Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Abstracting"
  1. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E.; Sigel, A.: How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting : four core working steps of an expert abstractor (1995) 0.01
    0.012320205 = product of:
      0.08624143 = sum of:
        0.08624143 = weight(_text_:case in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08624143 = score(doc=2930,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.48085782 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    4 working steps taken from a comprehensive empirical model of expert abstracting are studied in order to prepare an explorative implementation of a simulation model. It aims at explaining the knowledge processing activities during professional summarizing. Following the case-based and holistic strategy of qualitative empirical research, the main features of the simulation system were developed by investigating in detail a small but central test case - 4 working steps where an expert abstractor discovers what the paper is about and drafts the topic sentence of the abstract