-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.16
0.16198085 = product of:
0.37795532 = sum of:
0.05399362 = product of:
0.16198085 = sum of:
0.16198085 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16198085 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34585547 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16198085 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16198085 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34585547 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.16198085 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16198085 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34585547 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Ashford, J.H.; Matkin, D.I.: Studies in the application of free text package systems for information storage and retrieval in libraries and related information centres (1982)
0.14
0.14234844 = product of:
0.33214635 = sum of:
0.06809558 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06809558 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
0.1219638 = weight(_text_:case in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1219638 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.68003565 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
0.14208697 = weight(_text_:studies in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14208697 = score(doc=1351,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.87287253 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Series
- Case studies in library automation; no.1
-
Kuhlthau, C.C.: Longitudinal case studies of the information search process of users in libraries (1988)
0.13
0.12528335 = product of:
0.2923278 = sum of:
0.058367632 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058367632 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.14784245 = weight(_text_:case in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14784245 = score(doc=5876,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.8243277 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.08611771 = weight(_text_:studies in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08611771 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.52904063 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- In depth case study of six students from high school through college
-
Bury, S.: Comparison of classification schedules for libraries (1980)
0.08
0.07805783 = product of:
0.18213494 = sum of:
0.055029534 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055029534 = score(doc=1603,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
0.069693595 = weight(_text_:case in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069693595 = score(doc=1603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
0.05741181 = weight(_text_:studies in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05741181 = score(doc=1603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Discusses the basic criteria for comparison of classification for libraries. Identifies a set of intellectual criteria, derived from the general theory of library classification as expounded by Dewey, Bliss, and Ranganathan. Compares LC, DC, and BC in relation criteria namely - order, university, hospitality, adaptability, terminology, relationship, synthesis, notational features - simplicity, brevity, expressiveness, specifity, synonymity, flexibility, correlation, case of use, revision and practical use. Highlights the value of comparative studies among classification schemes
-
Grogan, D.: Grogan's case studies in reference work : Vol.1-6 (1987)
0.08
0.07684835 = product of:
0.17931281 = sum of:
0.06809558 = weight(_text_:libraries in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06809558 = score(doc=751,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.0609819 = weight(_text_:case in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0609819 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.05023533 = weight(_text_:studies in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05023533 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- LCSH
- Reference services (Libraries)
- PRECIS
- Libraries / Reference services
- Subject
- Reference services (Libraries)
Libraries / Reference services
-
Studwell, W.E.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for Southeast Asia : some proposed additions (1982)
0.06
0.05779764 = product of:
0.20229173 = sum of:
0.03404779 = weight(_text_:libraries in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03404779 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
0.16824394 = product of:
0.3364879 = sum of:
0.3364879 = weight(_text_:asia in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3364879 = score(doc=292,freq=8.0), product of:
0.29789865 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3024383 = idf(docFreq=80, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
1.1295382 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
7.3024383 = idf(docFreq=80, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Southeast Asia is an important and populous region with an extensive literature. Many libraries in the United States and Canada have large or moderate collections of Southeast Asia materials. Yet the Library of Congress has not provided sufficient subject heading period subdivisions for the area. Additional subdivisons are proposed in detail for: Asia, Southeastern; Indonesia; Malaysia; Singapore; Philippines; Thailand; Indochina; Vietnam; Cambodia; Laos; and Burma. The historical and/or logical justification for the proposed additions follow each area. The function of the essay is not to present absolute answer, but to promote awareness of the problem and to suggest reasonable alternatives.
-
Whitlatch, J.B.: Unobtrusive studies and the quality of academic library reference services (1989)
0.06
0.05504204 = product of:
0.19264713 = sum of:
0.07782351 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07782351 = score(doc=5852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.5807211 = fieldWeight in 5852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5852)
0.11482362 = weight(_text_:studies in 5852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11482362 = score(doc=5852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.70538753 = fieldWeight in 5852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5852)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- College and research libraries. 50(1989), S.181-194
-
Carroll, J.M.; Mack, R.L.: Metaphor, computing systems and active learning (1985)
0.05
0.045440074 = product of:
0.15904026 = sum of:
0.11482362 = weight(_text_:studies in 6506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11482362 = score(doc=6506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.70538753 = fieldWeight in 6506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6506)
0.044216637 = product of:
0.08843327 = sum of:
0.08843327 = weight(_text_:22 in 6506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08843327 = score(doc=6506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6506)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- International journal of man-machine studies. 22(1985), S.39-57
-
Lee, T.: ¬The development of CJK bibliographic databases in North America and East Asia (1988)
0.04
0.043576885 = product of:
0.15251909 = sum of:
0.050547853 = weight(_text_:libraries in 418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050547853 = score(doc=418,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.3771894 = fieldWeight in 418, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=418)
0.10197124 = product of:
0.20394248 = sum of:
0.20394248 = weight(_text_:asia in 418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20394248 = score(doc=418,freq=4.0), product of:
0.29789865 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3024383 = idf(docFreq=80, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.6846036 = fieldWeight in 418, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.3024383 = idf(docFreq=80, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The successful development of computer technology for automating Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (CIK) vernacular scripts and the completion of the RLIN CJK system in 1983 marked the beginning of online operations of East Asian libraries in North America and helped keep them in the mainstream of library automation. The RLIN CJK system and the subsequently developed OCLC CJK system are building CJK bibliographic databases which have made East Asian cooperative cataloging and resources sharing a true reality. The emergence, features, current conditions, and future plans of the two CJK systems are discussed. So are the automated programs of national libraries in East Asia in terms of their building national databases for vernacular materials and designing and producing national MARCs for exchange of bibliographic information among libraries. The outlook of cooperation between the CJK systems and international exchange of CJK bibliographic information is also examined.
-
Matthews, J.R.; Lawrence, G.S.; Ferguson, D.K.: Using online catalogs : a nationwide survey, a report of a study sponsored by the Council on Library Resources (1983)
0.04
0.042463288 = product of:
0.1486215 = sum of:
0.04815084 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04815084 = score(doc=4168,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
0.10047066 = weight(_text_:studies in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10047066 = score(doc=4168,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.6172141 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- LCSH
- Online library catalogs / Use studies
Library catalogs / Use studies
Libraries / United States / Automation
- Subject
- Online library catalogs / Use studies
Library catalogs / Use studies
Libraries / United States / Automation
-
Hyman, R.J.: Shelf access in libraries (1982)
0.04
0.04128153 = product of:
0.14448534 = sum of:
0.058367632 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058367632 = score(doc=3391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
0.08611771 = weight(_text_:studies in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08611771 = score(doc=3391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.52904063 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Series
- ALA studies in librarianship; no.9
-
Campbell, M.J.: Business information services : some aspects of structure, organization and problems (1981)
0.04
0.04128153 = product of:
0.14448534 = sum of:
0.058367632 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058367632 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
0.08611771 = weight(_text_:studies in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08611771 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.52904063 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- As provided by the public library sector, and compared with government despartments, professional and commerical institutions, the press and academic libraries
- Series
- Social science information studies
-
Studwell, W.E.; Aggarwal, N.K.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for East Asia, South Asia, and Asia in general : some proposed additions (1983)
0.04
0.035682507 = product of:
0.24977753 = sum of:
0.24977753 = product of:
0.49955505 = sum of:
0.49955505 = weight(_text_:asia in 308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.49955505 = score(doc=308,freq=6.0), product of:
0.29789865 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3024383 = idf(docFreq=80, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
1.6769296 = fieldWeight in 308, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
7.3024383 = idf(docFreq=80, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=308)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Vickery, B.C.: Systematic subject indexing (1985)
0.04
0.035575107 = product of:
0.08300858 = sum of:
0.019455878 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019455878 = score(doc=3636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.14518027 = fieldWeight in 3636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3636)
0.034846798 = weight(_text_:case in 3636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034846798 = score(doc=3636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.1942959 = fieldWeight in 3636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3636)
