Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Multilinguale Probleme"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  1. Nie, J.-Y.: Query expansion and query translation as logical inference (2003) 0.03 
    0.02748202 = product of:
  0.10992808 = sum of:
    0.05077526 = weight(_text_:case in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05077526 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
    0.05915282 = weight(_text_:studies in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05915282 = score(doc=1425,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.37408823 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    A number of studies have examined the problems of query expansion in monolingual Information Retrieval (IR), and query translation for crosslanguage IR. However, no link has been made between them. This article first shows that query translation is a special case of query expansion. There is also another set of studies an inferential IR. Again, there is no relationship established with query translation or query expansion. The second claim of this article is that logical inference is a general form that covers query expansion and query translation. This analysis provides a unified view of different subareas of IR. We further develop the inferential IR approach in two particular contexts: using fuzzy logic and probability theory. The evaluation formulas obtained are shown to strongly correspond to those used in other IR models. This indicates that inference is indeed the core of advanced IR.
  2. Oard, D.W.: Alternative approaches for cross-language text retrieval (1997) 0.00 
    0.0037023628 = product of:
  0.029618902 = sum of:
    0.029618902 = weight(_text_:case in 1164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029618902 = score(doc=1164,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.17000891 = fieldWeight in 1164, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1164)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    I will not attempt to draw a sharp distinction between retrieval and filtering in this survey. Although my own work on adaptive cross-language text filtering has led me to make this distinction fairly carefully in other presentations (c.f., (Oard 1997b)), such an proach does little to help understand the fundamental techniques which have been applied or the results that have been obtained in this case. Since it is still common to view filtering (detection of useful documents in dynamic document streams) as a kind of retrieval, will simply adopt that perspective here.

Authors

Years

Types