-
Hyman, R.J.: Shelf access in libraries (1982)
0.04
0.035088256 = product of:
0.14035302 = sum of:
0.0566983 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0566983 = score(doc=3391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
0.08365472 = weight(_text_:studies in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08365472 = score(doc=3391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.52904063 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Series
- ALA studies in librarianship; no.9
-
Rider, A.F.: Rider's International Classification for the arrangement of books on the shelves of general libraries (1961)
0.01
0.010022938 = product of:
0.080183506 = sum of:
0.080183506 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080183506 = score(doc=6162,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.6159477 = fieldWeight in 6162, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6162)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 24(1963) no.1, S.77-78 (M.F. Tauber)
-
Imhof-Crämer, T.: Cataloguing in public libraries (1983)
0.01
0.009449717 = product of:
0.07559773 = sum of:
0.07559773 = weight(_text_:libraries in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07559773 = score(doc=224,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.5807211 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986)
0.01
0.008268503 = product of:
0.06614802 = sum of:
0.06614802 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06614802 = score(doc=1524,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
-
Cooper, L.: Problems associated with the ability of elementary school children to successfully retrieve material in the school library media center and some alternative methods of classification which may help to alleviate these problems : a case study of the Common School Library, Amherst, Massachusetts (1996)
0.01
0.0074047255 = product of:
0.059237804 = sum of:
0.059237804 = weight(_text_:case in 6743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059237804 = score(doc=6743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 6743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6743)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
East, D.: User views of compact shelving in an open access library (1994)
0.00
0.0035436437 = product of:
0.02834915 = sum of:
0.02834915 = weight(_text_:libraries in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02834915 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Provides an overview of the installation of electrically and mechanically assisted compact shelving and procedures for relocating over 2.000 linear feet of books, scores, recordings and manuscripts, prior to, during and after installation of such a system at Bowling Green State University (BGSU), Ohio, USA. In the light of concern expressed by librarians that patrons would be dissatisfied with the accompanying restrictions such as reduced browsing capability, slow retrieval, and their need to obtain instruction in operating the shelving, a survey was conducted among graduate and undergraduate students to ascertain their views of electric compact shelving for books and scores in the Music Library of Sound Recordings Archives of BGSU Libraries. The survey identified: apprehension concerning the use of the installation; the adequacy of instructions for use; the level of inconvenience / delay in accessing material; overall satisfaction; and the positive and negative features of the installation
