Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Assem, M. van; Malaisé, V.; Miles, A.; Schreiber, G.: ¬A method to convert thesauri to SKOS (2006) 0.02
    0.023150655 = product of:
      0.09260262 = sum of:
        0.05077526 = weight(_text_:case in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05077526 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
        0.04182736 = weight(_text_:studies in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04182736 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri can be useful resources for indexing and retrieval on the Semantic Web, but often they are not published in RDF/OWL. To convert thesauri to RDF for use in Semantic Web applications and to ensure the quality and utility of the conversion a structured method is required. Moreover, if different thesauri are to be interoperable without complicated mappings, a standard schema for thesauri is required. This paper presents a method for conversion of thesauri to the SKOS RDF/OWL schema, which is a proposal for such a standard under development by W3Cs Semantic Web Best Practices Working Group. We apply the method to three thesauri: IPSV, GTAA and MeSH. With these case studies we evaluate our method and the applicability of SKOS for representing thesauri.
  2. Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P.: Refining thesaurus relational structure : implications and opportunities (2008) 0.01
    0.0063469075 = product of:
      0.05077526 = sum of:
        0.05077526 = weight(_text_:case in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05077526 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper the possibility to develop a richer relational structure for thesauri is explored and described. The development of a new environmental thesaurus - EARTh (Environmental Applications Reference Thesaurus) - is serving as a case study for exploring the refinement of thesaurus relational structure by specialising standard relationships into different subtypes. Together with benefits and opportunities, implications and possible challenges that an expanded set of thesaurus relations may cause are evaluated.
  3. Garshol, L.M.: Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! : making sense of it all (2005) 0.00
    0.0039860546 = product of:
      0.031888437 = sum of:
        0.031888437 = product of:
          0.06377687 = sum of:
            0.06377687 = weight(_text_:area in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06377687 = score(doc=4729,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1952553 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.32663327 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The task of an information architect is to create web sites where users can actually find the information they are looking for. As the ocean of information rises and leaves what we seek ever more deeply buried in what we don't seek, this discipline becomes ever more relevant. Information architecture involves many different aspects of web site creation and organization, but its principal tools are information organization techniques developed in other disciplines. Most of these techniques come from library science, such as thesauri, taxonomies, and faceted classification. Topic maps are a relative newcomer to this area and bring with them the promise of better-organized web sites, compared to what is possible with existing techniques. However, it is not generally understood how topic maps relate to the traditional techniques, and what advantages and disadvantages they have, compared to these techniques. The aim of this paper is to help build a better understanding of these issues.
  4. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.00
    0.003355627 = product of:
      0.026845016 = sum of:
        0.026845016 = product of:
          0.05369003 = sum of:
            0.05369003 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05369003 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  5. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.00
    0.002348939 = product of:
      0.018791512 = sum of:
        0.018791512 = product of:
          0.037583023 = sum of:
            0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037583023 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  6. Müller, T.: Wissensrepräsentation mit semantischen Netzen im Bereich Luftfahrt (2006) 0.00
    0.0016778135 = product of:
      0.013422508 = sum of:
        0.013422508 = product of:
          0.026845016 = sum of:
            0.026845016 = weight(_text_:22 in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026845016 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    26. 9.2006 21:00:22