_:case in 2676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069693595 = score(doc=2676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 2676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2676)
        0.05741181 = weight(_text_:studies in 2676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05741181 = score(doc=2676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 2676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2676)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The 10 contributions are concerned with the nature, composition, and implementation of the cognitive interaction between the human and the computer, through the development of intelligent interfaces. The topic is addressed from a variety of theoretical, empirical, and design perspectives, by authors who are currently carrying out research in interface design and related issues. The text is organised into sections on theory, design, and case studies, together with a critique of the intelligent interface concept. Relevant recent advances in artificial intelligence, cognitive psychology, psychophysiology and computer science are emphasized
  7. Ihadjadene, M.: ¬L' acces sujet dans les catalogues en ligne : le cas des bibliothèques universitaires en France (1998) 0.04
    0.03563518 = product of:
      0.12472313 = sum of:
        0.055029534 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055029534 = score(doc=3215,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 3215, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3215)
        0.069693595 = weight(_text_:case in 3215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069693595 = score(doc=3215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 3215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3215)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Presents the results of an inquiry carried out in 1997 on subject access in university libraries. Examines issues including the quality of holdings, indexing and research strategies, navigation and available aids. Offers suggestions for improving the concept of the online catalogue
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Subject access in online catalogues: the case of university libraries in France
  8. Sellers, M.: Cataloging decision consequences : accessing table of contents in the online catalog (1994) 0.03
    0.034401275 = product of:
      0.12040445 = sum of:
        0.048639696 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048639696 = score(doc=2399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 2399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2399)
        0.07176476 = weight(_text_:studies in 2399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07176476 = score(doc=2399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.44086722 = fieldWeight in 2399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2399)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the retrieval and user issues related to the impact of including table of contents notes as a searchable field in online catalogues. Includes a review of evaluation criteria, a summary of previously published studies, and a conceptual model which addresses some of the disadvantages of the searchable MARC field
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 20(1994) no.3, S.24-27
  9. Batt, C.: ¬The cutting edge (II) (1990) 0.03
    0.034401275 = product of:
      0.12040445 = sum of:
        0.048639696 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048639696 = score(doc=3591,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 3591, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3591)
        0.07176476 = weight(_text_:studies in 3591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07176476 = score(doc=3591,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.44086722 = fieldWeight in 3591, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3591)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The belief that the OPAC represents the most revolutionary development in libraries since open access and could transform the effectiveness of many services if enough interest is taken. Describes some OPAC studies being undertaken in the UK.
  10. Seymour, S.: Online public access catalog user studies : a review of research methodologies, March 1986-November 1989 (1991) 0.03
    0.03431552 = product of:
      0.12010431 = sum of:
        0.038911756 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038911756 = score(doc=6603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 6603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6603)
        0.08119255 = weight(_text_:studies in 6603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08119255 = score(doc=6603,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.4987843 = fieldWeight in 6603, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6603)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews studies of users of OPACs focusing on the research methodology of librarians. Surveys and questionnaires, interviews, observation, controlled experiment and transaction log analysis were used with varying degrees of expertise and success in academic public libraries with a variety of user populations. Poor methodology due to lack of training and funding sharply limit their usefulness in most cases
  11. Park, I.: ¬A comparative study of major OPACs in selected academic libraries for developing countries : user study and subjective user evaluation (1997) 0.03
    0.0321261 = product of:
      0.112441346 = sum of:
        0.055029534 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055029534 = score(doc=1778,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
        0.05741181 = weight(_text_:studies in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05741181 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Provides information on the characteristics of 5 online catalogue systems in 5 academic libraries in the austin, Texas and North Texas, USA, and their use by Korean students at University of North Texas, USA, in order to assist system managers in the selection of online catalogues. Proposes recommendations when designing, adopting, or managing a new online catalogue system. Topics for further studies on the characteristics of online systems and their use are also suggested
  12. Rosenthal, M.; Shupe, B.: Evaluating patron use of an online catalog (1995) 0.03
    0.0321261 = product of:
      0.112441346 = sum of:
        0.055029534 = weight(_text_:libraries in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055029534 = score(doc=936,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
        0.05741181 = weight(_text_:studies in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05741181 = score(doc=936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    While much has been written about OPACs in college and university libraries, few OPAC studies from community colleges have appeared in the literature. Provides a background to the work of Nassau Community College, Garden City, New York (NCC) and its library. Describes the NCC OPAC and presents a study of its use covering user profiles; user success; and user strategies and patterns of use
    Source
    Community and junior college libraries. 8(1995) no.1, S.75-86
  13. Thorne, R.; Whitlatch, J.B.: Patron online catalog success (1994) 0.03
    0.03002608 = product of:
      0.105091274 = sum of:
        0.03404779 = weight(_text_:libraries in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03404779 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.071043484 = weight(_text_:studies in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071043484 = score(doc=855,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.43643627 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The project explored the ways in which the online catalogue contributes, or does not contribute to the success of library users. Key issues examined included: whether students are really getting appropriate assistance when using the online catalogue; the most common searching successes and failures observed for people using the online catalogue without staff assistance; and the effectiveness of online catalogue use by librarians providing reference assistance compared to other sources (reference books, electronic and printed indexes). Reviews relevant studies of online catalogues and reference success and describes the methodology and results of 3 different online catalogue studies: the Reference Assessment Survey; the online catalogue study of unassisted users; and the document availability study; all conducted at San José State University Library; California, using the Reference Transaction Assessment Instrument. Considers the implications of the results for reference practice and study methodology
    Source
    College and research libraries. 55(1994) no.6, S.479-497
  14. Hogan, S.A.: Educating users about catalogues and cataloguing : the impossible dream (1993) 0.03
    0.028400049 = product of:
      0.09940016 = sum of:
        0.07176476 = weight(_text_:studies in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07176476 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.44086722 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
        0.0276354 = product of:
          0.0552708 = sum of:
            0.0552708 = weight(_text_:22 in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0552708 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogue use studies in manual and online environments over the last 50 years have been succesful in identifying user behaviour and causes of user failure, but they have not led to substantial change in catalogue codes of practices. The online environment offers a myriad of new challenges
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.2, S.23-26
  15. Norden, D.J.; Lawrence, G.H.: Public terminal use in an online catalog : some preliminary results (1981) 0.03
    0.028110335 = product of:
      0.09838617 = sum of:
        0.04815084 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04815084 = score(doc=2164,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 2164, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2164)
        0.05023533 = weight(_text_:studies in 2164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05023533 = score(doc=2164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 2164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2164)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The authors have studied the transaction counts from two and one-half years activity at the public use terminals of the Ohio State University Libraries' prototype online card catalog to determine what search options academic library patrons use the most often and whether this pattern varies from that reported in major catalog use studies. The preliminary findings indicate significant differences in search strategy that may result from a unique user group that prefers to search the online catalog, more useful searches in the online system, or special search patterns imposed by the computer hardware itself. Both the different searches used by patrons and why they choose them should be important factors in the design of future online catalogs
    Source
    College and research libraries. 42(1981), S.308-316
  16. Lundgren, L.: Helping children to help themselves (1998) 0.03
    0.028110335 = product of:
      0.09838617 = sum of:
        0.04815084 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04815084 = score(doc=3705,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 3705, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3705)
        0.05023533 = weight(_text_:studies in 3705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05023533 = score(doc=3705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 3705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3705)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Looks at ways of making library catalogues easier for children to use, including the Book House, a Danish search system based on studies of how library users carry out searches in the catalogues. This and other research shows that much can be done to make library catalogues easier for children to use and to encourage the search for information andreading. In this work libraries must start from the subjects children ask about and adapt to children's level of development and ways of expressing themselves
    Footnote
    Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to children and libraries in Scandinavia
  17. Pavelsek, M.J.: ¬A case against instructing users of computerised retrieval systems (1991) 0.03
    0.02715134 = product of:
      0.09502969 = sum of:
        0.03404779 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03404779 = score(doc=4834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 4834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4834)
        0.0609819 = weight(_text_:case in 4834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0609819 = score(doc=4834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 4834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4834)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    College and research libraries news. 52(1991) no.5, S.297-299
  18. Millsap, L.; Ferl, T.E.: Search patterns of remote users : an analysis of OPAC transaction logs (1993) 0.03
    0.02715134 = product of:
      0.09502969 = sum of:
        0.03404779 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03404779 = score(doc=6038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 6038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6038)
        0.0609819 = weight(_text_:case in 6038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0609819 = score(doc=6038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 6038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6038)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The focus of this study is the search behavior of remote users of the University of California MELVYL Library System, an OPAC. Transaction logs from randomly selected remote user search sessions are analyzed. Descriptive data on the number and type of searches, choice of search mode and database, number of retrievals, number and type of errors, and use of system HELP facilities are presented. The search data have been cross-tabulated with demographic data on the same group of remote users, collected through an online survey conducted by the authors. Effectiveness of system usage is discussed. A case mode is made for the desirability of additional heuristics in the catalog portion of the system
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 12(1993) no.3, S.321-343
  19. Ramesh Babu, B.; Tamizhchelvan, M.: ¬An investigation into the features of OPACs in Tamil Nadu (India) (2003) 0.03
    0.026744775 = product of:
      0.09360671 = sum of:
        0.050547853 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050547853 = score(doc=4755,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.3771894 = fieldWeight in 4755, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4755)
        0.043058854 = weight(_text_:studies in 4755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043058854 = score(doc=4755,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 4755, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4755)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the results of a research survey conducted at the Department of Library and Information Science, University of Madras, Chennai, India which examines features provided in online public access catalogues (OPACs) in Tamil Nadu. OPACs are recent developments in libraries in India in general and Tamil Nadu in particular. A review of the literature reveals that only a few studies on OPACs in India have been conducted and there is no comprehensive study about the OPACs in Tamil Nadu. A sample of 50 libraries in Tamil Nadu were selected at random, out of which 36 responded. The analysis of the data represents the state-of-the-art of the libraries in the summer of 2002. The major findings of the survey reveal emerging trends in OPAC.
  20. Pasanen-Tuomainen, I.: Analysis of subject searching in the TENTTU books database (1992) 0.03
    0.02573664 = product of:
      0.090078235 = sum of:
        0.029183816 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029183816 = score(doc=4252,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 4252, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4252)
        0.06089442 = weight(_text_:studies in 4252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06089442 = score(doc=4252,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.37408823 = fieldWeight in 4252, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4252)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a pilot study for an Internordic project to monitor the use of online catalogues in the Nordic technological university libraries. Focuses on the use of classification in subject searching, how the UDC is used and the extent of its use. Studies user interaction with the OPACs and improvements to information retrieval in the catalogues using the transaction log method to gather data. The pilot study examnines the TENTTU Books database which is the online union catalogue of the Helsinki Univ. of Technology Library, a multilingual database with true information retrieval. The Internordic study itself will make comparisons between the TENTTU system and the new Virginia Tech Library System. Discusses the users monitored, method of analysis, subject searching in the database, results and how the UDC codes were used. Compares this to other studies conducted in Finland and evaluates the project

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 391
  • m 20
  • s 12
  • el 11
  • r 9
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • i 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects