-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.02
0.017042633 = product of:
0.06817053 = sum of:
0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037798867 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.03037167 = product of:
0.06074334 = sum of:
0.06074334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06074334 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.01
0.0148187205 = product of:
0.059274882 = sum of:
0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037798867 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.021476014 = product of:
0.042952027 = sum of:
0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042952027 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996)
0.01
0.01296638 = product of:
0.05186552 = sum of:
0.03307401 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03307401 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.018791512 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037583023 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
-
Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006)
0.01
0.01296638 = product of:
0.05186552 = sum of:
0.03307401 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03307401 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.018791512 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037583023 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003)
0.01
0.011708075 = product of:
0.0468323 = sum of:
0.033409793 = weight(_text_:libraries in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033409793 = score(doc=154,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.25664487 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.013422508 = product of:
0.026845016 = sum of:
0.026845016 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026845016 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Encoded Archival Description (EAD) has provided a new way to approach manuscript and archival collection representation. A review of previous representational practices and problems highlights the benefits of using EAD. This new approach should be considered a partner rather than an adversary in the access providing process. Technological capabilities now allow for multiple metadata schemas to be employed in the creation of the finding aid. Crosswalks allow for MARC records to be generated from the detailed encoding of an EAD finding aid. In the process of creating these crosswalks and detailed encoding, EAD has generated more changes in traditional processes and procedures than originally imagined. The North Carolina State University (NCSU) Libraries sought to test the process of crosswalking EAD to MARC, investigating how this process used technology as well as changed physical procedures. By creating a complex and indepth EAD template for finding aids, with accompanying related encoding analogs embedded within the element structure, MARC records were generated that required minor editing and revision for inclusion in the NCSU Libraries OPAC. The creation of this bridge between EAD and MARC has stimulated theoretical discussions about the role of collaboration, technology, and expertise in the ongoing struggle to maximize access to our collections. While this study is a only a first attempt at harnessing this potential, a presentation of the tensions, struggles, and successes provides illumination to some of the larger issues facing special collections today.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003)
0.01
0.009261699 = product of:
0.037046798 = sum of:
0.023624292 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023624292 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.013422508 = product of:
0.026845016 = sum of:
0.026845016 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026845016 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
-
Kushwoh, S.S.; Gautam, J.N.; Singh, R.: Migration from CDS / ISIS to KOHA : a case study of data conversion from CCF to MARC 21 (2009)
0.01
0.008975883 = product of:
0.071807064 = sum of:
0.071807064 = weight(_text_:case in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071807064 = score(doc=2279,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.41216385 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Standards are important for quality and interoperability in any system. Bibliographic record creation standards such as MARC 21 (Machine Readable Catalogue), CCF (Common Communication Format), UNIMARC (Universal MARC) and their local variations, are in practice all across the library community. ILMS (Integrated Library Management Systems) are using these standards for the design of databases and the creation of bibliographic records. Their use is important for uniformity of the system and bibliographic data, but there are problems when a library wants to switch over from one system to another using different standards. This paper discusses migration from one record standard to another, mapping of data and related issues. Data exported from CDS/ISIS CCF based records to KOHA MARC 21 based records are discussed as a case study. This methodology, with few modifications, can be applied for migration of data in other bibliographicformats too. Freeware tools can be utilized for migration.
-
Boruah, B.B.; Ravikumar, S.; Gayang, F.L.: Consistency, extent, and validation of the utilization of the MARC 21 bibliographic standard in the college libraries of Assam in India (2023)
0.01
0.008268503 = product of:
0.06614802 = sum of:
0.06614802 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06614802 = score(doc=1183,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- This paper brings light to the existing practice of cataloging in the college libraries of Assam in terms of utilizing the MARC 21 standard and its structure, i.e., the tags, subfield codes, and indicators. Catalog records from six college libraries are collected and a survey is conducted to understand the local users' information requirements for the catalog. Places, where libraries have scope to improve and which divisions of tags could be more helpful for them in information retrieval, are identified and suggested. This study fulfilled the need for local-level assessment of the catalogs.
-
Xu, A.; Hess, K.; Akerman, L.: From MARC to BIBFRAME 2.0 : Crosswalks (2018)
0.01
0.007813 = product of:
0.062504 = sum of:
0.062504 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062504 = score(doc=5172,freq=14.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.48013863 = fieldWeight in 5172, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5172)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- One of the big challenges facing academic libraries today is to increase the relevance of the libraries to their user communities. If the libraries can increase the visibility of their resources on the open web, it will increase the chances of the libraries to reach to their user communities via the user's first search experience. BIBFRAME and library Linked Data will enable libraries to publish their resources in a way that the Web understands, consume Linked Data to enrich their resources relevant to the libraries' user communities, and visualize networks across collections. However, one of the important steps for transitioning to BIBFRAME and library Linked Data involves crosswalks, mapping MARC fields and subfields across data models and performing necessary data reformatting to be in compliance with the specifications of the new model, which is currently BIBFRAME 2.0. This article looks into how the Library of Congress has mapped library bibliographic data from the MARC format to the BIBFRAME 2.0 model and vocabulary published and updated since April 2016, available from http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/index.html based on the recently released conversion specifications and converter, developed by the Library of Congress with input from many community members. The BIBFRAME 2.0 standard and conversion tools will enable libraries to transform bibliographic data from MARC into BIBFRAME 2.0, which introduces a Linked Data model as the improved method of bibliographic control for the future, and make bibliographic information more useful within and beyond library communities.
-
Nichols introduces MARCit (1998)
0.01
0.0070872875 = product of:
0.0566983 = sum of:
0.0566983 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0566983 = score(doc=1438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Advanced technology libraries. 27(1998) no.2, S.10-11
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: Organizing audiovisual and electronic resources for access : a cataloging guide (2000)
0.01
0.0070872875 = product of:
0.0566983 = sum of:
0.0566983 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0566983 = score(doc=5754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Imprint
- Englewood, CO : Libraries Unlimited
-
Ferguson, B.: MARC/AACR2/authority control tagging : a blitz cataloging workbook (2005)
0.01
0.0070872875 = product of:
0.0566983 = sum of:
0.0566983 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0566983 = score(doc=4602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 4602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4602)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Imprint
- Littleton, Colo. : Libraries Unlimited
-
McBride, J.L.: Faceted subject access for music through USMARC : a case for linked fields (2000)
0.01
0.0063469075 = product of:
0.05077526 = sum of:
0.05077526 = weight(_text_:case in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05077526 = score(doc=5403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Heaney, M.: Object-oriented cataloging (1995)
0.01
0.0058467137 = product of:
0.04677371 = sum of:
0.04677371 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04677371 = score(doc=3339,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Catalogues have evolved from lists of physical items present in particular libraries into computerized access and retrieval tools for works dispersed across local and national boundaries. Works themselves are no longer constrained by physical form yet cataloguing rules have not evolved in parallel with these developments. Reanalyzes the nature of works and their publication in an approach based on object oriented modelling and demonstrates the advantages to be gained thereby. Suggests a strategic plan to enable an organic transformation to be made from current MARC based cataloguing to object oriented cataloguing. Proposes major revisions of MARC in order to allow records to maximize the benefits of both computerized databases and high speed data networks. This will involve a fundamental shift away from the AACR philosophy of description of, plus access to, physical items
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 14(1995) no.3, S.135-153
-
Curwen, A.G.; Kirk, C.: Application of UNIMARC to multinational databases : feasibility study (1999)
0.01
0.0058467137 = product of:
0.04677371 = sum of:
0.04677371 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04677371 = score(doc=4079,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 4079, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4079)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- The Bayerische Staatsbibliothek acting on behalf of the Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL) was responsible for the preparation of this report under a contract agreed with the Commission of the European Communities Directorate General XIII as part of their Libraries Programme. The report considers the feasibility of the application of UNIMARC to multinational databases, and was based on a comparison of machine-readable bibliographic records in the UNIMARC format from 6 different national sources. Some are conversions from other formats, while others are 'native' UNIMARC records. The records are of books of the hand press period, that is, from the time of Gutenberg to about 1830
-
Sandberg-Fox, A.M.: ¬The microcomputer revolution (2001)
0.01
0.0058467137 = product of:
0.04677371 = sum of:
0.04677371 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04677371 = score(doc=5409,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 5409, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5409)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- With the introduction of the microcomputer in the 1980s, a revolution of sorts was initiated. In libraries this was evidenced by the acquisition of personal computers and the software to run on them. All that catalogers needed were cataloging rules and a MARC format to ensure their bibliographic control. However, little did catalogers realize they were dealing with an industry that introduced rapid technological changes, which effected continual revision of existing rules and the formulation of special guidelines to deal with the industry's innovative products. This article focuses on the attempts of libraries and organized cataloging groups to develop the Chapter 9 descriptive cataloging rules in AACR2; it highlights selected events and includes cataloging examples that illustrate the evolution of the chapter.
-
Fiander, D. J.: Applying XML to the bibliographic description (2001)
0.01
0.005637133 = product of:
0.045097064 = sum of:
0.045097064 = product of:
0.09019413 = sum of:
0.09019413 = weight(_text_:area in 5441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09019413 = score(doc=5441,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1952553 = queryWeight, product of:
4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.46192923 = fieldWeight in 5441, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5441)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Over the past few years there has been a significant amount of work in the area of cataloging internet resources, primarily using new metadata standards like the Dublin Core, but there has been little work on applying new data description formats like SGML and XML to traditional cataloging practices. What little work has been done in the area of using SGML and XML for traditional bibliographic description has primarily been based on the concept of converting MARC tagging into XML tagging. I suggest that, rather than attempting to convert existing MARC tagging into a new syntax based on SGML or XML, a more fruitful possibility is to return to the cataloging standards and describe their inherent structure, learning from how MARC has been used successfully in modern OPAC while attempting to avoid MARC's rigid field-based restrictions.
-
Wool, G.J.; Austhof, B.: Cataloguing standards and machine translation : a study of reformatted ISBD records in an online catalog (1993)
0.00
0.0047248583 = product of:
0.037798867 = sum of:
0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 7321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037798867 = score(doc=7321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 7321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7321)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 12(1993) no.4, S.383-403
-
¬The core bibliographic record for music and sound recordings (1998)
0.00
0.0047248583 = product of:
0.037798867 = sum of:
0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037798867 = score(doc=3801,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Describes the background to the creation of a core bibliographic record for music and sound recordings, provides a definition of a core bibliographic record and presents the core record for printed and manuscript music and the core record for sound recordings which were prepared by the International Association of Music Libraries, Archives and Documentation Centres Working Group in Perugia, 1-6 Sep 1996
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.00
0.004697878 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = product of:
0.07516605 = sum of:
0.07516605 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07516605 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
