Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

André, P.W.; Janakiev, E.; Case, M.M.; Randall, K.M.: Serials control in an online integrated system : can latest entry cataloging help? (1986) 0.03

0.027009096 = product of:
  0.108036384 = sum of:
    0.059237804 = weight(_text_:case in 381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059237804 = score(doc=381,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 381, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=381)
    0.048798583 = weight(_text_:studies in 381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048798583 = score(doc=381,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 381, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=381)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract: An experiment in latest entry cataloging of selected serial title changes is currently being conducted at Northwestern University Library. The integrated structure of Northwestern's automated system NOTIS and its applications to serials processing were primary factors leading to the investigation of latest entry cataloging as an alternative to the current standard of successive entry cataloging for serial title changes. A systematic investigation was conducted through most of 1985 and allowed project staff to identify and evaluate a number of concerns and problems. The study team is encouraged with the results, but will continue gathering cataloging statistics and will conduct user studies before adopting latest entry cataloging as a permanent option.

Sanders, T.R.: Monographs of a regular frequency (1988) 0.02

0.017569296 = product of:
  0.070277184 = sum of:
    0.03307401 = weight(_text_:libraries in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03307401 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
    0.037203178 = product of:
      0.074406356 = sum of:
        0.074406356 = weight(_text_:area in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074406356 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1952553 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.38107216 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract: In cataloging, it is necessary to determine whether the item is monographic or serial in nature. Library of Congress rule interpretations have progressively restricted the types of publication which can be cataloged as serial. These interpretations have been, essentially, new rules. These new LC rules depart from past practice, and are not always consistently applied. Restricting the types of publication considered serial may work against efficient acquisition of materials, and confuse patron access, especially on automated in-house systems. Decisions made by major cataloging agencies and distributed via (inter)national bibliographic utilities may be accepted too readily in other libraries. The whole area of what is or is not serial needs to be rethought.

Hustand, S.: Problems of duplicate records (1986) 0.02

0.017544128 = product of:
  0.07017651 = sum of:
    0.02834915 = weight(_text_:libraries in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02834915 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
    0.04182736 = weight(_text_:studies in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04182736 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract: Duplicate records is a familiar problem in bibliographic databases. The problem is obvious when a union catalogue is established by automatically merging two or more separate and independent source of catalogue information. However, even in systems with on-line cataloguing and access to previous records, duplication is a problem. Author / title search search prior to cataloguing does not cut duplication to zero. A great deal of effort has been put into developing methods of duplicate detection. A major problem in this work has been efficiency. Particularly in the on-line setting is this of importance. Most studies have dealt with book and article material. The Research Libraries Group Inc. has described matching algorithms also for films, maps, recordings, scores and serials. Various methods of detecting duplicates will be discussed.

Wellisch, H.H.: ¬The case of the missing subtitle (1981) 0.02

0.016925087 = product of:
  0.1354007 = sum of:
    0.1354007 = weight(_text_:case in 270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1354007 = score(doc=270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.7771836 = fieldWeight in 270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=270)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Nasatir, M.: ¬The cataloging and classification of machine-readable data files : Part 1: a case for incorporating records of machine-readable data files into the public catalog (1981) 0.01

0.012693815 = product of:
  0.10155052 = sum of:
    0.10155052 = weight(_text_:case in 269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10155052 = score(doc=269,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.5828877 = fieldWeight in 269, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=269)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Olsen, N.B.: Cataloging microcomputer software (1988) 0.01

0.011812146 = product of:
  0.09449717 = sum of:
    0.09449717 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09449717 = score(doc=3982,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.72590137 = fieldWeight in 3982, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3982)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Imprint: Littleton, CO : Libraries Unlimited

Intner, S.S.: Special libraries : a cataloguing guide (1988) 0.01

0.011693427 = product of:
  0.09354742 = sum of:
    0.09354742 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09354742 = score(doc=3461,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.71860564 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Imprint: Littleton, CO : Libraries Unlimited

Burger, R.H.: NACO at the University of Illinois at U-C : a narrative case study (1986) 0.01
```
0.010471863 = product of:
  0.0837749 = sum of:
    0.0837749 = weight(_text_:case in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0837749 = score(doc=380,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.48085782 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
```
Abstract

Although the Name Authority Cooperative Project (NACO) is now almost ten years old, little has been written about it from the perspective of NACO participants. This article provides a narrative case study of the effects of NACO on one academic research library, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The decision to accept NACO membership, NACO training at the Library of Congress, post-training implementation at the University of Illinois and effects on work flow, productivity and morale are portrayed in this description. It is hoped that the information contained here can provide more insight into the pros and cons of NACO membership that could be generalized to any library.

Harris, G.; Huffman, R.: Cataloging of theses : a survey (1985) 0.01

0.010229618 = product of:
  0.08183695 = sum of:
    0.08183695 = weight(_text_:libraries in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08183695 = score(doc=334,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.628649 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract: Where rules exist for cataloging of dissertations, libraries follow the rules. Where no rules exist, libraries are forced to improvise. Libraries improvise with invented call numbers and with invented access points for theses as theses.

Lin, J.C.: Rule of Three : a case of discrimination against certain authors caused by the cataloging rules (1985) 0.01

0.008462544 = product of:
  0.06770035 = sum of:
    0.06770035 = weight(_text_:case in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06770035 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Graham, C.: Rethinking national policy for cataloging microform reproductions (1986) 0.01
```
0.008462544 = product of:
  0.06770035 = sum of:
    0.06770035 = weight(_text_:case in 371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06770035 = score(doc=371,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 371, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=371)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
```
Abstract

Current national cataloging policy requires the creation of unique cataloging records for an original publication and each of its microfilm reproductions. Such redundant entries are difficult to decipher and expensive to produce and maintain. The case of serial publications is most urgent, especially due to the proliferation of preservation microfilming efforts and union list projects. The master record concept used in the United States Newspaper Project offers a viable alternative method. Librarians should lobby to have the single record approach adopted as national policy.

Jenkins, D.L.: Cataloging vacancies in academic libraries : "If at First You Don't Succeed..." (1983) 0.01

0.008352448 = product of:
  0.066819586 = sum of:
    0.066819586 = weight(_text_:libraries in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066819586 = score(doc=324,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.51328975 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract: This article repons the results of a study of re-opened, extended or "second" searches for professional cataloging positions in academic libraries. Procedures used in searches, analysis of applicants, and reasons why the initial searches were unsuccessful are given.

Studwell, W.; Loertscher, D.: Cataloging books : a workbook of examples (1989) 0.01

0.008268503 = product of:
  0.06614802 = sum of:
    0.06614802 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06614802 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Imprint: Littleton, CO : Libraries Unlimited

Carter, C.A.: On-the-job training for catalog librarians : a case history of a formal approach to training (1987) 0.01

0.0074047255 = product of:
  0.059237804 = sum of:
    0.059237804 = weight(_text_:case in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059237804 = score(doc=386,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Lambrecht, J.H.: ¬A case for pre-order searching in the catalog department (1988) 0.01

0.0074047255 = product of:
  0.059237804 = sum of:
    0.059237804 = weight(_text_:case in 433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059237804 = score(doc=433,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 433, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=433)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Stine, D.: ¬The effect of AACR2 and serials cataloging on medium-sized research libraries (1983) 0.01

0.0070872875 = product of:
  0.0566983 = sum of:
    0.0566983 = weight(_text_:libraries in 303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0566983 = score(doc=303,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 303, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=303)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Heynen, J.: ¬The ARL Microform Project for the bibliographic control of microforms : report on a survey of microform sets in U.S. and Canadian libraries (1984) 0.01

0.0070872875 = product of:
  0.0566983 = sum of:
    0.0566983 = weight(_text_:libraries in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0566983 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Hurowitz, R.; Kalinsky, K.; McDonald, D.R.; Deventer, B.V.: Future catalogs and bibliographic links at Stanford University Libraries (1981) 0.01
```
0.0066819587 = product of:
  0.05345567 = sum of:
    0.05345567 = weight(_text_:libraries in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05345567 = score(doc=272,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
```
Abstract

The decision by many libraries to adopt AACR2, freeze their catalogs, and initiate new catalogs raises several questions regarding connections of links between the catalogs. This paper examines the intended goal of catalogs, how the existence of more than one catalog affects such goals, and alternative methods of linking catalogs for names, subjects, and titles. In addition, recommendations are presented regarding the optimal method of linking catalogs and changes in organization, staffing, and costs are investigated.
Mandel, C.A.; Rhee, S.F.: Shared cataloging : some remaining issues (1986) 0.01
```
0.0066819587 = product of:
  0.05345567 = sum of:
    0.05345567 = weight(_text_:libraries in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05345567 = score(doc=379,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
```
Abstract

During the summer of 1985 the authors wrote "Shared Cataloging: Some Remaining Issues" as a background document for discussions of the Committee on Bibliographic Control of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL). The paper identifies five factors which result in duplication of original cataloging and inhibit shared cataloging programs among research libraries. Several mechanisms whereby duplication of original cataloging efforts can be minimized in order to increase the efficacy of shared cataloging programs are described. The paper concludes by enumerating eight recommendations for further investigation.
Abrera, J.B.; Lin, J.C.: Parallel title problems of interpretation (1981) 0.01
```
0.006576655 = product of:
  0.05261324 = sum of:
    0.05261324 = product of:
      0.10522648 = sum of:
        0.10522648 = weight(_text_:area in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10522648 = score(doc=279,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1952553 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.5389174 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
```
Abstract

This study examines the interrelationship of the rules on parallel title in AACR2. What emerges from the analysis are two principles that were utilized in the codification of the rules: (1) a principle of interrelationship (i.e. transcribing a data element in its relationship to other data elements); and (2) a principle of structured format (i.e. transcribing a data element in a prescribed order). A graphic representation of the possible combinations and positions of the data elements of descriptions in the title and statement of responsibility area (Area 1) shows that the present rules do not ensure consistency in bibliographic recording.

Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications