Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gnoli, C."
  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Gnoli, C.: "Classic"vs. "freely" faceted classification (2007) 0.01
    0.005637133 = product of:
      0.045097064 = sum of:
        0.045097064 = product of:
          0.09019413 = sum of:
            0.09019413 = weight(_text_:area in 715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09019413 = score(doc=715,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1952553 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.46192923 = fieldWeight in 715, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Claudio Gnoli of the University of Pavia in Italy and Chair of ISKO Italy, explored the relative merits of classic 'faceted classification' (FC) and 'freely faceted classification' (FFC). In classic FC, the facets (and their relationships) which might be combined to express a compound subject, are restricted to those prescribed as inherent in the subject area. FC is therefore largely bounded by and restricted to a specific subject area. At the other extreme, free classification (as in the Web or folksonomies) allows the combination of values from multiple, disparate domains where the relationships among the elements are often indeterminate, and the semantics obscure. Claudio described how punched cards were an early example of free classification, and cited the coordination of dogs : postmen : bites as one where the absence of defined relationships made the semantics ambiguous
  2. Gnoli, C.; Pullman, T.; Cousson, P.; Merli, G.; Szostak, R.: Representing the structural elements of a freely faceted classification (2011) 0.01
    0.0052890894 = product of:
      0.042312715 = sum of:
        0.042312715 = weight(_text_:case in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042312715 = score(doc=4825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Freely faceted classifications allow for free combination of concepts across all knowledge domains, and for sorting of the resulting compound classmarks. Starting from work by the Classification Research Group, the Integrative Levels Classification (ILC) project has produced a first edition of a general freely faceted scheme. The system is managed as a MySQL database, and can be browsed through a Web interface. The ILC database structure provides a case for identifying and representing the structural elements of any freely faceted classification. These belong to both the notational and the verbal planes. Notational elements include: arrays, chains, deictics, facets, foci, place of definition of foci, examples of combinations, subclasses of a faceted class, groupings, related classes; verbal elements include: main caption, synonyms, descriptions, included terms, related terms, notes. Encoding of some of these elements in an international mark-up format like SKOS can be problematic, especially as this does not provide for faceted structures, although approximate SKOS equivalents are identified for most of them.
  3. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.00
    0.0016778135 = product of:
      0.013422508 = sum of:
        0.013422508 = product of:
          0.026845016 = sum of:
            0.026845016 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026845016 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

Types