-
Kokabi, M.: ¬The Iranian adaptation of UNIMARC (1997)
0.02
0.02339217 = product of:
0.09356868 = sum of:
0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037798867 = score(doc=537,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
0.055769812 = weight(_text_:studies in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055769812 = score(doc=537,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Outline of a thesis produced at the University of New South Wales School of Information, Library and Archive Studies, the first serious study of MARC for Iran despite 12 years of the presence of computers in Iranian libraries. Considers the various MARC formats, reasons for choosing UNIMARC, and the use of the Farsi language in machines. Lists the modifications required to UNIMARC for use in the Iranian National Bibliography
-
Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004)
0.02
0.022294091 = product of:
0.089176364 = sum of:
0.06770035 = weight(_text_:case in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06770035 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
0.021476014 = product of:
0.042952027 = sum of:
0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042952027 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This case study details the evolution of descriptive practices and standards used in the Mount Holyoke College Archives and the Five College Finding Aids Access Project, discusses the relationship of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and the MARC standard in reference to archival description, and addresses the challenges and opportunities of transferring data from one metadata standard to another. The study demonstrates that greater standardization in archival description allows archivists to respond more effectively to technological change.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
-
Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998)
0.02
0.02222808 = product of:
0.08891232 = sum of:
0.0566983 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0566983 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
0.03221402 = product of:
0.06442804 = sum of:
0.06442804 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06442804 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Date
- 2. 8.2001 16:22:33
- Imprint
- Englewood, CO : Libraries Unlimited
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.02
0.019311456 = product of:
0.077245824 = sum of:
0.055769812 = weight(_text_:studies in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055769812 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.021476014 = product of:
0.042952027 = sum of:
0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042952027 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 32(1995) no.3, S.i-iv
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.02
0.017042633 = product of:
0.06817053 = sum of:
0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037798867 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.03037167 = product of:
0.06074334 = sum of:
0.06074334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06074334 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.02
0.016302295 = product of:
0.06520918 = sum of:
0.04910217 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04910217 = score(doc=4748,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.3771894 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.01610701 = product of:
0.03221402 = sum of:
0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03221402 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995)
0.01
0.014912305 = product of:
0.05964922 = sum of:
0.03307401 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03307401 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.026575211 = product of:
0.053150423 = sum of:
0.053150423 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053150423 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Briefly summarizes the problems encountered when attempting to use the USMARC cataloguing format in US school libraries and describes the development of CEMARC format by the Northwest Ohio Educational Technology Foundation (NWOET), which addresses the main problems by: offering sata entry guidelines for a minimum USMARC standard in order to clarify inconsistencies in application; and by suggesting enhancements and new fields that go beyond the USMARC standard. Concludes with brief notes on early CEMARC implementation
- Date
- 11. 9.1996 19:22:20
- Source
- Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
-
Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989)
0.01
0.0148187205 = product of:
0.059274882 = sum of:
0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037798867 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.021476014 = product of:
0.042952027 = sum of:
0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042952027 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. Describes how changes are effected in MARC and the role of the various groups in the library community that are involved in the implementing these changes. Discusses the expansion of the formats to accomodate cataloguing and retrieval for visual materials. Expanded capabilities for coding visual materials offer greater opportunity for user access.
- Date
- 4.12.1995 22:40:20
-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.01
0.0148187205 = product of:
0.059274882 = sum of:
0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037798867 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.021476014 = product of:
0.042952027 = sum of:
0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042952027 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
Matoria, R.K.; Upadhyay, P.K.: Migration of data from one library management system to another : a case study in India (2004)
0.01
0.014809451 = product of:
0.11847561 = sum of:
0.11847561 = weight(_text_:case in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11847561 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.68003565 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004)
0.01
0.01404969 = product of:
0.05619876 = sum of:
0.040091753 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040091753 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30797386 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.01610701 = product of:
0.03221402 = sum of:
0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03221402 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
-
UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994)
0.01
0.01296638 = product of:
0.05186552 = sum of:
0.03307401 = weight(_text_:libraries in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03307401 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
0.018791512 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037583023 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
-
Snow, M.: Visual depictions and the use of MARC : a view from the trenches of slide librarianship (1989)
0.01
0.01296638 = product of:
0.05186552 = sum of:
0.03307401 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03307401 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
0.018791512 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037583023 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. The only way to get bibliographic records on to campus on-line library catalogues, and slide records on the national bibliographic utilities, is through the use of MARC. Discusses the importance of having individual slide and photograph records on the national bibliographic utilities, and considers the obstacles which currently make this difficult. Discusses mapping to MARC from data base management systems.
- Date
- 4.12.1995 22:51:36
-
Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996)
0.01
0.01296638 = product of:
0.05186552 = sum of:
0.03307401 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03307401 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.018791512 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037583023 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
-
Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006)
0.01
0.01296638 = product of:
0.05186552 = sum of:
0.03307401 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03307401 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.018791512 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037583023 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003)
0.01
0.011708075 = product of:
0.0468323 = sum of:
0.033409793 = weight(_text_:libraries in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033409793 = score(doc=154,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.25664487 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.013422508 = product of:
0.026845016 = sum of:
0.026845016 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026845016 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Encoded Archival Description (EAD) has provided a new way to approach manuscript and archival collection representation. A review of previous representational practices and problems highlights the benefits of using EAD. This new approach should be considered a partner rather than an adversary in the access providing process. Technological capabilities now allow for multiple metadata schemas to be employed in the creation of the finding aid. Crosswalks allow for MARC records to be generated from the detailed encoding of an EAD finding aid. In the process of creating these crosswalks and detailed encoding, EAD has generated more changes in traditional processes and procedures than originally imagined. The North Carolina State University (NCSU) Libraries sought to test the process of crosswalking EAD to MARC, investigating how this process used technology as well as changed physical procedures. By creating a complex and indepth EAD template for finding aids, with accompanying related encoding analogs embedded within the element structure, MARC records were generated that required minor editing and revision for inclusion in the NCSU Libraries OPAC. The creation of this bridge between EAD and MARC has stimulated theoretical discussions about the role of collaboration, technology, and expertise in the ongoing struggle to maximize access to our collections. While this study is a only a first attempt at harnessing this potential, a presentation of the tensions, struggles, and successes provides illumination to some of the larger issues facing special collections today.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003)
0.01
0.009261699 = product of:
0.037046798 = sum of:
0.023624292 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023624292 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.013422508 = product of:
0.026845016 = sum of:
0.026845016 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026845016 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
-
Kushwoh, S.S.; Gautam, J.N.; Singh, R.: Migration from CDS / ISIS to KOHA : a case study of data conversion from CCF to MARC 21 (2009)
0.01
0.008975883 = product of:
0.071807064 = sum of:
0.071807064 = weight(_text_:case in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071807064 = score(doc=2279,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.41216385 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Standards are important for quality and interoperability in any system. Bibliographic record creation standards such as MARC 21 (Machine Readable Catalogue), CCF (Common Communication Format), UNIMARC (Universal MARC) and their local variations, are in practice all across the library community. ILMS (Integrated Library Management Systems) are using these standards for the design of databases and the creation of bibliographic records. Their use is important for uniformity of the system and bibliographic data, but there are problems when a library wants to switch over from one system to another using different standards. This paper discusses migration from one record standard to another, mapping of data and related issues. Data exported from CDS/ISIS CCF based records to KOHA MARC 21 based records are discussed as a case study. This methodology, with few modifications, can be applied for migration of data in other bibliographicformats too. Freeware tools can be utilized for migration.
-
Information transfer and exchange formats (1991)
0.01
0.008714033 = product of:
0.06971227 = sum of:
0.06971227 = weight(_text_:studies in 7891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06971227 = score(doc=7891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.44086722 = fieldWeight in 7891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7891)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Hagler, R.: ¬The bibliographic record and information technology (1991)
0.01
0.008268503 = product of:
0.06614802 = sum of:
0.06614802 = weight(_text_:libraries in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06614802 = score(doc=899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 53(1992) S.86-88 (E.A. Franco)
