Search (258 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Kuhlthau, C.C.: Longitudinal case studies of the information search process of users in libraries (1988) 0.11
    0.10648768 = product of:
      0.28396714 = sum of:
        0.0566983 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0566983 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
        0.14361413 = weight(_text_:case in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14361413 = score(doc=5876,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.8243277 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
        0.08365472 = weight(_text_:studies in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08365472 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.52904063 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    In depth case study of six students from high school through college
  2. Ray, K.L.; Long, M.S.: Analyzing search styles of patrons and staff : a replicative study of two university libraries (1997) 0.09
    0.0903016 = product of:
      0.24080427 = sum of:
        0.02834915 = weight(_text_:libraries in 608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02834915 = score(doc=608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=608)
        0.04182736 = weight(_text_:studies in 608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04182736 = score(doc=608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=608)
        0.17062776 = weight(_text_:pacific in 608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17062776 = score(doc=608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3193714 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.059301 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.5342612 = fieldWeight in 608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.059301 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=608)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Librarians at the University of the Pacific, California (UOP) designed a replication of an earlier transaction log study carried out at Adelphi University, New York (LRTS 38(1994) no.3, S.293-305). It was hypothesized that library staff would use a feature that allows the searcher to limit a search by location or material type more often than users. It was also hypothesized that library staff and reference librarians would have a higher success rate than public users. The third hypothesis was that UOP users would perform keyword searches more often than library staff. Studies were conducted in 1995 in 1996 to test these hypotheses to provide comparative data on the search styles of users and staff. Searches of the INNOPAC database, using transaction logs, were performed by 4 terminal groups: public users, technical services staff, public services staff, and reference librarians. It was discovered that replicating a study is not nearly as straightforward as was initially thought. It was also found to be surprisingly difficult to compare year to year data at the same institution; primarily due to a continually changing technological environment
  3. Baruchson-Arbib, S.; Bronstein, J.: Humanists as information users in the digital age : the case of Jewish studies scholars in Israel (2007) 0.07
    0.07167311 = product of:
      0.19112828 = sum of:
        0.0566983 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0566983 = score(doc=1320,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 1320, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1320)
        0.05077526 = weight(_text_:case in 1320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05077526 = score(doc=1320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 1320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1320)
        0.08365472 = weight(_text_:studies in 1320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08365472 = score(doc=1320,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.52904063 = fieldWeight in 1320, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1320)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    User studies provide libraries with invaluable insight into their users' information needs and behaviors, allowing them to develop services that correspond to these needs. This insight has become even more important for libraries since the advent of the Internet. The Internet has brought about a development of information technologies and electronic information sources that have had a great impact on both the ways users search for information and the ways libraries manage information. Although humanists represent an important group of users for academic libraries, research studies into their information-seeking behavior since the advent of the Internet have been quite scarce (Ellis & Oldman, 2005) in the past decade. This study presents updated research on a group of humanists, Jewish studies scholars living in Israel, as information users in the digital age based on two categories: (a) the use of formal and informal information channels, and (b) the use of information technologies and their impact on humanistic research.
  4. Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999) 0.06
    0.06149599 = product of:
      0.1639893 = sum of:
        0.023624292 = weight(_text_:libraries in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023624292 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
        0.06037259 = weight(_text_:studies in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06037259 = score(doc=297,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.3818022 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
        0.07999241 = sum of:
          0.0531474 = weight(_text_:area in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0531474 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1952553 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03962768 = queryNorm
              0.27219442 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.026845016 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026845016 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03962768 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    In information needs, seeking and use (INSU) research, individuals have most commonly been perceived as users (e.g., Kuhlthau, 1991; Dervin & Nilan, 1986; Dervin, 1989; Belkin, 1980). The concept user originates from the user of libraries and other information services and information systems. Over the years the scope of the concept has become wider and it is nowadays often understood in the sense of seekers of information (e.g., Wilson, 1981; Marchionini, 1995) and users of information (e.g., Streatfield, 1983). Nevertheless, the concept has remained ambiguous by being on the one hand universal and on the other hand extremely specific. The purpose of this paper is to map and evaluate views on people whose information behaviour has been in one way or another the core of our research area. The goal is to shed some light on various relationships between the different aspects of doers in INSU studies. The paper is inspired by Dervin's (1997) analysis of context where she identified among other themes the nature of subject by contrasting a `transcendental individual' with a `decentered subject', and Talja's (1997) presentation about constituting `information' and `user' from the discourse analytic viewpoint as opposed to the cognitive viewpoint. Instead of the metatheoretical approach applied by Dervin and Talja, a more concrete approach is valid in the present analysis where no direct arguments for or against the underlying metatheories are itemised. The focus is on doers in INSU studies leaving other, even closely-related concepts (i.e., information, information seeking, knowledge etc.), outside the scope of the paper.
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:55:52
  5. Busch, J.A.; Giral, A.: Subsidizing end user access to research databases : from card file to the World Wide Web (1996) 0.05
    0.051853962 = product of:
      0.13827723 = sum of:
        0.02834915 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02834915 = score(doc=6988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 6988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6988)
        0.05077526 = weight(_text_:case in 6988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05077526 = score(doc=6988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 6988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6988)
        0.05915282 = weight(_text_:studies in 6988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05915282 = score(doc=6988,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.37408823 = fieldWeight in 6988, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6988)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews work of the Getty Art History Information Program (AHIP), recently renamed the Getty Information Institute, where humanities scholars were trained in DIALOG online searching and then allowed 24 hour unlimited access to DIALOG searching and DIALOG databases and where complete transaction logs were taken to yield the data upon which the Getty Online Searching Project was based. Summarizes results of the study of this subsidized access which was reported in a series of papers by M.J. Bates, who found that searching patterns of humanities researchers differed substantially from previous studies in the sciences and social sciences disciplines. Presents a model of the relative merits and opportunities associated with the various contractual arrangements and incentive strategies employed by AHIP with vendors such as DIALOG, consortia such as the Research Libraries Group, and a CD-ROM publication programme, compared to print publications and the experimental offer of access to some of the AHIP databases over the WWW. The arguments are illustrated by means of 2 case studies, involving: changes in pricing of the Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals; and the Getty Online Searching Project
  6. Gandhi, T.M.K.: ¬The need for catalogue use studies in Indian libraries (1996) 0.05
    0.04751581 = product of:
      0.19006324 = sum of:
        0.05345567 = weight(_text_:libraries in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05345567 = score(doc=488,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
        0.13660757 = weight(_text_:studies in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13660757 = score(doc=488,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.86391973 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the importance of catalogue use studies, particularly in the context of database development for networking. A literature review reveals that most of the studies are conducted in western countries which may be grouped in 3 categories: user studies; studies relating to search failures; and experiments with methodology. Stresses the need for more such studies in the context of libraries in India, particularly in the view of library network development in the country
  7. Palmquist, R.A.; Kim, K.-S.: Modeling the users of information systems : some theories and methods (1998) 0.04
    0.044653416 = product of:
      0.119075775 = sum of:
        0.03307401 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03307401 = score(doc=2070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
        0.048798583 = weight(_text_:studies in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048798583 = score(doc=2070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
        0.037203178 = product of:
          0.074406356 = sum of:
            0.074406356 = weight(_text_:area in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074406356 = score(doc=2070,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1952553 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.38107216 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Examines some of the theories that have evolved to explain the mental processes required for the use of information systems. Categorizes research in this area into system oriented and user oriented studies and reviews this research. Describes a sample of methodologies used for examining users and their information seeking behaviour. Concludes with a discussion of the implications of these theories and methods for librarians and information specialists
    Footnote
    Part of an issue devoted to electronic resources and their use in libraries, from the viewpoint of reference services, with an emphasis on the Internet and Geographic Information Systems
  8. Wilson, V.: Catalog users "in the wild" : the potential of an ethnographic approach to studies of library catalogs and their users (2015) 0.04
    0.039208744 = product of:
      0.15683497 = sum of:
        0.059237804 = weight(_text_:case in 2016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059237804 = score(doc=2016,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 2016, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2016)
        0.09759717 = weight(_text_:studies in 2016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09759717 = score(doc=2016,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.6172141 = fieldWeight in 2016, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2016)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    An increasing number of library user studies are employing ethnographic techniques as an alternative to more traditional qualitative methods such as surveys. Such techniques, however, are only beginning to see significant application to catalog user studies. Beginning with a discussion of the applied ethnographic method and its current usage within the field of Library and Information Science research, this article will assess methods that have traditionally been applied to studies of catalog users and present the case for the potential of an ethnographic approach for future catalog evaluation and design.
  9. Novotny, E,: I don't think I click : a protocol analysis study of use of a library online catalog in the Internet age (2004) 0.04
    0.038274355 = product of:
      0.10206495 = sum of:
        0.02834915 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02834915 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
        0.04182736 = weight(_text_:studies in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04182736 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
        0.031888437 = product of:
          0.06377687 = sum of:
            0.06377687 = weight(_text_:area in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06377687 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1952553 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.32663327 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    There's something magical about interface design. The research done to determine user behavior that leads to design decisions is positively fascinating. This time round we have a group at Penn State testing the proficiency of users on their brand new OPAC. The users were divided into two groups, "experienced" and "first-time". Results confirm other studies in this area, namely, that when confronting an OPAC, users both experienced and not, assume they're in front of something similar to Google. They go for keywords by default, expect results ranked by relevancy (as opposed to chronology), make no use of Boolean Operators, have no idea of what information is actually indexed, and lack the curiosity or time to "learn the system". "We can either abandon this population," the author stresses, "or design systems that do not require expert knowledge to be used effectively.
    Source
    College and research libraries. 65(2004) no.6, S.525-563
  10. Matthews, J.R.; Lawrence, G.S.; Ferguson, D.K.: Using online catalogs : a nationwide survey, a report of a study sponsored by the Council on Library Resources (1983) 0.04
    0.03609272 = product of:
      0.14437088 = sum of:
        0.04677371 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04677371 = score(doc=4168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
        0.09759717 = weight(_text_:studies in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09759717 = score(doc=4168,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.6172141 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    LCSH
    Online library catalogs / Use studies
    Library catalogs / Use studies
    Libraries / United States / Automation
    Subject
    Online library catalogs / Use studies
    Library catalogs / Use studies
    Libraries / United States / Automation
  11. Wilson, T.D.: On user studies and information needs (1981) 0.03
    0.034778517 = product of:
      0.13911407 = sum of:
        0.09659615 = weight(_text_:studies in 598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09659615 = score(doc=598,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.61088353 = fieldWeight in 598, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=598)
        0.04251792 = product of:
          0.08503584 = sum of:
            0.08503584 = weight(_text_:area in 598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08503584 = score(doc=598,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1952553 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.43551105 = fieldWeight in 598, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=598)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Apart from information retrieval there is virtually no other area of information science that has occasioned as much resarch effort and writing as 'user studies'. Within user studies the investigation of 'information needs' has been the subject of much debate and no little confusion. The aim of this paper is to attempt to reduce this confusion by devoting attention to the definition of some concepts and by proposing the basis for a theory of the motivations for information-seeking behaviour
  12. Watanabe, T.: ¬A new tide in the user studies : focusing on C.C. Kuhlthau's cognitive user model (1997) 0.03
    0.032823835 = product of:
      0.13129534 = sum of:
        0.04677371 = weight(_text_:libraries in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04677371 = score(doc=74,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
        0.08452163 = weight(_text_:studies in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08452163 = score(doc=74,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.53452307 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews a series of studies conducted by C.C, Kuhlthau who investigated users' information seeking behaviour in libraries over a 10 year period. In her study she constructed and Information Search Process (ISP) Model which represents aspects of user activities as a whole including feelings, thoughts and actions or behaviour. Argues that, while the ISP model sheds new light on user studies, it has problems in the following areas: problem solving processes; the understanding of 'feelings'; and the method of investigating users' information seeking behaviour. Recommends that the ISP model be reconstructed from different perspectives and verified in areas other than libraries. This may lead to the development of a new model of information seeking
  13. Coles, C.: Information seeking behaviour of public library users : use and non-use of electronic media (1999) 0.03
    0.030895144 = product of:
      0.08238705 = sum of:
        0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037798867 = score(doc=286,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
        0.033850174 = weight(_text_:case in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033850174 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.1942959 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
        0.010738007 = product of:
          0.021476014 = sum of:
            0.021476014 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021476014 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper highlights some of the significant findings from author's PhD: "Factors affecting the end-use of electronic databases in public libraries." Public libraries have a wide range of different types of users who, unlike academic or special library users, are not necessarily information-trained (see Coles, 1998). Whereas the academic, special library user may have specific information needs that can be met by electronic sources, public library users do not necessarily have such specific information needs that can easily be identified and met. Most user surveys have tended to concentrate on the searching and retrieval aspect of information seeking behaviour, whereas this study's user survey focused more on how people perceived and related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). It was not how people searched a particular electronic source, in this case CD-ROM, that was of prime interest but rather whether or not people actually used them at all and the reasons why people did or did not use electronic media. There were several reasons the study looked at CD-ROM specifically. Firstly, CD-ROM is a well established technology, most people should be familiar with CD-ROM/multimedia. Secondly, CD-ROM was, at the start of the study, the only open access electronic media widely available in public libraries. As well as examining why public library users chose to use electronic sources, the paper looks at the types of CD-ROM databases used both in the library and in general Also examined are what sort of searches users carried out. Where appropriate some of the problems inherent in studying end-users in public libraries and the difficulty in getting reliable data, are discussed. Several methods were used to collect the data. I wished to avoid limiting research to a small sample of library sites, the aim was to be as broad in scope as possible. There were two main groups of people 1 wished to look at: non-users as well as CD-ROM users
    Date
    22. 3.2002 8:51:28
  14. Seymour, S.: Online public access catalog user studies : a review of research methodologies, March 1986-November 1989 (1991) 0.03
    0.029167322 = product of:
      0.11666929 = sum of:
        0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037798867 = score(doc=6603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 6603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6603)
        0.07887042 = weight(_text_:studies in 6603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07887042 = score(doc=6603,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.4987843 = fieldWeight in 6603, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6603)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews studies of users of OPACs focusing on the research methodology of librarians. Surveys and questionnaires, interviews, observation, controlled experiment and transaction log analysis were used with varying degrees of expertise and success in academic public libraries with a variety of user populations. Poor methodology due to lack of training and funding sharply limit their usefulness in most cases
  15. Wilson, T.D.: On user studies and information needs (2006) 0.03
    0.02888579 = product of:
      0.11554316 = sum of:
        0.08365472 = weight(_text_:studies in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08365472 = score(doc=611,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.52904063 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
        0.031888437 = product of:
          0.06377687 = sum of:
            0.06377687 = weight(_text_:area in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06377687 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1952553 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.32663327 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Apart from information retrieval there is virtually no other area of information science that has occasioned as much research effort and writing as "user studies". Within user studies the investigation of "information needs" has been the subject of much debate and no little confusion. The aim of this paper is to attempt to reduce this confusion by devoting attention to the definition of some concepts and by proposing the basis for a theory of the motivations for information-seeking behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - The paper describes the issues of user studies and information needs within the context of information science. Findings - The paper finds that the problem seems to lie, not so much with the lack of a single definition, as with a failure to use a definition appropriate to the level, and purpose of the investigation. Originality/value - The analysis may be used as a springboard to research based upon a wider, holistic view of the information user.
  16. Park, I.: ¬A comparative study of major OPACs in selected academic libraries for developing countries : user study and subjective user evaluation (1997) 0.03
    0.02730637 = product of:
      0.10922548 = sum of:
        0.05345567 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05345567 = score(doc=1778,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
        0.055769812 = weight(_text_:studies in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055769812 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Provides information on the characteristics of 5 online catalogue systems in 5 academic libraries in the austin, Texas and North Texas, USA, and their use by Korean students at University of North Texas, USA, in order to assist system managers in the selection of online catalogues. Proposes recommendations when designing, adopting, or managing a new online catalogue system. Topics for further studies on the characteristics of online systems and their use are also suggested
  17. Rosenthal, M.; Shupe, B.: Evaluating patron use of an online catalog (1995) 0.03
    0.02730637 = product of:
      0.10922548 = sum of:
        0.05345567 = weight(_text_:libraries in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05345567 = score(doc=936,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
        0.055769812 = weight(_text_:studies in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055769812 = score(doc=936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    While much has been written about OPACs in college and university libraries, few OPAC studies from community colleges have appeared in the literature. Provides a background to the work of Nassau Community College, Garden City, New York (NCC) and its library. Describes the NCC OPAC and presents a study of its use covering user profiles; user success; and user strategies and patterns of use
    Source
    Community and junior college libraries. 8(1995) no.1, S.75-86
  18. Griesbaum, J.; Mahrholz, N.; Kiedrowski, K. von Löwe; Rittberger, M.: Knowledge generation in online forums : a case study in the German educational domain (2015) 0.03
    0.027177408 = product of:
      0.07247309 = sum of:
        0.033850174 = weight(_text_:case in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033850174 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.1942959 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
        0.027884906 = weight(_text_:studies in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027884906 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.17634688 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
        0.010738007 = product of:
          0.021476014 = sum of:
            0.021476014 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021476014 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to get a first approximation of the usefulness of online forums with regard to information seeking and knowledge generation. Design/methodology/approach - This study captures the characteristics of knowledge generation by examining the pragmatics and types of information needs of posted questions and by investigating knowledge related characteristics of discussion posts as well as the success of communication. Three online forums were examined. The data set consists of 55 threads, containing 533 posts which were categorized manually by two researchers. Findings - Results show that questioners often ask for personal estimations. Information needs often aim for actionable insights or uncertainty reduction. With regard to answers, factual information is the dominant content type and has the highest knowledge value as it is the strongest predictor with regard to the generation of new knowledge. Opinions are also relevant, but in a rather subsequent and complementary way. Emotional aspects are scarcely observed. Overall, results indicate that knowledge creation predominantly follows a socio-cultural paradigm of knowledge exchange. Research limitations/implications - Although the investigation captures important aspects of knowledge building processes, the measurement of the forums' knowledge value is still rather limited. Success is only partly measurable with the current scheme. The central coding category "new topical knowledge" is only of nominal value and therefore not able to compare different kinds of knowledge gains in the course of discussion. Originality/value - The investigation reaches out beyond studies that do not consider that the role and relevance of posts is dependent on the state of the discussion. Furthermore, the paper integrates two perspectives of knowledge value: the success of the questioner with regard to the expressed information need and the knowledge building value for communicants and readers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  19. Joinson, A.; Banyard, P.: Psychological aspects of information seeking on the Internet (2002) 0.03
    0.027009096 = product of:
      0.108036384 = sum of:
        0.059237804 = weight(_text_:case in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059237804 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
        0.048798583 = weight(_text_:studies in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048798583 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Two studies are presented that investigate information seeking behaviour on the Internet. In study one, soccer fans' information seeking on the World Wide Web is investigated. In study two, access rates to a cancer information Web site are analysed. It is tentatively argued that there is a tendency for people to access information more commonly avoided in "real life", although in the case of football fans, the tendency to "bask in reflected glory" remains when online, while cutting off reflected failure is minimised. Implications for understanding and researching psychological processes of Web browsing behaviour are discussed.
  20. Meadow, C.T.: Speculations on the measurement and use of user characteristics in information retrieval experimentation (1994) 0.03
    0.025828285 = product of:
      0.10331314 = sum of:
        0.08452163 = weight(_text_:studies in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08452163 = score(doc=1795,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.53452307 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
        0.018791512 = product of:
          0.037583023 = sum of:
            0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037583023 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a recently composite view of several user studies in information retrieval. Contains personal conclusions and speculations based on these studies, rather than formal statistical results, which so often are not comparable from 1 experiment to another. Suggests a taxonomy of user characteristics for such studies, in order to make results comparable. Discusses methods and effects of user training, then manner of expression of a query or information need, conduct of a search, use of the system command language or its equivalent, analysis by the user of retrieved information, and user satisfaction with outcome. Concludes with suggestions for system design and experimental methodology
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 19(1994) no.4, S.1-22

Languages

  • e 253
  • d 3
  • ja 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 246
  • r 7
  • m 4
  • el 3
  • b 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…