0.028705904 = weight(_text_:studies in 3636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028705904 = score(doc=3636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.17634688 = fieldWeight in 3636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3636)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Brian C. Vickery, Director and Professor, School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, is a prolific writer on classification and information retrieval. This paper was one of the earliest to present initial efforts by the Classification Research Group (q.v.). In it he clearly outlined the need for classification in subject indexing, which, at the time he wrote, was not a commonplace understanding. In fact, some indexing systems were made in the first place specifically to avoid general classification systems which were out of date in all fast-moving disciplines, especially in the "hard" sciences. Vickery picked up Julia Pettee's work (q.v.) an the concealed classification in subject headings (1947) and added to it, mainly adopting concepts from the work of S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.). He had already published a paper an notation in classification, pointing out connections between notation, words, and the concepts which they represent. He was especially concerned about the structure of notational symbols as such symbols represented relationships among subjects. Vickery also emphasized that index terms cover all aspects of a subject so that, in addition to having a basis in classification, the ideal index system should also have standardized nomenclature, as weIl as show evidence of a systematic classing of elementary terms. The necessary linkage between system and terms should be one of a number of methods, notably:
- adding a relational term ("operator") to identify and join terms; - indicating grammatical case with terms where this would help clarify relationships; and - analyzing elementary terms to reveal fundamental categories where needed. He further added that a standard order for showing relational factors was highly desirable. Eventually, some years later, he was able to suggest such an order. This was accepted by his peers in the Classification Research Group, and utilized by Derek Austin in PRECIS (q.v.). Vickery began where Farradane began - with perception (a sound base according to current cognitive psychology). From this came further recognition of properties, parts, constituents, organs, effects, reactions, operations (physical and mental), added to the original "identity," "difference," "class membership," and "species." By defining categories more carefully, Vickery arrived at six (in addition to space (geographic) and time): - personality, thing, substance (e.g., dog, bicycle, rose) - part (e.g., paw, wheel, leaf) - substance (e.g., copper, water, butter) - action (e.g., scattering) - property (e.g., length, velocity) - operation (e.g., analysis, measurement) Thus, as early as 1953, the foundations were already laid for research that ultimately produced very sophisticated systems, such as PRECIS.
- Imprint
- Littleton, CO : Libraries Unlimited
-
Lau, B.; Winkel, A.: Problems in subject description of monographical literature : report on an experiment (1983)
0.03
0.0321261 = product of:
0.112441346 = sum of:
0.055029534 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055029534 = score(doc=1776,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 1776, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1776)
0.05741181 = weight(_text_:studies in 1776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05741181 = score(doc=1776,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 1776, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1776)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- As monographs represent an important category of documentary sources in academic libraries, the authors have studies possible ways to improve subject retrieval in information systems. Special attention was paid to qualitative apects of indexing while preparing subject descriptions of various types - those based on classification codes or words from free-term or controlled vocabularies. The elaborated subject description model includes elements from both approaches. The experiment has shown the viability of the model and the feasibility of its implementation at academic libraries
-
Ungvary, R.: Intensional splitting : an empirical examination of conceptual duality (1986)
0.03
0.031776354 = product of:
0.11121723 = sum of:
0.0609819 = weight(_text_:case in 5219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0609819 = score(doc=5219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 5219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5219)
0.05023533 = weight(_text_:studies in 5219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05023533 = score(doc=5219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 5219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5219)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Certain words are extremely closely connected, regarding their meanings; such word pairs can be formed, however, not only with the well-known synonyms and antonyms, but also with words of clearly different meaning (e.g. light-photon). Our studies show that, even in the case of real synonyms, there is a purely semantical - and consequently conceptual - difference between the parts/elements of the word pairs. Within the pairs there is an elementary conceptual accessibility between the parts; according to all indications this is the basis for the remarkable semantical connection. This close connection is the intensional splitting, the quantum of relation. It is assumed that is plays an important role in the semantical deep structure. Synonyms and antonyms are mere random marks of the existence of this relation on the level of the natural language
-
André, P.W.; Janakiev, E.; Case, M.M.; Randall, K.M.: Serials control in an online integrated system : can latest entry cataloging help? (1986)
0.03
0.031776354 = product of:
0.11121723 = sum of:
0.0609819 = weight(_text_:case in 381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0609819 = score(doc=381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=381)
0.05023533 = weight(_text_:studies in 381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05023533 = score(doc=381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=381)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- An experiment in latest entry cataloging of selected serial title changes is currently being conducted at Northwestern University Library. The integrated structure of Northwestern's automated system NOTIS and its applications to serials processing were primary factors leading to the investigation of latest entry cataloging as an alternative to the current standard of successive entry cataloging for serial title changes. A systematic investigation was conducted through most of 1985 and allowed project staff to identify and evaluate a number of concerns and problems. The study team is encouraged with the results, but will continue gathering cataloging statistics and will conduct user studies before adopting latest entry cataloging as a permanent option.
-
Norden, D.J.; Lawrence, G.H.: Public terminal use in an online catalog : some preliminary results (1981)
0.03
0.028110335 = product of:
0.09838617 = sum of:
0.04815084 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04815084 = score(doc=2164,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 2164, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2164)
0.05023533 = weight(_text_:studies in 2164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05023533 = score(doc=2164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 2164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2164)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The authors have studied the transaction counts from two and one-half years activity at the public use terminals of the Ohio State University Libraries' prototype online card catalog to determine what search options academic library patrons use the most often and whether this pattern varies from that reported in major catalog use studies. The preliminary findings indicate significant differences in search strategy that may result from a unique user group that prefers to search the online catalog, more useful searches in the online system, or special search patterns imposed by the computer hardware itself. Both the different searches used by patrons and why they choose them should be important factors in the design of future online catalogs
- Source
- College and research libraries. 42(1981), S.308-316
-
Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985)
0.03
0.028010072 = product of:
0.065356836 = sum of:
0.019455878 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019455878 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.14518027 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.034846798 = weight(_text_:case in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034846798 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.1942959 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.011054159 = product of:
0.022108318 = sum of:
0.022108318 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022108318 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Julia Pettee's contribution to classification theory came about as part of her work an subject headings. Pettee (1872-1967) was for many years librarian of the Union Theological Seminary in New York and was best known for the classification system she developed for the seminary and as the author of the book Subiect Headings. She was one of the first to call attention to the fact that there was a classification system in subject headings. It was, as she put it, "completely concealed when scattered through the alphabetical sequence" (p. 98). On the other hand, she recognized that an index entry was a pointing device and existed to show users specific terms. Index terms, unlike subject headings, could be manipulated, inverted, repeated, and stated in as many words as might be desired. The subject heading, she reiterated, had in it "some idea of classification," but was designed to pull together like material and, unlike the index term, would have limited capability for supplying access by way of synonyms, catchwords, or other associative forms. It is interesting that she also thought of the subject heading in context as forming a three-dimensional system. Logically this is the case whenever one attempts to reach beyond the conventional hierarchy as described an a plane surface, and, in fact, thought out as if the classification were an a plane surface. Pettee described this dimension variously as names "reaching up and over the surface ... hands clasp[ing] in the air" from an individual term (pp. 99-100). Or, in other context, as the mapping of "the many third-dimensional criss-crossing relationships of subject headings." (p. 103) Investigations following Pettee's insight have shown the nature and the degree of the classification latent in subject headings and also in the cross-references of all indexing systems using cross-references of the associative type ("see also" or equivalent terminology). More importantly, study of this type of connection has revealed jumps in logic and meaning caused by homographs or homonyms and resulting in false connections in classification. Standardized rules for making thesauri have prevented some of the more glaring non sequiturs, but much more still needs to be done. The whole area of "related terms", for example, needs to be brought under control, especially in terms of classification mapping.
- Footnote
- Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
- Imprint
- Littleton, CO : Libraries Unlimited
-
Opitz, A.: 'Allegro'-Anwendertreffen in der Herzog-August-Bibliothek in Wolfenbüttel (1989)
0.03
0.02715134 = product of:
0.09502969 = sum of:
0.03404779 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03404779 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
0.0609819 = weight(_text_:case in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0609819 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04079441 = queryNorm
0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Describes the result of seminars on the software package, Allegro, on 27-28 Oct and 3-4 Nov 88, organised by Brunswick Technical University Library and the Herzog August Library in Wolfenbüttel, in order to provide an opportunity for exchanging experiences on different Allegro applications, as well as information on current developments of Allegro and its prospects. Examines a series of case histories, including the use of Allegro in small libraries for cataloguing and the production of card catalogues, the creation of lists of new titles and subject catalogues for circulation, the cataloguing of periodicals with data in MARC format on CD-ROM, the use of Allegro in both MS-DOS and UNIX environment, and improvements in response times, as well as the introduction of window technology.
